All Cases

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1088 OF 2014 The State of Maharashtra (Through The Special Land Acquisition Officer) & anr. … Appellants vs. Shri. Gopal Rama Gumbade (Deceased) Thr. LRs. Smt. Sakhubai Gopal Gumbade & ors. … Respondents Mr. A. R. Patil, A. G. P. for the appellants. Coram : Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 3rd May, 2016 P.C. : Admit. [Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3620 OF 2016 Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. J. Shekhar i/b J. Shekhar & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for the Respondent State. Mr. M. S. Topkar, for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. Mr. Rampal Kohli, for Respondent No. 5. CORAM : V. M. KANADE, M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 28, 2016 PC. Issue notice before admission returnable on 25.4.2016. Sd/- [V. M. KANADE, J.] Sd/- [M. S. KARNIK, J.] Vinayak Halemath [1VI. 3. KAKINIK, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation •••• Petitioner vs State of Maharashtra and others •••• Respondents Mr. Shekhar Jagtap a/w Akshay Kapadia i/b J. Shekhar & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. S. A. Sawant a/w Mr. Ketan Joshi for respondent no. 3 o. 3 Mr. R. S. Kohli for Respondent no. 5. Ms. Pavitra Manesh i/b Mr. M. S. Tapkar for respondent nos. 6 & 7 t nos .6&7 CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 29 MARCH , 2016 ORDER: Not on board. In view of the urgency expressed, matter is taken on board today. Pending the other writ petitions, this Court in Writ Petition No. 337 of 2016, have passed workable order wherein this Court has observed in para 5 as under: **"**5 However, considering the emergent situation in question and so also the obligations of the "Local Authority" to provide various services in the city of Nashik through or by appointing agents/contractors and to avoid further complications, as such sudden revocation of registration itself rendered the Petitioner helpless for want of power and authority to appoint the Licensed Contractor or agents for providing essential services, therefore, by way of interim arrangement, we are inclined to observe that the position as of 31 December 2015 requires to continue in all respect, qua the subject matter of impugned notice dated 1 January 2016 i.e. no revocation of registration, so that the people at large should not be made to suffer because of the stated inaction on the part of the Corporation of non compliances, so referred in impugned order dated 1 January 2016. The Petitioner to continue with their obligations to provide amenities and/or facilities and services to the citizen of Nashik City." A statement is made that this arrangement is still continuing. By impugned tender notice dated 29/02/2016, four contractors whose issue with regard to their black listing, are pending in the Court i.e. Writ Petition No. 379 of 2016, 380 of 2016, 11630 of 2015 & 11631 of 2015. The issue is also pending with the State Government in view of the appeal under section 451 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 filed by respondent no. 5. After going through the orders passed by this Court in the petition filed by those contractors, who are at present black listed and as their applications for stay and/or related issues are not yet finalized in their favour, the resolution and decision taken by respondent no. 3 i.e. Standing Committee of Municipal Corporation, permitting them to participate in the tender process, in our view, at this stage, required to be stayed. This is to avoid further complications and specifically in view of the fact of pendency of writ petitions so referred above. By keeping all points open, including maintainability of writ petitions as alternative remedy is available, and the other petitions are pending in this Court for final decision as recorded above, we are inclined to pass the order as under. O R D E R (i) Adinterim relief in terms of prayer clause (C) which reads thus: "C. Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Writ Petition, this Hon'ble High Court may kindly stay the effect, implementation, execution and operation of the impugned Resolution No. 822 dated 29/02/2016 passed by the Respondent no. 3 and thereby permitting the Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 to participate in the tender process due on 29/03/2016." Parties to act upon the authenticated copy of this order. The learned counsel for respondent no. 5, on instructions, seeks stay of this order passed in Court today. Considering the reasons so recorded above, the said request is rejected. Stand over to 12/04/2016. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation -Versus F Petitioner State of Maharashtra & Ors. R Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.882 OF 2016 D.882 OF 20 16 Sayyed Asif Ali A Applicant In the matter between: Nashik Municipal Corporation P Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. R Respondents Mr.Shekhar Jagtap with Akshay Kapadia i/b. J. Shekhar & Co. for petitioner Mr.Ketan Joshi for respondent No.3 Mr.S.R.Ranghe for respondent No.4 and for applicant in CAW 882 of 2016 Mr. Rampal S. Kohli for respondent No.5 CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A.SAYED, JJ § DATE : 13th April 2016. 2016. P.C. 1] In view of the earlier order dated 5th April 2016 after considering the civil application as well as the submissions so made, we have specifically ordered as under:- "5. On 29 March, except Respondent No. 4, all other Respondents were duly heard. Based upon the orders passed in Writ Petitions, which are mentioned in para 4 of the order dated 29 March 2016 and considering the urgency so expressed, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) of the Petition has been granted. As the matter itself is directed to be listed on 12 April, 2016, we are inclined to list this matter on 12 April 2016 so that all the Respondents will be heard on merits of the matter, including the submissions revolving around the order so passed on 29 March, 2016. In view of the above, no case is made out for interim relief and/or recalling any order at this stage in this Civil Application. The Petitioner to file Reply to the Civil Application. The submission is made that in other Writ Petitions (Writ Petition No. 379 of 2016, 380 of 2016, 11630 of 2015 & 11631 of 2015) directions are given to list the said Petitions after two weeks for final disposal and it is also observed that further process of the tender shall be subject to the final outcome of the Writ Petitions. Therefore, it is also necessary for the parties to file common precipe so that all these matters can be heard together by one Bench. Parties to take steps accordingly. Place the Petition on 12 April 2016 for hearing before the appropriate Bench." 2] We are informed that a precipe is already filed in pursuance of the above order on 11th April 2015 before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice for appropriate orders. 3] Let the matter be placed before appropriate bench in view of the above. (A.A.SAYED, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J)

Order - Status 12: mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Akshar Kapadia i/b. J. Shekhar & Co. Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Ketan Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Mr. Mohammed Ashraf, Advocate for Respondent No.5 Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the State Ms. Pavitra M. i/b. Mr. M.S. Topkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 CORAM : V.M.KANADE & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 20TH APRIL, 2016 P.C. : Not before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member. Matter be placed before the appropriate Bench. Application is made for speaking to the minutes of our order dated 28th March, 2016. In fact the order was passed that the matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member. However, inadvertently an order is passed " issue notice before admission returnable on 25.4.2016 ". The said order is accordingly modified and it is clarified that on 28th March, 2016 order which was passed was "The matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member". The order is accordingly modified and shall be read as follows: "The matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member" . (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 14: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 15: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11630 OF 2015 M/s Samiksha Construction Company ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP STAMP NO. 23039 OF 2017 In Writ Petition 11630 OF 2015 M/s Samiksha Construction Company ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11631 OF 2015 M/s Vishal Services ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 380 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan Bora ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 293 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 474 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 292 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 473 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan P. Bora ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 1064 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 11631 OF 2015 M/s Vishal Services ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 473 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor Shri. Chetan Bora ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 334 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 379 OF 2016 ....RESPONDENT M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 336 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 380 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan P. Bora ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 640 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 379 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 474 OF 2010 Tain Constructions ....PETITIONER V/S Vilas Shankar Shelar And Ors. ....RESPONDENT ....APPLICANT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 19th March, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 07/08/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....RESPONDENT Mr. Mithchelle Almeida i/b Rompal Singh Kohli for Respondent Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 & 2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 29th April, 2024 P.C. : Stand over to 08/07/2024 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3931 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.17290 OF 2008 Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : : : Court's or Judge's Orders : & Registrar's orders : Mr.M.S.Menon, adv. for Applicant. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 29th July, 2008. P.C.: Notice to the respondents returnable one week. Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) till then. (J.H.BHATIA, J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATIONNO. 3931 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1684 OF 2008 Devnarayan Razak ... Appellant (Org. Plaintiff) Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr.Bombay Respondent (Org. Defendant) Mr. M.S.Menon, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. J.J.Xavier, Advocate, for the respondent. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 2nd September, 2008. P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for both the parties. The Appeal is admitted. According to the plaintiff, the suit structure was in possession of his father since 1950 as tenant of M/s. Indian Hume Pipe Co.Ltd. However, the plaintiff has produced rent receipts for few months of 1997. According to him, the assessment bill for the year 1998-99 shows the property was assessed prior to 1961-62 and therefore, it is protected. He also points out that the Municipal Corporation had offered some alternative accommodation in May 2003 by notice under Sec. 105B of the Municipal Corporation Act. This statement of the plaintiff was not challenged in the cross-examinatin by the defendants. Taking into consideration these circumstances, interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). (J.H.iBHATIA, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.39 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 81 OF 2018 Sandeep Nagin Patel. ... Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent ..... Mr. Rakesh Bhatkar, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : A.M.BADAR J. DATED : 7th FEBRUARY 2018. P.C. : 1 Heard the learned Advocate for the appellant/accused. Perused the impugned Judgment and Order of conviction and resultant sentence. .... 2 Admit. 3 Issue notice to the respondent. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives notice for the respondent/State. 4 Call for Record and Proceedings. (A.M.BADAR J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 209 OF 2017 Shri Sampat Shankar More … Applicant Vs. Shri Dinesh Sangramsing Thakor & Anr. … Respondents Mr. Prashant Patil for the Applicant. Mr. A.R.Kapadnis, APP for State. CORAM : I : A.S. GADKARI DATE : : 23rd MARCH, 2018 P.C. ` Issue notice to Respondent No. 1, returnable after three weeks. In addition to Court notice, the applicant is permitted to serve Respondent No. 1 by way of private notice and to file an affidavit of service after Respondent No. 1 is duly served. Stand over to 13.04.2018. (A.S. GADKARI, J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION APPLN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 209 OF 2017 Sampat Shankar More ....Appellant V/S Dinesh Sangramsing Thakor And Anr ....Respondent Prashant Daulatrao Patil For Appellant Ms.V.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J DATE : 10th April, 2018 P.C. : Await Service for Respondent No.1. Stand over to 03/05/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Nalawade FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 209 OF 2017 Sampat S.More vs. Disnesh S. Thakor and anr. Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders None for the Applicant. Ms. S.S.Kadtane i/by K.U.Nikam for the Respondent No.1. Mr. A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the RespondentState. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 03rd May, 2018 P.C. None for the applicant. Dismissed for non prosecution. (A.S.GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION IN APPLICATION NO. 719 OF 2019 In APPLN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) STAMP NO. 214 OF 2019 The Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd. Now Known As Godavari Bio-refineries Ltd. Thr Pandurang Dalvi ....Applicant V/S Ramesh Anandrao Sawant And Anr. ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 7th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 05/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )