All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 289 OF 2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (St.) No. 14685 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Segandh B. Deshmukh, for the Applicant / Appellant. CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2016 PC. Issue notice before admission R/o. 5th December, 2016. Hamdast permitted. Sd/- [V. M. KANADE, J.] Sd/- [Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] ________________________________________________________________ VPH Vinayak Halemath

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C.A.M. NO.289 OF 2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO.14685 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None Present. CORAM : R.M. JOSHI I/c.REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 25th November, 2016 1 week granted for furnishing copy. sd/­ I/c.Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm – R(J­II) – 25.11.16

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C.A.M. NO.289 OF 2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO.14685 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None Present. CORAM : AJIT N. MARE, REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 09th December, 2016 S.O. to 1 week. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm – R(J­II) – 09.12.16

Order - Status 11: (CAM 289 of 2016) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 289 OF 2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) No.14685 OF 2016 Smt. Sarika Badal Shinde ...Applicant Vs. Shri Badal Vijay Shinde ...Respondent *********** Mr. Sugandh B. Deshmukh for Applicant Mr. Abhijit Patil i/b. Mr. Sushant S. Prabhune for Respondent *********** CORAM : R.M. BORDE & A.S. GADKARI, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 04, 2017 P.C. : This is an application, seeking condonation of delay of 60 days in filing the present Family Court Appeal. The decree passed by the Family Court appears to have been (CAM 289 of 2016) issued in the absence of the Appellant. In this view of the matter, the delay of 60 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. Civil application for condonation of delay is allowed and disposed of. Place the Family Court Appeal for consideration on the Board on 11.1.2017 [ A.S. GADKARI, J.] [ R.M. BORDE, J.] Vaishali Tikam

Order - Status 7: 914-CAS-1334-2018.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1334 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.3953 OF 2017 Shri Sahebamin Mashaksaheb Patil … Applicant Vs Smt. Khajabi Peeransaheb Patil ... Respondent … Mr. J. Yadav I/by Mr. A.A.Joshi for the Applicant. CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J. DATE : APRIL 11, 2019 P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 It is an application for condonation of delay of 4 days occurred in filing appeal against the judgment and decree dated 2nd November,2016 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.40 of 2010. That for the reasons stated in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application, delay is condoned and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Place this appeal as per the CMIS date. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1580 OF 2004. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's orders. orders or directions and Registrar's orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Nitin Pradhan for the Petitioner. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED : 16th June, 2005. P.C.: Issue notice to the Respondent returnable on 5th August 2005. The learned A.P.P. waives service for Respondent No.2. In addition to service through Court the Advocate for the Petitioner to serve private notice. Judge.

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1580 OF 2004 Nasari Dairy Products Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. Smt.Shobhadevi ...Respondents Shinde & anr. Mr.Prakash Nail for the petitioner Mr.Y.S.Shinde A.P.P. for State None for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 31,2008 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner filed a private complaint in the court of Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Gadhinglaj in which process was issued. The process was issued only for two offences under section 323 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code. In a petition filed by the petitioner, this court has interfered and directed that the process should be issued against the Respondents for other offences under the Companies Act and Indian Penal Code. By order dated 8th July 2002, the learned Magistrate passed an order of discharge by exercising power under sub section 2 of section 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973. The order of discharge was passed as the Petitioner failed to appear and adduce evidence. A revision application preferred by the petitioner against the said order was rejected by the learned Magistrate. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was diligently prosecuting the complaint and in fact the petitioner was in a position to adduce evidence. He submitted that if an opportunity is granted, the petitioner is in a position to adduce evidence to substantiate the charges. He, therefore, submitted that by setting aside the impugned order, the complaint be remanded. I have considered the submissions. The order dated 21st July 2000 passed by the learned Magistrate shows that the Petitioner was seeking adjournment. When the complaint appeared on board on 20th June 2002, neither the petitioner nor his Advocate were present. The learned Judge passed an order recording that if on the next date the petitioner failed to lead evidence before charge, necessary order will be passed on the complaint. On 8th July 2002, when the complaint came up before the court, the learned Magistrate noted that no evidence has been adduced by the petitioner. The learned Judge referred to his earlier order passed on an application at Exh.42 in which he had observed that the averments made in the complaint and verification recorded therein was not sufficient to frame the charges in absence of any further evidence adduced by the petitioner. As the evidence was not adduced by the petitioner, the learned Judge proceeded to pass an order of discharge by exercising power under sub section 2 of section 245 of the said Code. I find no reason to 2 - interfere with the said order as well as the order of the Sessions Court by which an order of discharge has been confirmed. The complaint was of the year 1996. After granting sufficient opportunities the petitioner could not adduce the evidence. Considering all the aforesaid factual aspects, now it will be unjust to exercise power under Article 227 of Constitution of India or under section 482 of the said Code to interfere at this stage and to permit the petitioner to adduce the evidence. No case is made out for interference. Hence, petition is rejected. JUDGE

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2661 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1360 OF 2009 Pratap Shivram Mandhare & Anr. .. Applicants V/s. Gulab Maruti Mandhare & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. P.J. Pawar for the Applicants. Mr. P.G. Karande for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.V. Sonawane, AGP, for Respondent No.2. ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2657 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1361 OF 2009 Pratap Shivram Mandhare & Anr. .. Applicants V/s. Maharashtra Housing & Area Develop. Board & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. P.J. Pawar for the Applicants. Mr. S.V. Sonawane, AGP, for Respondent No.1. Mr. P.G. Karande for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C.: There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (b) of the Civil Applications. However, if the prosecution launched against the applicants-appellants results in their conviction, the MHADA and/or the other respondents may move this Court for dismissal of the First Appeals. The Civil Applications are disposed of. .......

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3891 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2016 IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance .. Appellant Vs. Ganesh Rangrao Akurde & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Varsha Chavan, Advocate for appellant. None for respondents. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. DATE : 21ST NOVEMBER 2018 P.C. FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2016 1 Not on board. Taken upon production. 2 Heard. 3 Admit. 4 Call for record and proceedings. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3891 OF 2016 5 Issue notice of the application, returnable on 30th January 2019. 6 On the applicant depositing the entire amount of compensation as awarded by the Claims Tribunal within a period of four weeks from today before the Claims Tribunal, Kolhapur, execution proceedings shall remain stayed until further orders. (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3891 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1380 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's orders Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Ms.Varsha Chavan for the applicant Mr.Vikrant A. Desai for the respondent no.1 CORAM : K. K. TATED, J DATE : APRIL 1,2019 P.C.: . At the request of advocate for the applicant, stand over to 10.04.2019 to enable the Applicant to take instruction whether they complied the order dated 21.11.2018 i.e. to deposit entire awarded amount in the Tribunal. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3891 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2016 Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Applicant V/s. Ganesh Rangrao Akurde & anr. Respondents Mr. D.S. Joshi I/b. Ms. Varsha Chavan for the applicant. Mr. Vikrant A. Desai for respondent no.1. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 25th JUNE, 2019. P.C.: . Mr. D.S. Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant states that the entire compensation as per the judgment and award has been deposited before the Claims Tribunal on 14/12/2018. In the light of said statement, interim relief is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Civil Application stands disposed of. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Second Appeal No.534 Of 2012. Alongwith Civil Application No.1316 Of 2012. Sudhir Mahadev Yashvantrao :: Appellant. ---------------------------- ---- ------------ Versus Mandakini Dhondu Chalke (Since dead, through LR's.) & Ors. :: Respondents. Appearance => Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar, Advocate for the Appellants. CORAM => R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE => 27th AUGUST, 2013. P.C. :- Heard Mr. Gorwadkar, learned counsel for the appellant. The learned District Judge in Civil Appeal No.38 Of 2007 has entertained the Appeal preferred by the present appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 17th July, 2007 passed in Reg.Civil Suit No.219 Of 2001 by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ratnagiri. The learned District Judge by his Judgment and Decree dated 20th February, 2012 permitted the present appellant to enjoy the right more particularly as set out in the operative part of the order. In my view, this protects the interest of the present appellant, adequately. (2) In view of the aforesaid discussion, points raised by learned counsel for the appellant cannot be accepted to admit the Second Appeal as no substantial question of law is involved. Hence, Second Appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. Civil Application No.1316/2012 is dismissed. (R.Y. GANOO, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 Harishchandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport … Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents ..... Ms. Veenu Dubey i/b Mr.Anil Dubey, for the Appellant/Applicant. Mr. A.R.Kapadnis, APP, for the Respondent-State. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 26th JULY, 2023. P.C. It appears from the police report submitted by the Senior Police Inspector, Pant Nagar Police Station to the learned APP that the concerned police personnel had only enquired with the landlord of the victim's parents about the whereabouts of the victim. It seems that there are no efforts made by the concerned police station to trace out and locate the whereabouts of victim and her parents. REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2023.07.28 10:36:50 +0530 2 Learned APP seeks one more opportunity to trace and the location of the victim. 3 At his request, stand over to 9 th August, 2023. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 5: Uday S. Jagtap IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 WITH I.A. NOS. 1784 OF 2023 & 1783 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2023 Harischandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport .. Appellant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents ..... Ms. Veenu Dubey i/b Mr. Anil Dubey for the appellant Mr. Jai V. Kanade for the respondent no.2 – appointed Advocate Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the respondent – State ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 30th AUGUST, 2023 P.C. . At the request of learned Counsel for respondent no.2, list on 13th September, 2023. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 6: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1783 OF 2023 a/w INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.562 OF 2023 ….. Harishchandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport ] Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents Ms. Veena Dubey i/b Mr. Anil Dubey, for Applicant. Ms. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Jai V. Kanade, Appointed Advocate, for Respondent No.2. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 13th September, 2023. P.C. Heard. Reserved for orders. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 8: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1784 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.562 OF 2023 Harishchandra Rampal Saroj @ Airport ] Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents ….. Ms. Veenu Dubey i/b Mr. Anil Dubey, for Applicant. Ms. G.P. Mulekar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Jai V. Kanade, Appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. ….. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. RESERVED ON : 13.09.2023 PRONOUNCED ON : 15.09.2023 ORDER: . In view of disposal of Interim Application No.1783 of 2023, this application stands disposed of. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]