All Cases

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Cri.Application No.64 of 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers & Anr. …… Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …... Respondents. --- Mr Jatin Karia (Shah) a/w Ms Dipti J Karia a/w Ms Snehanlata Munj a/w Ms Shraddha Kamble a/w Ms Preeti SG for the applicants. Dr Ashwini A Takalkar, APP for respondent No.1/State. --- Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 21 January 2025. P.C. : Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By a judgment and order dated 12.09.2024, the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, 70th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai, in CC No.7002519/SS/2018, convicted applicant No.1 and 2 for the offences punishable under Sections 138 read with 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 ('NI Act'). Applicant No.2 was sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for six months and pay fine of Rs.3,00,000/- Page No. 1 of 3 21 January 2025 within two months, with default stipulations. Aggrieved, the applicants filed a criminal appeal bearing No.648 of 2024 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, along with a miscellaneous application bearing No.2255 of 2024 for suspension of the sentence. By an order dated 19.11.2024, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, suspended the sentence imposed subject to the payment of 50% of the fine/compensation within 60 days. Dissatisfied, the applicants have approached this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The learned Counsel representing the applicants submits that the requirement to deposit 50% of the amount set by the Additional Sessions Judge is excessive and disproportionate, without any justification. The learned Counsel further submits that the applicants are in a financial difficulty and to show their bonafides, they are ready to deposit 20% instead of 50% of the fine/ compensation amount awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge within three weeks from today with the trial Court. Page No. 2 of 3 21 January 2025 Considering the material on record and the arguments advanced across the Bar, the sentence shall be suspended in the ad-interim subject to the applicants depositing 20% of the fine amount before the trial Court within three weeks from the date of uploading of this order. Issue notice to respondent No.2. Stand over to 24 March 2025. [ R. N. Laddha,J. ] Page No. 3 of 3 21 January 2025

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Digitally signed by CHITRA SONAWANE Date: 2025.03.24 16:36:48 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Cri.Application No.62 of 2025 With Cri.Application No.63 of 2025 With Cri.Application No.64 of 2025 With Cri.Application No.65 of 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers & Anr. …… Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …... Respondents. Mr Jatin P Karia (Shah) a/w Ms Snehankita M Munj and Ms Shraddha Kamble for the applicants. Ms Dr AA Takalkar, APP for respondent/State in APL/63/2025 and APL/65/2025. Mr VN Sagare, APP for State in APL/62/2025. Mr PH Gaikwad, APP for State in APL/64/2025. Mr MA Bastiri for respondent No.2. Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 24 March 2025. P.C. : The applicants to provide the copies of these applications to the learned Counsel for respondent No.2. Interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate Page No. 1 of 2 24 March 2025 Chitra Sonawane 45-APL-62-2025.doc till the next date. Stand over to 13 June 2025. [ R. N. Laddha,J. ] Page No. 2 of 2 24 March 2025

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 62 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 63 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 64 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 65 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 17th June, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 01/07/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 62 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 63 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 64 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 65 OF 2025 Samarth Krupa Developers And Anr ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK J DATE : 8th July, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 29/07/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 4: Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Department & Ors …Respondents Mr Saurabh Pakale *, i/b PU Malgaonkar, for the Petitioner.* Ms SS Bhende, AGP *, for the Respondent-State.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ. DATED: 17th February 2023 PC:- 1. Issue notice to Respondents Nos. 5 and 6. Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 waive service. In addition to service through Court, private service, including by courier and email is permitted. 2. Affidavit in Reply is to be filed and served by 10th March 2023. 3. List the matter on 14th March 2023. (Neela Gokhale, J) (G. S. Patel, J) AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2023.02.20 17:51:49 +0530

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 14th March, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/04/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 13th April, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 23/06/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: Arun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through School Education & Sports Dept & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through School Education & Sports Dept & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through School Education & Sports Dept & Ors …Respondents ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2023.08.05 15:12:20 +0530 Mr Saurabh Pakale *, i/b Padmaja U Malgaonkar, for the Petitioner.* Mrs AA Purav, AGP *, for State.* Mr Onkar Wable *, i/b Milind Deshmukh, for Respondents Nos. 5 & 6.* Digitally signed by CORAM G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ. DATED: 4th August 2023 PC:- 1. We will require an answer as to the refusal on page 27. Prima facie we are not satisfied that either of these grounds for refusal of the appointment can be sustained. Undoubtedly, every school needs a sport teacher. Whether that sport teacher is described as such or as a trained teacher makes to us no difference at all. We are also unable to see what procedure can be said not to have been followed in the appointment of the trained teacher. 2. The learned AGP will take instructions. 3. List the matter on 9th August 2023. (Neela Gokhale, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 9th August, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 17/10/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1690 OF 2023 WRIT PETITION NO.1690 OF 2023 Mr. Ashok B. Kolte Petitioner. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Others Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1691 OF 2023 Mr. Ajit B.Barve Petitioner. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Others Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2023 Mr. Santosh Pakale with Mr. Abhishek Karnik and Mr.Nilesh Desai, for the Petitioner in all the Petitions. The State of Maharashtra & Others .. Respondents. Ms. A.A. Purav, AGP for Respondent-State in all the Petitions. CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2023. P.C:- The learned AGP seeks further time in the matter to file Affidavit-in-Reply. 2 Stand over to 3rd October, 2023. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA ,J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE,J.) 904-wp-1690-2023.doc S.R.JOSHI 1 of 1 Signed by: Smita R. Joshi Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 04/09/2023 19:02:19

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT ( Matter was not recd. in Court. ) CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUNIL B. SHUKRE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA, JJ DATE : 3rd October, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 09/11/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents YUGANDHARA SHARAD PATIL Digitally signed by YUGANDHARA SHARAD PATIL Date: 2024.02.14 11:01:07 +0530 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Amol Janrao and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Ajit Barve and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioner in all Petitions. Ms. A.A. Purav AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Respondent No. 5. .…... ……. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M.SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 8 FEBRUARY 2024 P.C.: . All these Writ Petitions are circulated with the preacipe that they are connected with Writ Petition No. 8926 of 2023. Learned counsel for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No. 8926 of 2023 is not informed and he is also not aware whether these Petitions are identical or not. Remove from Board. Liberty to file fresh preacipe. (M.M.SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 21st February, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 15/04/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res Nos. 5 & 6 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 26th March, 2024 P.C. : Stand over to 02/04/2024 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 2nd April, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 04/04/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 27: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res No. 5 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 4th April, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 06/05/2024 ( for passing orders). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Deptt. & Ors. ... Respondents with WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Deptt. & Ors. ... Respondents with WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Deptt. & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioners in both Petitions Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the Respondent No.5 Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent – State in WP 1690/23 Ms. Pooja Joshi Deshpande, AGP for the Respondent – State in WP 1691/23 and 1692/23 CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 29 APRIL 2024 P.C. :- It is the contention of the Petitioner that the Deputy Director of Education could not have taken review of the earlier approvals granted and such review is only on exceptional grounds such as fraud, misrepresentation and collusion. After the matter was closed for orders, it is noticed that certain factual clarification is required from the State. A show cause notice in all these Petitions is also issued to the erstwhile Education Officer who is named in the show cause notice and subject of the show cause notice is regarding the orders passed by this Education Officer. Therefore, though the reply affidavit has been filed, it does not explain as to why a show cause notice is issued to the Education Officer and whether the orders passed by this Education Officer have been taken in review because of collusion. The State will have to file reply as to whether there was any allegation of collusion between the Respondent – Management and the Education Officer. Stand over to 8 May 2024. M.M. SATHAYE, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 8th May, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 14/06/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 14th June, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 05/09/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 35: 52 WP-1690-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve …Petitioner Versus HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date: 2024.07.04 14:23:21 +0530 The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents *** Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Ms. Padmaja Malgaonkar, for Petitioner . Mr. S.B. Kalel AGP for Respondent/State in WP/1690/2023 and WP/1691/2023. *** Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for Respondent/State in WP/1692/2023. CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 3 JULY 2024 P.C.: . Papers of the Petitions are not placed before the Court. The learned AGP seeks further time. The Registry will ensure that papers are placed before the Court on the next date, failing which to take necessary steps for reconstruction. Stand over to 24 July 2024. Reply to be filed by 18 July 2024. ( M.M. SATHAYE, J.) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.1690 of 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. With Writ Petition No.1691 of 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. With Writ Petition No.1692 of 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioner. Mr. S.B. Kalel and Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for Respondents – State. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR, AND M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 24 July 2024. P.C. : The learned AGP points out that another set of writ petitions concerning the orders of the same Education officer, Mr. B.K. LSP 2 33 wp 1690-1691-1692.23.doc Dahiphale, are due on 5 August 2024. Stand over to 5 August 2024. In the meanwhile, the learned AGP will file additional reply. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 40: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 5th August, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 19/09/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 41: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 19th August, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 22/11/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 42: 35.WP.1690.2023 - B.doc ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Digitally signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2024.09.04 17:46:01 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioners in all Petitions. Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the Respondent No. 5 in all Writ Petitions. Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for Respondents – State in all Writ Petitions. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATED : 4 SEPTEMBER 2024 P.C.: We had called upon the State to file additional affidavit to point out whether there was any case of fraud, collusion or misrepresentation which had led to passing of the impugned order by the Deputy Director of Education The collusion if at all, would be between the Respondent-Management and the Education Officer. Therefore, it was expected that the reply was to be filed by the Deputy Director of Education. Instead, it is the Deputy Education Inspector has filed the reply and has avoided to mention anything about collusion between the Respondent – Management and the concerned Education Officer. The affidavit should be by the Deputy Director of Education, who is further directed to explain whether any departmental action is initiated or pending against the concerned Education Officer, if it is the case of collusion. Let the affidavit be filed by the Deputy Director of Education by 18 September 2024. Stand over to 20 September 2024. (M. M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 46: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE :- 16th OCTOBER, 2024 P.C :- At the time of rising at 6.30 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be To be listed in the listed on category 20 – 31 14.11.2024 Interim Applications 9 to 17 19.11.2024 Fresh Admissions 8, 32 to 50 2.12.2024 Due Category 51 to 70 3.12.2024 71 to 95 4.12.2024 96 to 118 5.12.2024 119 to 143 6.12.2024 (except Sr. Nos.45, 56, 76, 141 & 142) (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Husen

Order - Status 47: .. 1 .. common order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. Date :- 19th NOVEMBER, 2024 Per Court :- At the time of rising at 5.45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 51 to 63 27/11/2024 Fresh Admission 66 to 69, 71 27/11/2024 Fresh Admission 72 & 73 14/12/2024 For Admission 76 to 79, 81, 83 to 92 28/11/2024 Urgent Admission 93 to 95 29/11/2024 Interim Application Order 96 to 102 24/02/2025 Due Admission 104 to 135 2 Due Admission 136 to 146 25/02/2025 common order 104 to 135 24/02/2025 Due Admission 136 to 146 25/02/2025 Due Admission 148 to 160 25/02/2025 Due Admission 161 to 189 26/02/2025 Due Admission 191 to 204 27/02/2025 Due Admission 206 to 221 27/02/2025 Due Admission 224 to 254 256 to 275 28/02/2025 28/02/2025 Due Admission Due Admission 276 to 277 16/12/2024 Final hearing (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Harish Signed by: Harish V. Chaudhari Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 22/11/2024 18:05:15

Order - Status 50: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Sr. Adv. a/w Mr. Nilesh Desai & Ms. Netra Tembe for the Petitioner Adv. K. S. Thorat, B. Pnl & Adv. N. M. Mehra, AGP for the State - Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ DATE : 4th December, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 10/12/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 52: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. **** Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai, Ms. Netra Tembe, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.S. Thorat, 'B' Panel Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4./State. Mr. Milind Deshmukh, for Respondent No. 5. **** CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 10th DECEMBER, 2024 P.C. : We have considered the submissions of the learned Advocates for the respective sides. Save and except, a bald statement that there are irregularities and illegalities committed in the appointment of these Petitioners, we hardly find any material before us, which could substantiate the stand taken by the Deputy Director Education. Moreover, a report has been submitted by Shri Rajesh Kshirsagar, Deputy Director Education-cum-Authorised Officer Education, office of the Divisional Education, Pune that there are no irregularities and the appointments of these Petitioners appear to be in order. However, he further concludes that the provisions of the MEPS Act, 1977 and MEPS Rules, 1981 have not been strictly followed. The issue before us is as to whether these Petitioners who have been working for more than 12 years, can be disturbed or dislodged on account of some irregularities that might have been committed by the Management. If that be so, since the Management is whole and sole incharge of carrying out recruitment process, the issue would turn upon the Management. However, no affidavit in reply has yet been filed by the Management i.e. Rayat Shikshan Sanstha. In view of the above, we grant time to the Management to file a common affidavit in reply in the first Petition and explain as to whether there were any irregularities and if at all some irregularities are noticed, whether we should attribute the same to the conduct of the Management. Let the reply be filed on or before 10th January, 2025. List this Petition on 22nd January, 2025, to be called out after the fresh admissions board is over. Interim protection granted to these Petitioners would continue until disposal of these Petitions, which we intend to do on the next date. Unpaid salaries of these Petitioners from the dates of the impugned orders, shall be paid to the Petitioners prior to the next date in the matter and the regular salary would also be paid. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Digitally signed by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date: 2024.12.13 19:29:44 +0530

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2014 Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P. M. Palshikar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 07 APRIL, 2014 P.C.: The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Labour Court, Mumbai has not considered the stand of the Petitioner that 5 th Pay Commission, upon which the reliance was sought by the Respondent, was made applicable only after execution of the agreement dated 25 June 2004 and the Respondent had obtained voluntary retirement scheme on 31 May 2004 and therefore, it was not applicable to him. Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 5 May 2014. Till further orders, the Respondent will not take coercive steps based on the impugned order. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 29: Sequeira IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 of 2014 The Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation. .. Petitioner Vs. Shri Balkrishna Ganpati Salunkhe. .. Respondent Mr.P.M.Palshikar, for the Petitioner. Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad, for the Respondent. CORAM: N.M.Jamdar, J. Monday 23 November, 2015 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Petitioner Federation challenges the order dated 3 August 2013 passed by Labour Court, Mumbai allowing application filed by the Respondentmember under Section 33 (c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court has accepted the claim of the Respondent No.1 for entitlement of difference and wages for the period from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2004 after applicability of recommendation from 5th Pay Commission and certain other findings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that some employees of the Federation who were not in the category of workmen had filed Writ petition No.4274 of 2009 and 4267 of 2009 with the Aurangabad bench of this Court and the Division bench had granted identical relief which is granted by the Labour Court in the present case. The learned counsel submitted that the Federation has challenged the decision of the Division bench by way of Civil Appeal Nos.4521 and 4522 of 2013 and the Apex Court has admitted and granted leave and unconditionally stayed the operation of the orders. Copies of the orders are placed on record. In view of this position, Rule. Respondent waives service. The interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). Liberty to apply after the decision of the Apex Court is rendered. (N.M.Jamdar, J.)