Sorry, no records were found. Please adjust your search criteria and try again.
Sorry, unable to load the Maps API.
1) Document Filed: Report
Filed By : A.A. Sayyed
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 24/08/2007
2) Document Filed: Report
Filed By : Chandu Tulsidas Pahuja
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 2: 19/09/2007
Respondent-1: Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Chandu Tulsidas Pahuja
Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.229 OF 2006 Rajaram Waman Masurkar. ..Petitioner. V/s. Lokmanya Shikshan Prasarak & Ors. ..Respondents. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JULY 17, 2006. P.C. : None appears for the petitioner. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 229 OF 2006 Rajaram Waman Masurkar ....Petitioner Versus Lokmanya Shikshan Prasarak & ors. ...Respondents Mr. Chetan Damre i/b. Mr. D. N. Salvi, advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 26th July, 2012. P.C.: Learned counsel for the petitioner having taken instructions from the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the contempt petition with liberty to approach the competent authority under Section 13 of M.E.P.S. Act for implementation of the order of the School Tribunal. Leave with liberty as prayed for, is granted. The contempt petition is disposed of, as withdrawn. In the event, the petitioner prefers an application under Section 13 of the M.E.P.S. Act before the competent authority, the competent authority shall dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. In view of the disposal of the contempt petition, Civil Application Nos. 85 and 256 of 2011 will not survive for consideration, and the same are disposed of.
1) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Govt. Pleader For R.No. 2
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 22/08/2006
Respondent-1: Lokmanya Shikshan Prasarak
Respondent-2: Ors
Petitioner-1: Rajaram Waman Masurkar
Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.38 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1750 OF 2006 State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Applicants Vs. Mr. Ramesh Vaja Rabari & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, A.P.P. for the applicants-State. None for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & D. B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : 12TH APRIL, 2007. P.C.: - Heard Mr. Mhaispurkar, the learned A.P.P. appearing for the applicants. As a last chance, time to complete the investigation is extended by three weeks from today i.e. till 3/5/2007. Criminal application is disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [D. B. BHOSALE, J.]
Respondent-1: Ramesh Vaja Rabari
Respondent-2: Anr.
Petitioner-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.421 OF 2004 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST.) NO.21881 OF 2004 ALONGWITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST.) NO.21881 OF 2004 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court's or Judge's orders. coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ None for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 25TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C. : . No plausible reason for condoning the delay is made out hence application for condonation of delay is dismissed and as a consequence thereof letters patent appeal is also dismissed. We may add that such appeal against the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court is certainly not maintainable. ...
Respondent-1: Nichrome India Ltd.
Petitioner-1: A.v.cleaning Products Pvt.ltd.
Respondent-1: Shri.madhukar Bhagwan Kulkarni
Respondent-2: Others
Petitioner-1: Shri.dattu Hariba Jadhav