Tag: Criminal Anticipatory Bail

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 696 OF 2014 Shashikant Chandrakant Rane … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. R. Sathyanarayanan, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP for the State. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 17th June, 2014. P.C. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the police from Mulund Police Station have arrested the applicant/accused, hence this Application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous and so he wants to withdraw this Application. Hence, the Application for the anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 4: SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2023.06.02 16:44:17 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr.Mayank Joshi – Advocate for Applicants. Mr.Y.Y.Dabke – APP for the Respondent – State. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : st 31 MAY, 2023 P. C. :- Mentioned out of turn. Learned Advocate for the Applicants seeks liberty to carry out an amendment in the Application. Liberty granted. It be carried out within a week. Copy be served on other side. Matter be kept on 13th June, 2023. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant And Anr. APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIRAM MADHUSUDAN MODAK J DATE : 17th July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 17/08/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant And Anr. APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIRAM MADHUSUDAN MODAK J DATE : 24th July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 28/07/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Mayank Joshi - Advocate for the Applicant Mr. H. J. Dedhia - APP for the Respondent/State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 28th JULY, 2023 P. C. :- The Respondent No. 2 is department of the CGST. Recently, they have not been served about circulation. Matter be kept on 31st July, 2023, high on board. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 13: +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr.Mayank Joshi a/w Mr.Sumedh Sonawane and Mr.Parshva Bhankharia – Advocates for Applicants. Mr.H.J.Dedhia – APP for Respondent No.1 – State. Mr.Santosh Khedkar – Assistant Commissioner SGST–Mazgaon, Mumbai–INV–044. Mr.Rajendra Pisal – State Tax Officer–Thane–THA–SUR–C–002. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATED : 31ST JULY 2023 P. C. : Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants. There is a preliminary objection taken by learned APP about placing this Application before the concerned Court. According to him, Thane Office of Sales Tax Department is not going to lodge prosecution but Competent Authority is the Mazgaon Office – Mumbai. With their assistance, my attention is invited to the following three documents :- (a) A show cause notice issued for cancellation of registration on Page No.22 dated 7th September, 2022. (b) Summons issued by Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Mazgaon, Mumbai dated 31st March, 2023 on Page No.25 wherein, the Applicant was directed to remain present for recording statement under Section 70 of MGST Act. (c) A show cause notice for cancellation of registration dated 26th April, 2023 issued by Thane Office (Page No.31). Learned APP after taking instructions submitted that Thane Office is not going to initiate any prosecution against the Applicant. The statement is accepted. In view of that, the subject does not fall within the assignment of this Court. So, only apprehension remains is on the basis of summons issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax – Mazgaon. In respect of that apprehension, let Office to place it before Appropriate Bench. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Anr. … Applicants versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents None for Applicants. Mr. R.M.Pethe, APP for State. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 8 SEPTEMBER 2023 P.C. None appears for the Applicants when called out. Stand over to 12 October 2023. ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 1/1

Order - Status 18: 4-ABA-1486-23.DOC Sayali Upasani IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2023 Sachin Hemant Sawant and Others ...Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents None for Applicants. Mr. M. G. Patil, APP for State. CORAM:- N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED:- 12th OCTOBER, 2023 PC:- None present for the applicants. None had appeared for the applicants on 8th September, 2023 as well. The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] Signed by: Sayali D Upasani Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 13/10/2023 11:46:26 1/1

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.712 OF 2015 James D'Souza ..Applicant. versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. ..... Mr. Parvez Memon with Mr. Ravi Mishra i/b MZM Legal for the Applicant. Mr. Arfan Sait, Addl. P.P. for the State. ..... CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. (VACATION COURT) 19th May 2015. P.C. : The Applicant has been charged with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code by the Deccan Police Station vide F.I.R. No.98 of 2015 dated 2nd April, 2015. It is the case of the complainant that she was working with the travel agency viz. Sudin Travel Agency, Karve Road, Pune. The Applicant on telephone approached her and pretended that he is the owner of Dark Oranges Hospitality company and regularly requires substantial quantity of air tickets. Under that pretext, the Applicant got booking of 20 air tickets, domestic and international, from the complainant. It is further the case of the Applicant that the total value of the said tickets was Rs.7,50,000/-. Despite repeated requests from the complainant, the Applicant did not pay the said amount and on some or the other pretext avoided to pay the same. It was further revealed to the complaint that the company viz. Dark Oranges Hospitality was not in existence at the address mentioned therein. She, therefore, lodged a complaint with the police. The police are investigating the said crime. The learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that the present case is of civil nature and it is only because of the dispute about the quantum of amount to be paid to the complainant, the amount remained to be paid. He expressed his willingness to deposit the disputed amount in this Court with a view to prove his bonafide. It appears to me that the offence is simpliciter under Section 420 and the Applicant has expressed his desire to prove his bonafide by depositing the disputed amount in this Court. On this ground, I am inclined to release the Applicant on anticipatory bail upto 11th June, 2015 on the following conditions : i) The Applicant shall deposit the amount of Rs.7,50,000/- by way of demand draft in the Registry of this Court within a period of three days from today. Subject to deposit of the said amount by the Applicant, in the event of arrest, the Applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and a solvent surety in the like amount; ii) The Applicant shall attend the Deccan Police Station, Pune as and when called for between 11.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m.; iii) The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses and/or shall not indulge into any act amounting to tampering of evidence; iv) In case, the Applicant fails to deposit the amount within a period of three days from today, the protection granted to the Applicant shall come to an end without further reference to this Court; v) It is further made clear that the period of three days shall not be extended in any event and for whatsoever reason. Place this matter on Board on 11th June, 2015 for further orders. (A.S. Gadkari, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 712 OF 2015 James D'Souza .....Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr. Sherbir Panag a/w Parvez Memon & Ravi Mishra i/b MZM Legal for Applicant Ms. P. P. Shinde APP for the State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : 7th JULY 2015 PC : By an order dated 19/05/2015, Vacation Court (Coram: A. S. Gadkari, J.) had granted conditional pre-arrest bail to the applicant. Condition was that he shall deposit amount of Rs. 7,50,000/- by way of demand draft in this Court within a period of 3 days from 19/05/2015. It is an admitted position that order has not been complied with till today. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he would still be willing to deposit Rs. 5,00,000/-, however, according to him, amount of Rs. 7,50,000/- is the amount alleged by the complainant and that criminal proceedings cannot be treated as recovery proceedings. Learned Vacation Court had observed that counsel for the applicant had expressed his willingness to deposit the disputed amount in this Court with a view to prove his bonafides. Today, as the amount is disputed, judicial propriety warrants that application be heard and decided by the same bench. In view of this, Registry shall take directions and place the matter before appropriate Bench. However, learned counsel for the applicant would be at liberty to take steps. Removed from board. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 11: Dond IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.712 OF 2015. Mr. James D'Souza ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Ravi Mishra i/b MZM Legal for Applicant. Mrs. Prajakta Shinde, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM: A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 21st July 2015. P.C. 1 This matter is placed before me in pursuance of order dated 7th July 2015 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench as I had passed the interim order dated 19.5.2015. 2 Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 3 The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that, though the statement was made on behalf of the applicant on 19th May 2015 before this Court thereby expressing his willingness to deposit the disputed amount in this Court with a view to prove bonafide of the applicant, the applicant could not deposit the same within the said stipulated period and even as of today as the applicant is running short of the funds. He further submits that the applicant is trying to settle the matter out of the Court with the original complainant, but due to order dated 19.5.20015 the same could not take place. 4 It is to be noted here that in order dated 19.5.20015 in para-2, a statement of the Counsel for the applicant was recorded. The said statement is undoubtedly based on the instructions given by the applicant to his Counsel. On the basis of the said statement, the disputed amount was to be deposited within a period of three days from the date of order i.e. from 19.5.2015. As stated above, the said order has not been complied with. The applicant has failed to comply with the said order and has enjoyed prearrest bail till today. It is surprising to note here that the police authorities have also not taken notice of the condition imposed in para no.3(i), upon the applicant by the said order dated 19.5.2015. Para-3 (i) of the order dated 19.5.20015 reads as under: "The Applicant shall deposit the amount of Rs.7,50,000/- by way of demand draft in the Registry of this Court within a period of three days from today. Subject to deposit of the said amount by the Applicant, in the event of arrest, the Applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal 2 bond of Rs.50,000/- and a solvent surety in the like amount." 5 The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that his client is ready and willing to deposit the admitted amount of Rs.5,00,000/- in this Court as the applicant is disputing amount of Rs.7,50,000/- as has been mentioned in the said order. In my considered opinion this statement is clearly an afterthought of the applicant after enjoying pre-arrest bail for a considerable period. 6 Thus, it is clear that order dated 19.5.2015 was self-operative and failure on the part of the applicant to deposit the said amount, the anticipatory bail granted to the applicant has already come to an end. May that as it may, apart from the prima facie observations made in the order dated 19.5.2015 even on merits also the application has little merits. The minute perusal of the First Information Report and the documents of investigation, reveals that the applicant is perpetrator of the said crime and his custodial interrogation by the police is necessary for the purpose of further investigation. 7 In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the present Application and is accordingly dismissed. (A.S. GADKARI,J.) ABA.712-2015

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2015 Mr. Ismail S/o. Mehmoob Sayyed ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.A.M.Saraogi, Advocate,for the applicant. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP, for the State CORAM: SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 2nd July, 2015. P.C . Heard. This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. The applicant herein is apprehending his arrest in Crime No.249 of 2014 registered at Basant Park (Chembur) Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 420 read with Section 34 of IPC. The applicant had approached the Court of Sessions seeking pre-arrest bail in the year 2014. By an order dated 30.5.2014, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge had directed the Investigating Officer to give 48 hours' notice to the applicant prior to his arrest. The application was disposed of. Mhi 2 ABA-818-15.sxw The Senior Inspector of Police of Chembur Police Station had requested the officer in charge of Aurad Police Station, Dist. Bidar, Karnataka State that the present applicant is wanted in Crime No.249 of 2014 registered at Chembur Police Station and in the eventuality that the applicant is traced, he shall be detained and the information be relegated to Chembur Police Station. It is pertinent to note that the police personnel of Chembur Police Station had made several visits to serve a 48 hours notice upon the applicant, but to no avail as his permanent address is not known. It appears that the applicant is absconding. The learned counsel for the applicant has fairly submitted that the applicant was not even arrested in the offence registered against him at Aurad Police Station. The whereabouts of the applicant are not known. There is no impugned order which may be challenged before this Court under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. In view of this, the applicant doe not deserve the discretionary relief in the nature of pre-arrest bail. Hence, the application being sans merits, stands rejected. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 130 OF 2020 Jabin Nawaj Shaikh Sajit Salim Hundekari ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ….. Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w Mr. Sunil Kamble, Advocate for the Applicants. Smt. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State-Respondent. Mr. P.A. Gaikwad, Police Hawaldar, Shrikapur Police Station, Present. ….. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 17th January, 2020 PC : The applicants had preferred an application for anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court in connection with C.R. No. 5 of 2020 registered with Shikrapur Police Station, Pune Rural for offences punishable under Sections 306, 504, 506 r/w Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. By order dated 9th January, 2020 the learned Special Judge had declined to grant interim protection to the applicants. However, the other accused were granted interim protection. The order further indicates that the accused-applicants were directed to remain present before the Court till the disposal of the main application. Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that, in the event the applicant remains present before the Sessions Court, there is apprehension of their arrest. It is further submitted that the applicant No.1 is pregnant lady. It is also submitted that the applicants are having similar role with other accused who were granted interim protection. The case before the Sessions Court for hearing the application is tomorrow. Considering the aforesaid circumstance, interim protection can be granted to the applicants pending their application before Sessions Court. O R D E R i) In the event of arrest of applicants in C.R. No. 5 of 2020 registered with Shikrapur Police Station, Pune Rural, the applicants be released on bail on furnishing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25000/-, with one or more sureties in the like amount; ii) This interim protection shall operate till the disposal of the application, pending before the Sessions Court. It is made clear that this court has not adjudicated merits of the case and the Sessions Court shall deal with the application in accordance with law. iii) Application stands disposed of accordingly. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

#VALUE!

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1144 OF 2019 Prakash Siddhnath Shukla & Ors. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan i/b Mr. Chinmay P. Gaonkar for the Applicants. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondent – State. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATED : 24th MAY, 2019. (VACATION COURT) P.C. : 1 I have perused the F.I.R. There are allegations in the F.I.R. that applicants have tendered forged documents to stake claim to their right in a Slum Rehabilitation Project. Prima facie there is nothing to show that the documents were genuine. However, the investigation is still in progress. Learned Counsel for the applicant seeks time to give details of the documents which were supplied by the applicants to the authorities. Time as prayed for is granted. 2 Stand over to 12.06.2019. (SARANG V. KOTWAL J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1144 OF 2019 Prakash Siddhnath Shukla And Ors Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent MS.Ameeta Kuttikrishnan i/by Chinmay P Gaonkar For Applicant V.V.Gangurde App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 13th June, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to 17/06/2019 UNDER THE CAPTION OF URGENT CIRCULATIONS. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1144 OF 2019 Prakash Siddhnath Shukla And Ors Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent Ms. Ameeta kuttikrishanan i/b.Mr Chinmay P Gaonkar For Applicant. V.V.Gangurde App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 17th June, 2019 P.C. : At the request of Applicant ,stand over to 19/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1144 OF 2019 Prakash Siddhnath Shukla & ors. .Applicants Vs. P.C. The State of Mahrashtra .Respondent Ms Ameeta Kuttikrishnan i/b. Mr. C. P. Gaonkar, Advocate, for the Applicants Mr. S. S. Hulke, APP, for the Respondent – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 19.06.2019 . Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this Application, the Applicants seek prearrest bail in connection with C. R. No. 8 of 2017 registered with the Andheri Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Without going into the merits of the allegation made by the Complainant, learned counsel for the Applicants relies on the Judgment of this Court in W. P. No. 924 of 2016 with Cri. Application No. 486 of 2016 ( Sayyed Anwar Ahmed & anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. ) dated 27th & 28th February, 2017, to show that the complaint at the behest of the Complainant is not maintainable. Learned counsel for the Applicants in particular, relies on para 28 of the said Judgment, wherein it is stated that in cases of SRA Schemes, in view of the law laid down in Shailesh Gandhi Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, an aggrieved party must first approach the High Power Committee; and if the High Power Committee finds that there is an element of criminality or in cases of impersonation etc, it would ensure that the investigation is handed over to the appropriate agency. It is further stated that if a Complainant has any grievance about the names included in Annexure – II, he can always approach the High Power Committee and that the said Committee can direct setting of criminal law in motion, if it finds criminality in it. Learned counsel in view of the said decision submits that the complaint filed by the Complainant before the learned JMFC, pursuant to which an order under Section 156(3) came to be passed and the aforesaid C. R. came to be registered is untenable. Learned APP does not dispute the aforesaid. In the facts, custodial interrogation of the Applicants is not warranted. Accordingly, the Application is allowed and the Applicants are granted prearrest bail on the following terms & conditions : O R D E R (i) In the event of arrest, the Applicants be enlarged on bail, on executing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/ each with one or two sureties in the like amount; (ii) The Applicants shall report to the investigating officer of the concerned police station as & when called for by the investigating officer. The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.703 OF 2014 Sheikh Mahmud Aalam ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms.Anjali Awasthi for the Applicant Mr.Y.M. Nakhawa APP, for Respondent – State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: JUNE 10, 2014 P.C.: The application is moved for transit anticipatory bail as the applicant/accused is prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code as the offence is registered at C.R. No.2 of 2014. The learned Counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that the applicant/accused is not aware of the prosecution as he is a permanent resident of Mumbai. When the proceedings have been initiated under section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code by the concerned Court, his father came to know about the involvement of the accused in the said crime and, therefore, he was informed accordingly. The Learned Counsel has submitted that if the applicant/accused is protected temporarily for eight days, he would go before the appropriate Court and obtain anticipatory bail. He submitted that the applicant/accused is falsely implicated. Learned Prosecutor opposes the application. He has pointed out that the FIR is registered on 3.1.2014 at Shahganj police station, District Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh. The name of the applicant/accused is appearing in the FIR. He submitted that it is a case of murder and hence, no anticipatory bail should be granted. In view of the submissions of the learned Counsel and the complaint, I am not inclined to grant transit anticipatory bail to the applicant/accused. The applicant/accused to take proper recourse before the appropriate forum. Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected accordingly. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant Prashant Jadhav App for state. Jayesh D.Talekar adv for intervener. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 3rd June, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 06/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant Prashant Jadhav App for state. Jayesh D.Talekar adv for intervener. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 6th June, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant, Stand over to 13/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 13th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time , Stand over to 14/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir .Applicant P.C. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. .Respondents Mr. N. S. Mundargi, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP, for the Respondent No. 1 – State Mr. N. V. Sawant i/b. Mr. J. D. Talekar, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 2 / Intervenor CO CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DA DATE : 14.06.2019 . Mr. Mundargi, learned counsel for the Applicant seeks two weeks time to take instructions. Stand over to 28.06.2019 . (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 28th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time , Stand over to 08/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent None present for applicant N.V.Sawant i/by Jayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 S.V.Gavand App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 8th July, 2019 P.C. : None present for applicant,Stand over to 10/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent MS.Keral Mehta i/by Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant Jayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 P.H.Gaikwad Patil App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 10th July, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 15/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 15th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time ,Stand over to 01/08/2019. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 1st August, 2019 P.C. : Due to Paucity of time, stand over to 05/08/2019. Ad interim relief,if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant JN.V.Sawant i/by ayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 P.H.Gaikwad Patil App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 5th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 08/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant N.V.Sawant i/by Jayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 P.H.Gaikwad App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 8th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 09/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent Gaueav Thote i/by Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant N.V.Sawant i/by Jayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 P.H.Gaikwad Patil App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 9th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 13/08/2019 under the caption of URGENT ADMISSION. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 30: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir .Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. .Respondents Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP, for the Respondent No. 1 – State Mr. N. W. Sawant i/b. Mr. Jayesh D. Talekar, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 2 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. P.C. DATE : 13.08.2019 . Heard learned counsel for the Applicant. By this Application, the Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with C. R. No. I-80 of 2019 registered with the APMC Police Station, Navi Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406 & 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the Applicant without going into the merits of the Application states that the Applicant is ready to deposit Rs. 59,50,000/- in the Registry of this Court, without prejudice to his rights & contentions. Learned counsel for the Applicant has tendered an undertaking of the Applicant duly affirmed before this Court. The said undertaking is taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. In the said undertaking, the Applicant has in para 2 stated that he without prejudice to his rights and contentions, only to show his bonafides is willing to deposit Rs. 59,50,000/- in the Registry of this Court; that an amount of Rs. 20,00,000/- will be deposited in this Court on or before 19.08.2019 and the balance amount of Rs. 39,50,000/- within a period of eight weeks from today. Without going into the merits, having regard to the undertaking given by the Applicant, the Applicant is granted interim protection on the following terms & conditions :- O R D E R (i) In the event of arrest, the Applicant be enlarged on bail, on executing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount; (ii) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer of the concerned police station on 20th, 21st & 22nd August, 2019 between 10.00 a. m. and 12.00 noon and thereafter, as & when called for by the investigating officer; 2 of 3 (iii) The Applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs. 20,00,000/ on or before 19.08.2019 in the Registry of this Court and the balance amount of Rs. 39,50,000/- within eight weeks from today. If there is a breach in depositing the aforesaid amount, it is made clear that the interim relief shall stand vacated without further reference to the Court. Stand over to 27.08.2019 . To be listed on the Supplementary Board " For recording compliance of the first deposit of Rs. 20,00,000/- ". All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi for the Applicant Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State Ms. Jayesh Talekar for the Intervener CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. TUESDAY, 27th AUGUST 2019 P.C. : 1 Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has deposited Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs) as directed by this Court vide order dated 13th August 2019. He further submits that the balance amount i.e. Rs. 39,50,000/- will be deposited on or before 8 th October 2019. 2 Stand over to 10th October 2019 for recording compliance of the said deposit. To be listed on the supplementary board. 3 Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi for the Applicant Ms. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent-State Ms. Jayesh Talekar for the Respondent No.2/Complainant CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. THURSDAY, 10th OCTOBER 2019 P.C. : 1 Learned counsel for the applicant seeks time. On his request, stand over to 14th November 2019. 2 Needless to state that the interim relief stands vacated in view of the order dated 13th August 2019, as the applicant has committed breach of the undertaking to deposit Rs. 39,50,000/-. 3 Liberty to move the Vacation Court in the event the applicant intends to deposit the amount before the next date, for restoration of the interim relief. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 19th December, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 22/01/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 22nd January, 2020 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 07/02/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 40: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 7th February, 2020 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 03/03/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 42: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 3rd March, 2020 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 24/03/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 44: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents - Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi, for the Applicant. Mr. S. V. Gavand, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1 – State. None for the Respondent No.2/Complainant. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : Learned Counsel for the applicant states that pursuant to the order dated 13th August 2019, the applicant deposited an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- in this Court, however could not deposit the balance amount of Rs.39,50,000/- as undertaken within 8 weeks from the date of the order i.e. 13th August 2019. He submits that the applicant is bed-ridden and that the family members of the applicant will make an attempt/endeavour to deposit the said amount of Rs.39,50,000/- within 15 days from today. He submits that the said amount will be deposited in the Registry of this Court on or before 16th August 2021. Stand over to 17th August, 2021. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 46: 1-aba.1087.2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi, for the Applicant. Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1 – State. None for the Respondent No.2/Complainant. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, stand over to 25th August, 2021. It is made clear that interim relief was already vacated vide order dated 10th October 2019. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 48: RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Digitally signed by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date: 2021.08.26 15:56:10 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS.2, 10 TO 13, 46 TO 49 AND 50 TO 54 ON THE BOARD DATED 25th AUGUST, 2021 CAUSE TITLES AND APPEARANCE AS NOTIFIED ON THE BOARD DATED 25th AUGUST, 2021. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 25TH AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, it is not possible to proceed with the hearing of these matters today. All these matters are adjourned and will be listed on the Board on the respective assigned dates as mentioned below : Serial Nos. Assigned Date 2 02/09/2021 10 to 13 01/09/2021 46 to 49 13/09/2021 50 to 54 14/09/2021 Ad-interim order granted in any of the above said matters, if any, to continue till the next date. Order accordingly. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 50: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 3 TO 8 AND 10 ON THE BOARD DATED 1st SEPTEMBER, 2021 CAUSE TITLES AND APPEARANCE AS NOTIFIED ON THE BOARD DATED 1st SEPTEMBER, 2021. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, it is not possible to proceed with the hearing of these matters today. All these matters are adjourned and will be listed on the Board on the respective assigned dates as mentioned below : Serial Nos. Assigned Date 3 to 6 04/10/2021 7 to 8 & 10 05/10/2021 Ad-interim order granted in any of the above said matters, if any, to continue till the next date. Order accordingly. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 52: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents Mr. Omneel Jadhav i/b Mr. Niranjan Mundargi, for the Applicant. Ms. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent–State. None for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.DATE :4th OCTOBER, 2021 P. C. : At the request of learned Counsel for the applicant, stand over to $25^{text{th}}$ October 2021. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 54: Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2023.03.23 14:24:38 +0530 2.aba1087.19.doc Shiv IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1/1 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Keral Mehta i/b Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi for the Applicant. Mrs. M. R. Tidke APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATED : 18TH MARCH 2023 P. C. : The Applicant has expired. Time is sought to place on record the death certificate of the Applicant. Matter be kept on 31st March 2023, under the caption "for dismissal". [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 57: 17.aba1087.19.doc HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2023.04.05 10:41:45 +0530 Shiv IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Keral Mehta i/b Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis APP for Respondent No.1-State. None for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATED : 31ST MARCH 2023 P. C. : On 18th March 2023, there was submission made that the Applicant has expired. In the meantime this fact is confirmed by learned Advocate for the Applicant and she has received instructions to withdraw this Application. Hence Application is disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty is sought on behalf of the Applicant to file Application on behalf of the LRs of the deceased-Applicant for withdrawal of amount already deposited. My attention is invited to the order dated 13th August 2019, thereby directing the Applicant to deposit certain amount. Learned APP submitted that amount cannot be given back. Today, we are only granting liberty to the LRs to file Application. The merits can be considered when that Application is heard for withdrawal of the amount. There is also appearance on behalf of Respondent No.2 in Anticipatory Bail Application. If such Application is filed, Respondent No.2 or learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 may be served. Liberty granted to move such application. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 5: Ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION No. 873 of 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe .. Applicant. Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. H.P. Ingle I/by Mr. Prashant Goyal Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State. CORAM : C.V. BHADANG, J. DATE : 15th May, 2017. (VACATION JUDGE) P.C. The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with investigation of Crime No. 8 of 2017 registered with Meghwadi Police Station, Jogeshwari (East), Mumbai under Section 406, 420 of IPC. On hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP, it appears that earlier there was First Information Report (FIR) lodged by Abhishek Rai on 6th November, 2016 bearing Crime No. 288 of 2016 registered with Police Station, Vanrai, Mumbai on similar allegations in which the applicant had approached this Court by filing ABA No. 288 of 2017. This Court on 5th May, 2017 has granted interim protection to the applicant on certain conditions. A perusal of the First Information Report in the present case would show that the allegations by and large are similar. The FIR was lodged by Mr. Rohit Sonik. The applicant is alleged to have committed misappropriation and breach of trust in respect of mobile handsets worth Rs.2,01,666/-. Considering the fact that in respect of similar allegations this Court had granted interim protection, the following order is passed: (i) By way of an interim relief, it is directed that in the event of arrest in connection with investigation of Crime No. 8 of 2017, Meghwadi Police Station, the applicant shall be released on bail on executing a P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount; (ii) The applicant shall attend the Investigating Officer on Monday and Friday between 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. and as and when required by the Investigating Officer; and (iii) The applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Agency and shall not tamper or influence the prosecution witnesses. Stand over to 8th June, 2017. (C.V. BHADANG,J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.873/2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe Applicant vs State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Hemant Ingle i.b Mr.Prashant Goyal for Applicant Mr.A.R.Kapadnis APP for State CORAM : PRAKASH D.NAIK, J. DATE : 8 JUNE 2017 P.C. By an order dated 15.5.2017 interim protection was granted to the Applicant. The Applicant was directed to attend the police station. The Advocate for the Applicant submitted that he has complied with the said directions. The learned APP submitted that the Investigating Officer is not present and he would like to take instructions in the matter. In view of the said circumstances, stand over to 28.6.2017. Ad interim order granted earlier to continue till then. (PRAKASH D.NAIK, J)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 …... …... Aditya Dilip Bagwe .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Prashant Goyel, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent – State. P.I. More, Meghwadi Police Station, present. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATED : JUNE 28, 2017. P.C. : The applicant was granted interim protection vide order dated 15th May, 2017. There was a condition to attend the investigating officer on Monday and Friday. Learned APP on instructions submits that the applicant has not complied with the condition of reporting. It is further submitted that the applicant has given false address and he was not traceable at the given address. Learned advocate for the applicant seeks time to take instruction. Hence, stand over to 7th July, 2017. 2 Interim relief granted earlier to continue till then. ( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent …... Mr.Prashant Goyal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATED : JULY 25, 2017. …... P.C. : Stand over to 7th August, 2017. 2 This matter to be heard along with Anticipatory Bail Application No.288 of 2017. 3 Interim relief granted earlier to continue till then. 4 The applicant shall attend Meghwadi Police Station, Jogeshwari (East), Mumbai, on Saturday 29th July, 2017 between 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. ( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 670 OF 2017 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Ahishek Rai ...Intervener IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Aditya Dilip Bagwe ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Prashant Goyal for the Applicant Mr. Ajay Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent-State Mr. S. C. Singh for the Intervener CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. MONDAY, 7th AUGUST, 2017 P.C. : Learned Counsel for the applicant to furnish a copy of the application being Criminal Application No. 288 of 2017 on the learned Counsel for the intervener on or before 11th August, 2017. Stand over to 16th August, 2017. Interim protection to continue till the next date. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 18th August, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 07/09/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 7th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 25/09/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 25th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 12/10/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO.670 OF 2017 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Abhishek Rai Intervener. In the matter between Aditya Dilip Bagwe Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents Mr. Shrinivas Singh i/b S.I.Singh for Intervener Mr.Hemant Ingale i/b Prashant Goyal for the applicant Ms.P.P.Shinde, APP for the State CORAM: A.M. BADAR, J. DATED: 12th OCTOBER, 2017 PC: Mr. Shrinivas Singh appears for the Intervener. At the request of the parties stand over to 16th November 2017. In the meanwhile interim order to continue. (A.M. BADAR, J )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J DATE : 16th November, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 11/12/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: Dond IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 WITH APPP NO. 670 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra . … Respondent Mr. Hemant Ingle i/b Prashant Goyal for Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for State. Mr. Nitin Dalvi for Intervener. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 16th JANUARY 2018. P.C.: 1] At the request of learned Counsel for the applicant, stand over to 23rd January 2018. Interim relief to continue till then. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 29: Nalawade IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.670 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ..Applicant. vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr. Sugat i/by Prashant Goyal for the Applicant in ABA No.873/2017 and ABA No.288/2017. Mr.Nitin Dalvi i/by Shweta Singh for the Applicant in APPP No.670/2017. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP. for the State. CORAM: A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 6th February, 2018. P.C. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the Advocate on record is not keeping well and is unable to attend the Court today. At his request, S.O. to 20.2.2018. Interim relief to continue till then. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 31: Dond IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ..Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. T.N. Khandare i/b Prashant Goyal for Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for State. Mr. Nitin Dalvi for Original Complainant. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 20th FEBRUARY 2018. P.C.: 1] Applicant is directed to attend the Investigating Officer from 22nd February 2018 to 25th February 2018 between 10.00 a.m to 2.00 p.m and to join in the process of investigation. 2] Stand over to 1st March 2018. Interim relief to continue till then. (A.S.GADKARI, J.) 1/1

Order - Status 32: Dond IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ..Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. T.N. Khandare i/b Prashant Goyal for Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for State. Mr. Nitin Dalvi for Original Complainant. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 20th FEBRUARY 2018. P.C.: 1] Applicant is directed to attend the Investigating Officer from 22nd February 2018 to 25th February 2018 between 10.00 a.m to 2.00 p.m and to join in the process of investigation. 2] Stand over to 1st March 2018. Interim relief to continue till then. (A.S.GADKARI, J.) 1/1

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 23rd March, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 02/04/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 2nd April, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 17/04/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 17th April, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 26/04/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 40: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 26th April, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 06/06/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 42: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ….Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra ….Respondent. Mr. Sugat Ingale i/by Hemant Ingale for the Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar APP, for the RespondentState. Mr. Nitin Dalvi for the intervenor. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 25th JUNE, 2018. P.C.: It is submitted that the Advocate on record is in personal difficulty and is unable to attend the Court today. 2 At the request of the learned counsel, stand over to 11th July, 2018 for hearing. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 46: Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagve Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Prashant Goyal, for the Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM: A. S. GADKARI, J DATED: 11th JULY, 2018 PC: 1. By an order dated dated 15th May, 2017, the applicant was granted interim relief. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP. Perused the record of investigation. The first information report is lodged by Mr. Rohit Sonik on 7th January, 2017. 2. It is the precise prosecution case against the applicant that, the applicant after gaining confidence of the first informant, took delivery of handsets/mobile phones of Vivo company amounting to Rs.2,01,666/ for sale and thereafter neither returned the said handsets nor paid the 1/3 4-ABA873-17.DOC consideration for the same. That the applicant thereafter did not contact to the first informant. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that this is pure and simple civil transaction. He submitted that the applicant has already repaid the amount to the first informant. He submitted that Mr. Rajesh Singh, the partner of Abhishek Rai had been to his shop for collecting the cash towards sale of mobile phones and as the applicant was unable to repay the amount to Mr. Rajesh Singh, he took away all the mobile phones, which were kept for display in the shop. He further submitted that the applicant did not have the said mobile phones as the same have been forcibly taken away by Mr. Rajesh Singh and therefore the applicant could not return the said handsets to the first informant. He, therefore, prayed that the applicant may be granted the prearrest bail. 4. The record of investigation indicates that apart from the first informant herein, there are other five other victims in the present crime, who have been cheated by the applicant by adopting similar modus operendi to the tune of 2/3 approximately Rs.21,07,000/ (Rs. Twenty one lakhs seven thousand only). This Court by an order dated 11th July, 2018 has rejected Anticipatory Bail Application No. 288 of 2017 preferred by the applicant in CR No.288 of 2016 registered with Vanrai police station, Mumbai wherein also similar modus operendi was adopted by the applicant. 5. After taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, the serious allegations against the applicant and the gravity of the offence, this Court is of the considered view that the applicant does not deserve to be protected by prearrest bail. 6. The application is accordingly rejected. [A. S. GADKARI, J.] Santosh Subhash Kulkarni Digitally signed by Santosh Subhash Kulkarni Date: 2018.07.16 11:16:06 +0530