All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER --- CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 4th September, 2013 P.C. : On account of paucity of time, the following matters on the daily board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. --- Sr.Nos. Adjourned Date 06,09,10,17,20,36,37,38,40,41,42,44 16/09/2013 12,13,14,15,16,43 17/09/2013 19, 22, 23 08/10/2013 24,26,27,28,29,31,32,33,34,35,45 10/10/2013 25 24/09/2013 39 27/04/2013 46,47,48 19/09/2013 49, 50 20/09/2013 If any ad-interim or interim relief granted in the aforesaid matters is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the dates which are fixed under this order. If there is an extreme urgency, the parties can get the papers produced before the Court.

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1939 OF 2013 Ganesh Arjun Ghadage And Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Vivek Salunke Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 18, 2013. P. C.: . Heard learned Counsel Mr. Vivek Salunke for the Petitioners and Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P. for the State. Issue notice to Respondent No.2 returnable on 15 January 2014. (M.L.TAHALIYANI, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1939 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders None for the Petitioner Mr. D. R. More APP for the State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : JANUARY 24, 2014 P.C. : None present for the Petitioner. Learned counsel for the Petitioner shall furnish a complete spare to the Office within one week from today. Upon furnishing spare copy, Office to issue fresh notice to the Respondent. Notice returnable 4 weeks. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 12: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1939 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Rupesh Zade h/f. Mr. Pravin Dubade, advocate for Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for State. CORAM :SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV , J DATE :JUNE 9, 2014 P.C.: 1 Stand over to 23/6/2014. Pendency of this Writ Petition shall not be construed as a stay to the trial in Special Case No. 25/2011 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati. Office to communicate this order to the concerned court. ( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J) ..... Talwalkar 1/1

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1939 OF 2013 Ganesh Arjun Ghadage and others .....Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another ....Respondents Mr. Vivek Salunke for Petitioner Mr. Rupesh Zade for Respondent Mr. A. S. Shitole APP for the State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : JUNE 23, 2014 PC : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. Petitioner herein had filed an application seeking relief that Special Case No. 25 of 2011 be tried along with R.C.C. No. 32 of 2012. The said application was rejected by the Sessions Court on the ground that the incident reported in R.C.C. No. 32 of 2012 is not arising out of the same incident and therefore, application seeking clubbing of the cases was rejected. Hence, this writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge is not yet framed. However, it appears from the charge-sheet that there are allegations against present petitioners under the provisions of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 and therefore, petitioner would have to be tried by the Special Court. In that case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused in R.C.C. No. 166 of 2011 should also be tried by the Special Court. However, as against them, there are no allegations under the provisions of the Special Act and therefore, they would have to be tried by the Court of Magistrate. In view of this, petition stands disposed of. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT FIRST APPEAL NO. 2176 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Appellants V/s. Janabai Shalik Pethkar & Anr. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3498 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2176 OF 2005 Janabi Shalik Pethkar …Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST.) NO. 789 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2176 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Appellants V/s. Janabai Shalik Pethkar …Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2177 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Appellants V/s. Shankar Hiru Chipalekar D/h Chindhibai Shankar Chipalekar & Ors. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3497 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2176 OF 2005 Shankar Hiru Chipalekar D/H Chindhibai Shankar Chipalekar & Ors. …Appellants V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST.) NO. 79O OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2177 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Appellants V/s. Shankar Hiru Chipalekar D/h Chindhibai Shankar Chipalekar & Ors. …Respondents ---------- Mr. A. R. Patil, for State-Appellants/Applicants. Mr. S. G. Surana, for the Respondents. ----------- CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. D. S. DESHMUKH, REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL-II) V. A. SATHE, OSD AT CPC DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2021 P.C. : . Mr. A. R. Patil, learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, had given an offer of Rs.25/- per sq. mt. As the appellants are not present, further formalities could not be complied with. Therefore, as submitted by their learned Advocate, all these matters be kept in next Lok Adalat. (V. A. SATHE) (D. S. DESHMUKH) (S. M. MODAK, J.) OSD at CPC Registrar (Judl.-II) (Judge)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2895 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO. 24862 OF 2003 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's orders. orders or directions and Registrar's orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED : 3rd Sept., 2004. P.C.: If the entire amount of Court fee payable in the First Appeal is paid within a period of six weeks from today, the First Appeal will stand restored. If the Court fee is not paid within the stipulated time, the order of dismissal will stand. No further extension will be granted. Civil Application stands disposed of. Judge.

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10504 OF 2022 In SECOND APPEAL 517 OF 2022 Shri. Dadaso Hariba Rode ....PETITIONER V/S Shri. Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 874 OF 2022 Pandurang Maruti Chavan ....APPELLANT V/S Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 962 OF 2022 Pandurang Maruti Chavan ....APPELLANT V/S Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19901 OF 2022 In Second Appeal 517 OF 2022 Shri. Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....PETITIONER V/S Shri. Dadaso Hariba Rode ....RESPONDENT None for Applicant. Mr. Sukumar Ghanavat for Respondent. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 18th January, 2023 P.C. : Mentioned out of turn. At the request of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner/Respondent, stand over to 15/02/2023. Ad-interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10504 OF 2022 In SECOND APPEAL 517 OF 2022 Shri. Dadaso Hariba Rode ....PETITIONER V/S Shri. Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 874 OF 2022 Pandurang Maruti Chavan ....APPELLANT V/S Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 962 OF 2022 Pandurang Maruti Chavan ....APPELLANT V/S Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19901 OF 2022 In Second Appeal 517 OF 2022 Shri. Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....PETITIONER V/S Shri. Dadaso Hariba Rode ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 15th February, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 26/04/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19901 OF 2022 In SECOND APPEAL 517 OF 2022 Shri. Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....PETITIONER V/S Shri. Dadaso Hariba Rode ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10504 OF 2022 In Second Appeal 517 OF 2022 Shri. Dadaso Hariba Rode ....PETITIONER V/S Shri. Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 874 OF 2022 Pandurang Maruti Chavan ....APPELLANT V/S Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 962 OF 2022 Pandurang Maruti Chavan ....APPELLANT V/S Vinayak Tukaram Chavan And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr.Sukumar Ghanavat for Applicant in I.A.No.19901/2022. Ms.Divya Pawar for Appellant in S.A.No.517/2022 and Applicant in I.A.No.10504/2022 in S.A.No.517/2022. Mr.Nagesh Y. Chavanf or Appellant in S.A.No.962/2022. S.A.No.874/2022 and Applicant in I.A.No.428/2023 in S.A.No.962/2022. for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 8th March, 2023 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Appellant(s)/ Applicant(s) / Petitioner(s) / Respondent No. stand over to 15/03/2023. Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: 9-ia-10504-2022 in sa-517-2022.doc Pallavi IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.10504 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.517 OF 2022 Shri. Dadaso Hariba Rode ...Applicant Versus Shri. Vinayak Tukaram Chavan and Ors. ...Respondents WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.517 OF 2022 Shri. Dadaso Hariba Rode … Appellant Versus Shri. Vinayak Tukaram Chavan and Ors. … Respondents WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.962 OF 2022 Pandurang Maruti Chavan … Appellant Versus Vinayak Tukaram Chavan & Ors. … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.428 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.962 OF 2022 Pandurang Maruti Chavan … Appellant Versus Vinayak Tukaram Chavan & Ors. … Respondents WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.874 OF 2022 Pandurang Maruti Chavan … Appellant Versus Vinayak Tukaram Chavan & Ors. … Respondents 1/2 Pallavi WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.19901 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.517 OF 2022 Shri Vinayak Tukaram Chavan …Applicant In the matter between Shri Dadaso Hariba Rode …Appellant Versus Shri Vinayak Tukaram Chavan and Ors. Respondents Mr. Sandesh D. Patil i/b. Ms. Divya A. Pawar, for the Applicant in SA/517/2022 and for Applicant in IA/10504/2022. Mr. Nagesh Y. Chavan for the Appellant in SA/962/2022, SA/874/2022 & Applicant in IA/428/2023 and for Respondent in SA/517/2022. Mr. Sukumar Ghanavat for the Applicant in IA/19901/2022 in SA/517/2022. CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 29th MARCH 2023 P.C. : Stand over to 12th April 2023 at 2.30 pm. Ad-interim relief to continue till then. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2612 OF 2006 Ganesh Ramchandra Aarde Versus The State of Maharashtra )Applicant )Respondent Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.S.B.Malvankar for the applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 27.7.2006. PC 1. This is an application for grant of bail. The applicant is shown as an accused alongwith another person in C.R.No.149/2006 registered by the Goregaon police station for offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 420, 380, & 408 r/w 34 of IPC. The applicant was working as a peon in the office of the Complainant and he said to have stolen blank cheque and handed it to the co-accused who forged it and encashed it for the amount of Rs.1,82,000/ An : 2 : amount of Rs.1,71,800/- is recovered. This applicant is a peon and is arrested on 1.5.2006. Investigation is completed. In my view bail can be granted to the present applicant. It is therefore, directed that pending his trial in connection with C.R.No.149/2006 registered by the Goregaon police station, the applicant may be released on bail in the sum of Rs.5,000/ with one surety in the like amount subject to the condition that he will report to the Investigating officer once a month on every Monday till the disposal of the trial. Application stands disposed off. (R.S.Mohite,J)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5825 of 2007 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram,appearances,Court's Orders : Court's or Judges order or directions and Registrar Orders : ------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Amit Borkar for the petitioner. CORAM : S.B. MHASE & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 10th August 2007. P.C:- . Notice returnable after four weeks. Hamdast allowed. (D.G.KARNIK, J) (S.B.MHASE, J)