All Probate Petition

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.490 OF 2015 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.773 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. Shyamkumar Marwadi for applicant. Ms. Mallika Ingale for respondent no.2. Mr. Tapan Thatte for Intervener in APPP-490/2015. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 17th November 2015 P.C.: This application has been taken out by the original complainant for intervention in Anticipatory Bail Application no.773 of 2015. For the reasons stated in the said application and in the interest of justice, I am inclined to allow the said application. The applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No.773 of 2015 is hereby directed to implead the original complainant as respondent no.3. The amendment to be carried out within one week from today. The application is allowed in the above terms. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.303 OF 2009 IN APPLICATION NO.4486 OF 2008 Ashutosh Dnyaneshwar Agashe Vs. State of Mah) Office Notes, Office Court's Court's or Judge's orders. s orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Nr 01 0 0 1 Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr. Counsel, with Mr S.V.Kotwal Advocate, for the applicant. Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 07/07/2009 PC: Heard Mr. Shirish Gupte, learned senior counsel for the applicant and Mrs Shinde, learned APP, for the respondent. By this application, the applicant is seeking relaxation of the condition imposed by this court vide order dated 30.1.2009 in Criminal Application No. 4486 of 2008. By this order, the applicant was directed not to leave the city of Pune without seeking permission of the court. Mr Gupte, learned senior counsel for the applicant, submits that such condition was imposed because his presence for interrogation was required at that stage and some other accused were to be arrested. He submits that his presence for interrogation is not required since the investigation, insofar as the present applicant is concerned, is almost over. The learned APP does not dispute this submission and submits that she has no objection for allowing the applicant to leave the city of Pune once in a week with prior intimation to the police. In the circumstances, I pass the following order. The applicant is allowed to leave the city of Pune once in a week with prior intimation to the police. Rest of the order dated 30.1.2009 remains unaltered. The application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 2

Order - Status 7: CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2183 OF 2013 Noor Jahan Abdul Rauf Marne ..Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... .... Mr. Vivekanand N. Upadhye, for the Applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, APP, for the Respondent – State. CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J. DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2014 P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant on this application for relaxation of condition of bail. It is prayed that the applicant may be allowed to furnish the cash security instead of personal surety for the total amount of Rs.20,000/. Considering the prayer and considering the case against the applicant as mentioned in the order passed by this Court while granting bail, provisionally for the period of three weeks from today the applicant is given liberty to give cash security of Rs.20,000/ and the applicant shall complete the process of submitting the surety and thereafter acceptance of the same within this period of three weeks as the liberty of cash bail is only for the period of three weeks from today. Trial Court to take appropriate action and accept the cash bail only for the period of three weeks from today and thereafter deal with the applicant in accordance with law. With these directions, present application is disposed of. (A.R. JOSHI, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.640 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.575 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.149 OF 2015 Motorola Solutions Inc. (Formerly Known as Motorola Inc.) ... Applicant V/s. Iridium India Telecom Limited & Ors. ... Respondents ..... Mr.Subodh Desai i/b. Bachubhai Munim & Co., Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : A.M.BADAR J. .... DATED : 5th JUNE 2018. P.C. : 1 Mr.Subodh Desai, the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that though the main application is under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and though the assignment is with the Honourable Shri.Justice P.D.Naik, there is standing Order to the effect that his matter may not be listed before the Honourable Shri.Justice P.D.Naik. 2 Registry to verify and report by 3.00 p.m. (A.M.BADAR J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.640 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.575 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.149 OF 2015 Motorola Solutions Inc. (Formerly Known as Motorola Inc.) ... Applicant V/s. Iridium India Telecom Limited & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Subodh Desai i/b. Bachubhai Munim & Co., Advocate for the Applicant. ..... Mr.Vineet Unnikrishnan i/b. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr.Ativ Patel i/b. AVP Partners, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3 to 19. .... Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : A.M.BADAR J. DATED : 5th JUNE 2018. P.C. : 1 Shri.Subodh Desai, the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant has placed on record the modified consent terms, which are marked as Exhibit 'Y' for the purpose of identification. 2 Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant as well as the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3 They are unanimous in stating that the Court may modify the Order dated 25th February 2015 passed in Criminal Application No.149 of 2015 so as to read in it the modified consent terms dated 3rd May 2018 and more particularly clause 18(ii) thereof. 4 As all parties to the application are unanimous in getting the Order dated 25th February 2015 passed by this Court in Criminal Application No.149 of 2015 modified, the following Order : ORDER i) Clause (iv) of paragraph 2 of the Order dated 25th February 2016 is modified in the following manner : "(iv)The Criminal Complaint pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Khadki shall stand quashed upon payment being made in terms of clause 18(ii) of the modified consent terms at Exhibit 'Y'." ii) The application is accordingly disposed of. (A.M.BADAR J.)

Order - Status 8: 901-APPP-640-2018-575-2018-149-2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.640 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.575 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.149 OF 2015 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. (FORMERLY ) KNOWN AS MOTOROLA INC. )...APPLICANT V/S. IRIDIUM INDIA TELECOM LIMITED & ORS. )...RESPONDENTS Mr.Subodh Desai i/b. Bachubhai Munim & Co., for the Applicant. Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 15th JUNE 2018 P.C. : 1 Motion is made by the Registry for Speaking to Minutes of the order dated 5th June 2018. 2 Parties by their respective counsel. It is seen that inadvertently typographical mistake crept in Clause (1) of avk 1/2 paragraph 4 of the order dated 5th June 2018. Date " 25th February 2016" is typed thereat instead of the date " 25th February 2015 ." Hence, date in Clause (1) of paragraph 4 be corrected as "25th February 2015". With this, motion stands disposed of. (A. M. BADAR, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION IN APPLICATION NO. 640 OF 2018 In CR. APPLICATION IN APPLICATION 575 OF 2018 Motorola Solutions Inc (formerly Known As Motorola Inc) ....Applicant V/S Iridium India Telecom Limited And Ors ....Respondent Mr.Subodh Desai i/b. Bachubhai Munim And Company For Applicant Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for state CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J DATE : 20th June, 2018 P.C. : Wrongly placed on board. Remove from board. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.819 OF 2016 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.744 OF 2016 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.743 OF 2016 Sudeep Kumar Ramani Bhusanprasad ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.399 OF 2016 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.819 OF 2016 Aditya S. Sawant ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ..... Mr.Prashant Raut i/b. S.P.Kadam, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.Dhanraj Vanjari, Advocate for the Intervenor. Mrs.Rutuja Ambekar and Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP for the Respondent/State. .... CORAM : P. N. DESHMUKH J. DATED : 13th JULY 2016. P.C. 1 Learned counsel for the applicant states that on the earlier date on 07/07/2016 matter was in fact by consent adjourned to 20/07/2016. Order dated 07/07/2016 reveals that mater is adjourned till today. However, since request is made by learned counsel for both sides for grant of adjournment, by consent stand over to 22nd July 2016 . 2 Adinterim relief to continue till adjourned date. 3 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor points out that in spite of directions applicant is not marking his presence with Investigating Officer in V.P.Road Police Station on Thursday between 10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon. The learned counsel for the applicant states that as applicant was arrested in some other crime in Hyderabad, he could not comply with the condition and states that since he is released on bail in that crime, shall continue to comply with the order. 4 Applicant is accordingly directed to attend Investigating Officer on 14th July 2016 and shall continue to attend to V.P.Road Police station between 12.00 noon to 2.00 p.m., to L.T.Marg Police Station between 2.30 p.m. to 4.30 p.m. and to Nagpada Police Station between 5.00 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. on each Friday until further order. (P. N. DESHMUKH J.)

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 399 OF 2016 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 819 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel a/w S.P. Kadam for applicant in Anticipatory Bail Applications. Mr. Deepak Thakare, APP for the State. Mr.A.A. Naik, for Intervener. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 21st September 2016. P.C.: This is an application for intervention by the original complainant-Aditya Sawant in CR No.8 of 2016 registered with Nagpada Police Station, Mumbai. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The learned counsel for the applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No.819 of 2016 is hereby directed to implead the original complainant as respondent No.2. The amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today and the amended copy of the application be served upon the learned counsel for the original complainant. Criminal Application No.399 of 2016 is allowed in the aforesaid terms. then. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 9: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 7: 1 1p.aba173.143.15.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 173 OF 2015 Shekhar Bhagwanrao Gore .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 143 OF 2015 Arvind Gyanchand Bansal and another ….Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 129 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 143 OF 2015 Sandeep Ghadge Intervener IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Arvind Gyanchand Bansal and another Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra Respondent WITH CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 144 OF 2015 Rakesh Tikaram Vishwakarma and another ….Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2015 IN Talwalkar 1/3 2 1p.aba173.143.15.sxw CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 144 OF 2015 Sandeep Ghadge Intervener IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Rakesh Tikaram Vishwakarma and another Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra Respondent WITH CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 145 OF 2015 A. Parthiban and another ….Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 130 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 145 OF 2015 Sandeep Ghadge Intervener IN THE MATTER BETWEEN A. Parthiban and another Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 143 OF 2015 Smt. Shubhangi Sandip Yadav. ….Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ….Respondent. ….. Talwalkar 2/3 Mr. Prashant Patil, advocate for Applicant in ABA 173 of 2015. Ms. Veera Shinde APP for the State. Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil, advocate for applicant in APPP 41/16 in ABA 143/15. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 P.C.: 1 Not on board. Upon production taken on board. 2 This is for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 26/2/2015. In second line of paragraph5 of the order, the name "Sandeep mane" be read as "Sandip Uttam Yadav". Corrections be carried out accordingly. 3 In view of the above order correcting the order dated 26/2/2015, the Criminal Application No. 41 of 2016 is allowed and disposed of accordingly. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) Talwalkar 3/3

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1285 OF 2011 Murlimanohar Nandalaji Jari and anr .. Applicants -versus The State of Maharashtra and anr .. Respondents. Mr. Ranvir Shekhawat, for the applicant. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondent State. Mr. Rahul R. Singh, for the original complainant. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 4th January, 2012 P.C. Time to deposit money is extended by one week with the understanding that if the amount is not deposited within the stipulated period, the order shall stand revoked. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 9: APPP-1.12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1285 OF 2011 Murlimanohar Nandalalji Jaria & Anr. .... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents Shri Ranvir Shekhawat for the Applicants. Smt. V.R. Bhosale, APP, for the State. Shri Rahul R. Singh for the Complainant. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 11, 2012 P.C: The learned Metropolitan Magistrate may accept the amount without insisting on the presence of the applicants through the lawyer of the applicants. The application accordingly stands disposed of. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)