Tag: Criminal Anticipatory Bail

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1525 OF 2022 Kiran Sunder Anchan .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Niranjan Mundargi i/b Mr.Vaibhav G. Bagade for the Applicant. ... … Mr.S.V.Gavand, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 10th JUNE, 2022 P.C:- At the request of the learned A.P.P., re-notify to 13/06/2022. ( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1525 OF 2022 Kiran Sunder Anchan ] ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b Mr. Vaibhav G. Bagade for the applicant. … Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P. for the State. Mr. Rajiv Sakpal, PI attached to Andheri Police Station is present in the court. … CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2022. P.C.:- C.R. No.372 of 2022 came to be registered with Andheri Police Station on 23/04/2022, pursuant to a raid conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar, Bengali Chawl, Koldongri, Sahara Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai. The incident resulted in invoking Sections 308, 294, 114 and Section 34 of the IPC read with Sections 3, 8(1), (2), (4) and 33 (R) of the Maharashtra Act, 2016. The said C.R. arraign 22 persons as accused and the applicant came to be arraigned as accused No.19. Relying upon the remand report, learned counsel would submit that the Manager as well as the cashier of the concerned Bar, in which the raid was conducted, are arrested. One Shridhar Shetty (accused No.23) is the owner of the Bar, who has been released on bail in an anticipatory bail application. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the applicant advanced an argument that the applicant is the Manager in one Hotel Mansa Bar & Restaurant, Andheri and he has been arraigned as an accused, without any connection with the raid conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar. Learned A.P.P. was, therefore, asked to ascertain the factual position. Learned A.P.P. states that the FIR makes a reference to Kiran Pujari and the applicant is Kiran Sunder Anchan and learned A.P.P. is unable to point out any positive material to demonstrate that the person named in the FIR is the applicant. In any case, when specifically asked as to what is the connection with the owner/Manager of the other Bars, operating within the jurisdiction of Andheri Police Station and why all of them are arraigned as accused, no response is coming forward from the side of the prosecution. In the absence of any involvement of the applicant in the raid, which was conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar and since the applicant was neither the owner nor employed in the said Bar and, in fact, the owner of the Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar is informed to have been granted protection, there is no reason why the same protection cannot be extended to the present applicant. Hence, the following order: ORDER (a) In the event of arrest, the applicant Kiran Sunder Anchan shall be temporarily released on bail in C.R. No.372 of 2022 registered with Andheri Police Station, District Mumbai, on executing P.R. bond to the extent of Rs.25,000**/** and furnishing one or two sureties of the like amount. (b) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case and shall not tamper with prosecution evidence. (c) The applicant shall report to the Andheri Police Station from 20/06/2022 to 22/06/2022 between 3.00 p.m. and 5.00 p.m. and, thereafter, as and when directed. List the application along with Anticipatory Bail Application No.1484 of 2022 on 11/07/2022. All parties are directed to act on the downloaded copy of the order supplied by the Advocate under his seal and signature. [SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1525 OF 2022 Kiran Sunder Anchan ] ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b Mr. Vaibhav G. Bagade for the applicant. … Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P. for the State. Mr. Rajiv Sakpal, PI attached to Andheri Police Station is present in the court. … CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2022. P.C.:- C.R. No.372 of 2022 came to be registered with Andheri Police Station on 23/04/2022, pursuant to a raid conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar, Bengali Chawl, Koldongri, Sahara Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai. The incident resulted in invoking Sections 308, 294, 114 and Section 34 of the IPC read with Sections 3, 8(1), (2), (4) and 33 (R) of the Maharashtra AJN This order stands corrected as per speaking to the minutes order dated 17.06.2022 . Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein) Act, 2016. The said C.R. arraign 22 persons as accused and the applicant came to be arraigned as accused No.19. Relying upon the remand report, learned counsel would submit that the Manager as well as the cashier of the concerned Bar, in which the raid was conducted, are arrested. One Shridhar Shetty (accused No.23) is the owner of the Bar, who has been released on bail in an anticipatory bail application. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the applicant advanced an argument that the applicant is the Manager in one Hotel Mansa Bar & Restaurant, Andheri and he has been arraigned as an accused, without any connection with the raid conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar. Learned A.P.P. was, therefore, asked to ascertain the factual position. Learned A.P.P. states that the FIR makes a reference to Kiran Pujari and the applicant is Kiran Sunder Anchan and learned A.P.P. is unable to point out any positive material to demonstrate that the person named in the FIR is the applicant. In any case, when specifically asked as to what is the connection with the owner/Manager of the other Bars, operating within the jurisdiction of Andheri Police Station and why all of them are arraigned as accused, no response is coming forward from the side of the prosecution. In the absence of any involvement of the applicant in the raid, which was conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar and since the applicant was neither the owner nor employed in the said Bar and, in fact, the owner of the Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar is informed to have been granted protection, there is no reason why the same protection cannot be extended to the present applicant. Hence, the following order: ORDER (a) In the event of arrest, the applicant Kiran Sunder Anchan shall be released on bail in C.R. No.372 of 2022 registered with Andheri Police Station, District Mumbai, on executing P.R. bond to the extent of Rs.25,000**/**- and furnishing one or two sureties of the like amount. (b) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case and shall not tamper with prosecution evidence. (c) The applicant shall report to the Andheri Police AJN This order stands corrected as per speaking to the minutes order dated 17.06.2022 . Station from 20/06/2022 to 22/06/2022 between 3.00 p.m. and 5.00 p.m. and, thereafter, as and when directed. The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed off in the above terms. All parties are directed to act on the downloaded copy of the order supplied by the Advocate under his seal and signature. [SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1525 OF 2022 Kiran Sunder Anchan ] ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent … … Ms. Keral Mehta for the applicant. Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2022. P.C.:- Not on board. On mentioning, taken on board. It is pointed out that there are certain errors in the operative part of the order dated 13/06/2022 inasmuch as, the word 'temporarily' appearing in clause (a) of the operative part, is an inadvertent error and the same needs to be deleted. Similarly, paragraph No.6 is an inadvertent error and the same be replaced as follows: "6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed off in the above terms." The Order dated 13/06/2022 be corrected accordingly. [SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.] AJN

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 559 OF 2018 Jamila Nasir Shaikh ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Vijay Dhananjay Upadhyay For Applicant Adv. A. A. Takalkar APP for State CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 21st March, 2018 P.C. : Stand over to 22/03/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 559 OF 2018 Mrs. Jamila Nasir Shaikh .Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. V. D. Upadhyay, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs. J. S. Lohokare, APP, for the Respondent – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 22.03.2018 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this Application, the Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with C. R. No. 56 of 2018 registered with the Malvani Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 363, 364(A), 342, 354(D), 366, 506 r/w 34of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 9, 10 & 11 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act ( for short 'POCSO' ). Learned counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant has not been named in the FIR and that the allegations are essentially as against co-accused – Sohail. He submits that even in the remand report, the Applicant's name has not been disclosed. Learned APP states that the victim has taken the name of the Applicant as being the person who was present at the place where the incident took place. She submits that investigation is still in progress. Learned APP seeks time to take detailed instructions. In the meantime, till the next date, the Applicant is granted interim protection on the following terms & conditions :- O R D E R (i) In the event of arrest, the Applicant be enlarged on bail, on executing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount; (ii) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer of the concerned police station on 2 nd & 3rd April, 2018 between 10:00 a. m. and 12:00 noon. Stand over to 10.04.2018 . To be listed on the Supplementary Board . All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPTORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 559 OF 2018 Jamila Nasir Shaikh Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. Vijay Upadhyay for the Applicant Ms. J. S. Lohokare, A.P.P for the Respondent-State API Mr. Ananda Vishnu Bagadi from Malvani Police Station is present CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. TUESDAY, 10th APRIL, 2018 P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. By this application, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No. 56 of 2018 registered with the Malvani Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 363, 364(A), 342, 354(D), 366, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 9, 10 and 11 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has not been named in the FIR and that the allegations are essentially as against co-accused-Sohail. He submits that even in the remand report, the applicant's name has not been disclosed. Perused the papers. It appears and it is not disputed by the learned A.P.P that the victim has taken the name of the person, as she was present at the place where the incident took place. Learned A.P.P submits that apart from the same, there are no other allegations qua the applicant. It appears that the applicant has reported to the Investigating Officer pursuant to the interim protection granted to her vide order dated 22nd March, 2018. Considering the role of the applicant, custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required. Hence, the applicant is granted pre-arrest bail on the following terms and conditions : ORDER (i) In the event of the arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount ; (ii) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station as and when called; (iii) The applicant shall not tamper or attempt to influence the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case. (iv) The applicant to cooperate with the investigating agency; The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of. It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie, for the purpose of deciding this application. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2821 OF 2022 …. Kunal Sunil Hargude ...Applicant Versus State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Rahul Kadam, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. A. A. Khatavkar, PSI Shikrapur Police Station present. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : th 12 October, 2022. PER COURT : Heard both sides. Stand over to 19th October, 2022. 'for passing order'. Till then the applicant shall not be arrested. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 6: 11.ABA.2821.2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2821 OF 2022 Kunal Sunil Hargude Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Rahul S. Kadam, Advocate for applicant. MsP.N.Dabholkar, APP, for State. Mr.Tejas S. Pawar, Advocate for complainant. API V.S.Pawar, Shikrapur Police Station, present. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 19th October 2022 PC : Learned Advocate Mr.T.S.Pawar submitted that he has instructions to appear for the complainant. He undertakes to file his vakalatnama. He is permitted to appear for complainant in this application. Copy of application be served upon him by advocate for applicant. Stand over to 14th November 2022. Interim relief to continue. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 2821 OF 2022 Kunal Sunil Hargude ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3722 OF 2022 In Cr. Anticipatory Bail Appln. 2821 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Adhik Kadam i/by Mr. Rahul Kadam for Applicant Mr. A. A. Palkar APP for State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE J DATE : 14th November, 2022 P.C. : Not before the Bench of which Justice Sandeep K. Shinde is a member. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3496 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude and another … Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent AND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2821 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3722 OF 2022 Kunal Sunil Hargude … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents …...... …...... Mr. Ashish Vernekar for the Applicants in ABA-3496-2022. Mr. Rahul Kadam for the applicant in ABA-2821-2022. Mr. P.H. Gaikwad Patil, APP for the State. CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 13 FEBRUARY 2023 P.C. :- The learned Counsel for the parties submits that the settlement talks are going on. In view thereof, stand over to 3 March 2023. Interim order to continue till next date. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. ) KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI Digitally signed by KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI Date: 2023.02.13 18:44:52 +0530 Kanchan P Dhuri 1 / 1

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3496 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude and another … Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent AND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2821 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3722 OF 2022 …...... …...... Kunal Sunil Hargude … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Ashish Vernekar for the Applicants in ABA-3496-2022. Mr. Rahul Kadam for the Applicant in ABA-2821-2022. Mr. P.H. Gaikwad Patil, APP for the State. CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 3 MARCH 2023 P.C. :- At the request of the learned Counsel for the Applicants, stand over to 21 March 2023. Interim order to continue till next date. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. ) KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI Digitally signed by KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI Date: 2023.03.04 10:25:56 +0530 Kanchan P Dhuri 1 / 1

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3496 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude and anr … Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2821 OF 2022 Kunal Sunil Hargude … Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent WITH CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3722 OF 2022 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2821 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude … Intervenor In the matter between Kunal Sunil Hargude … Applicant Versus ~ ~ State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr.Satyavrat Joshi a/w Mr. Ashish S. Vernekar for the Applicant in ABA/3496/2022. …...... Mr. Rahul S. Kadam for the Applicant in ABA/2821/2022. Mr. P.H. Gaikwad Patil, APP for the Respondent – State. Ravikiran Mohan Jadhav, PH 2229, Shikrapur Police Station, Pune, present. CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 21 MARCH 2023 P.C. :- At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant, stand over to 12th April, 2023. Ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue till the next date. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. )

Order - Status 17: 7-aba-3496-22 @ G.doc DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Digitally signed by DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Date: 2023.04.12 14:07:00 +0500 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3496 OF 2022 Sunil N. Hargude and anr. …Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents. WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2821 OF 2022 Kunal S. Hargude …Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. WITH CONNECTED INTERIM APPLICATION Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w. Mr. Ashish S. Vernekar for the Applicants in ABA 3496/22. Mr. Rahul S. Kadam for the Applicant in ABA 2821/22. Mrs.Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Tejas S. Pawar for the Intervenor. CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 12.04.2023. P.C. : List on 13 June 2023. The interim order, if any, to continue till the next date. [N.R.BORKAR, J.]

Order - Status 19: VRJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3496 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude & Anr. … Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2821 OF 2022 Kunal Sunil Hargude … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3722 OF 2022 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2821 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude … Applicant the matter between In Kunal Sunil Hargude … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Ashish S. Vernekar for the applicant in ABA/3496/2022. Mr. Rahul S. Kadam for the applicant in ABA/2821/2022. Mr. Tejas S. Pawar for the applicnat in IA/3722/2022. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JUNE 13, 2023 P.C.: 1. Stand over to 4 th July 2023. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till 4th July 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 3496 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude And Anr APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 2821 OF 2022 Kunal Sunil Hargude APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 25th July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 10/08/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3496 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude and anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent WITH CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2821 OF 2022 Kunal Sunil Hargude ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent WITH CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3722 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2821 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude ...Applicant In the matter between : Kunal Sunil Hargude ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Samay Pawar i/b. Mr. Ashish Vernekar for the Applicant in ABA . Mrs. Geeta P. Mulekar, APP for the Respondent-State. API V. S. Pawar, Shikrapur Police Station, Pune, present. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 24 AUGUST 2023 P. C. : At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, stand over to 13 September 2023. Interim order, granted earlier, shall continue to operate till next date. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3496 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude and Anr. … Applicants versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2821 OF 2022 Kunal Sunil Hargude … Applicant versus State Of Maharashtra … Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3722 OF 2022 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2821 OF 2022 Sunil Namdev Hargude … Applicant and Kunal Sunil Hargude … Applicant versus State Of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Samay Pawar i/by Mr. Ashish S. Vernekar, for Applicants in ABA 3496 of 2022. Mr. Rahul S. Kadam, for Applicant in ABA 2821 of 2022. Mr. M.G.Patil, APP for State. Mr. Amol Anil Khatavkar, PSI Shikrapur Police Station present. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 9 OCTOBER 2023 P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2821 OF 2021 This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R.No.803 of 2022 registered with Shikrapur Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 420, 465, 467, 471 of IPC. 3**.** The Applicant Kunal is the son of Applicant No.1 Sunil in ABA No.3496 of 2022. Applicant No.2 Ganesh is the brother of Applicant No.1 Sunil and uncle of Kunal. The first informant Sunil had lodged a report against Kunal with the allegations that his relations with his wife Dwarka have been strained. Dwarka and Kunal are residing separetely. Disputes arose over the ancestral properties. A civil suit is instituted by Kunal in the Court at Shirur. Namdev, the father of Sunil and Ganesh and grand-father of Kunal was bed-ridden. Namdev passed away on 14 April 2022. The first informant alleged that after the death of Namdev, it transpired that the applicant had obtained a Power of Attorney and Agreement for sale by setting up an imposter. On the basis of the said forged documents, the applicant also got executed the sale deed in his name. After realizing the fraud, the first informant lodged the report. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3496 OF 2022 This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R.No.1004 of 2022 registered with Shikrapur Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 341, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 3 read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. Subsequently, Section 307 of the IPC came to be added. Kunal lodged a report with the allegations that on 9 November 2022 while he was passing from behind John Dear Factory on Talegaon Dhamdhere to Sanaswadi Road, a car intercepted him. Three persons alighted from the said car and they boarded the first informant's car. One of those persons was armed with a knife like sharp weapon. The first informant was assaulted on his right hand. One of the assailants pointed a pistol at the neck of the first informant and threatened to shoot him if he did not return the lands to his father and uncle. The assailants declared that they were sent by the applicants – Sunil and Ganesh. Initially this Court has granted interim protection in both the matters. The learned Counsel for the Applicant in ABA 2821 of 2022 submits that the applicants have amicably resolved the disputes and the applicant – Kunal has filed an application for quashing of the prosecution. The learned Counsel for the Applicants in ABA 3496 of 2022 also submits that in view of the settlement, those applicants are also in the process of filing an application for quashing the prosecution. Evidently, the genesis of the offences is in the dispute between the father and son over the ancestral properties. It appears that a suit was instituted by the applicant – Kunal during the lifetime of his grand-father. The allegations of forgery and using the forged documents for the purpose of cheating revolve around documents. At this length of time, the custodial interrogation of the applicants does not seem to be warranted. I am, therefore, inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the applicants. Hence, the following order : ORDER ABA NO.2821 OF 2022 (i) In the event of the arrest of the Applicant – Kunal Sunil Hargude in connection with C.R.No.803 of 2022 registered with Shikrapur Police Station, the Applicant be released on bail on furnishing a PR bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. (ii) The Applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and report to Shikrapur Police Station on 16th, 17th and 18 October 2023 in between 10.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. (iii) The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and/or give threat or inducement to the first informant or any of the prosecution witnesses or any of the persons acquainted with the facts of the case. (iv) The Applicant shall produce all the original documents which are in his SSP 4/6 custody before the Investigating Officer. (v) The Applicant shall also submit his specimen handwriting and signature to the Investigating Officer. (vi) The Applicant shall regularly attend the proceedings before the jurisdictional Court. ABA NO.3496 OF 2022 (vii) In the event of the arrest of the applicants – Sunil Namdev Hargude and Ganesh Namdev Hargude in connection with C.R.No.1004 of 2022 registered with Shikrapur Police Station, they be released on bail on furnishing a PR bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount. (viii) The Applicants shall co-operate with the investigation and report to Shikrapur Police Station on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2023 in between 10.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. (ix) The Applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and/or give threat or inducement to the first informant or any of the prosecution witnesses or any of the persons acquainted with the facts of the case. (x) The Applicants shall regularly attend the proceedings before the jurisdictional Court. (xi) The applications stand disposed. (xii) The Interim application also stands disposed. (xiii) It is clarified that these prima facie observations are confined to determine entitlement to pre-arrest bail only. ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2020 Jayesh Thokarshi Shah ….Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent **** Mr. S.S. Karmarkar i/by. Karmarkar & Associates, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for the State. PSI, Mr. Anil More, Mira Road Police Station present. CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. Thursday, 23 January, 2020. P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the applicant, list as per the CMIS date. Interim relief is refused. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 184 OF 2020 Jayesh Thokarshi Shah ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE, J DATE : 20th February, 2020 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 18/03/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Diksha Rane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 184/2020 JAYESH THOKARSHI SHAH ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Mr. Vrindavan Patil i/b. Kamalakar & Asso. for the applicant. Smt. M.R. Tidke, APP for the respondent – State. ------------ C0RAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : OCTOBER 22, 2021 P.C. : At the request of learned APP, stand over to October 25, (M.S.KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 184 OF 2020 Jayesh Thokarshi Shah APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 25th October, 2021 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 30/10/2021 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: PMB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.184 OF 2020 Jayesh Thokarshi Shah .. Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. S.S. Karmarkar i/b M/s. Karmarkar and Associates for the Applicant. Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for the State. Mr. Sachin Kotmire, P.I., Mira Road Police Station. CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 26, 2021 P.C.:- At request of learned counsel for the applicant, stand over to 06.12.2021. (M.S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 15: Diksha Rane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2020 JAYESH THOKARSHI SHAH ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Mr. S.S. Karmarkar i/b. Karmarkar & Associates for applicant. Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for State. Mr. Sachin Kotmire, PI, Mira Road Police Station. ------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : DECEMBER 6, 2021 P.C. : Stand over to 8th December, 2021 for passing orders. (M.S.KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 19: Ingale FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2020 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. S.S. Karmarkar i/b Karmarkar & Associates, for the Applicant. Mr.N.B. Patil, APP for the respondent. CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J. DATE : DECEMBER 8 2021 $$ Learned Counsel for the applicant has served some documents on the learned APP. He requests for time to go through the same. Stand over to 17/12/2021 at 5.00 p.m. (M.S.KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 22: Diksha Rane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 184/2020 JAYESH THOKARSHI SHAH ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ None for the applicant. Smt. Veera Shinde, APP for the State. Mr. Sachin Kotmire, PI, Mira Road Police Station. C0RAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2021 P.C. : None for the applicant. Only by way of an indulgence, list the application on 6/1/2022, at 5.00 p.m. (M.S.KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 184 OF 2020 Jayesh Thokarshi Shah ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr.S.S.Karmarkar i/b M/s.KARMARKAR AND ASSOCIATES for Applicant. Smt.Veera Shinde - APP for State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 14th February, 2022 P.C. : At the request of the learned APP, stand over to 17/02/2022 . Ad-interim/ Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 184 OF 2020 Jayesh Thokarshi Shah ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr.S.S.Karmarkar i/b. KARMARKAR AND ASSOCIATES for Applicant. Mr.A.R.Patil - APP for State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 17th February, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 18/02/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: Diksha Rane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION DIKSHA DINESH RANE Digitally signed by DIKSHA DINESH RANE Date: 2022.02.18 15:52:51 +0530 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 184/2020 JAYESH THOKARSHI SHAH ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Dr. Samarth S. Karmarkar a/w. Nilam Pawar, Mr. V. V. Patil i/ b. Kamalakar & Asso. for the applicant. Mrs. P. P. Shinde, APP for the respondent – State. Mr. Sachin Kotmire, PI, Mira Road Police Station. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2022. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP. Learned APP, on instructions, submits that earlier investigating officer is transferred and new investigating officer has taken over the investigation. My attention is invited to the order dated January 23, 2020 passed by this Court refusing interim relief. This Court had adjourned the matter as per the CMIS date at the request of learned counsel for the applicant. When the matter came up today, learned APP, on instructions of the investigating officer submitted that as the allegations pertain to the offences punishable under sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 447, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Court, the investigating officer wants to investigate the crime on the basis of the documents which are in possession of the applicant. For the present, it is indicated that, if the applicant presents himself before the investigating officer with the documents required for the purpose of investigation, that would suffice. In this with of the matter, the following order is passed. ORDER In the event of the arrest of the applicant in C. R. No. 59/2019 of the Mira Road Police Station, the applicant shall be released on his executing PR bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount. The applicant shall furnish his residential address and contact details to the investigating officer. The applicant shall not tamper with the witnesses or try to contact them. The applicant to attend the investigating officer on 21st, 22nd and 23rd, February, 2022, between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. and thereafter, as and when necessary. Stand over to March 7, 2022. (M.S.KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 30: Diksha Rane DIKSHA DINESH RANE Digitally signed by DIKSHA DINESH RANE Date: 2022.02.26 16:07:03 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2020 JAYESH THOKARSHI SHAH ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Dr. Samarth S. Karmarkar a/w. Ms. Kalyani Virkar I.b, Karmarkar & Associates for the applicant. Smt. Veera Shinde, APP for the respondent – State. Mr. Sachin Kotmire, PI, Mira Road Police Station. ------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2022. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the applicant. This is an application for grant of pre-arrest bail in respect of C. R. No. 59/2019 registered with the Mira Road Police Station under sections 420, 465, 467, 471, 447, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. In brief, it is the prosecution case that the complainant lodged report at police station that the applicant (original accused no.1) along with accused no.2 executed Power of Attorney and sold out property situated at Mauje Goddeo, Old Survey no. 367, Hissa No. 02A/01, new Survey No.64/2/A/1, admeasuring 0.30.09 to accused no. 3. The accused no. 3 had prepared forged map of land and submitted to Mira Bhaindar Municipal Corporation and made encroachment on the land. On 19/6/2018, the accused had a scuffle with the complainant and his employee and abused them. The dispute is in respect of the land which the complainant claims to be lawfully in occupation of. It is the applicant's case that he was falsely implicated in this crime. According to him, Shri Renald Miranda, Nirmala Miranda, Bibiyan Mure, Reeta Toni Miranda, Linet Menzes, Nelson Mirandam, Tereza Mendosa, Brunadet Kado had executed Power of Attorney in favour of Jayesh Thakarshi Shah (applicant) who was a partner of the company on 25/6/1989. The applicant sold the property to M/s. V. P. Developers, partner Shri Vallabhadas G. Thakkar, Pankaj S. Shah on 10/8/1990. According to learned counsel for the applicant, since then, the applicant has no concern with the said property. On 18/2/2022, the following order came to be passed:- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP. Learned APP, on instructions, submits that earlier investigating officer is transferred and new investigating officer has taken over the investigation. My attention is invited to the order dated January 23, 2020 passed by this Court refusing interim relief. This Court had adjourned the matter as per the CMIS date at the request of learned counsel for the applicant. When the matter came up today, learned APP, on instructions of the investigating officer submitted that as the allegations pertain to the offences punishable under sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 447, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Court, the investigating officer wants to investigate the crime on the basis of the documents which are in possession of the applicant. For the present, it is indicated that, if the applicant presents himself before the investigating officer with the documents required for the purpose of investigation, that would suffice. In this with of the matter, the following order is passed. ORDER In the event of the arrest of the applicant in C. R. No. 59/2019 of the Mira Road Police Station, the applicant shall be released on his executing PR bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/ with one or more sureties in the like amount. The applicant shall furnish his residential address and contact details to the investigating officer. The applicant shall not tamper with the witnesses or try to contact them. The applicant to attend the investigating officer on 21st, 22nd and 23rd, February, 2022, between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. and thereafter, as and when necessary. Stand over to March 7, 2022." Learned APP, on instructions from the investigating officer who is present in the Court, submits that the applicant co-operated with the investigation and submitted all the original documents which investigating officer needed for the purpose of investigation. The alleged offence is mainly based on documentary evidence. The investigating officer submits that the documents produced are sufficient for the purpose of investigation. As the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required, the application deserves to be allowed in the following terms: - ORDER i. In the event of the arrest of the applicant in connection with C. R. No. 59/2019 of the Mira Road Police Station, the applicant shall be released on his executing PR bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount. ii. The applicant shall furnish his residential address and contact details to the investigating officer. iii. The applicant shall not tamper with the witnesses or try to contact them. iv. The applicant shall report to the investigating officer as and when called. v. The application stands disposed of. (M.S.KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1205 OF 2019 Uday Manohar Sule .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ….... Mr.S.V. Marwadi i/b. N.M. Nadar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr.Anilkumar Patil, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 06th JUNE, 2019 P.C. : Learned Counsel for the Applicant on instructions of the daughter of the Applicant, who is present in the Court, prays for withdrawal of this Application. Liberty as prayed for is granted. The Application is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of accordingly. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.886 OF 2017 Dilip @ Deepak Shankar Karanjkar Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Avnendra Kumar i/by Rahul Tiwari for Applicant. Smt.J.S.Lohokare, APP, for State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 05th June 2017 PC : Learned advocate for Applicant states that he has not served copy of application to the office of Public Prosecutors. He, therefore, seeks a week's time. Request is accepted. Stand over to 12th June 2017. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 886 of 2017 Dilip @ Deepak Shankar Karanjkar …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Rahul Tiwari for the applicant. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the respondentState. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 12 JUNE 2017 P.C. : This is an application for anticipatory bail in connection with C.R. No. 78 of 2017 registered with Kurar Police Station, Malad(E), Mumbai for the offences punishable under section 135 and 138 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003. The FIR was registered on 5 April, 2017. It is the prosecution case that the officers employed with Reliance Energy Ltd. has conducted raid on 5 April, 2017 and they noticed theft of electricity is being committed from Mini Pillar and seven cables found on terrace of Sai Medical which were running through drainage. It was noticed that electricity supply was being provided to 500 to 600 unauthorised hutment dwellers which are situated 700 to 800 meters within forest area. On enquiry, it was revealed that the applicant and the coaccused Satyawan Chavan and Manoj Jadhav had committed theft of electricity and supplied the same to the hutment dwellers. It was further revealed that theft of electricity was committed from 6 October, 2016 to 5 April, 2017 and around 467240 units worth Rs.79,43,086/ were utilized by the accused. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this crime. He has not committed the said offence. The prosecution has relied upon the hearsay evidence which was devoid of any merits. He submitted that there is no evidence to connect the applicant with the said crime. Learned APP submitted that the applicant is involved in the said crime. This fact is evident from the statements of hutment dwellers which were recorded during the course of investigation. The witnesses have stated that the applicant and the coaccused had provided them the electricity from the said cables. He further pointed out that two other accused are absconding. He also submitted that at the earlier point of time similar FIR was registered against the applicant with same police station vide C.R No.137 of 2016. He submitted that the accused/applicant is habitual offender and is involved in such activities repeatedly and therefore the anticipatory bail application should be rejected. Considering the aforesaid submissions and taking into consideration the involvement of the applicant which is based on the statement of the witnesses and also looking into the fact that the applicant has earlier committed the similar offence, I am not inclined to grant this application. Hence I pass the following order; :: ORDER :: (i) Anticipatory Bail Application no.886 of 2017 is rejected. (ii) Application stands disposed of. [PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1 OF 2018 Vijay Ramdas Nikam And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.Balkrishna D Joshi For Applicant Mrs.P.P. Shinde - APP for State CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 5th January, 2018 P.C. : Learned APP waives service and seeks time to take instructions. Time as prayed for is granted. Stand over to 10/01/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1 OF 2018 Vijay Ramdas Nikam And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.Balkrishna D Joshi For Applicant Ms.Veera Shinde - APP for State CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 10th January, 2018 P.C. : Stand over to 29/01/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 01 OF 2018 Shri Vijay Ramdas Nikam & Ors. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Virendra Pethe i/b Mr. Balkrishna D. Joshi, for the applicant. Mr. S.R.Agarkar,APP, for the State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J. DATE : 22nd January, 2018. P.C. : It is submitted that the applicant No.2 has been detected with malignant tumor. The report of Tata Memorial Centre dated 4.1.2018 indicates that the liver lesio biopsy was taken. Biopsy shows high grade malignant tumor. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that he would give the photocopies of the report to the learned APP during the course of the day. The learned APP to take instructions to that effect. The matter to be listed on 29.1.2018. (SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1 OF 2018 Vijay Ramdas Nikam And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.Balkrishna Joshi for Applicant Ms.Veera Shinde - APP for State CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 29th January, 2018 P.C. : Stand over to 07/02/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1 OF 2018 Vijay Ramdas Nikam And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 7th February, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Stand over to 12/02/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1 OF 2018 Vijay Ramdas Nikam And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 12th February, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Stand over to 27/02/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1 OF 2018 Vijay Ramdas Nikam And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J DATE : 27th February, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for 05/03/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: Sarnobat IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 01 OF 2018 Shri Vijay Ramdas Nikam & Ors.... Applicants.Vs.... Respondent. WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 03 OF 2018. Vijay Pundalik Patil. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. .. Applicant. .. Respondent. Mr. Balkrishna D. Joshi for the Applicants in ABA No. 01/18. Mr. Anoop U. Patil, for the Applicant in ABA No. 03/18. Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent/State. $frac{text{CORAM}}{text{DATE}} : underline{P. N. DESHMUKH, J.}$ P. C. : Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that as per telephonic instructions, applicant No. 1 is arrested on 1 st March, 2018. Learned counsel for applicants is not aware of the said fact. Learned counsel for applicant No. 3 submits that applicant has provided his bank accounts with the Investigating Officer and that applicant No. 2 is not arrested in view of oral directions of this Court being a Cancer patient. This statement is also made by Additional (13(14)ABA118 ABA318 Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for the applicant in ABA No. 03/2018 submits that as per oral directions of this Court, applicant has submitted his accounts and that his bank accounts are freezed and therefore, submits that applicant be protected by interim protection. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor seeks time for want of instructions as I.O. is not present. Record reveals that notice is issued to Respondent on 5th January, 2018 and time was granted to file affidavit in reply which was further extended on 10th January, 2018 and 29th January, 2018 and thereafter on three occasions, application came to be adjourned for want of time. In these circumstances, as further time is granted to file affidavit in reply, following order is passed. ORDER (i) In the event of arrest of applicant Nos. 1 and 3 in ABA No.01/2018 and applicant in ABA No. 03/2018, in Crime No. 396/2017 registered with Sarkarwada Police Station, Nasik, they shall be released on bail on their executing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with one surety in the like amount. (ii) The above applicants shall attend Investigating Officer for a period of one week from 8th March, 2018. 2/3 (13(14)ABA118 ABA318 (iii) ABA No. 03/2018 be heard along with this application. (iv) Stand over to 19th March, 2018. [ P. N. DESHMUKH , J.]

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION No. 1 OF 2018 Vijay Ramdas Nikam & Ors. … Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION No. 3 OF 2018 Vijay Pundalik Patil … Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent *** Mr. Virendra Pethe i/b Balkrishna D. Joshi, for the Applicants in ABA. 1/2018. Mr. Anoop Patil, for Applicant in ABA. 3/2018. *** Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : P. N. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : MARCH 19, 2018 PC :- . Learned counsel for Applicants submits that Applicant / accused No.1 in ABA No. 1/2018 was arrested on 1st March, 2018. Learned counsel further submits that Applicant No. 3 for want of knowledge of order dated 5th March, 2018 since not communicated by his counsel has not attended investigating officer for a period of one week from 8th March, 2018. None appears for Applicant No. 1 in ABA. No. 3/2018. Applicant No. 3 in ABA. No. 1/2018 to attend Investigating Officer for a period of one week and shall co-operate with the investigation. S. O. to 2nd April, 2018. Interim order to continue till next date.

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTI.BAIL APPLICATION NO.01 OF 2018 Vijay Ramdas Nikam 2. Anil Navnath Shinde 3. Sarangdhar Yadav Pansare .. Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent with ANTI.BAIL APPLICATION NO.03 OF 2018 Vijay Pundalik Patil .. Applicant vs 1. State of Maharasjtra 2.The Sarkarwada Police Stn. Dist Nasik .. Respondents Nr.Balkrishna D.Joshi for Applicants in ABA NO.01/2018 Mr.Anoop U.Patil for Applicant in ABA No.3/2018 Mr.Sandeep Barve for Intervener Ms.Veera Shinde Addl.Public Prosecutor for State CORAM : P. N.DESHMUKH,, J. DATE : 2ND APRIL, 2018. P.C.: Learned counsel Mr.Sandeep Barve submits that he be granted one week's time to file an application to intervene in this application. In that view of the matter, stand over to 11.4.2018. Interim orders to continue till the adjourned date. (P.N.DESHMUKH, J.) rng

Order - Status 27: Sarnobat IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAL APPLICATION NO. 01 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 430 OF 2018 Vijay Ramdas Nikam & Ors. Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. Respondent. Mr. Virendra Pethe i/by Mr. Balkrishna D. Joshi, for the Applicants. Mr. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent. CORAM : P. N. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 11th APRIL, 2018. P. C. : Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant No.1 Vijay Ramdas Nikam is already arrested and as such submits that application be allowed to be withdrawn against him as same is rendered infructuous and further contended that applicant No. 2-Anil Navnath Shinde has expired as he was suffering from Cancer. Learned APP on instructions from investigating officer confirms the same. Learned counsel submits that applicant No. 3-Sarangdhar Yadav Pansare do not want to prosecute this application and on his instruction seeks leave to withdraw the said application. In view of submissions advanced as aforesaid, application of applicant Nos. 1 and 2 stand disposed of, as application filed by applicant No.1 is rendered infructuous, since arrested, and applicant No. 2 is dead. Application of applicant No. 3 is allowed to be withdrawn as prayed for and as such stands dismissed. Anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of. In view of above, application No. 430/2018 for intervention is become infructuous and accordingly disposed of. [ P. N. DESHMUKH , J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 697 OF 2014 Shashikant Chandrakant Rane vs. … Applicant The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents Mr. R. Sathyanarayanan, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Alpa Javeri, APP for the State. I.O. Mr. P.D. Kadam, A.S.I., LCB, Ratnagiri present. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 17th June, 2014. P.C. This Application for anticipatory bail is moved directly before this Court. Learned APP, on instructions from the police constable of Ratnagiri Police Station, makes a statement that on the basis of complaint of Mrs. Suhasini Chavan, no offence is registered at Ratnagiri Police Statement. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this Application, as the applicant/accused wants to file an Application before the Sessions Court, Thane. As the offence is registered at C.R. No. I264/2013 with Dombivli Police Station, Thane, the learned counsel is allowed to withdraw this Application for anticipatory bail with liberty to file an Application before Sessions Court, Thane. Hence, the Application for the anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1647 OF 2021 Ashok Gena Sarwade .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent … … Mr.Vikrant V. Phatate for the Applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the State. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 17th JULY, 2021 P.C:- On showing disinclination to grant the relief as prayed for, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J M.M.Salgaonkar

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1462 OF 2022 Sunil Bherulal Joshi APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Adv. Lalita L. Rajguru for Applicant Shri. A. A. Palkar, APP for State CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE J DATE : 6th June, 2022 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant , stand over to 13/06/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1462 OF 2022 Sunil Bherulal Joshi ] ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent … … Mr. Alankar Kirpekar i/b Ms. Lalita Rajguru for the applicant. Mr. A.A. Palkar, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2022. P.C.:- The applicant is arraigned as accused No.1 in C.R. No.213 of 2022 registered with Naya Nagar Police Station invoking Sections 498A, 376 and 384 of the IPC. On the basis of the complaint, the applicant, mother in law, father in law and sister in law were arraigned as accused. The complaint lodged on 26/03/2022 narrates that the complainant was married to the applicant on 04/12/2017 and when she started cohabiting in the matrimonial house, she was subjected to harassment. It is stated that on 16/08/2020, she was driven out of the house and she went to her parental house. Thereafter, on 02/03/2021, the matter was reconciled between the husband and the wife and, she again started residing with the applicant in their house located at Mira Road, Thane, but her allegation is that the harassment continued. She states that she was harassed by her mother-in-law, father-in-law and sister-inlaw, who used to trouble her by insulting her. As far as father-in-law is concerned, serious allegations are leveled against him, seeking sexual favours and indulging in forcible sexual intercourse, due to which Section 376 of the IPC came to invoked against him. The father in law was granted protection from arrest by me by order dated 07/06/2022 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.1484 of 2022. Perusal of the accusation leveled against the applicant, justifying invocation of Section 498A of the IPC falls short of harassment and cruelty, contemplated under Section 498A of the IPC. The marriage was solemnized in the year 2017, but the FIR was registered after four years and when the FIR is perused the allegations are vague in nature and bereft of any particular material, barring that she was driven out from the matrimonial house. In the wake of the above, the applicant deserves an interim AJN protection subject to the stipulation that he shall render cooperation to the Investigating Officer. Hence the following order: ORDER (a) In the event of arrest, the applicant Sunil Bherulal Joshi shall be temporarily released on bail in C.R. No.213 of 2022 registered with Naya Nagar Police Station, District Thane, on executing P.R. bond to the extent of Rs.25,000**/** and furnishing one or two sureties of the like amount. (b) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case and shall not tamper with prosecution evidence. List the application along with Anticipatory Bail Application No.1484 of 2022 on 11/07/2022. All parties are directed to act on the downloaded copy of the order supplied by the Advocate under his seal and signature. [SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1484 OF 2022 Bherulal Govind Joshi ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1462 OF 2022 Sunil Bherulal Joshi ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Alankar Kirpekar a/w. Ms. Lalita Rajguru, Mr. Piyush Tiwari i/b. Lalita Rajguru, for the Applicant Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent/State. Mr. Vinayak Jadhav, API, Naya Nagar police station. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2023 P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. This application is preferred seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No. 213 of 2023 registered at Naya Nagar police station for the offences punishable under sections 376 and 498-A and 384 of Indian penal Code, 1860. The applicant in ABA No. 1484 of 2022 is the father in law of the first informant. The applicant in ABA No. 1462 of 2022 is her husband. In ABA No. 1484 of 2022, by an order dated 7th June, 2022 this Court was persuaded to grant interim protection ascribing reasons. The applicant in ABA No. 1462 of 2022 was also granted interim protection by an order dated 13th June, 2022. Both the applicants have attended the police station and cooperated with the investigation. So far as the applicant in ABA No. 1484 of 2022, the allegations are of illtreatment and sexual assault. While granting interim bail, this Court had adverted to the aspects of delay and the element of probability. Those reasons also weigh with the Court, in making the order of interim bail absolute. So far as the applicant in ABA No. 1462 of 2022 the allegations are primarily of matrimonial cruelty. I am, therefore, inclined to make the order of interim bail absolute qua Sunil Joshi as well. The order of interim bail dated 7th June, 2022 qua the applicant Bherulal Joshi (ABA No. 1484 of 2022) is made absolute on the terms and conditions incorporated therein. The order of temporary bail dated 13th June, 2022 qua the applicant Sunil Joshi (ABA No. 1462 of 2022) is made absolute on the terms and conditions incorporated therein. The applicants henceforth shall appear before the investigating officer as and when directed. The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and give threat or inducement to first informant, any of the prosecution witnesses or any person acquainted with the facts of the case. The applicants shall regularly attend the proceedings before the jurisdictional Court. It is clarified that these prima facie observations are confined to determine entitlement to pre-arrest bail only. Applications disposed. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.)