All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, JJ DATE : 30th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent Karan L Jain For Applicant Ms.S.D.Shinde- APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 27th August, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to as per CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1773 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1774 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2022 Padmanabhan Thandu Iyer...ApplicantVersusState Of Maharashtra And Anr....Respondents Ms. Saiyukta S. Kamat, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 17 th JUNE, 2022. PER COURT: 1. These interim applications are preferred by the applicant for suspension of sentence and grant of bail during the pendency of Criminal Revision Application No.251 of 2022. 2. The applicant has been convicted for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act vide judgment and order dated 14 th February, 2017 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30 th Court, Kurla, Mumbai and sentenced to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- in default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment of one year. He is also sentenced to pay compensation of Rs.4,45,000/- within one month from the date of order. The judgment of the trial Court has been confirmed by the Sessions Court by judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2022. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is ailing. There are discrepancies in the evidence adduced before the trial Court. The applicant has deposited Rs.1,00,000/- before the Appellate Court towards the compensation during the pendency of appeal. The applicant would deposit further amount of Rs.1,00,000/- within a period of four weeks from today. Considering the submissions, presently interim relief can be granted to the applicant till the next date of hearing. Hence, I pass the following order: ORDER i. The sentence of imprisonment imposed vide Judgment and order dated 14th February, 2017 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai in C.C. No.3001612/SS/2015 and confirmed by Judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2022 passed by the Sessions Court, Greater Bombay in Criminal Appeal No.187 of 2017 is suspended and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount; ii. The applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- till the next date of hearing. iii. The applicant shall deposit the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- before the trial Court within a period of four weeks from today. iv. Stand over to 18th July, 2022. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 552 OF 2003 Anjana (nee) Anjira Ashok Jadhav ...Appellant vs. Nana...Respondents Vithoba Nalawade & Ors. Mr.Bhushan Walimbe for the Appellant Mr.P.J.Thorat h/f Shri R.A.Thorat for Respondent Nos.1 to 5. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 16, 2007. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Second Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : i) Whether the certified copy of the statement at Exh-46 of the first Respondent in a proceeding under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code,1966 was admissible in evidence to prove the admission contained therein of the ii) Whether it can be said that the admission of the first Respondent in the statement at Exh.46 is not admissible in evidence as the first Respondent was not confronted with the alleged admission during his cross examination? The learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 waives service. Printing is dispensed with. The Appellant is directed to file private paper book within a period of one year from today failing which Appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the court. relationship between the Appellant and Rajaram ? JUDGE

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....Applicant V/S State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents … WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....Applicant V/S State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents Mr. Manish Bohra a/w Mr. Lalit Pal, Mr. Aditya Dwevedi i/b M/s. A.S. Khan & Associates for the Applicant. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent No.1-State. … … CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 24TH MAY 2023. (VACATION COURT) P.C.: 1 Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 21 June 2023. 2 The learned APP waives notice on behalf of Respondents/State. SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2023.05.24 16:37:11 +0530 (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1908 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1907 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT Mr.Manish M. Bohra i/b. M/s. A.S.Khan and Associates for Applicant Ms.M.R.Tidke APP for Respondent/State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 23rd August, 2023 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Appellant(s)/ Applicant(s) / Petitioner(s) / Respondent No. stand over to 13/09/2023. Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1908 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1907 OF 2023 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2023 ALONGWITH REVISION APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1910 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1909 OF 2023 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Manish M. Bohra - Advocate for the Applicant Mr. Santosh S. Avhad i/by Jayakar Partners - Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar – APP for the Respondent - State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 12th JANUARY 2024 P. C. :- 1. It is true that on 13/12/2023, submission by learned Advocate for the Applicant was recorded that Rs. 1 Lakh is to be paid till 12/01/2024. Only Rs. 50,000/- is paid. Whereas SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2024.01.17 11:38:32 +0530 balance amount of Rs. 1,00,000 was agreed to be paid on or before 12/02/2024. The Applicant is bedridden due to fall. He has got difficulty to pay remaining amount. 2. There is a prayer to keep this matter in second week of February so that the Applicant will clear entire arrears. 3. It is opposed on behalf of the Respondent No. 2- Complainant. 4. Now there is choice to the parties at what amount they should settle and what should be the installments. 5. Better to keep these applications for hearing on admission on 06th February, 2024 . 6. Interim relief granted earlier to continue till next date. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1908 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1907 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK J DATE : 5th March, 2024 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 08/04/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1910 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1909 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1908 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1907 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents .................... Mr. Manish Bohra, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Santosh Avhad, Advocate i/by Jayakar & Partners for Respondent No.2. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2024 P.C . : 1. Mentioned. Not on Board. Taken on Board. 2. Heard Mr. Bohra, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr. Avhad, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. 3. Perused the praecipe dated 11.12.2024. 4. Praecipe dated 11.12.2024 is filed by private Respondent who is original Complainant. This is a group of two Criminal Revision Applications namely Criminal Revision Application No.133 of 2023 and Criminal Revision Application No.134 of 2023. 5. Mr. Avhad, learned Advocate appearing for private Respondent No.2 draws my attention to order dated 13.12.2023 followed by order dated 06.02.2024. I have perused both the orders. In compliance of aforesaid twin orders, private Respondent has received a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- uptil now. He would submit that an amount of Rs.1,10,000/- has been deposited by Applicant in Trial Court pursuant to the order dated 06.02.2024. That apart, he would submit that Applicant has also deposited an amount of Rs.30,000/- i.e. Rs.15,000/- each in both the cases towards cash bail in the Trial Court. He would submit that if private Respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.1,10,000/- and Rs.30,000/- which stands deposited by Revision Applicant in the Trial Court it would meet the ends of justice. 6. Mr. Bohra, learned Advocate appears for Revision Applicant. He would submit that he has instructions to submit to the orders of the Court and would not object any Application seeking withdrawal. 7. Mr. Avhad, learned Advocate appearing for private Respondent persuaded the Court to pass an order allowing private Respondent to withdraw the aforestated amount from the Trial Court. 8. In view of the above and more specifically no objection given by Mr. Bohra on behalf of Revision Applicant, the learned Trial Court is directed to permit the withdrawal of amount of Rs.60,000/- and Rs.50,000/- deposited in the twin cases before Trial Court and amount of Rs.15,000/- each deposited towards cash bail by Applicant on the presentation of server copy of this order. 9. Trial Court shall act and ensure that private Respondent is returned the deposited money as directed above alongwith all accrued interest thereon within a period of one week from the date of server copy of this order being presented before Trial Court. Trial Court shall not insist on certified copy of this order. Once amounts are received by private Respondent, liberty to Revision Applicant to move Revision Application for further appropriate orders. 10. Stand over to 13 th January, 2025. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2024.12.11 14:43:23 +0530

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 17930 OF 2024 RAVINDRA VISHNU MORE. ..Petitioner VS UTTAM RAMCHANDRA SAWANT AND ORS. ...Respondents __________ Mr. Mandar G. Bagkar, for the Petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. GP, for the State. __________ CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATE : 12 DECEMBER 2024 P.C.: Stand over to 22 January 2025. To be heard alongwith Writ Petition No.17924 of 2024. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [G. S. KULKARNI, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 17930 OF 2024 Ravindra Vishnu More ....PETITIONER V/S Uttam Ramchandra Sawant And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 17924 OF 2024 Uttam Ramchandra Sawant ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thoru. Addl Chief Sec. Revenue And Forest Dept And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M.S. SONAK & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN, JJ DATE : 24th January, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 31/01/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 17930 OF 2024 Ravindra Vishnu More ....PETITIONER V/S Uttam Ramchandra Sawant And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 17924 OF 2024 Uttam Ramchandra Sawant ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thoru. Addl Chief Sec. Revenue And Forest Dept And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M.S. SONAK & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN, JJ DATE : 31st January, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 07/02/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 17930 OF 2024 Ravindra Vishnu More ....PETITIONER V/S Uttam Ramchandra Sawant And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 17924 OF 2024 Uttam Ramchandra Sawant ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thoru. Addl Chief Sec. Revenue And Forest Dept And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M.S. SONAK & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN, JJ DATE : 7th February, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 07/03/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )