All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.208 OF 2017 Sudhir Sitaram Pise … Applicant V/s. Shri. Vijay Raghunath Patil & Ors. … Respondents None for the Applicant Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 22nd MARCH 2018 P.C.: None for the Applicant. Dismissed for nonprosecution. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION APPLN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 208 OF 2017 Sudhir Sitaram Pise Appellant V/S Vijay Raghunath Patil And Anr Respondent Mr.Sachin Deokar i/b. Patil Rakesh Sharad For Appellant Mr.P.H.Gaikwad Patil, APP for state CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J DATE : 12th February, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 26/02/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 PRANAY SAKHARAM JARANDE ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2024 AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 PRATIMA PRAMOD AGHAM ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS Adv. Vinayak Pandit i/b Adv. Ajinkya Udane for the Appellant. Adv. Sankalan Das i/b Adv. Pranali Kakade for the Respondent. Ms. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : APRIL 4, 2024 P.C. : By consent, stand over to 30/04/2024. Interim order already in operation to continue till then. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 10: Diksha Rane 913. APEAL 244-24.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244/2024 PRANAY SAKHARAM JARANDE ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994/2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996/2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244/2024 PRATIMA PRAMOD AGHAM ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS ------------ Adv. Ajinkya M. Udane for the applicant. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for the State. Adv. Pranali Kakade a/w. Adv. Sankalan Das for the respondent no.2. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : APRIL 24, 2024. P.C. : 1. List this appeal on 30/4/2024 along with Criminal Appeal No.632/2021. 2. Advocate Pranali Kakade is requested to appear on behalf of the appellant/victim in Criminal Appeal No.632/2021. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 13: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents Ms. Pranali Kakade appointed Advocate for the Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and for Respondent No.2 in Appeal no.244 of 2024. ________ Mr. Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for Respondent in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Appellant in Appeal No.244 of 2024. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent/State in both Appeals. Ms. Pratima P. Agham – through Video Conferencing - Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.244 of 2024 __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024. P.C.: 1 Ms. Pratima Pramod Agham has appeared through video conferencing. Her identity is confirmed by Ms. Kakade who has placed on record copy of the Adhar card. Ms. Agham confirms the position that she does not wish to press accusation against the accused. She would pray for withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 So far as Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is concerned, the same seeks pre-arrest bail in respect of Pranay Sakharam Jarande by challenging the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. The Appellant is already under interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 10 December 2020. In view of the willingness expressed by the first informant not to press the accusation against the accused, in my view interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant deserves to be made absolute. Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is accordingly allowed by setting aside the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. Interim protection granted by this Court on 10 December 2020 is made absolute. 3 In view of the disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024, the Interim Application Nos.996 of 2024 and 994 of 2024 do not survive and the same are also accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 ________ Ms. Pranali Kakade appointed Advocate for the Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and for Respondent No.2 in Appeal no.244 of 2024. Mr. Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for Respondent in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Appellant in Appeal No.244 of 2024. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent/State in both Appeals. Ms. Pratima P. Agham – through Video Conferencing - Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.244 of 2024 __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024. P.C.: 1 Ms. Pratima Pramod Agham has appeared through video conferencing. Her identity is confirmed by Ms. Kakade who has placed on record copy of the Adhar card. Ms. Agham confirms the position that she does not wish to press accusation against the accused. She would pray for withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 So far as Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is concerned, the same seeks pre-arrest bail in respect of Pranay Sakharam Jarande by challenging the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. The Appellant is already under interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 10 December 2020. In view of the willingness expressed by the first informant not to press the accusation against the accused, in my view interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant deserves to be made absolute. Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is accordingly allowed by setting aside the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. Interim protection granted by this Court on 10 December 2020 is made absolute. 3 In view of the disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024, the Interim Application Nos.996 of 2024 and 994 of 2024 do not survive and the same are also accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) katkam Page No. 2 of 2 SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2024.07.23 18:15:30 +0530

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ....Appellant V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Ms. Pranali Kakade appointed Advocate for the Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and for Respondent No.2 in Appeal no.244 of 2024. Mr. Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for Respondent in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Appellant in Appeal No.244 of 2024. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent/State in both Appeals. Ms. Pratima P. Agham – through Video Conferencing - Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.244 of 2024 __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024. P.C.: 1 Ms. Pratima Pramod Agham has appeared through video conferencing. Her identity is confirmed by Ms. Kakade who has placed on record copy of the Adhar card. Ms. Agham confirms the position that she does not wish to press accusation against the accused. She would pray for withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 So far as Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is concerned, the same seeks pre-arrest bail in respect of Pranay Sakharam Jarande by challenging the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. The Appellant is already under interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 10 December 2020. In view of the willingness expressed by the first informant not to press the accusation against the accused, in my view interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant deserves to be made absolute. Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is accordingly allowed by setting aside the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. Interim protection granted by this Court on 10 December 2020 is made absolute. 3 In view of the disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024, the Interim Application Nos.996 of 2024 and 994 of 2024 do not survive and the same are also accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2024.11.14 20:10:12 +0530 katkam Page No. 2 of 2

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Appellant V/s. Lata Sakharam Jarande and Ors. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. Lata Sakharam Jarande and Ors. ….Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2024 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Applicant/ Intervenor IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. State of Maharashtra ….Respondents ___Page No. 1 of 2 ___ 23 July 2024 Ms. Maitreyee Garade a/w. Mr. Vinayak Pandit i/by. Mr. Ajinkya Udane, for the Appellant. __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ Mr. Ashok R. Metkari, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated : 23 July 2024. P.C. : Office has suo-moto placed the above appeals on board seeking speaking to the minutes of the order dated 19 June 2024. It appears that name of the Appellant ' Pranay Sakharam Jarande' is not reflected in Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 2024. The corrections be carried out in the order and the order be read accordingly. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2024.07.23 18:02:20 +0530

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Appellant V/s. Lata Sakharam Jarande and Ors. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ….Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2024 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Applicant/ Intervenor IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. State of Maharashtra ….Respondents ___Page No. 1 of 2 ___ 23 July 2024 Ms. Maitreyee Garade a/w. Mr. Vinayak Pandit i/by. Mr. Ajinkya Udane, for the Appellant. __________________________________________________ Mr. Ashok R. Metkari, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated : 23 July 2024. P.C. : Office has suo-moto placed the above appeals on board seeking speaking to the minutes of the order dated 19 June 2024. It appears that name of the Appellant ' Pranay Sakharam Jarande' is not reflected in Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 2024. The corrections be carried out in the order and the order be read accordingly. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Note : Corrections are carried out in cause-title only pursuant to speaking to minutes order dated 14 November 2024. NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2024.11.14 18:15:25 +0530 Digitally ___Page No. 2 of 2 ___ 23 July 2024

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ....Appellant V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 ________ Ms. Maitreyee Garad i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for the Appellant. Ms. Shilpa K. Gajare-Dhumal, APP for Respondent/State. __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 14 NOVEMBER 2024. P.C.: 1 Office has suo-moto placed the above Appeals on board seeking speaking to the minutes of the orders dated 19 June 2024 and 23 July 2024. katkam Page No. 1 of 2 2 It appears that name of the Respondents 'The State of Maharashtra & Anr.' in the cause title is not reflected in Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024. The corrections be carried out in the orders and the orders be read accordingly. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2014 Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P. M. Palshikar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 07 APRIL, 2014 P.C.: The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Labour Court, Mumbai has not considered the stand of the Petitioner that 5 th Pay Commission, upon which the reliance was sought by the Respondent, was made applicable only after execution of the agreement dated 25 June 2004 and the Respondent had obtained voluntary retirement scheme on 31 May 2004 and therefore, it was not applicable to him. Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 5 May 2014. Till further orders, the Respondent will not take coercive steps based on the impugned order. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 29: Sequeira IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 of 2014 The Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation. .. Petitioner Vs. Shri Balkrishna Ganpati Salunkhe. .. Respondent Mr.P.M.Palshikar, for the Petitioner. Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad, for the Respondent. CORAM: N.M.Jamdar, J. Monday 23 November, 2015 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Petitioner Federation challenges the order dated 3 August 2013 passed by Labour Court, Mumbai allowing application filed by the Respondentmember under Section 33 (c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court has accepted the claim of the Respondent No.1 for entitlement of difference and wages for the period from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2004 after applicability of recommendation from 5th Pay Commission and certain other findings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that some employees of the Federation who were not in the category of workmen had filed Writ petition No.4274 of 2009 and 4267 of 2009 with the Aurangabad bench of this Court and the Division bench had granted identical relief which is granted by the Labour Court in the present case. The learned counsel submitted that the Federation has challenged the decision of the Division bench by way of Civil Appeal Nos.4521 and 4522 of 2013 and the Apex Court has admitted and granted leave and unconditionally stayed the operation of the orders. Copies of the orders are placed on record. In view of this position, Rule. Respondent waives service. The interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). Liberty to apply after the decision of the Apex Court is rendered. (N.M.Jamdar, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.4980 OF 2006 Bhimrao Vithal Patil, .. Petitioner. Vs Shankar Yashwant Bansode & ors .. Respondents Mr V.B.Naik i/b Mr I.M.Khairdi, for the petitioner. Mr Uday V Warunjikar, for respondent no.1. CORAM : : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 22.08.2006 PC: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Rule. There shall be ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer caluses (c) and (d). Pendency of this petition shall not operate as stay to the proceedings before the Assistant Charity Commissioner in Change Report Nos 1886 of 2005 and 1225 of 2005. The Assistant Charity Commissioner shall endeavour to dispose of both the aforestated change reports, after giving an opportunity of being heard to both sides, in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4980 OF 2006 Bhimrao Vitthal Patil ....Petitioner V/S Shankar Yashwant Bansode And Ors. ....Respondent Mr. I. M. Khairdi For Petitioner Mr. P. P. Pujari, AGP for State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J DATE : 26th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the Petitioner, Place the petition for final hearing Board week commencing from 23/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4980 OF 2006 Bhimrao Vitthal Patil ....Petitioner V/S Shankar Yashwant Bansode And Ors. ....Respondent Mr. I. M. Khairdi For Petitioner Mr. A. R. Metkari, AGP For State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J DATE : 23rd September, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners / respondent / applicant , Stand over to 18/11/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4980 OF 2006 Bhimrao Vitthal Patil … Petitioner vs. Shankar Yashwant Bansode & Ors. … Respondents Mr.I.M.Khairadi, for the Petitioner. Mr.R.P.Kadam, AGP for the State. CORAM :- G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- APRIL 1, 2021 PC : This petition has been notified as per the list of matters as received from the office of the learned Government Pleader to have become infructuous. As per the office notice dated 16 March 2021, the Advocate for the petitioner/petitioner were called upon to give a praecipe in advance in case the petition has not become infructuous. Such praecipe has been received in regard to this petition. It is informed on behalf of the petitioner that the petition has not become infructuous. List the petition for hearing before the regular Court. (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Petitioner V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent MR.Rajdeep Gude i/by Khandeparkar And Associates For Petitioner. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J DATE : 19th August, 2016 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners Stand over to 24/08/2016, ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar & Ors. ….. Appellants VERSUS Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar since deceased through his legal heirs & Ors. ….. Respondents Mr.A.S.Khandeparkar, a/w. Mr.Prerak Sharma and Mr.Rajdeep Gude for the Appellants. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2016 P.C . Issue notice before admission returnable on 26th September, 2016 . In addition to the court notice, appellants are also permitted to serve the respondents by private notice i.e. by Registered A.D., courier or Hand Delivery and shall file affidavit of service before the next date. [R.D. DHANUKA, J.]

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar ..... Appellants (since deceased through his L.Rs.) Govind Daji Gudekar @ Kumbhar & Ors. Versus Vithhal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar ..... Respondents (since deceased through his L.Rs.) Rukmini Vitthal Gudekar & Ors. Mr. Rajdeep D. Gude h/f Khandeparkar & Associates for Appellants. None for Respondents. CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J. DATE : 5 JANUARY 2017. P.C. . Learned Counsel for the Appellants informs the Court that Appellant No.2 has expired and they have yet to take out an appropriate application for bringing his legal heirs on record. Stand over to 6 February 2017. (S.C.Gupte, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.7 OF 2016 Shri Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (Since deceased through his LRS) Govind Daji Gudekar @ Kumbhar & Ors. …Appellants Versus Vithhal K. Gudekar & Kumbhar (Since deceased through his LRS) Rukmini V. Gudekar & Ors. …Respondents ….. Mr. Rajdeep Gude with Amogh Karandikar i/by Khandeparkar & Associates, Advocates for the Appellants . ….. CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J. DATE : 10 FEBRUARY 2017 P.C. : . The learned counsel for the Appellants informs the Court that Appellant No.2 has expired and that names of legal heirs of the deceased have been made available to the Advocates for the Appellants only recently. He seeks time to take out an application for bringing legal heirs on record. To that end, the Second Appeal is stood over to 21.3.2017. 2 In the meantime, Appellants may also issue notice to Respondent Nos.6,7,9 and 11 returnable on 21.3.2017. (S.C.GUPTE, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar, since deceased through his legal representatives 1a. Govind Daji Gudekar @ Kumbhar & Ors. ...Appellants vs. Vitthal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar, since deceased through his legal heirs, 1a. Rukmini Vitthal Gudekar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Amogh Karandikar I/b. Khandeparkar & Associates for Appellants. CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J. 21 MARCH 2017 P.C.: Learned Counsel for the Appellants informs the court that though notices issued to Respondent Nos.6, 7, 9 and 11 have been returned unserved, the Appellants will make one more attempt of service, since new addresses of the Respondents are now available with the Appellants. S.O. to 11 April 2017. The Appellants are also permitted to effect a private service of the second appeal and file an affidavit of service by the next date. (S.C. GUPTE, J.)

Order - Status 15: Rane (sr.9) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Second Appeal NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ...Applicants Versus Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. . ..Respondents WITH Civil Application in SA NO. 609 OF 2017 IN Second Appeal NO. 7 OF 2016 Sushma Shashikant Malevadkar ...Applicant Versus Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ...Respondents WITH Civil Application in SA NO. 610 OF 2017 IN Second Appeal NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ...Applicants Versus Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ...Respondent(s) Mr. Rajdeep Gude i/by. Khandeparkar and Associates, Advocate for the Appellants/Applicants in all Civil Applications. None for the Respondents. CORAM: N.M. JAMDAR, J DATED: 21st April, 2017. PC:- The Appellants will take necessary steps as regards the unserved Respondents within period of eight weeks from today failing which the Appeal/Applications will stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents. Stand over to 14 July, 2017. (N.M. JAMDAR,J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar, since deceased through LHs Govind Daji Gudekar @ Kumbhar and others … Appellants Versus Vitthal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar since deceased through LHs, Rukmini Vitthal Gudekar and others … Respondents Mr. Rajdeep Gude i/b. Khandeparkar for the Appellants/Applicants. None for the Respondents. CORAM : S. J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 7TH JULY, 2017 P.C.: Amendments to the Second Appeal have been carried out by the Advocate for the Appellants. Place the above Second Appeal for Admission on 27.07.2017. ( S. J.KATHAWALLA, J. )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Appellant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 27th July, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for two weeks i.e. 10/08/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Appellant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 10th August, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for 07/09/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Appellant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 7th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for three weeks i.e. 28/09/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Appellant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J DATE : 28th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for three weeks i.e. 02/11/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Appellant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR, J DATE : 17th January, 2018 P.C. : On account of paucity of time the matter stand adjourned to 16/02/2018.If ad-interim relief is granted and is operative till today, the same will operate till the next date. If ad-interim relief not granted for limited period the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 30: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Appellant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 609 OF 2017 In SECOND APPEAL 7 OF 2016 Sushma Shashikant Malevadkar ....Applicant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 610 OF 2017 In SECOND APPEAL 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Applicant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent Mr S Rajpurkar i/by Khandeparkar And Associates For Appellant Mr G H Keluskar i/by Mr Sudhir Prabhu, Advocate For R.nos.1a To 1d,2a To 2f,3,4a To 4e,5, 6, 7, 9 & 10. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J DATE : 16th August, 2019 P.C. : By consent, Stand Over to 19/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Appellant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 609 OF 2017 In SECOND APPEAL 7 OF 2016 Sushma Shashikant Malevadkar ....Applicant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 610 OF 2017 In SECOND APPEAL 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Applicant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent Mr R P Mahadik i/by Khandeparkar And Associates For Appellant CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J DATE : 19th August, 2019 r P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the Appellant, Stand over to 26/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Appellant V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J DATE : 26th August, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, the matter is adjourned to 16/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 36: sa_mandawgad 4sa7-16+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since deceased)through LRs. and Ors. … Appellants. Versus Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since deceased) through LRs and Ors. … Respondents. Mr. Rhoit P. Mahadik i/by Khandeparkar & Associates for the Appellants. ——— ——— CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : JANUARY 18, 2024 P. C.: Stand over to 31st January, 2024. Interim relief granted earlier, if any, to continue till the next date. ( Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.)

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.7 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2016 Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (Since Decd. Thr. Lrs.) and Ors. ...Appellants V/s. Vithal Krishna Gudekar & Kumbhar (Since decd. Thr. Lrs.) and Ors. ...Respondent Mr. Farhan Shaikh i/b Khandeparkar & Associates for the Appellants. Mr. Sudhir Prabhu for Respondent Nos.1A to 1D, 2A to 2F, 3, 4A to 4E, 5 and 10. CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 31st JANUARY, 2024. P. C.:- Mr. Shaikh, learned counsel for the appellants submits that respondent Nos. 1A, 3 and 4B have expired and Interim Application will be filed for bringing on record legal heirs of the deceased. The Interim Application to be filed within one week from today. 3. Stand over to 7 th February 2024. Ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue till next date. (SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.)

Order - Status 40: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.7 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.610 OF 2017 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.610 OF 2017 (Since Deceased) through LRs and Ors. ••• Appellants. Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (Since Deceased) through LRs and Ors. … Appellants. Versus ••• Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.609 OF 2017 Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (Since Deceased) through LRs and Ors. ••• Applicants. Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (Since Deceased) through LRs and Ors. … Applicants. Versus ••• Respondent. Mr. Rushikesh Bhagat i/by Mr.Khandeparkar & Associates for the Appellants/Applicants. ——— ——— CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 07, 2024 P. C.: Learned counsel appearing for the Appellants seeks two weeks time to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased parties. At his request, stand over to 21st February, 2024. ( Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.)

Order - Status 42: Harish IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.7 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.7 OF 2016 Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (Since Deceased Thr. Lrs) Govind Daji Gudekar @ Kumbhar & Ors. ...Appellants/ Applicants Versus Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (Since Deceased Thr. Lrs) Rukmini vitthal Gudekar & Ors. ...Respondents -------------------- Adv. Rohit P. Mahadik a/w Rushikesh G. Bhagat i/b Khandeparkar & Associates for the Appellants/Applicants. Adv. G. H. Keluskar, S. P. Prabhu for Respondent Nos. 1A to 1D, 2A to 2F, 3, 4A to 4E, 5 to 11. CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 21, 2024 P. C. : Learned counsel for the Appellants submit that the Interim Application for bringing on record the legal heirs of the deceased Respondent Nos. 1A, 3 and 4B is ready and will be filed within a period of one weed from today. If the Interim Application is not filed within a prescribed period, the Appeal to stand abated qua Respondent Nos. 1A , 3 and 4B. List the Appeal on 28th February, 2024. (SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. )

Order - Status 44: sa_mandawgad 21sa7-16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.7 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2016 Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since deceased) through his LRs. and Ors. … Appellants. Versus Vitthal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since deceased) through his LRs. and Ors. … Respondents. Mr. Farhan Shaikh i/by Khandeparkar and Associates, for Appellants. Mr. Sudhir Prabhu, for the Respondent Nos.1A to 1D, 2A to 2F, 3, 4A to 4E, 5 and 6, 7, 9 and 10. ——— ——— CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2024 P. C.: This Court is informed that the Interim Application qua the deceased-Respondents have already been filed. Stand over to 13th March, 2024. ( Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.)

Order - Status 46: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2016 Shri. Daji Ratnu Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. ....APPELLANT V/S Vithal Krishna Gudekar @ Kumbhar (since ....RESPONDENT Deceased Thr. Lrs) And Ors. CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 13th March, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 18/04/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )