All Cases

Order - Status 5: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr. A. H. H. Ponda a/w Swapnil Ambure i/b Dinesh Tiwari for Petitioner Mrs. A. A. Mane AGP for the State. CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE AND V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. (VACATION COURT) DATED : st JUNE, 2015. 1 P.C. : Issue notice to respondent no. 1 for final disposal of disposal of the matter. Notice returnable on 16/06/2015 16/06/2015. Learned APP waives service of notice for respondent no. 2. 2) There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause 'b' till then. (V.L. ACHLIYA, J.) (R. K. DESHPANDE, J.)

Order - Status 5: R. B. Bohora Educational & Welfare Trust .. Petitioner -versus Vijay. V Mundaware .. Respondent. Mr. C.G. Gavnekar, for the Petitioner. S. N. Bhosle, AGP for respondent No.9. CORAM: R.V. MORE, J. DATED: 22nd July, 2010 P.C. vks Issue Notice before admission, returnable on 23.8.2010. In the meanwhile there shall be interim reliefs in terms of prayer clause (c). (R. V. MORE, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET WRIT PETITION NO.5595 OF 2010 1 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Suhas Deokar i/b Mr.C.G.Gavnekar for the petitioner Mr.R.M.Patne ,A.G.P for the respondent No.9 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : AUGUST 23,2010 P.C.: 1 Await service till 17th September 2010. In the meanwhile, Advocate for the petitioner will serve private notice to the respondent Nos.1 to 8. If Affidavit of service is not filed on or before 15th September 2010, Petition will stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the Court. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till further orders. JUDGE

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5595 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders. Shri C.G. Gavnekar for the Petitioner. Shri J. Shekhar i/;by M/s. J. Shekhar & Co. for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. Shri Suhas S. Deokar for Respondent Nos. 5 to 8. Shri Suresh Bhosale, AGP for the Respondent No.9. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C.: . Heard Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 1st , 3 rd and 4th Respondents. Heard learned AGP for Respondent No.9. The impugned order has been passed in purported exercise of powers under Section 41A of the Bombay Public Trusts act, 1950. Considering the scope of Section 41A of the said Act, prima facie, it appears that the impugned order could not have been passed in exercise of the said power. Rule. There will be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (d). Ash Notwithstanding pendency of this petition and grant of interim relief, it will be open for the parties to take action in accordance with law. (A.S.OKA, J)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2003 Shri Namdeo Nivrutti Sarode .. Petitioner Vs. All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. U.P.Warunjikar for the petitioner. Mr. Mahesh Subramaniam h/f Mr. S.V.Pitre for applicant in C.A.No.12/2004. CORAM: S.P.DAVARE,J. DATE: 10th February, 2009. P.C. None for the respondents. The learned Counsel for the applicant in C.A.No.12/2004 states that Contempt Petition No.305 of 2002 is pending before the Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.M.Savant and the contemnors in the said petition and in the present petition are the same and he submits that he will prefer an application to club both the Contempt Petition before the Hon'ble Chief Justice. Hence, stand over after four weeks. (S.P.DAVARE,J.)

Order - Status 20: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.59/2003 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders None for the Petitioner Mr. Anant Bobe i/b. Nitin Dhumal for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JANUARY 7, 2016 P.C.: Heard. Mr.Bobe, Advocate states that he received instructions to appear in the matter on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 3, recently. He seeks some time to file vakalatnama. At his request, 2 weeks time is granted to do so. Office is directed to place the matter on board in the week commencing from 25/01/2016. JUDGE

Order - Status 23: 205.59.03-cp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.59/2003 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders None for the parties. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JANUARY 27, 2016 P.C.: None for the parties. Dismissed for default. JUDGE

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 103 OF 2016 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2003 Namdeo Nivrutti Sarode … Applicant vs. All India shri. Shivaji Memorial Soc. & Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2169 OF 2002 Shri. Rajaram Bampat Kamble ... Petitioner vs. The Secretary/Admintrative Officer, All India Shri. Shivaji Memorial Soc. Pune & Ors. ... Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2632 OF 2015 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2169 OF 2002 Shri. Rajaram Bampat Kamble ... Petitioner vs. The Secretary/Admintrative Officer, All India Shri. Shivaji Memorial Soc. Pune & Ors. ... Respondent .... .... Mr. Uday P. Waranjukar for the Applicant. Mr. S.V. Pitre for the Petitioner in WP/2169/2002 Mr. Nitin Dhumal for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Mr. A.R. Metkari AGP for the State. Coram : A.A.Sayed, J. Date : 12 April 2017 P.C. : 1 Learned AGP to take instructions on Civil Application No. 117 of 2017 as to whether the Applicant has been absorbed permanently as Teacher (Lecturer) in SNDT Arts & Commerce Junior College, Pune. 2 Learned AGP to take further instructions in the Civil Application No. 103 of 2016 in Contempt Petition No. 59 of 2003 whether the salary being paid to the Applicant can be made online. 3 Stand over to 26 April 2017. (A.A.Sayed, J.) Sameer

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, JJ DATE : 30th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent Karan L Jain For Applicant Ms.S.D.Shinde- APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 27th August, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to as per CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1773 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1774 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2022 Padmanabhan Thandu Iyer...ApplicantVersusState Of Maharashtra And Anr....Respondents Ms. Saiyukta S. Kamat, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 17 th JUNE, 2022. PER COURT: 1. These interim applications are preferred by the applicant for suspension of sentence and grant of bail during the pendency of Criminal Revision Application No.251 of 2022. 2. The applicant has been convicted for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act vide judgment and order dated 14 th February, 2017 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30 th Court, Kurla, Mumbai and sentenced to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- in default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment of one year. He is also sentenced to pay compensation of Rs.4,45,000/- within one month from the date of order. The judgment of the trial Court has been confirmed by the Sessions Court by judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2022. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is ailing. There are discrepancies in the evidence adduced before the trial Court. The applicant has deposited Rs.1,00,000/- before the Appellate Court towards the compensation during the pendency of appeal. The applicant would deposit further amount of Rs.1,00,000/- within a period of four weeks from today. Considering the submissions, presently interim relief can be granted to the applicant till the next date of hearing. Hence, I pass the following order: ORDER i. The sentence of imprisonment imposed vide Judgment and order dated 14th February, 2017 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai in C.C. No.3001612/SS/2015 and confirmed by Judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2022 passed by the Sessions Court, Greater Bombay in Criminal Appeal No.187 of 2017 is suspended and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount; ii. The applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- till the next date of hearing. iii. The applicant shall deposit the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- before the trial Court within a period of four weeks from today. iv. Stand over to 18th July, 2022. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 552 OF 2003 Anjana (nee) Anjira Ashok Jadhav ...Appellant vs. Nana...Respondents Vithoba Nalawade & Ors. Mr.Bhushan Walimbe for the Appellant Mr.P.J.Thorat h/f Shri R.A.Thorat for Respondent Nos.1 to 5. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 16, 2007. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Second Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : i) Whether the certified copy of the statement at Exh-46 of the first Respondent in a proceeding under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code,1966 was admissible in evidence to prove the admission contained therein of the ii) Whether it can be said that the admission of the first Respondent in the statement at Exh.46 is not admissible in evidence as the first Respondent was not confronted with the alleged admission during his cross examination? The learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 waives service. Printing is dispensed with. The Appellant is directed to file private paper book within a period of one year from today failing which Appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the court. relationship between the Appellant and Rajaram ? JUDGE