All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1822 OF 2009 Gulabidevi Jayantiprasad Santoshi. Versus Appellant. Jayantiprasad Shadalram Santoshi & Ors. Respondents. Mr. A. M. Saraogi for the Appellants. None for the Respondents. I CORAM : A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 3RD DECEMBER,2009. P. C.: Issue notice to respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4, returnable on 11th January, 2010. Humdast permitted. Sd/ (A. A. SAYED, J.) 1

Order - Status 10: vss THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1822 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's order or Directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders S.N. Fatima h/f A.M. Saraogi for Appellant Ι Mr.S.J. Ghogare for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. DATED: MARCH 29, 2010 P.C.: The advocate for the appellant has not supplied the fresh address for serving respondent Nos.3 and 4. S.O. for two weeks. It is made clear that if respondent Nos.3 and 4 are not served within that period, the appeal to stand dismissed against respondent Nos.3 and 4. The advocate for the appellant may also serve them by private notice. Mr.Ghogare appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

Order - Status 12: vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1822 OF 2009 Smt.Gulabidevi Jayantiprasad Santoshi ... Appellant V/s. Shri Jayantiprasad Shadalram Santoshi & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.A.M. Saraogi i/b Sayed Nisar Fatima for Appellant Mr.S.J. Ghogare for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: APRIL 12, 2010 P.C.: Mr.Ghogare, appearing for the respondents, points out that the impugned judgment in the present first appeal is a common judgment passed in four suits. The appellant had filed First Appeal No.1837 of 2009 in respect of S.C. Suit No.5495 of 2003. That appeal was dismissed on February 26, 2010. The learned advocate therefore submits that the same order must follow in the present appeal. Mr.Saraogi, appearing for the appellant, states that the appellant is filing a review petition in that matter and therefore these appeals should be adjourned. S.O. for four weeks. It is made clear that if the review petition is dismissed, the same order as was passed on February 26, 2010 in First Appeal No.1837 of 2009 will follow in the present appeal.

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1822 OF 2009 IN SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO.5498 OF 2003 ......... Gulabdevi Jayantiprasad Santoshi Appellant Vs. Jayantiprasad Shadalram Santoshi and ors. Respondents Mr.A.M.Saraogi, for appellant. Mr.Sagar Ghogre, for respondents. ......... CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 7th JUNE, 2010. P.C. : Mr.Saraogi, learned counsel for appellants, states that against the order dated 26th February, 2010 passed in First Appeal No.1837 of 2009 a Review Petition is filed in this Court in the month of April, 2010. He states that he will serve copy of the said review petition on the learned counsel appearing for respondents. 2] The statements are accepted. List the First Appeal after four weeks. In the meantime, learned counsel for appellant will move the appropriate Court for deciding the review petition. S.O. for four weeks.

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1822 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICAITON NOS.2852 and 2853 OF 2009 IN F.A.NO.1822 of 2009 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. A. M. Saraogi, for the appellant. Ms.Anita Patil i/b S.J.Ghogre, for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 08/12/2010 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr Saraogi, learned counsel for the appellant, prays for withdrawal of this appeal with liberty to the appellant to adopt appropriate remedy for redressal of her grievance. The First Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. While granting liberty, I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on rights of the parties or examined merits of the case. If any such proceedings is filed by the appellant, same may be considered in accordance with law. The civil applications are also disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)

Order - Status 4: Chitra Sonawane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924 OF 2021 Vivian Felix Gonsalves …. Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …. Respondents. … Mr.A.M. Saraogi for the petitioner. Mr.Ravi Kadam, AGP for State. Miss Savita Suryavanshi for respondent no.2. CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 17th JULY, 2021. [Through Video Conferencing] P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. By this petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging order dated 24th May 2021 passed under the provisions of Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act ('the said Act' for short). … Learned AGP Mr.Ravi Kadam appearing on behalf of the State submits that alternate efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner u/s 154 of the said Act. Considering the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the fact that in the present matter when this Court called upon the learned Advocate for the petitioner, as to how much amount he can pay, to which, he submitted that he require some time to take instructions from his client. On his request matter to appear on board on 20th July 2021. Hence, the following order is passed. a) Matter to appear on board on 20th July, 2021. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 6: 41 wp2924-21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924 OF 2021 Vivian Flexi Gonsalves ..... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….. Respondents Mr.Amit Dubey i/b Mr.Ashok Saraogi for the Petitioner Mr.Ravi Kadam, A.G.P. for the State Ms.Savita Suryavanshi for the Respondent no.2 Mr.Anil D'souza for the Respondent nos.3 to 6 CORAM: K.K.TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : JULY 20, 2021 P.C. . Heard. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that his Arguing Counsel A.M.Saraogi is not available. Hence, he requires some time. The learned counsel for the Respondent no.3 to 6 submit that they have not received copy of Petition. He submits that Petitioner may be directed to provide copy of Petition to them. Hence, the following order is passed: TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Digitally signed by TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date: 2021.07.22 12:43:52 +0530 a. Petitioner is directed to serve copy of Petitioner on all the Respondents on or before 23.07.2021 and fle Affdavit of Service to that effect, failing which they have to pay cost to each and every Respondents. b. Matter to appear on board on 27.07.2021. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2924 OF 2021 .… .… Vivian Felix Gonsalves ] Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra through Deputy Registrar ] ] Cooperative Societies,Vasai & Ors. ] ] Respondents. Mr.A.M. Saraogi for Petitioner. Mr.R.P. Kadam, AGP for State. Ms Savit Suryavanshi for respondent no.2. Mr.Anil D'souza for respondent nos.3 to 6. CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 27th JULY, 2021. [Through Video Conferencing] P.C. Heard learned Counsel for parties. At the request of learned Advocate for the petitioner, matter to appear on board on 6th August 2021. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2924 OF 2021 Vivian Felix Gonsalves ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thru Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Vasai And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE K.K. TATED & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ DATE : 6th August, 2021 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 11/08/2021 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2924 OF 2021 Vivian Felix Gonsalves ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thru Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Vasai And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE K.K. TATED & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ DATE : 11th August, 2021 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 12/08/2021 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2924 OF 2021 Vivian Felix Gonsalves ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thru Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Vasai And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE K.K. TATED & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ DATE : 12th August, 2021 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 18/08/2021 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: 27.2924.21-wp.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924/2021 BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL signed by BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Date: 2021.08.23 13:00:00 +0530 Digitally Vivian Flexi Gonsalves ….. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents None for the Petitioner Mr. R. P. Kadma, AGP for the State Mr. Ashish Suryavanshi I/b. Savita Suryavanshi for Respondent No.2. CORAM: K.K.TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 18, 2021 P.C. 1 None for the Petitioner. The learned counsel for Respondent No.2 seeks some time. 2 It is to be noted that, in the present proceedings, the Petitioner is challenging the order dated 24.05.2021 passed by Respondent No.1 under the provisions of section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Against the said order, revision is maintainable under section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act 1960. 3 Place the matter on board on 31.08.2021. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 18: 31 wp2924-21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924 OF 2021 Vivian Flexi Gonsalves …. Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….. Respondents None for the petitioner Mr.R.P.Kadam, A.G.P. for the State Ms.Sarita Suryavanshi for the respondent no.2 Mr.S.S.Redekar i/b Mr.Anil D'souza for the respondent nos.3 to 6 CORAM: K.K.TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 31, 2021 P.C. . None for the Petitioner. As no one appeared on behalf of Petitioner, Registry is directed to place the matter on board on 03.09.2021 for dismissal. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.) Mohite 1/1 Digitally signed by TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date: 2021.09.02 19:08:36 +0530

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924 OF 2021 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Digitally signed by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date: 2021.09.06 11:00:26 +0530 Vivian F. Gonsalves ] Petitioner. … … Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] Respondents. None for petitioner. Ms Savita Suryavanshi for Respdt.no.2. Mr.R. P. Kadam, AGP for State. CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2021. P.C. 1 None for the petitioner. Ms Savita Suryavanshi, learned Advocate for respondent. The office note shows that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 18.8.21 and 31.8.2021 and today also. This Court by order dated 31.8.2021 directed Registry to keep the matter on board under caption 'for dismissal'. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1835 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders None present for the petitioner Mr.S.N.Gawade A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 26th NOVEMBER 2009 P.C. : None present for the petitioner when called. Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1835 of 2009 Kiran Dhondopant Thakur ....Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra & anr. ....Respondents Mr. D.V. Sutar for the petitioner. Ms. A.T. Jhaveri-APP for the State. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 18th July, 2011 PC: Issue notice for final disposal, returnable on or before 16th August, 2011. Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). (B.R. GAVAI, J)

Order - Status 16: rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1835 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders. None present. ..... ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 12, 2011. P.C.: None for the petitioners. Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (A.S.OKA, J.)

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1835 OF 2009 Kiran D. Thakur and anr. ...Petitioners v/s The State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondents None for Petitioners. Mrs S.V. Gajare Dhumal, APP for Respondent State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED : 3RD DECEMBER 2013. P.C. : The learned counsel for petitioners is again called, absent. S.O. to 19th December 2013. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL J.)

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1835 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1835 OF 2009 Kiran Dhondopant Thakur and another .....Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & another ....Respondents Mr. D. V. Sutar Advocate for Petitioner Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa APP for the State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : JANUARY 16, 2014 PC : Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused had filed a petition seeking quashing of the proceedings. This Court (Coram : A. S. Oka, J.) by an order dated 13/07/2009, has issued Rule and granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause 'b'. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petitioners are similarly situated, hence : Rule. Interim relief in terms of prayer clause 'b'. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 25: Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1835 OF 2009 Kiran Dhondopant Thakur and Anr … Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra and Anr … Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.358 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1835 OF 2009 Kiran Dhondopant Thakur and Anr … Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra and Anr … Respondents Ms. Kavita Vijapure i/b D.V. Sutar for the petitioners. Smt. M.R. Tidke, APP for the State. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : APRIL 26, 2023 P.C.: Learned advocate for the petitioners has filed praecipe for withdrawal of the petition. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPW) NO. 274 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3464 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None for Applicant Ms. Saloni M. Ghule, I/by Sanjiv Sawant for R. No. 1 Mr. Deepak Thakare, APP for State CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2016 P.C. None for the applicant. 2] This is an application for early hearing of Writ Petition No. 3464/2013 preferred by the original petitioner. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitionerhusband on instructions submitted that in pursuance of the order dated 26.3.2013 her client is regularly paying the maintenance of Rs. 10,000/ to the applicantwife. 3] In view of the same, I find that there is no urgency in hearing the petition expeditiously. The application is disposed off with liberty to the applicantwife to file fresh application for appropriate reliefs, if the petitionerhusband commits any breach of orders dated 13.9.2013 and 17.6.2014. 4] The application is disposed off in the aforesaid terms. (A. S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4039 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.157 OF 1996 The State of Maharashtra .. Appellant V/s. Bapu Ragho Patil .. Respondent (Since deceased through his LR's) Smt.Mirabai Bapu Patil Mr.S.V.More for the Appellant/Applicant. Mr.Prashant Jadhav for the Respondent. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. By the above Civil Application, the Applicant prays for condonation of delay in filing the Application and for bringing the heirs of the original Respondent on record. Shri S.D.Patil has filed his appearance for the said heirs. The Civil Application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clauses 'b' and 'c'. The Civil Application is, accordingly, disposed of. The learned A.G.P. to carry out the amendment in the cause title of the Appeal within four weeks from date. [R.M.SAVANT, J.]

Order - Status 8: 39-CAW-2247-2014-WP-4110-2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2247 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4110 OF 2003 DADASAHEB GANGADHAR SHETE )...PETITIONER V/s. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ANR. )...RESPONDENTS Mr.Sagar Mane h/f. Mr.Narendra Bandiwadekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Coram: Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Date : : 28th October, 2014. P.C. : 1 No directions need be given for expeditious hearing of the petition since the petitions of the year 2003 have already come on board for final hearing. The civil application is, therefore, disposed off. Office to place the petition on board for final hearing as per the chronology. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J.)

Order - Status 6: srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1874 OF 2011 Jogindar Rikai Paswan Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents Mr.D.G.Khamkar for petitioner. Dr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. July 27, 2011. P.C. Heard. The learned APP seeks further time of two weeks. Time granted by way of last chance. S.O. for two weeks. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)

Order - Status 11: 10WP.1874-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1874 OF 2011 Jogindara Rikai Paswan. ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another. ..Respondents. .......... Mr.D.G. Khamkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs.M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR AND P. D. KODE, JJ. .......... DATED : 22nd AUGUST, 2011. P.C. Learned APP, on instructions, states that the petitioner's case for premature release was duly considered by the appropriate authority and the petitioner has been categorized under Category No.4(d). That decision has been taken on 4th August, 2011. If the said decision is not communicated to the petitioner, we hope and trust that the appropriate authority will do the needful in that behalf. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in the matter. Accordingly, Petition is disposed of. (P. D. KODE, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) 1

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.793 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.682 OF 2006 Dinesh R. Damankar ... Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.C.K. Pendse for Appellant Mrs.V.R. Bhosale, APP, for Respondent CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 16, 2006 P.C.: . Application for bail rejected as no case for such grant is made out.