All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @ Chand ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 5th June, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned, 27/06/2017 Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @ Chand ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 13th July, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 31/07/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @ Chand ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 14th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 29/09/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @ Chand ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 14th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 29/09/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @Chand Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.S.R.Gaud i/b Mr.M.R.Gowd, for the Applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 26th SEPTEMBER, 2017 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on board. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions of the instructing Advocate, seeks leave to withdraw this application. The Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. It is made clear, that this application has not been heard on merits. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 401 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO. 17334 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's orders : Court's or Judge's Orders _______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Mr. Parekh i/b. M/s. K.R. Parekh & Co., Advocate for the Applicant. CORAM : G.S.GODBOLE, J DATED : 12TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. PC : Heard. Rule returnable after 6 weeks. In addition to service through Court, Advocate of the Applicant/s is also permitted to send private notice by RPAD or Speed Post AD and file Affidavit of Service only if acknowledgment is received or postal envelope is returned with remark "refused". The Civil Application will however be heard either after Court service notices are served or Respondent/s appear through Advocate by filing Vakalatnama on service of private notice. (G.S.GODBOLE, J)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.401 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.17334 OF 2011 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.K.R.Parekh i/b K.R.Parekh & Co. for the Applicant Ms Savina S. Baygera for the resp. nos.1,2,4 to 8 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 18,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1,2 and 4 to 8. The application is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. 2 In view of the averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 194 OF 2008 Vinay Prahaladrai Poddar ... Appellant versus Mrs. Rachana Vinay Poddar ...Respondent Mr. V.S. Kapse for the appellant. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2008 . P.C. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks some time for depositing cost imposed by this Court as per the order dated 23 rd September, 2008. The amount of cost to be deposited before the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority be deposited on or before 24 th October, 2008. Adjourned to 12 th November, 2008. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.

Order - Status 15: pmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.194 OF 2008 Mr. Vinay Prahaladrai Poddar … Appellant V/s. Mrs. Rachana Vinay Poddar … Respondent Mr. V.S. Kapse, for the Appellant. Mr. Harish R. Pawar, for Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 15th APRIL, 2014 P.C. . The Consent Terms duly signed by the Appellant and the Respondent and their respective Advocates are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Appellant and Respondent are personally present. Through their respective counsel they state that they have carefully read the terms and conditions incorporated in the Consent Terms and they accept the correctness thereof. The Appellant has handed over to the Respondent, a Banker's cheque in the sum of Rs.8 lakhs in terms of clause 3 of the Consent Terms. By accepting the undertakings in the Consent Terms, we dispose of the Appeal in terms of Consent Terms. Hence, we pass the following order : ORDER (i) The undertakings in the Consent Terms marked "X" for identification are accepted; (ii) The impugned Judgment and Decree dated 17th December, 2007 in Petition No.A811 of 2006 is hereby quashed and set aside and the said Petition No.A818 of 2007 is restored; (iii) By consent, the said Petition is converted into a Petition under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Amendment shall relate back to the date of the institution of the said Petition; (iv) The parties have agreed that reconciliation is not possible and in view of the differences between them, the dissolution for the marriage is the only solution; (v) Accordingly in Petition No.A818 of 2007, there shall be decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The marriage solemnised between the Appellant and Respondent dated 13th February, 2001 is hereby dissolved by the decree of divorce; (vi) The Appeal is disposed of on above terms and in terms of the Consent Terms. There will be no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J ) (A.S.OKA, J )

Order - Status 5: 1 WP-1008-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1008 OF 2011 Mrs. Kavarthapu Arunadevi Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents Mr. Ghanshyam Upadhyay,Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the respondent No.1 - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 25th April, 2011. P.C. Notice to the respondent No.2, returnable 8 weeks. Private service by Regd.Post A.D./Speed Post/Courier is permitted with condition that the petitioner shall file affidavit of service. Till the next date, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). (J.H.BHATIA,J.) Mhi

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1008 OF 2011 Mrs.Kavarthapu Arunadevi Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents. Mr.Gaurav Agarwal i/b Law Juris for the petitioner. Mr.S.R.Shinde APP for the State. Mr.Vivek Jalan i/b Mr.Ketan Chotani for respondent no.2. CORAM : P.D.KODE, J. DATED : 23RD JULY, 2012 P.C. In response to grievance made by Mr.Jalan, learned counsel for respondent no.2 that copy of the petition has not been furnished to said respondent, learned counsel for the petitioner states that copy of the petition has already been furnished/served upon respondent no.2, however, he will furnish additional copy of the petition during the course of day. Hence S.O. for one week. (P. D. KODE, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1008 OF 2011 Mrs. Kavarthapu Arunadevi. ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Pawan Kumar Mishra i/b. Law Juris for the Petitioner. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State. Mr. Ketan Chotani for Respondent 2. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 30th JULY 2012. P.C. :- Affidavit in reply of Respondent No.2 tendered. Copy received by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. He seeks accommodation. Stand over to 27th August 2012. To be heard finally at admission stage. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1008 OF 2011 Kavarthapu Arunadevi. ..Petitioner Versus -The State of Maharashtra and another. ..Respondents Mr.Ghanshyam Upadhyay a/w Mr.Gaurav Agrawal i/by Law Juris, for the Petitioner. Mr.A.R.Patil, APP, for the Respondent/State. Ms.Manjiri Parasnis i/by Mr.Ketan A. Chotani, for the Respondent No.2. ........... ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 10th May, 2013. PC: 1 The Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed as such with liberty aforesaid. ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. )

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6730 OF 2023 AND WRIT PETITION NO.6731 OF 2023 AND WRIT PETITION NO.6732 OF 2023 AND WRIT PETITION NO.6733 OF 2023 M/s. Rishi Construction .. Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation for the City of Kalyan Dombivali & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar a/w. Mr. Hrishikesh Pawaskar a/w. Mr. S.M. Mangaonkar, for the Petitioner in all petitions. Mr. A.S. Rao, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2-Corporation. Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.3-State. CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & R.N. LADDHA, JJ DATE : 7TH JUNE, 2023. P.C. : Leave to file additional documents on record is granted to the petitioner. Issue notice for final disposal at the admission stage to the respondents, returnable on 21st June, 2023. Mr. A.S. Rao, learned counsel waives service of notice for Respondent Nos.1 and 2-Corporation. Learned AGP waives service of notice for Respondent No.3-State. Stand over to 21st June, 2023. [ R.N. LADDHA, J. ] [ SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J. ]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6730 OF 2023 M/s. Rishi Construction ....PETITIONER V/S Municipal Corporation For The City Of Kalyan Dombivali Thru Municipal Commissioner And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6731 OF 2023 M/s. Rishi Construction ....PETITIONER V/S Municipal Corporation For The City Of Kalyan Dombivali Thru Municipal Commissioner And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6732 OF 2023 M/s. Rishi Construction ....PETITIONER V/S Municipal Corporation For The City Of Kalyan Dombivali Thru Municipal Commissioner And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6733 OF 2023 M/s. Rishi Construction ....PETITIONER V/S Municipal Corporation For The City Of Kalyan Dombivali Thru Municipal Commissioner And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUNIL B. SHUKRE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 21st June, 2023 P.C. : Wrongly on board. Remove from the Board. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6285 OF 2017 Shri. Ajay Rajendra Pawar ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....Respondent Suresh M Sabrad For Petitioner Mrs.R.M.Shinde,A.G.P.for state. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M.S. SONAK, JJ DATE : 14th June, 2017 P.C. : Stand over to 12/07/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6285 OF 2017 Shri. Ajay Rajendra Pawar ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....Respondent Suresh M Sabrad For Petitioner Shri P.P. More, AGP for State. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M.S. SONAK, JJ DATE : 12th July, 2017 P.C. : Stand over to 13/07/2017 under the caption of withdrawal. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6285 OF 2017 Ajay R. Pawar ..Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr. S.M. Sabrad for the Petitioner Mr. P.P. More, AGP for the Respondents – State. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : JULY 13, 2017. P.C. : . The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.1 while passing the impugned order dated 6th May 2016 did not consider the Government Resolution (G.R.) dated 12th March 2013 (ExhibitW), the report dated 16th February 2016 of the Additional Collector and the various judgments passed by this Court from time to time. 2] We find that there is no mention about consideration of the said G.R., report of the Additional Collector as also the judgments on which the petitioner has placed reliance. In the circumstances, we allow the petitioner to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a review petition before respondent No.1. The petitioner may file the review petition within two weeks. 3] Needless to say that we have not commented upon the merits on the petitioner's entitlement. The respondent No.1 is free to decide the review petition, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible but not later than three months from the date of filing of such review petition. 4] With aforesaid liberty, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn. (M. S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)