Tag: Criminal Anticipatory Bail

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2015 Mr. Ismail S/o. Mehmoob Sayyed ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.A.M.Saraogi, Advocate,for the applicant. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP, for the State CORAM: SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 2nd July, 2015. P.C . Heard. This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. The applicant herein is apprehending his arrest in Crime No.249 of 2014 registered at Basant Park (Chembur) Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 420 read with Section 34 of IPC. The applicant had approached the Court of Sessions seeking pre-arrest bail in the year 2014. By an order dated 30.5.2014, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge had directed the Investigating Officer to give 48 hours' notice to the applicant prior to his arrest. The application was disposed of. Mhi 2 ABA-818-15.sxw The Senior Inspector of Police of Chembur Police Station had requested the officer in charge of Aurad Police Station, Dist. Bidar, Karnataka State that the present applicant is wanted in Crime No.249 of 2014 registered at Chembur Police Station and in the eventuality that the applicant is traced, he shall be detained and the information be relegated to Chembur Police Station. It is pertinent to note that the police personnel of Chembur Police Station had made several visits to serve a 48 hours notice upon the applicant, but to no avail as his permanent address is not known. It appears that the applicant is absconding. The learned counsel for the applicant has fairly submitted that the applicant was not even arrested in the offence registered against him at Aurad Police Station. The whereabouts of the applicant are not known. There is no impugned order which may be challenged before this Court under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. In view of this, the applicant doe not deserve the discretionary relief in the nature of pre-arrest bail. Hence, the application being sans merits, stands rejected. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 130 OF 2020 Jabin Nawaj Shaikh Sajit Salim Hundekari ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ….. Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w Mr. Sunil Kamble, Advocate for the Applicants. Smt. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State-Respondent. Mr. P.A. Gaikwad, Police Hawaldar, Shrikapur Police Station, Present. ….. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 17th January, 2020 PC : The applicants had preferred an application for anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court in connection with C.R. No. 5 of 2020 registered with Shikrapur Police Station, Pune Rural for offences punishable under Sections 306, 504, 506 r/w Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. By order dated 9th January, 2020 the learned Special Judge had declined to grant interim protection to the applicants. However, the other accused were granted interim protection. The order further indicates that the accused-applicants were directed to remain present before the Court till the disposal of the main application. Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that, in the event the applicant remains present before the Sessions Court, there is apprehension of their arrest. It is further submitted that the applicant No.1 is pregnant lady. It is also submitted that the applicants are having similar role with other accused who were granted interim protection. The case before the Sessions Court for hearing the application is tomorrow. Considering the aforesaid circumstance, interim protection can be granted to the applicants pending their application before Sessions Court. O R D E R i) In the event of arrest of applicants in C.R. No. 5 of 2020 registered with Shikrapur Police Station, Pune Rural, the applicants be released on bail on furnishing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25000/-, with one or more sureties in the like amount; ii) This interim protection shall operate till the disposal of the application, pending before the Sessions Court. It is made clear that this court has not adjudicated merits of the case and the Sessions Court shall deal with the application in accordance with law. iii) Application stands disposed of accordingly. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

#VALUE!

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1144 OF 2019 Prakash Siddhnath Shukla & Ors. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan i/b Mr. Chinmay P. Gaonkar for the Applicants. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondent – State. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATED : 24th MAY, 2019. (VACATION COURT) P.C. : 1 I have perused the F.I.R. There are allegations in the F.I.R. that applicants have tendered forged documents to stake claim to their right in a Slum Rehabilitation Project. Prima facie there is nothing to show that the documents were genuine. However, the investigation is still in progress. Learned Counsel for the applicant seeks time to give details of the documents which were supplied by the applicants to the authorities. Time as prayed for is granted. 2 Stand over to 12.06.2019. (SARANG V. KOTWAL J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1144 OF 2019 Prakash Siddhnath Shukla And Ors Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent MS.Ameeta Kuttikrishnan i/by Chinmay P Gaonkar For Applicant V.V.Gangurde App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 13th June, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to 17/06/2019 UNDER THE CAPTION OF URGENT CIRCULATIONS. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1144 OF 2019 Prakash Siddhnath Shukla And Ors Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent Ms. Ameeta kuttikrishanan i/b.Mr Chinmay P Gaonkar For Applicant. V.V.Gangurde App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 17th June, 2019 P.C. : At the request of Applicant ,stand over to 19/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1144 OF 2019 Prakash Siddhnath Shukla & ors. .Applicants Vs. P.C. The State of Mahrashtra .Respondent Ms Ameeta Kuttikrishnan i/b. Mr. C. P. Gaonkar, Advocate, for the Applicants Mr. S. S. Hulke, APP, for the Respondent – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 19.06.2019 . Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this Application, the Applicants seek prearrest bail in connection with C. R. No. 8 of 2017 registered with the Andheri Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Without going into the merits of the allegation made by the Complainant, learned counsel for the Applicants relies on the Judgment of this Court in W. P. No. 924 of 2016 with Cri. Application No. 486 of 2016 ( Sayyed Anwar Ahmed & anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. ) dated 27th & 28th February, 2017, to show that the complaint at the behest of the Complainant is not maintainable. Learned counsel for the Applicants in particular, relies on para 28 of the said Judgment, wherein it is stated that in cases of SRA Schemes, in view of the law laid down in Shailesh Gandhi Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, an aggrieved party must first approach the High Power Committee; and if the High Power Committee finds that there is an element of criminality or in cases of impersonation etc, it would ensure that the investigation is handed over to the appropriate agency. It is further stated that if a Complainant has any grievance about the names included in Annexure – II, he can always approach the High Power Committee and that the said Committee can direct setting of criminal law in motion, if it finds criminality in it. Learned counsel in view of the said decision submits that the complaint filed by the Complainant before the learned JMFC, pursuant to which an order under Section 156(3) came to be passed and the aforesaid C. R. came to be registered is untenable. Learned APP does not dispute the aforesaid. In the facts, custodial interrogation of the Applicants is not warranted. Accordingly, the Application is allowed and the Applicants are granted prearrest bail on the following terms & conditions : O R D E R (i) In the event of arrest, the Applicants be enlarged on bail, on executing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/ each with one or two sureties in the like amount; (ii) The Applicants shall report to the investigating officer of the concerned police station as & when called for by the investigating officer. The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.703 OF 2014 Sheikh Mahmud Aalam ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms.Anjali Awasthi for the Applicant Mr.Y.M. Nakhawa APP, for Respondent – State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: JUNE 10, 2014 P.C.: The application is moved for transit anticipatory bail as the applicant/accused is prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code as the offence is registered at C.R. No.2 of 2014. The learned Counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that the applicant/accused is not aware of the prosecution as he is a permanent resident of Mumbai. When the proceedings have been initiated under section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code by the concerned Court, his father came to know about the involvement of the accused in the said crime and, therefore, he was informed accordingly. The Learned Counsel has submitted that if the applicant/accused is protected temporarily for eight days, he would go before the appropriate Court and obtain anticipatory bail. He submitted that the applicant/accused is falsely implicated. Learned Prosecutor opposes the application. He has pointed out that the FIR is registered on 3.1.2014 at Shahganj police station, District Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh. The name of the applicant/accused is appearing in the FIR. He submitted that it is a case of murder and hence, no anticipatory bail should be granted. In view of the submissions of the learned Counsel and the complaint, I am not inclined to grant transit anticipatory bail to the applicant/accused. The applicant/accused to take proper recourse before the appropriate forum. Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected accordingly. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant Prashant Jadhav App for state. Jayesh D.Talekar adv for intervener. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 3rd June, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 06/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant Prashant Jadhav App for state. Jayesh D.Talekar adv for intervener. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 6th June, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant, Stand over to 13/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 13th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time , Stand over to 14/06/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir .Applicant P.C. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. .Respondents Mr. N. S. Mundargi, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP, for the Respondent No. 1 – State Mr. N. V. Sawant i/b. Mr. J. D. Talekar, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 2 / Intervenor CO CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DA DATE : 14.06.2019 . Mr. Mundargi, learned counsel for the Applicant seeks two weeks time to take instructions. Stand over to 28.06.2019 . (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 28th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time , Stand over to 08/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent None present for applicant N.V.Sawant i/by Jayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 S.V.Gavand App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 8th July, 2019 P.C. : None present for applicant,Stand over to 10/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent MS.Keral Mehta i/by Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant Jayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 P.H.Gaikwad Patil App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 10th July, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 15/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 15th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time ,Stand over to 01/08/2019. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 1st August, 2019 P.C. : Due to Paucity of time, stand over to 05/08/2019. Ad interim relief,if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant JN.V.Sawant i/by ayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 P.H.Gaikwad Patil App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 5th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 08/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant N.V.Sawant i/by Jayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 P.H.Gaikwad App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 8th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 09/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent Gaueav Thote i/by Niranjan Shrikant Mundargi For Applicant N.V.Sawant i/by Jayesh D. Talekar Res No. 2 P.H.Gaikwad Patil App for state. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 9th August, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the applicant , Stand over to 13/08/2019 under the caption of URGENT ADMISSION. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 30: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir .Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. .Respondents Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP, for the Respondent No. 1 – State Mr. N. W. Sawant i/b. Mr. Jayesh D. Talekar, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 2 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. P.C. DATE : 13.08.2019 . Heard learned counsel for the Applicant. By this Application, the Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with C. R. No. I-80 of 2019 registered with the APMC Police Station, Navi Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406 & 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the Applicant without going into the merits of the Application states that the Applicant is ready to deposit Rs. 59,50,000/- in the Registry of this Court, without prejudice to his rights & contentions. Learned counsel for the Applicant has tendered an undertaking of the Applicant duly affirmed before this Court. The said undertaking is taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. In the said undertaking, the Applicant has in para 2 stated that he without prejudice to his rights and contentions, only to show his bonafides is willing to deposit Rs. 59,50,000/- in the Registry of this Court; that an amount of Rs. 20,00,000/- will be deposited in this Court on or before 19.08.2019 and the balance amount of Rs. 39,50,000/- within a period of eight weeks from today. Without going into the merits, having regard to the undertaking given by the Applicant, the Applicant is granted interim protection on the following terms & conditions :- O R D E R (i) In the event of arrest, the Applicant be enlarged on bail, on executing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount; (ii) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer of the concerned police station on 20th, 21st & 22nd August, 2019 between 10.00 a. m. and 12.00 noon and thereafter, as & when called for by the investigating officer; 2 of 3 (iii) The Applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs. 20,00,000/ on or before 19.08.2019 in the Registry of this Court and the balance amount of Rs. 39,50,000/- within eight weeks from today. If there is a breach in depositing the aforesaid amount, it is made clear that the interim relief shall stand vacated without further reference to the Court. Stand over to 27.08.2019 . To be listed on the Supplementary Board " For recording compliance of the first deposit of Rs. 20,00,000/- ". All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi for the Applicant Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State Ms. Jayesh Talekar for the Intervener CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. TUESDAY, 27th AUGUST 2019 P.C. : 1 Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has deposited Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs) as directed by this Court vide order dated 13th August 2019. He further submits that the balance amount i.e. Rs. 39,50,000/- will be deposited on or before 8 th October 2019. 2 Stand over to 10th October 2019 for recording compliance of the said deposit. To be listed on the supplementary board. 3 Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi for the Applicant Ms. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent-State Ms. Jayesh Talekar for the Respondent No.2/Complainant CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. THURSDAY, 10th OCTOBER 2019 P.C. : 1 Learned counsel for the applicant seeks time. On his request, stand over to 14th November 2019. 2 Needless to state that the interim relief stands vacated in view of the order dated 13th August 2019, as the applicant has committed breach of the undertaking to deposit Rs. 39,50,000/-. 3 Liberty to move the Vacation Court in the event the applicant intends to deposit the amount before the next date, for restoration of the interim relief. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 19th December, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 22/01/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 22nd January, 2020 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 07/02/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 40: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 7th February, 2020 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 03/03/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 42: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 3rd March, 2020 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 24/03/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 44: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents - Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi, for the Applicant. Mr. S. V. Gavand, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1 – State. None for the Respondent No.2/Complainant. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : Learned Counsel for the applicant states that pursuant to the order dated 13th August 2019, the applicant deposited an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- in this Court, however could not deposit the balance amount of Rs.39,50,000/- as undertaken within 8 weeks from the date of the order i.e. 13th August 2019. He submits that the applicant is bed-ridden and that the family members of the applicant will make an attempt/endeavour to deposit the said amount of Rs.39,50,000/- within 15 days from today. He submits that the said amount will be deposited in the Registry of this Court on or before 16th August 2021. Stand over to 17th August, 2021. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 46: 1-aba.1087.2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi, for the Applicant. Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1 – State. None for the Respondent No.2/Complainant. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, stand over to 25th August, 2021. It is made clear that interim relief was already vacated vide order dated 10th October 2019. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 48: RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Digitally signed by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date: 2021.08.26 15:56:10 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS.2, 10 TO 13, 46 TO 49 AND 50 TO 54 ON THE BOARD DATED 25th AUGUST, 2021 CAUSE TITLES AND APPEARANCE AS NOTIFIED ON THE BOARD DATED 25th AUGUST, 2021. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 25TH AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, it is not possible to proceed with the hearing of these matters today. All these matters are adjourned and will be listed on the Board on the respective assigned dates as mentioned below : Serial Nos. Assigned Date 2 02/09/2021 10 to 13 01/09/2021 46 to 49 13/09/2021 50 to 54 14/09/2021 Ad-interim order granted in any of the above said matters, if any, to continue till the next date. Order accordingly. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 50: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 3 TO 8 AND 10 ON THE BOARD DATED 1st SEPTEMBER, 2021 CAUSE TITLES AND APPEARANCE AS NOTIFIED ON THE BOARD DATED 1st SEPTEMBER, 2021. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, it is not possible to proceed with the hearing of these matters today. All these matters are adjourned and will be listed on the Board on the respective assigned dates as mentioned below : Serial Nos. Assigned Date 3 to 6 04/10/2021 7 to 8 & 10 05/10/2021 Ad-interim order granted in any of the above said matters, if any, to continue till the next date. Order accordingly. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 52: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents Mr. Omneel Jadhav i/b Mr. Niranjan Mundargi, for the Applicant. Ms. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent–State. None for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.DATE :4th OCTOBER, 2021 P. C. : At the request of learned Counsel for the applicant, stand over to $25^{text{th}}$ October 2021. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 54: Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2023.03.23 14:24:38 +0530 2.aba1087.19.doc Shiv IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1/1 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Keral Mehta i/b Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi for the Applicant. Mrs. M. R. Tidke APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATED : 18TH MARCH 2023 P. C. : The Applicant has expired. Time is sought to place on record the death certificate of the Applicant. Matter be kept on 31st March 2023, under the caption "for dismissal". [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 57: 17.aba1087.19.doc HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2023.04.05 10:41:45 +0530 Shiv IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1087 OF 2019 Hiraji Hashya Bhoir ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Keral Mehta i/b Mr. Niranjan S. Mundargi for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis APP for Respondent No.1-State. None for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATED : 31ST MARCH 2023 P. C. : On 18th March 2023, there was submission made that the Applicant has expired. In the meantime this fact is confirmed by learned Advocate for the Applicant and she has received instructions to withdraw this Application. Hence Application is disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty is sought on behalf of the Applicant to file Application on behalf of the LRs of the deceased-Applicant for withdrawal of amount already deposited. My attention is invited to the order dated 13th August 2019, thereby directing the Applicant to deposit certain amount. Learned APP submitted that amount cannot be given back. Today, we are only granting liberty to the LRs to file Application. The merits can be considered when that Application is heard for withdrawal of the amount. There is also appearance on behalf of Respondent No.2 in Anticipatory Bail Application. If such Application is filed, Respondent No.2 or learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 may be served. Liberty granted to move such application. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 5: Ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION No. 873 of 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe .. Applicant. Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. H.P. Ingle I/by Mr. Prashant Goyal Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State. CORAM : C.V. BHADANG, J. DATE : 15th May, 2017. (VACATION JUDGE) P.C. The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with investigation of Crime No. 8 of 2017 registered with Meghwadi Police Station, Jogeshwari (East), Mumbai under Section 406, 420 of IPC. On hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP, it appears that earlier there was First Information Report (FIR) lodged by Abhishek Rai on 6th November, 2016 bearing Crime No. 288 of 2016 registered with Police Station, Vanrai, Mumbai on similar allegations in which the applicant had approached this Court by filing ABA No. 288 of 2017. This Court on 5th May, 2017 has granted interim protection to the applicant on certain conditions. A perusal of the First Information Report in the present case would show that the allegations by and large are similar. The FIR was lodged by Mr. Rohit Sonik. The applicant is alleged to have committed misappropriation and breach of trust in respect of mobile handsets worth Rs.2,01,666/-. Considering the fact that in respect of similar allegations this Court had granted interim protection, the following order is passed: (i) By way of an interim relief, it is directed that in the event of arrest in connection with investigation of Crime No. 8 of 2017, Meghwadi Police Station, the applicant shall be released on bail on executing a P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount; (ii) The applicant shall attend the Investigating Officer on Monday and Friday between 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. and as and when required by the Investigating Officer; and (iii) The applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Agency and shall not tamper or influence the prosecution witnesses. Stand over to 8th June, 2017. (C.V. BHADANG,J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.873/2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe Applicant vs State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Hemant Ingle i.b Mr.Prashant Goyal for Applicant Mr.A.R.Kapadnis APP for State CORAM : PRAKASH D.NAIK, J. DATE : 8 JUNE 2017 P.C. By an order dated 15.5.2017 interim protection was granted to the Applicant. The Applicant was directed to attend the police station. The Advocate for the Applicant submitted that he has complied with the said directions. The learned APP submitted that the Investigating Officer is not present and he would like to take instructions in the matter. In view of the said circumstances, stand over to 28.6.2017. Ad interim order granted earlier to continue till then. (PRAKASH D.NAIK, J)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 …... …... Aditya Dilip Bagwe .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Prashant Goyel, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent – State. P.I. More, Meghwadi Police Station, present. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATED : JUNE 28, 2017. P.C. : The applicant was granted interim protection vide order dated 15th May, 2017. There was a condition to attend the investigating officer on Monday and Friday. Learned APP on instructions submits that the applicant has not complied with the condition of reporting. It is further submitted that the applicant has given false address and he was not traceable at the given address. Learned advocate for the applicant seeks time to take instruction. Hence, stand over to 7th July, 2017. 2 Interim relief granted earlier to continue till then. ( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent …... Mr.Prashant Goyal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATED : JULY 25, 2017. …... P.C. : Stand over to 7th August, 2017. 2 This matter to be heard along with Anticipatory Bail Application No.288 of 2017. 3 Interim relief granted earlier to continue till then. 4 The applicant shall attend Meghwadi Police Station, Jogeshwari (East), Mumbai, on Saturday 29th July, 2017 between 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. ( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 670 OF 2017 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Ahishek Rai ...Intervener IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Aditya Dilip Bagwe ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Prashant Goyal for the Applicant Mr. Ajay Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent-State Mr. S. C. Singh for the Intervener CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. MONDAY, 7th AUGUST, 2017 P.C. : Learned Counsel for the applicant to furnish a copy of the application being Criminal Application No. 288 of 2017 on the learned Counsel for the intervener on or before 11th August, 2017. Stand over to 16th August, 2017. Interim protection to continue till the next date. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 18th August, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 07/09/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 7th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 25/09/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 25th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 12/10/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO.670 OF 2017 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Abhishek Rai Intervener. In the matter between Aditya Dilip Bagwe Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents Mr. Shrinivas Singh i/b S.I.Singh for Intervener Mr.Hemant Ingale i/b Prashant Goyal for the applicant Ms.P.P.Shinde, APP for the State CORAM: A.M. BADAR, J. DATED: 12th OCTOBER, 2017 PC: Mr. Shrinivas Singh appears for the Intervener. At the request of the parties stand over to 16th November 2017. In the meanwhile interim order to continue. (A.M. BADAR, J )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J DATE : 16th November, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 11/12/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: Dond IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 WITH APPP NO. 670 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra . … Respondent Mr. Hemant Ingle i/b Prashant Goyal for Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for State. Mr. Nitin Dalvi for Intervener. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 16th JANUARY 2018. P.C.: 1] At the request of learned Counsel for the applicant, stand over to 23rd January 2018. Interim relief to continue till then. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 29: Nalawade IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.670 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ..Applicant. vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr. Sugat i/by Prashant Goyal for the Applicant in ABA No.873/2017 and ABA No.288/2017. Mr.Nitin Dalvi i/by Shweta Singh for the Applicant in APPP No.670/2017. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP. for the State. CORAM: A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 6th February, 2018. P.C. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the Advocate on record is not keeping well and is unable to attend the Court today. At his request, S.O. to 20.2.2018. Interim relief to continue till then. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 31: Dond IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ..Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. T.N. Khandare i/b Prashant Goyal for Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for State. Mr. Nitin Dalvi for Original Complainant. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 20th FEBRUARY 2018. P.C.: 1] Applicant is directed to attend the Investigating Officer from 22nd February 2018 to 25th February 2018 between 10.00 a.m to 2.00 p.m and to join in the process of investigation. 2] Stand over to 1st March 2018. Interim relief to continue till then. (A.S.GADKARI, J.) 1/1

Order - Status 32: Dond IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ..Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. T.N. Khandare i/b Prashant Goyal for Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for State. Mr. Nitin Dalvi for Original Complainant. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 20th FEBRUARY 2018. P.C.: 1] Applicant is directed to attend the Investigating Officer from 22nd February 2018 to 25th February 2018 between 10.00 a.m to 2.00 p.m and to join in the process of investigation. 2] Stand over to 1st March 2018. Interim relief to continue till then. (A.S.GADKARI, J.) 1/1

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 23rd March, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 02/04/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 2nd April, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 17/04/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 17th April, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 26/04/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 40: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 26th April, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 06/06/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 42: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagwe ….Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra ….Respondent. Mr. Sugat Ingale i/by Hemant Ingale for the Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar APP, for the RespondentState. Mr. Nitin Dalvi for the intervenor. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 25th JUNE, 2018. P.C.: It is submitted that the Advocate on record is in personal difficulty and is unable to attend the Court today. 2 At the request of the learned counsel, stand over to 11th July, 2018 for hearing. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 46: Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 873 OF 2017 Aditya Dilip Bagve Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Prashant Goyal, for the Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM: A. S. GADKARI, J DATED: 11th JULY, 2018 PC: 1. By an order dated dated 15th May, 2017, the applicant was granted interim relief. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP. Perused the record of investigation. The first information report is lodged by Mr. Rohit Sonik on 7th January, 2017. 2. It is the precise prosecution case against the applicant that, the applicant after gaining confidence of the first informant, took delivery of handsets/mobile phones of Vivo company amounting to Rs.2,01,666/ for sale and thereafter neither returned the said handsets nor paid the 1/3 4-ABA873-17.DOC consideration for the same. That the applicant thereafter did not contact to the first informant. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that this is pure and simple civil transaction. He submitted that the applicant has already repaid the amount to the first informant. He submitted that Mr. Rajesh Singh, the partner of Abhishek Rai had been to his shop for collecting the cash towards sale of mobile phones and as the applicant was unable to repay the amount to Mr. Rajesh Singh, he took away all the mobile phones, which were kept for display in the shop. He further submitted that the applicant did not have the said mobile phones as the same have been forcibly taken away by Mr. Rajesh Singh and therefore the applicant could not return the said handsets to the first informant. He, therefore, prayed that the applicant may be granted the prearrest bail. 4. The record of investigation indicates that apart from the first informant herein, there are other five other victims in the present crime, who have been cheated by the applicant by adopting similar modus operendi to the tune of 2/3 approximately Rs.21,07,000/ (Rs. Twenty one lakhs seven thousand only). This Court by an order dated 11th July, 2018 has rejected Anticipatory Bail Application No. 288 of 2017 preferred by the applicant in CR No.288 of 2016 registered with Vanrai police station, Mumbai wherein also similar modus operendi was adopted by the applicant. 5. After taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, the serious allegations against the applicant and the gravity of the offence, this Court is of the considered view that the applicant does not deserve to be protected by prearrest bail. 6. The application is accordingly rejected. [A. S. GADKARI, J.] Santosh Subhash Kulkarni Digitally signed by Santosh Subhash Kulkarni Date: 2018.07.16 11:16:06 +0530

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1506 OF 2023 … … Ajay Vijay Patil ....Applicant V/S State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr. Satyawrat Joshi i/b Mr. Ashish S. Vernekar for the Applicant. Mr. R.M. Pethe, APP for Respondent-State. Mangini Tukaram Malyalkar, ASI, Vita Police Station present in Court. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 23rd MAY 2023. (VACATION COURT) P.C.: At the request of learned Counsel for the Applicant, stand over to 7 th June 2023. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 7: SA Pathan IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1506 OF 2023 Ajay Vijay Patil … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Satyavrat Joshi i/by Mr. Ashish S. Vernekar, for the Applicant. Mr. Veera Shine , APP for the State-Respondent. Mr. Dilip Shinde, for Intervener (Original complainant). Mr. Mallalkar M. Tukaram, ASI, Vita police station. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JUNE 7, 2023 P.C.: This is an Application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking pre arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.229 of 2023 registered with Vita police station, Sangali for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 323, 327 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution case, one Satish Sambhaji Nikam is the father-in-law of the informant who executed will deed of his property in the name of the wife of the informant and her younger brother. For this reason Applicant took grudge against the informant. On 24th April, 2023, when the informant had taken with him the gold ornaments from his shop, Satish Nikam along with Yash Nikam came there and asked the informant to accompany them to Vita in four wheeler vehicle. At about 3:00 pm when they reached Karve, Satish Nikam stopped his vehicle near the construction site of Dhaba of Applicant. There was discussion amongst them. During discussion, accused No.3 started assaulting informant. The Applicant assaulted informant. Due to assault of Applicants, the informant suffered grievous injury. The informant, therefore, filed report with respondent No.1 – police station. Apprehending arrest, the Applicant filed Application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. which is rejected by the order dated 11th May, 2023. Aggrieved thereby, the Applicant has filed the present Application. The learned Advocate for the Applicant submitted that he has been falsely implicated. Due to assault caused by the Applicant, the informant suffered grievous injury. Having considered, the submissions and the case diary produced by learned APP. It appears that injuries caused by assault attributed to the Applicant are grievous in nature. Prima facie, injury certificate supports the case of prosecution that there is fracture over nose due to assault by hard object. The custodial interrogation of the Applicant is necessary to recover alleged loss of gold ornaments. The Applicant has previous crime bearing No.107 of 2012 under Sections 386, 387, 452, 323, 427 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code to his discredit. Therefore, considering the nature of offence alleged against the Applicant, alleged injuries caused by the Applicant and 2 previous antecedents, the Applicant does not deserve to be released on anticipatory bail. The Anticipatory Bail Application is, therefore, rejected. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.713 OF 2015 ..... Jagdish C. Vora ..Applicant. versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. ..... Mr. Ghanshyam Upadhyay i/b. Law Juris for the Applicant. Mr. Arfan Sait, Addl. P.P. for the State – Respondent. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. (VACATION COURT) 18th May 2015. P.C. : After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, when this Court expressed its opinion about non entertaining the application, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application. The application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to move the trial Court as per the order dated 13th May, 2015. The application is disposed of. 2] It is needless to mention that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits and the trial Court shall deal with the application on its own merits without being influenced of this order. (A.S. Gadkari, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1525 OF 2022 Kiran Sunder Anchan .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Niranjan Mundargi i/b Mr.Vaibhav G. Bagade for the Applicant. ... … Mr.S.V.Gavand, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 10th JUNE, 2022 P.C:- At the request of the learned A.P.P., re-notify to 13/06/2022. ( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1525 OF 2022 Kiran Sunder Anchan ] ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b Mr. Vaibhav G. Bagade for the applicant. … Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P. for the State. Mr. Rajiv Sakpal, PI attached to Andheri Police Station is present in the court. … CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2022. P.C.:- C.R. No.372 of 2022 came to be registered with Andheri Police Station on 23/04/2022, pursuant to a raid conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar, Bengali Chawl, Koldongri, Sahara Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai. The incident resulted in invoking Sections 308, 294, 114 and Section 34 of the IPC read with Sections 3, 8(1), (2), (4) and 33 (R) of the Maharashtra Act, 2016. The said C.R. arraign 22 persons as accused and the applicant came to be arraigned as accused No.19. Relying upon the remand report, learned counsel would submit that the Manager as well as the cashier of the concerned Bar, in which the raid was conducted, are arrested. One Shridhar Shetty (accused No.23) is the owner of the Bar, who has been released on bail in an anticipatory bail application. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the applicant advanced an argument that the applicant is the Manager in one Hotel Mansa Bar & Restaurant, Andheri and he has been arraigned as an accused, without any connection with the raid conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar. Learned A.P.P. was, therefore, asked to ascertain the factual position. Learned A.P.P. states that the FIR makes a reference to Kiran Pujari and the applicant is Kiran Sunder Anchan and learned A.P.P. is unable to point out any positive material to demonstrate that the person named in the FIR is the applicant. In any case, when specifically asked as to what is the connection with the owner/Manager of the other Bars, operating within the jurisdiction of Andheri Police Station and why all of them are arraigned as accused, no response is coming forward from the side of the prosecution. In the absence of any involvement of the applicant in the raid, which was conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar and since the applicant was neither the owner nor employed in the said Bar and, in fact, the owner of the Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar is informed to have been granted protection, there is no reason why the same protection cannot be extended to the present applicant. Hence, the following order: ORDER (a) In the event of arrest, the applicant Kiran Sunder Anchan shall be temporarily released on bail in C.R. No.372 of 2022 registered with Andheri Police Station, District Mumbai, on executing P.R. bond to the extent of Rs.25,000**/** and furnishing one or two sureties of the like amount. (b) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case and shall not tamper with prosecution evidence. (c) The applicant shall report to the Andheri Police Station from 20/06/2022 to 22/06/2022 between 3.00 p.m. and 5.00 p.m. and, thereafter, as and when directed. List the application along with Anticipatory Bail Application No.1484 of 2022 on 11/07/2022. All parties are directed to act on the downloaded copy of the order supplied by the Advocate under his seal and signature. [SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1525 OF 2022 Kiran Sunder Anchan ] ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b Mr. Vaibhav G. Bagade for the applicant. … Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P. for the State. Mr. Rajiv Sakpal, PI attached to Andheri Police Station is present in the court. … CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2022. P.C.:- C.R. No.372 of 2022 came to be registered with Andheri Police Station on 23/04/2022, pursuant to a raid conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar, Bengali Chawl, Koldongri, Sahara Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai. The incident resulted in invoking Sections 308, 294, 114 and Section 34 of the IPC read with Sections 3, 8(1), (2), (4) and 33 (R) of the Maharashtra AJN This order stands corrected as per speaking to the minutes order dated 17.06.2022 . Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein) Act, 2016. The said C.R. arraign 22 persons as accused and the applicant came to be arraigned as accused No.19. Relying upon the remand report, learned counsel would submit that the Manager as well as the cashier of the concerned Bar, in which the raid was conducted, are arrested. One Shridhar Shetty (accused No.23) is the owner of the Bar, who has been released on bail in an anticipatory bail application. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the applicant advanced an argument that the applicant is the Manager in one Hotel Mansa Bar & Restaurant, Andheri and he has been arraigned as an accused, without any connection with the raid conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar. Learned A.P.P. was, therefore, asked to ascertain the factual position. Learned A.P.P. states that the FIR makes a reference to Kiran Pujari and the applicant is Kiran Sunder Anchan and learned A.P.P. is unable to point out any positive material to demonstrate that the person named in the FIR is the applicant. In any case, when specifically asked as to what is the connection with the owner/Manager of the other Bars, operating within the jurisdiction of Andheri Police Station and why all of them are arraigned as accused, no response is coming forward from the side of the prosecution. In the absence of any involvement of the applicant in the raid, which was conducted in Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar and since the applicant was neither the owner nor employed in the said Bar and, in fact, the owner of the Samit Punjab Restaurant & Bar is informed to have been granted protection, there is no reason why the same protection cannot be extended to the present applicant. Hence, the following order: ORDER (a) In the event of arrest, the applicant Kiran Sunder Anchan shall be released on bail in C.R. No.372 of 2022 registered with Andheri Police Station, District Mumbai, on executing P.R. bond to the extent of Rs.25,000**/**- and furnishing one or two sureties of the like amount. (b) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case and shall not tamper with prosecution evidence. (c) The applicant shall report to the Andheri Police AJN This order stands corrected as per speaking to the minutes order dated 17.06.2022 . Station from 20/06/2022 to 22/06/2022 between 3.00 p.m. and 5.00 p.m. and, thereafter, as and when directed. The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed off in the above terms. All parties are directed to act on the downloaded copy of the order supplied by the Advocate under his seal and signature. [SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1525 OF 2022 Kiran Sunder Anchan ] ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent … … Ms. Keral Mehta for the applicant. Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2022. P.C.:- Not on board. On mentioning, taken on board. It is pointed out that there are certain errors in the operative part of the order dated 13/06/2022 inasmuch as, the word 'temporarily' appearing in clause (a) of the operative part, is an inadvertent error and the same needs to be deleted. Similarly, paragraph No.6 is an inadvertent error and the same be replaced as follows: "6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed off in the above terms." The Order dated 13/06/2022 be corrected accordingly. [SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.] AJN