All Writ Appeal

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2096 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2004 Subhan Mohamed Yusuf Parkar and another ... Petitioners versus Dastgir Mohamed Sathe and ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. H.A. Solkar, for the Petitioners. Mr. S.S. Pakale, for Respondents Nos. 1 to 5. Mr. M.A. Solkar, for Respondents Nos. 6 and 10. Mr. A.H. Palekar, for Respondents Nos. 25 and 26. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 3rd September 2004 P.C.: . Preliminary objection is raised on behalf of the Respondents that the main writ petition is finally disposed of. It is contended that if the grievance of the Petitioners is about the correctness of the order passed by the Inspector of the office of the Charity Commissioner, appointed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, the appropriate remedy is to question that decision by substantive proceedings and not by way of civil application in a disposed of writ petition. To over come this objection, Mr. Solkar, for the applicants, contends that the grievance of the applicants is about the inappropriate understanding and misapplication of the directions given by this Court in the disposed of writ petition. Even so, to my mind, there is substance in the preliminary objection taken on behalf of the Respondents about the maintainability of the civil application. The appropriate course is to permit the applicants to withdraw this application with liberty to resort to such other substantive remedy as may be available and permissible by law. That be done within one week from today. In the meantime, the parties shall maintain status quo as of today. Civil Application disposed of accordingly. . Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1538 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9282 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. P. N. Shekhar for the Applicant. Mr. Ajay A. Joshi for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JUNE 25, 2014 P.C.: Mentioned. Not on board. At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant, the matter is taken on board. The learned counsel for the Respondent seeks some time to file AffidavitinReply. At his request, S.O. to 4th July 2014. JUDGE

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1538 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9282 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders None for the applicant Mr.S.P.Rajepandhare i/b Mr.A.A.Joshi for the respondent nos.1 to 3 CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 04/07/2014 PC : 1 None for the applicant. 2 .Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 3 states that they have already filed an AffidavitinReply in the Registry. Same is not on record. Hence, Registry is directed to find out the same and place the same on record. 3 Stand over to 11.07.2014. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1538 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9282 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders None for the Applicant. Mr. Ajay A. Joshi for the Respondent. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JULY 18, 2014 P.C.: None appeared for the Applicant when the matter was called out. Office note shows that on 4 th July 2014 also none appeared on behalf of the Applicant. Hence, dismissed for default. JUDGE