All Letters Patent Appeal

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2010 AGAINST WRIT PETITION NO. 4022 OF 2008 Kumbhar Tanaji Kalappa .....Applicant versus Siddharth Charitable Trust Malgaon road, Subhashnagar, Miraj & ors........Respondents. Mr.A.M. Joshi adv. for the Applicant. Mr. G.T. Kamble i/b A.S.G. Deshmukh adv. for the Respondent no. 1. Mr. R.M. Patne AGP for respondent no.2. CORAM: J. N. PATEL Acting. C.J. AND B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 8th February, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard. We are not inclined to intervene in the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge as a specific view has taken by the learned Single Judge considering the factual aspect. The appeal is therefore dismissed. (Acting. C. J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 252 OF 2013 Mr. Prakash Bapu Wani Appellant vs. Mr. Parashuram Ramchandra & Anr. Respondents Mr. Dundapa B. Patil,Advocate for the appellant. Ms. S.V.Gajare,APP,for the respondent-State CORAM: SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 18th June, 2013. P.C. Heard. Issue notice to respondent No.1. Learned APP waives service for respondent No.2. Notice returnable ten weeks. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.252 of 2013 Prakash Bapu Wani .. Applicant Versus Parashuram Ramchandra Rahate and anr .. Respondents Mr.D.B.Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mrs.S.V.Gajare, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 2 nd MARCH, 2015 P.C. : 1 Heard. 2 Leave granted. 3 The Application for leave to Appeal be treated as a Memo of Appeal, and be numbered accordingly. The appeal is admitted. 4 Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks. 5 The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 waives service of notice for final hearing. 6 The respondent no.1 shall, however, execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/ before the trial court within a period of six weeks from today.

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.115 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4852 OF 2912 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.171 OF 2012 Shri Prabhakar Raghunath Patil & Ors. ..Appellants Versus The Secretary, Pimpalgaon Agriculture Produce Market Committee & ors. ..Respondents. Mr. M.S. Karnik i/b. Sachin Gite for the appellants. Mrs. Prashant Darandale, AGP for respondent Nos.3 to 5 for State. CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 13 August 2012. P.C. This appeal is directed against the interlocutory order dated 14 June 2012 of the learned Single Judge declining to grant interim relief, while admitting the appellants' Writ Petition against the judgment and order dated 15 May 2012 of the Additional Collector, Nashik in Revision Application No.50 of 2012 against the judgment and order dated 30 March 2012 passed by the learned Tahsildar, Dindori. By the said order the Tahsildar had granted permission to respondent No.1- Pimpalgaon Agricultural Produce Market Committee for laying down pipeline for carrying water for drinking purposes under the land belonging to the appellants, 7 in number, and 3 others. The appellants' case is that such permission can be granted only for carrying water for irrigation purposes and not for drinking purposes. The learned Single Judge has admitted the petition for considering the questions of law raised in the Writ Petition. However, the learned Single Judge has found that the balance of convenience is against the appellants and in favour of the respondents. We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order which is only an interlocutory order. The learned counsel for the appellants, however, submits that by allowing large quantity of water for drinking purposes, the water table level will come down considerably and will adversely affect the appellants right to draw water for irrigation purposes. The learned counsel for the appellants, therefore, states that the appellants would like to make representation to the Tahsildar for restricting the quantity of water to be supplied for drinking purposes. It is clarified that pendency of the Writ Petition before the learned Single Judge shall not preclude the appellants (Writ Petitioners) from making such representation, but we make it clear that we may not be treated to have expressed any opinion on the issue. Subject to the above, the Appeal is dismissed without going into the merits of the controversy between the parties. In view of the disposal of the appeal, the Civil Application does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE (N.M. JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2013 M/s. Kokan Mercantile Co-op. Bank Ltd. Through its authorized officer. … Applicant vs. Mr. Zahid I. Ayubi & Anr. … Respondents Mr. Vikas Singh i/b. Lambay & Co. for the applicant. Ms. A.T.Jhaveri, APP, for the State. CORAM: SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 18th June, 2013. P.C. Heard. Issue notice to respondent No.1. Learned APP waives service for respondent No.2. Notice returnable ten weeks. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 9: Sherla V. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED : 24th JANUARY, 2014 P.C. On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per CMIS: Sr. Nos. CMIS Date 19, 30, 34, 35, 36 03/02/2014 42 06/02/2014 20 05/02/2014 37 07/02/2014 21 23/04/2014 38 10/02/2014 22, 23 24/04/2014 41 28/04/2014 24, 40 25/04/2014 25 29/04/2014 26, 27, 28 30/04/2014 29 02/05/2014 31, 32, 33, 39, 43 20/02/2014 If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in any of the above said matters, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective assigned dates. If there is an extreme urgency, the parties are given liberty to get the papers produced before the Court. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Vikas Singh i/b. Lambay & Co.for the applicant. Ms. Vira Shinde,APP, for the State. CORAM :SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV , J DATE 22nd September, 2014. P.C.: None appears for the respondent, although served. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to place on record the notes of evidence. Time as prayed for is granted. S.O. To 10.11.2014. ( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2013 M/s. Kokan Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. ...Applicant Versus Zahid I. Ayubi & Anr. ...Respondents Mrs. Alisha Lambay I/b Lambay & Co. for the Applicant Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. WEDNESDAY, 22nd MARCH, 2017 P.C. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that as the parties have amicably settled their dispute, the applicant does not wish to pursue the aforesaid application. Accordingly, the application is disposed of as withdrawn. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.421 OF 2004 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST.) NO.21881 OF 2004 ALONGWITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST.) NO.21881 OF 2004 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court's or Judge's orders. coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ None for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 25TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C. : . No plausible reason for condoning the delay is made out hence application for condonation of delay is dismissed and as a consequence thereof letters patent appeal is also dismissed. We may add that such appeal against the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court is certainly not maintainable. ...

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.208 OF 2017 Sudhir Sitaram Pise … Applicant V/s. Shri. Vijay Raghunath Patil & Ors. … Respondents None for the Applicant Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 22nd MARCH 2018 P.C.: None for the Applicant. Dismissed for nonprosecution. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION APPLN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 208 OF 2017 Sudhir Sitaram Pise Appellant V/S Vijay Raghunath Patil And Anr Respondent Mr.Sachin Deokar i/b. Patil Rakesh Sharad For Appellant Mr.P.H.Gaikwad Patil, APP for state CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J DATE : 12th February, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 26/02/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 4: Dond IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 2017 Nilesh S. Pawar ..Applicant Vs Dattatray Ramkrushna Aware & Anr ..Respondents Mr. S.P. Dighe for applicant. Mr. V.V. Gangurde, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 10th APRIL 2018. P.C.: Leave to amend to annexe notes of evidence and exhibited documents before the Trial Curt. Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. Stand over to 3rd May 2018. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 6: Nalawade FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.223 OF 2017 Nilesh S. Pawar vs. Dattatray R. Aware Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. H.M. Inamdar i/by S.P. Dighe for the applicant. Mr.V.V.Gangurde, APP for the RespondentState. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 03rd May, 2018 P.C. Period to carry out the amendment is hereby extended by six weeks from today. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO. 223 OF 2017 Nilesh Surendra Pawar ...Applicant vs. Dattatray Ramkrushna Aware and Anr. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Satyajeet P. Dighe - Advocate for the Applicant Mr. N. B. Patil - APP for the State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 18th JANUARY, 2023 P. C. :- Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant. This is an appeal against judgment of acquittal for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Special Leave is sought. Let notice be issued to the Respondent-accused returnable on 08th February, 2023. Additionally, private notice is allowed and service affidavit be filed before the next date. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO. 223 OF 2017 Nilesh Surendra Pawar ...Applicant vs. Dattatray Ramkrushna Aware and Anr. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Abhijeet Khade h/f Mr. S. P. Dighe - Advocate for the Applicant Mr. N. B. Patil - APP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 08th FEBRUARY, 2023 P. C. :- Notice to the Respondent No. 1 is awaited. Let the matter be kept on 08th March, 2023. Applicant may also file an affidavit about private notice. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO. 223 OF 2017 Nilesh Surendra Pawar ...Applicant vs. Dattatray Ramkrushna Aware and Anr. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Abhijeet Khade i/by Mr. S. P. Dighe - Advocate for the Applicant Ms. M. R. Tidke - APP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 08th MARCH, 2023 P. C. :- Affidavit of private service filed is taken on record and marked as 'Annexure-X'. Notice is served on Respondent No. 1. Whereas Court notice is awaited. Today is the first day of appearance. One chance needs to be given. Matter be kept on 05th April, 2023. [S. M. MODAK, J.]