All Cases

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4846 OF 2005 ...................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's orders or directions and orders Registrar's orders ...................................................... Law Global for the Applicant. Ms S.D.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjay Khemka, Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : AUGUST 05, 2005. P.C.: 1. The Respondent No.2 appearing in person mentioned this matter at 02.00 p.m. for adjournment. The prayer made by the Respondent No.2 appearing in person was opposed by the Advocate for the Applicant on the ground that the Applicant desires to obtain ad-interim relief. None appears for the Applicant when the Application is called out. Dismissed for default. JUDGE

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4797 OF 2005 Sanjay Sitaram Khemka .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4846 OF 2005 Sampatraj Adania .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.S.S.Khemka, applicant in person in CA No.4797/05 and respondent no.2 in person in CA No.4846/05. Mr.Subhash Jha i/b Law Global for respondent no.3 in CA No.4797/05 and for the applicant. in CA No.4846/05. Mr.R.Y.Mirza A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 3RD AUGUST, 2006 P.C.: . Heard Sanjay Khemka in person and Mr.Subhash Jha, learned counsel for respondent-Sampatraj Adania and Mr.R.Y.Mirza learned A.P.P. for the State. Both the applications challenge one and the same order dated 15.7.2005 passed on the application Nos.162/N/2005 and 127/N/2005 filed under section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I am informed that application bearing No.121/N/2005 field by Mr.Sanjay Khemka on 3.3.2005 under section 451 was also pending at the relevant time. I heard the applicant - Sanjay Khemka in both the applications in person and Mr.Jha for the respondent-Sampatraj Adania. Both, the applicant-Khemka and Mr.Jha have fairly stated that I need not record the reasons for setting aside the order dated 15.7.2005 passed on the application nos.162/N/2005 and 127/N/2005 and the parties would be satisfied by the order that I proposed to pass. Hence the following order: (a) The order dated 15.7.2005 passed below application nos.127/N/2005 and 162/N/2005 by the Special Metropolitan Magistrate, 48th Court, Andheri is quashed and set aside. Both the applications stand restored to file. (b) The learned Magistrate shall hear and decide, application nos.127/N/2005 and 162/N/2005 with the application of Sanjay Khemka bearing No.121/N/2005 afresh as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The learned Magistrate may also hear application/s, if any, under section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure alongwith the aforesaid 2 applications. The learned Magistrate shall give hearing to all the concerned parties while passing the order on the aforesaid applications for return of property under section 451 of the Code and decide all the applications on merits in accordance with law. . With these directions the applications are disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)

Order - Status 14: 1 (APPR 211 of 2010 in REVN 412 of 2004) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 211 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 412 OF 2004 M/s.Chunilal Mangilal ...Applicant Vs. Phoenix (India) and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr.Subhash Jha i/b. Law Global for Applicant Mr. Ganesh Gole for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Mr.P.S. Hingorani -APP for the State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 22ND NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. This is an application for expeditious disposal of the criminal application no. 412 of 2004. The learned counsel for the Applicant does not want to press this application at this stage since I am inclined to hear the criminal application No. 412 of 2004 for final hearing 2 (APPR 211 of 2010 in REVN 412 of 2004) today itself. Hence, criminal application No. 211 of 2010 is disposed of . (V.M. KANADE J.) 3 (APPR 211 of 2010 in REVN 412 of 2004)

#VALUE!

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 9 JULY 2015. P.C . :- On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary/ Daily Boards stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date 2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 27/07/2015 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28 28/07/2015 31, 33, 34, 35, 36 30/07/2015 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 31/07/2015 43, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 03/08/2015 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1858 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 47 OF 2015 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh for Applicants. Mr. K. S. Pillai - C. A. of Respondent No.1 present CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 27 JULY 2015 P.C. :- 1] Mr. K. S. Pillai, constituted attorney for the respondent no.1 files reply opposing the application seeking amendment of the petition. However, since the petition is yet to be admitted, in my judgment, there is no reason to deny leave to amend. The objections of the respondent no. 1, mainly, are directed against the merits of the contentions and reliefs raised by way of amendment. Accordingly, the respondent no. 1 shall be at liberty to raise all such objections once the amendment is carried out and the petition is taken up for admission. 2] With liberty, as aforesaid, civil application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). Necessary amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today and within one week thereafter, copy of the amended petition be furnished to the respondents. 3] Place the main petition for admission on 24 August 2015. In the meanwhile, if any of the respondents, including the respondent no. 1, desire to file any reply, they shall be at liberty to do so. (M. S. SONAK, J.) Chandka

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 47 OF 2015 Smt. Maulanbee Jiyavuddin Shaikh And Anr. ....PETITIONER V/S Dr. (smt.) Chitra Kanagasabapathy And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 1858 OF 2015 In Writ Petition 47 OF 2015 Smt. Maulanbee Jiyavuddin Shaikh And Anr. ....APPLICANT V/S Dr. (smt.) Chitra Kanagasabapathy And Ors. ....RESPONDENT Mr.Piyush A. Singh a/w. Krishnakant Singh i/b.AJAY KUMAR SINGH for Petitioner Mr.Surya Das i/b. R.R. Sharma for R.Nos.4 to 7. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 12th January, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 02/02/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.788/05 Ajit... Khanderao Deshpande Appellant. Versus Smt. Nalini Khanderao Deshpande Mr.A.L. Kumar for appellant. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE,JJ. DATE : 4/7/05. PC: 1.Notice before admission. Notice Returnable in six weeks. (S.R.SATHE) (S.B.MHASE) &... Ors Respdts.

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL No.788 OF 2005 Office notes, : office memoranda : of coram, : appearances, : Court's orders : Court's or Judge's directions & : order Registrar's : orders : Ms. Deepti Mistry , Advocate for the appellant. CORAM: J. N. PATEL, AND A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : JULY 30, 2007. P.C.: The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that this being a family dispute, it has been settled out of Court, and therefore the appellant be permitted to withdraw the appeal. The statement is accepted. The appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 2.The appellant is entitled for refund of Court Fees, as per Bombay Court Fees Act & Rules. Sd/- [ A. A. SAYED, J.] [ J. N. PATEL, J.]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 252 OF 2013 Mr. Prakash Bapu Wani Appellant vs. Mr. Parashuram Ramchandra & Anr. Respondents Mr. Dundapa B. Patil,Advocate for the appellant. Ms. S.V.Gajare,APP,for the respondent-State CORAM: SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 18th June, 2013. P.C. Heard. Issue notice to respondent No.1. Learned APP waives service for respondent No.2. Notice returnable ten weeks. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.252 of 2013 Prakash Bapu Wani .. Applicant Versus Parashuram Ramchandra Rahate and anr .. Respondents Mr.D.B.Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mrs.S.V.Gajare, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 2 nd MARCH, 2015 P.C. : 1 Heard. 2 Leave granted. 3 The Application for leave to Appeal be treated as a Memo of Appeal, and be numbered accordingly. The appeal is admitted. 4 Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks. 5 The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 waives service of notice for final hearing. 6 The respondent no.1 shall, however, execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/ before the trial court within a period of six weeks from today.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (St) NO.13209 of 2019 Anand Baban Khedkar Appellant vs Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar Respondent Mr.Amijith Anandhan I.b.Mr,.Sachin Pawar for Appellant. CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J DATE : 22nd JULY, 2019 P.C Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. Issue notice to the Respondent returnable on 19.8.2019. In addition to Court's notice, learned counsel for the Appellant to serve the Respondent by private notice. [M.S.KARNIK,J]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ....Appellant V/S Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ....Respondent CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 17th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 22/11/2019 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ....Appellant V/S Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ....Respondent Adv.Sachin R,Pawar for Appellant CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 14th October, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners / respondent / applicant , Stand over to 11/11/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ....Appellant V/S Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ....Respondent Mr.Apmjit M.A. a/w Mr.L.R.Kewat for Appellant. Vilas Babanrao Tapkir Vp For Sole Res. For CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J DATE : 5th February, 2020 P.C. : Stand over to 06/02/2020 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: Tandle IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ... Appellant Versus Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ... Respondent. Mr. Sachin R. Pawar for the Appellant. Mr. V. B. Tapkir for the Respondent. - - - - - - - CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 6th FEBRUARY, 2020 P. C. : After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant at length when this Court expressed its disinclination to grant any relief, the learned counsel, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Appeal unconditionally. Leave and liberty granted. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that, the Trial Court will not get influenced by the dismissal of the present Appeal and shall decide the suit filed by the appellant on its own merits. (A. S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 4: Digitally signed by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date: 2024.06.25 13:49:54 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7844 OF 2024 IIFL Home Finance Ltd., Thane .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents Ms. Priyanka Fadia, i/by Mr. Shashank Fadia, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. M.S. Srivastava, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 24 TH JUNE, 2024. P.C. : It is informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the next date of the proceedings before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate is 8th July 2024. To consider whether the said proceedings are taken up on the adjourned date, put up for further consideration on 16th July 2024. [ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7844 OF 2024 Iifl Home Finance Ltd PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr Assistant RESPONDENT Government And Anr CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. CHANDURKAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 16th July, 2024 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 30/07/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7844 OF 2024 IIFL Home Finance Ltd., Thane .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents Ms. Priyanka Fadia, i/by Mr. Shashank Fadia, Advocates for the Petitioner. Ms. M.S. Srivastava, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 21 ST OCTOBER 2024. P.C. : The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition since the purpose of filing the same has been served. The writ petition is disposed of. [ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] 6-WP-7844-2024.doc Dixit