All Cases

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 9: ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms.Pallavi Dabholkar i/by Mr. S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr. K. Narayanan i/by M/s. Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED : 10th November, 2008. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing for Respondent in Writ Petition No.4905 of 2008 stating certain development needs to be taken on record by an affidavit and the same be filed within a period of one week. Adjourned to 17/11/2008. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 P.R.Enterprises, Mumbai .. Petitioners V/s. Kalyanji K.Gada (Since deceased through his LR's) Mrs.Maniben K.Gada & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr.K.Narayanan i/b.Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C. . Admit. Rule, returnable on 9th February, 2008. No coercive steps pursuant to the impugned order. The learned counsel for the Respondent waives service. (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.735 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr.Rajesh Dixit i/b M/s.V.R.Tripathi for the applicant CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 23/06/2014 PC : . Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the applicant, matter is taken on board for urgent orders. 2 By this Revision Application, appellant org.defendant challenges the order dt.28.04.2014 passed by Appellate Bench of Small Causes Court at Bombay in A1 Appeal No.222 of 2007. 3 Office note shows that Advocate Ramchandranarayan Jawal filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent. Hence, applicant is directed to serve respondent by private notice either by registered post A.D. and/or by hand delivery and file Affidavit of Service to that effect. 4 Matter to appear on board for admission on 9.7.2014. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.735 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. V. R. Tripathi for the Applicant. Mr. Ramchandranarayan Jawal for the Respondent. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JUNE 25, 2014 P.C.: Mentioned. Not on board. At the request of learned counsel for the Appellant, the matter is taken on board. By consent of the parties, S.O. to 16th July 2014. The learned counsel for the Respondent makes a statement that till next date Respondent will not take any coercive action against the Appellant pursuant to the order passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court in A1 Appeal No.222 of 2007. Same is accepted. S.O. to 16th July 2014. JUDGE

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM: MR. K.R. SHRIRAM, J DATED: JANUARY 20, 2015. P.C.: On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per CMIS: Sr. Nos. Assigned Dates 51, 52, 53, 57, 60, 61 04/02/2015 54, 55, 62, 64, 65 09/02/2015 56, 66, 67, 68 10/02/2015 2.If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in any of the above said matters, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective assigned dates. 3.If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court. (MR. K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM: K.R. SHRIRAM, J. DATED: MARCH 03, 2015. P.C.: On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per CMIS: Sr. Nos. Assigned Dates 49,50,51,52,53,56,58,59 23/03/2015 60,61,62,63,64,65,66 24/03/2015 2.If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in any of the above said matters, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective assigned dates. 3.If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court. Original Common order kept in Sr No. 49) CAC 114/2015 ( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM: K.R. SHRIRAM, J. DATED: MARCH 03, 2015. P.C.: On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per CMIS: Sr. Nos. Assigned Dates 49,50,51,52,53,56,58,59 23/03/2015 60,61,62,63,64,65,66 24/03/2015 2.If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in any of the above said matters, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective assigned dates. 3.If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court. SD/ ( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Date :- 03/03/2015 (Original Common order kept in Sr No. 49) CAC 114/2015) For Regr(J.)

Order - Status 16: CIVIL REVN. APPLICATION NO. 735 OF 2014 Kedarnath Kharban Yadav & ors. … Applicants v/s Smt.Prabhavati wd/o Narayan Laxman Parkar & ors. … Respondents Mr.P.S. Dani, senior advocate i/by V.R.Tripathi for the applicants. Mr.P.G. Karande i/by R.N. Jawal for the respondents. CORAM: N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2015 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that, even accepting the finding of fact recorded by the Courts below that there was creation of subtenancy in favour of the applicants in the year 1970, the applicants are entitled to the protection of the Act No.18 of 1987 i.e. Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Act, 1986. He relied on the decision in the case of (1) Lakhaichand Punamchand Marwadi & ors. v/s Thakurnath Datasaheb Tukaram Barse 1 , (2) Ismail Bhandubhai 1 1992 Bom.R.C. 173 Tamboli v/s Govind Gopalkrishna Bapat & ors . 2 (3) Sadanand Vaikunha Bhende v/s Dr.Gangadhar Subrao Koppikar & ors. 3 ; and (4) Krishnaji Ganesh Vaidya & anr. v/s Smt.Triveniben Anant Virkar Shete & ors . 4 , in support of his submission. 3 Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the applicants have not taken the ground that they are entitled to the protection of the above mentioned position of law and therefore it cannot be accepted in absence of pleadings. He relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Ganpati Narayan Nikam v/s Ramchandra Bhiku Savant & ors . 5 . However, this decision do not deal with the above mentioned enactment. 4 Arguable questions are raised for consideration. Rule. 5 Learned counsel for the applicants states that the applicants will not create third party rights in the property and they alone are in possession. 6 There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause ( c). ( N. M. JAMDAR, J. ) 2 1991 Bom.R.C. 415 3 1996 Bom.R.C. 209 4 2002(4) All.MR 757 5 2009(6) Mh.L.J. 948

Order - Status 18: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.735 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL. - II) : 24th February, 2025 DATE None Present. It appears from the office remark that Registrar (Judicial – II) vide order dated 10/02/2025 allowed Interim Application No.535/2025 and permitted the Appellant to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No.3. The learned Advocate for the Appellant was directed to carry out amendment within two weeks and file amended copy of Petition. However, it appears that the learned Advocate for Appellant has neither carried out amendment nor filed amended copy of Civil Revision Application. In such circumstances, the learned Advocate for the Appellant is directed to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No.3 by carrying out amendment as per order dated 10/02/2025 within two weeks and also file amended copy of Civil Revision Application. On failure, proceeding would stand abated against deceased Respondent No.3 – Smt.Priya Eknath Deolekar, without further reference to the Court of Registrar. sd/- Registrar (Judl. - II) dsm

Order - Status 4: SWAROOP SHARAD PHADKE Digitally signed by SWAROOP SHARAD PHADKE Date: 2022.02.20 14:56:49 +0530 R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) 10. civil ia 845-22.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 845 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4542 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4542 OF 2021 The Deputy Director of Land Records, Pune Division, Pune .. Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Tulshiram Bapu Kadu & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents .................... Mr. Sumit V. Khaire for the Petitioners Mr. S.S. Panchpor, AGP for the State CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2022 P.C.: . Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. 2. Perused the above Interim Application. For the reasons set out therein, time granted to the Applicant to decide Appeal Nos. 4128 of 2017 and 4130 of 2017 is extended by a period of four weeks from today. ................... 3. If notices are to be served on the concerned parties, the same shall be served by hand delivery. 4. It is clarified that no further extension shall be granted. 5. In view of the above, the Interim Application is disposed of. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.]

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 8: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.539 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.540 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.541 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.542 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.543 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.544 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.545 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.546 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.547 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.548 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.549 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.550 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.551 OF 2012 @ CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.552 OF 2012 Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. …Applicant versus 1.Tulsidas Goyal & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Rajendra Shahasane i/b. Mr.S.B.Thorat, for Applicant. Mr.A.R.Patil, APP for Respondent no.1. Ms.Shweta Sangtani i/b. Niranjan Mundargi, for Respondent no.2. Mr.Sachin Deokar i/b. Mr.V.V.Purwant, for Respondent nos.6, 11 to 13. --- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 29th July, 2013 P.C. : The submission of learned Counsel for original complainant (revision applicant) completed. Counsel for respondent no.1 (original accused) could not commence as Smt.Kanani, Advocate is not available. Counsel holding for her seeks accommodation. By way of last chance stand over to 5th August,2013. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.539 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.540 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.541 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.542 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.543 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.544 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.545 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.546 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.547 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.548 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.549 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.550 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.551 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.552 OF 2012 Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. …Applicant versus 1.Tulsidas Goyal & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Jitendra P.Patil, for Applicant. Ms.P.J.Kanani, for Respondent no.1. Mr.D.R.More, APP for State-Respondent no.3 --- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 7th AUGUST, 2013 --- P.C. : Learned Counsel for revision applicants seeks four weeks time to search address of respondent no.2, as the report is, the Company is closed and sealed. Stand over, at his instance, to 13th September,2013. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.539 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.540 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.541 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.542 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.543 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.544 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.545 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.546 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.547 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.548 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.549 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.550 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.551 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.552 OF 2012 Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. …. Applicant ….. ….. Versus Tulsidas Goyal and Ors. …. Respondents Mr.J.P. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.Nitin B. Patil, APP for Respondent – State. Rajeshri Aher RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date: 2025.07.08 10:56:22 +0530 CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 01.07.2025. P.C. : The Registry to verify and place these matters before the appropriate Court. [MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.]