All Cases
1) Document Filed: Report
Filed By : Abhyankar Govindrao Salok
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 03/04/2000
2) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Addl.Govt. Pleader
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 2: 31/01/2000
3) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Shri P.D. Dalvi
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 3: 23/02/2000
4) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Shri. P.D.Dalvi
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 4: 22/03/2000
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra And Os.
Petitioner-1: Ashok Shankar Khamkar
Respondent-1: Maruti N.bhagat
Petitioner-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 792 of 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.904 of 2005 Smt.Paskin Domnic Vaity .. Appellant versus Michael Pascol Pedade & ors. .. Respondents None for the appellant. Mr.Roop M. Vasudeo for the respondent no.12. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE,J DATED : 5th September 2005 P.C.: ... None for the applicant who are plaintiffs in L.C. Suit no.2068 of 2005. By the impugned order dated 5th May 2005, the Notice of Motion was made returnable on 1st July 2005 and at the same time, the prayer for ad-interim relief was refused. The trial Court considered the documents produced on record viz. 7/12 extracts and noted that the suit property was not in exclusive possession of the plaintiff. Appeal is therefore disposed of and hearing of the pending Notice of Motion is expedited. Civil Application does not survive. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J
1) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Mr. Roop M. Vasudeo For R.No.12
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 12/08/2005
Respondent-1: Michael Pascal Pedade
Respondent-2: Ors.
Petitioner-1: Paskin Domnic Vaity
Petitioner-2: Ors.
Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 146 OF 2015 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2896 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 146 OF 2015 .................... ................... The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. .. Appellant Versus Mirabai Rajendra Khairnar and Ors. .. Respondents Mr. D.S. Joshi, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Pritesh Borhade, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : SHRI. MILIND N. JADHAV, J. SHRI. D.N. KHER (COURT RECEIVER) & SHRI. S.K. DHEKALE (Dy. REGISTRAR, COURT RECEIVER) DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2021. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Parties have tendered the consent terms dated 11.12.2021 signed by the Appellant, Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 along with their respective Advocates. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. The undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted. Ajay Award be drawn according to the Consent terms. First Appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. In view of disposal of Appeal, pending Applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Statutory deposit be transferred to the concerned Tribunal within a period of one week from today. Court fee be refunded as per rules. [ S.K. DHEKALE ] [ D.N. KHER] [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Digitally signed by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2021.12.11 19:27:34 +0530
Respondent-1: The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Respondent-2: Nashik
Respondent-3: Anr.
Petitioner-1: Mirabai Rajendra Khairnar
Petitioner-2: Ors.
1) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Rajesh S.Datar
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 13/03/2002
Respondent-1: Blue Star
Petitioner-1: Uran Nagarpalika Parishad
Petitioner-2: Anr.
Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 34 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15084 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 757 OF 2018 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 07/09/2023 None present Learned Advocate for Appellant has filed this Interim Application No. 15084 of 2023 to restore the aforesaid First Appeal. But aforesaid First Appeal is already pending. It appears that the learned Advocate for Appellant has inadvertently filed this Interim Application for restoration of First Appeal. Therefore, this Interim Application No. 15084 of 2023 filed for restoration of First Appeal does not survive and disposed of as infructuous accordingly. Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) sat– R(J-II) – 02.01.2023
Respondent-1: Gajanan Atmaram Bhoir Since Deceased Thru Legal Heirs
Petitioner-1: State Of Maharashtra Thru Special Land Acquisition Officer
Respondent-1: The Municipal Corpn. Of Gr. Mumbai
Petitioner-1: Gopal Motilal Agrawal
Respondent-1: Dharmasukh Hiralal Nanavati& Ors.
Petitioner-1: Savitri Radhakrishnan
Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.642 OF 2012 IN DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF 2012 IN SUIT STAMP NO.1400 OF 2012 IN S.C.SUIT NO.1387 OF 2012 Umesh Laxmikant Raikar ....Appellant Vs. Dilip Vasant Raikar ....Respondent Mr. U. S. R. Singh for the Appellant. Mr. Lalit Jain for Respondent. CORAM : SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATE : 26th JULY 2012 P.C. : Mr. Lalit Jain, the learned Counsel for the Respondent points out that the submissions on the Notice of Motion have been substantially completed. The Respondent has completed his submissions and the submissions of the Appellant are partly complete. The Notice of Motion is kept for further hearing on 31st July 2012. In this circumstance, S.O. to 24th August 2012. (SMT. R. P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)
Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 642 OF 2012 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 830 OF 2012 Umesh Laxmikant Raikar ...Appellant/Applicant V/s. Dilip Vasant Raikar ...Respondent Mr. U.S.R. Singh for the Appellant/Applicant Mr. Lalit V. Jain for the Respondent CORAM: RANJIT MORE, J. DATE: AUGUST 28, 2012 P.C.:- Mr. Sigh, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal from Order, as the respondent's Notice of Motion has been dismissed on 17th August, 2012. Leave is granted. Appeal from Order is disposed of as withdrawn. Civil Application does not survive, and stands disposed of accordingly. ( RANJIT MORE, J.)
1) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Mr. Lalit V. Jain
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 10/07/2012
Respondent-1: Dilip Vasant Raikar
Petitioner-1: Umesh Laxmikant Raikar
Respondent-1: Ravindra K. Mitra
Petitioner-1: Pooanchand M. Sanghavi (decd.) By Heirs