All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3482 OF 2010 1 Tulsibai Shankar Vaijal & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors....Respondents Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni i/b Mr.A.L.Patki for the petitioners Mr.Hemang S. Rathattha for the respondent no.2 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MAY 3, 2010 P.C.: 1 This petition challenges the order passed on application for review of the order passed in Notice of Motion no.1373 of 2003. The petitioner has preferred an Appeal from Order stamp no.10602 of 2010 for challenging the order passed on the Notice of Motion. These two matters will have to be heard by the same Court. 2 The Registrar (Judicial-I) will take appropriate administrative order in this behalf from the Hon ble the Chief Justice. JUDGE ssp

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3482 OF 2010 WITH C.A.NO.3286 OF 2015 IN W.P.NO.3482 OF 2010 WITH C.A.NO.3287 OF 2015 IN W.P.NO.3482 OF 2010 ALONG WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 WITH C.A.(ST.) NO.17024 OF 2010 IN A.O.(ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 WITH C.A.NO.828 OF 2010 IN A.O.(ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 WITH C.A.(ST.) NO.10606 OF 2010 IN A.O.(ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 WITH C.A.(ST.) NO.30556 OF 2010 IN A.O.(ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 Tulsibai Shankar Vaijal and others … Petitioners Vs. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority and another … Respondents Mr. Abhay L. Patki for Petitioners and Appellants in WP and AO respectively. Mr. Jayesh Mestry i/b. Mr. Hemang R. for Respondent-MHADA. Mr. Drupad Patil for Interveners in C.A.No.3287/15 in WP 3482 of 2010 and C.A.(St.) No.30556 of 2010 in A.O.(St.) No.10602 of 2010. CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2015 P.C. : Not on Board. At the request of Mr. Patki, taken up in the production board. WRIT PETITION NO.3482 OF 2010 Heard Mr. Patki, learned Counsel for petitioners, Mr. Mestry, learned Counsel for respondent-MHADA. Mr. Patki seeks leave to withdraw this Petition unconditionally as the parties have filed consent terms in Writ Petition (L) No.14050 of 2015. He also seeks leave to delete respondent No.1. Leave is granted. Amendment shall be carried out forthwith On the motion made by Mr. Patki, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the disposal of the Petition, Civil Application No.3286 of 2015 for impleadment of applicants as respondents No.3 to 7 as also Civil Application No.3287 of 2015 for impleadment of applicants as respondents No.3 and 4 do not survive and the same are disposed of as such. APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 Heard Mr. Patki, learned Counsel for appellants, Mr. Mestry, learned Counsel for respondent-MHADA. Mr. Patki seeks leave to delete respondent No.1. Leave is granted. Amendment shall be carried out forthwith. Mr. Patki submitted that by the administrative order dated 03.02.2010, the Hon'ble Chief Justice has tagged this Appeal from Order along with Writ Petition No.3482 of 2010. He seeks permission to withdraw this Appeal from Order unconditionally in view of the parties filing consent terms in Writ Petition (L) No.14050 of 2015. On the motion made by Mr. Patki, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the disposal of the Appeal from Order, C.A.(St.) No.17024 of 2010 for impleadment of applicants as respondents No.3 to 7 as also C.A.No.828 oF 2010 for condonation of delay, C.A.(St.) No.10606 OF 2010 for injunction and C.A.(St.) No.30556 of 2010 do not survive and the same are disposed of as such. Order accordingly. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) Minal Parab

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2295 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5763 OF 2004 Janabai w/o R.J.Bhandari & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. Dr.Ramesh Dattatreya Pandit & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Jose George for Applicants. Mr.D'Souza for Respondent No.4. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JANUARY 27, 2009. P.C. Office objection be removed within two weeks from today, failing which, Application to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. If steps are taken in time, Application be listed on 11th February 2009. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2295 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5763 OF 2004 Janabai w/o.R.J.Bhandari & Ors. ..Applicants. V/s. Dr.Ramesh Dattatreya Pandit & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Jose George for applicants. Mr.D'Souza for Respondent No.4. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2009. P.C. : Counsel for the parties fairly submits that this application will have to proceed before Justice Mhase having regard to the nature of relief claimed. Accordingly, Office is directed to place the application before Justice Mhase subject to convenience of His Lordship. Liberty to apply. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)

Order - Status 11: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 2295 of 2006 IN Writ Petition No. 5763 of 2004 Janabai w/o R. J. Bhandari & Ors. Applicants. Versus Dr. Ramesh D. Pandit & Others. Respondents. Mr. Jose George for the Applicants. Mr. D'souza a/w Mr. A. S. Rai for the Respondent no.4. Coram : S. B. Mhase, JJ. Date : August 27, 2009. P. C. : Heard. This civil application is moved for removing the observations made by this Court in the order dated 27th April 2006. They want to delete following sentence from the said order : "Thus, this Court finds that so far as the identification of the property of S. C. Suit No. 4374 of 1978 is concerned there is no dispute between the parties." What is important to be noted is that the property was in possession of the Receiver. The Receiver identified the property of the plaintiff and prepared the measurement plan. As per the said plan the Receiver has placed the plaintiff in possession of the property and that was admitted by the original plaintiff before this Court. The defendants were also party in that proceeding before this Court. At that time they have not objected to the said plan. Therefore, on admitted facts the property has been identified by the Receiver and possession has been handed over to the plaintiff. It is also important to note that though the present civil application is filed in the year 2006, till date it was not pressed and circulated at any point of time. Probably, with a view that by the time matter comes before the Court, the Court will forget everything what had happened in 2006. However, fortunately everything has been correctly recorded by the Court and on that basis the order has been passed. There is no substance in the application and the same is hereby rejected. (S.B.MHASE, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1104 OF 2015 Rajesh Bharatbhai Rathod ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Tejas Hilage, Advocate appointed ,for the applicant. Ms. R.M.Gadhavi, APP, for the State CORAM: SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 18th June, 2015. P.C . An application is received through jail. The applicant is praying for bail in Case No.370 of 2011. This Court had requested the learned counsel Shri Tejas Hilage to espouse the cause of the applicant. He has graciously accepted to do the same. Office to furnish copy of the application to the Advocate so appointed. The learned APP to take specific instructions in respect of the stage of trial. S.O. to 25.6.2015. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1104 OF 2015 Rajesh Bharatbhai Rathod. ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. None for Applicant. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : JULY 13, 2015 P.C.: 1 Learned APP upon instructions submits that the applicant herein was taken to J.J. Hospital, Mumbai on 26/6/2015. It is reported that the applicant has been tested positive for HIV. 2 It is further submitted that the trial has commenced. The next scheduled date for recording of evidence is 27/7/2015. In view of this, the applicant does not deserve grant of bail. In the eventuality that the applicant files an application seeking bail on medical ground, Talwalkar 1/2 the learned Judge shall consider the same on its own merits. The application is accordingly disposed of. 3 Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in jail. ( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J) Talwalkar 2/2

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 13th July, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 14/07/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates …Petitioner Versus Nirmal Township "A" Co-operative Housing Society Limited and anr. …Respondents …...... Mr. Girish Godbole a/w Ms. Deepashikha Godbole a/w Kaushtubh Thipsay for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for the Respondents. …...... CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 14 JULY 2023 P.C. :- List on 4 August 2023. The parties shall remain present on the next date. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Deepashikha Godbole for Petitioner Mr. Shrikant Dinkar Patil for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 4th August, 2023 P.C. : By consent S. O. to 25/08/2023 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR J DATE : 22nd August, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/09/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B.K. Jhala and Associates .....Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Cooperative Housing Society Ltd and Anr .....Respondents Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b. Ms. Deepshikha Godbole, for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant Dinkar Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr Sanjay D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent No.2. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : rd 23 OCTOBER 2023 P.C. Learned counsels appearing for the parties state that the parties are agreeable to explore the possibility of settlement, and they need some time. Mr. Godbole, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions of the partner of the petitioner, Mr. Kamlesh Jhala, who is present in the court, states that he is willing to discuss and sort out the differences with respect to the area to be transferred to the society. varsha The Chairman of the Society, Mr Borkar Jalinder Namdeo is also present in the Court. He agrees that the society's office bearers shall attend the meeting in the petitioner's office on 29th October 2023. On request of both parties, stand over to 2nd November 2023. [GAURI GODSE, J.]

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates … Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Co-operative … Respondents Housing Society Ltd. and Another Mr. Girish S. Godbole i/b. Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay and Mr. Deepshikha Godbole for the Petitioner. Mr. Kishore Patil i/b. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil and Mr. Arjun S.Pawar for Respondent No. 1. Ms. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 5 th FEBRUARY 2024 P.C. Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 seeks some more time as the parties are still exploring possibility of settlement. Stand over to 21st February 2024. To be listed under the caption "For settlement". [GAURI GODSE, J.] RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2024.02.06 14:35:43 +0530

Order - Status 16: 8-wp-8512-2023.doc varsha IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B.K. Jhala and Associates … Petitioner vs. Nirmal Township A Cooperative Housing Society Ltd and Anr … Respondents Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b. Ms. Deepashikha Godbole, for Petitioner. Mr. Arjun S. Pawar for Respondent no.1. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 21 st FEBRUARY, 2024 P.C. :- Learned counsel for the respective parties state that parties are still exploring the possibility of settlement and according to them dispute is likely to be settled amicably. Hence, they request for some more time. Stand over to 8th March 2024. To be listed under the caption for 'Settlement'. (GAURI GODSE, J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates … Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Co-operative … Respondents Housing Society Ltd. and Another Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b. Mr. Deepshikha Godbole for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for Respondent No. 1. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for the State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 8 th MARCH 2024 P.C. Learned counsels for the respective parties submits that talks for amicable settlement are still going on. Hence, they request for some more time. At their request stand over to 15th March 2024. To be listed under the caption "For Settlement".

Order - Status 20: 21.8512.23 wp.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates .....Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Co Operative .....Respondents Housing Society Ltd and Anr Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b Deepashika Godbole for the petitioner Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for respondent Smt. M. S. Bane, AGP for the State CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 15th MARCH 2024 P.C. Learned counsel submits that parties have exchanged the offers for settlement and they need some more time for exploring the possibility of settlement. Stand over to 1st April 2023. To be listed under the caption "For Settlement". [GAURI GODSE, J.]

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala and Associates … Petitioner Vs. Nirmal Township A Co-operative … Respondents Housing Society Ltd. and Another Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/b. Mr. Deepshikha Godbole for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for Respondent No. 1. Ms. R. S. Pawar, AGP for the State. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 1 st APRIL 2024 P.C. Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that the parties are unable to settle the dispute amicably. They make a request to fix the petition for hearing on admission. Stand over to 29th April 2024. [GAURI GODSE, J.] rrpillai

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE: 29th APRIL 2024 P.C. :- Iresh On account of paucity of time, following matters on Daily Board stand adjourned as follows : Sr. Nos. Next Date 61 to 70 18th June 2024 71 to 80 19th June 2024 81 to 90 21st June 2024 91 to 100 24th June 2024 101 to 110 25th June 2024 111 to 116 26th June 2024 118 to 120 26th June 2024 121 to 126 28th June 2024 127 30th April 2024 128 to 130 28th June 131 to 133 1st July 2024 134 3rd May 2024 135 to 140 1st July 2024 141 to 148 2nd July 2024 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief or interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (GAURI GODSE, J.) 1/1

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Ms. Deepashikha Godbole for Petitioner Ms. R. S. Pawar, AGP for State CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 24th July, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Petitioner , stand over to 29/07/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates. ...Petitioner. Versus Nirmal Township A CHS Ltd and Another. ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Girish S. Godbole, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Kaustabh Thipsay and Ms. Deepashikha Godbole for the Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for the Respondent No.1. Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : July 29, 2024. P. C. : 1. Leave to correct pagination. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 seeks time to file reply. Let the reply be filed on or before 7th August 2024. Rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before 12th August 2024. List on 13th August 2024 . It is made clear that time permitting, the petition will be heard finally at the admission stage. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

Order - Status 30: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 13th August, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 06/09/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Ajinkya Taskar i/b Mr. Shrikant Patil for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 6th September, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 11/10/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : 11th October, 2024. P. C. : TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2024.10.15 09:56:54 On account of paucity of time, following matters on Daily Board dated 11th October 2024, stand adjourned as follows: - Serial. Nos. Next Date Sr. 32 To 51 rd December, 2024 (except Sr. 45) 3 Sr. 52 To 71 th December, 2024 (except Sr. 61) 4 Sr. 72 To 100 th December, 2024 (except Sr. 97) 6 Sr. 101 To 120 17th December, 2024 Sr. 121 To 140 18th December, 2024 Sr. 141 To 160 (except Sr. 155) 20th December, 2024 Sr. 161 To 180 rd January, 2025 (except Sr. 170) 3 Sr. 181 To 205 th January, 2025 (except Sr. 183,187,200) 6 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief or interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH J DATE : 6th December, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 25/04/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 37: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 5th March, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 15/04/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 39: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Girish Godbole, Sr. Adv. A/W Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/by Ms. Deepashikha Godbole for Petitioner. Mr. Shrikant Dinkar Patil for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 15th April, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 21/04/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 41: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8512 OF 2023 M/s. B. K. Jhala And Associates ....PETITIONER V/S Nirmal Township A Co Operative Housing Society Ltd. And Anr ....RESPONDENT Adv. Deepashikha Godbole for Petitioner. Mr. Kishor Patil i/by Mr. Shrikant Dinkar Patil for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 21st April, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 23/04/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 44: AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8512 OF 2023 B.K. Jhala & Associates … Petitioner V/s. Nirmal Township "A" Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Anr. … Respondents Mr. Girish S. Godbole, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/by Ms. Deepshikha Godbole for the petitioner. Mr. Kishor Patil i/by Mr. Shrikant D. Patil for respondent No.1. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : APRIL 23, 2025 P.C.: Mr. Godbole, learned Senior Advocate, on instructions from Mr. Kamlesh Jhala, partner of the petitioner, states that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file civil suit. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is made that this Court has not adjudicated petitioner's grievance on merits, and it shall be open for the petitioner to raise all contentions before the Civil Court by way of civil suit. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.349 OF 2003 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.240 OF 2003 Vasant Dattoba Bhosale & Ors. .. Applicants. Vs. Nanasaheb Krishnaji Patil .. Respondent. Mr.A.V.Anturkar for the applicants. Mr.M.L.Patil for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2007 P.C.: . In view of disposal of the appeal nothing further survives in this application, it is disposed of as such. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.744 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. P. S. Dani for the Applicant. Ms. A. M. Bhambwani for the Respondent. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JUNE 30, 2014 P.C.: Mentioned. Not on board. At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant the matter is taken on board for urgent orders. This Civil Revision Application is filed by the original Defendant Nos.1 and 7 challenging the judgment dated 28th March 2014 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court, Mumbai directing the Appellant to hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the Suit premises i.e. Room No.21/22 on the second floor of the building known as Chippi Chawl, sitaute at 3236, Bombay – 400 002 within three months from the date of order to the Plaintiff. The learned counsel for Respondent No.1 original Plaintiff makes a statement that till next date, she will not execute the decree. Statement is accepted. Office is directed to place the matter on board on 30th July 2014. In the meantime, the Applicant is directed to serve the Respondent by way of private notice either by RPAD and/or by hand delivery and to file an affidavit of service to that effect on or before next date. JUDGE

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 744 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr P.S.Dani, Advocate for the applicant. Mr P.S.Dani, Advocate for the applicant. Ms.Asha M. Bhambwani, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 27/08/2014 PC: Not on Board. At the request of Ms. Bhambwani, taken up in the production board. Heard Mr. P.S.Dani, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Asha Bhambwani, learned counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel appearing for the parties state that by order dated 30.7.2014, statement made by learned counsel for respondent no.1-original plaintiff that till next date she will not execute the decree, was accepted and the application was ordered to be listed today for admission. However, the application is not listed for admission till today, ie 27.8.2014. She, therefore, mentions the matter for continuation of the ad-interim order. In view thereof, list the Application for admission on 15.10.2014. In the meantime, the ad-interim order granted on 30.7.2014, shall remain in force. (R.G.KETKAR,J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 23 JUNE 2015. P.C . :- On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary/ Daily Boards stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date 10, 11,12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 13/07/2015 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 14/07/2015 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65 15/07/2015 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 73 16/07/2015 If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : JULY 15, 2015 P. C. : On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Supplementary and Daily Boards stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. Sr. Nos. C.M.I.S. Date Daily Board 03/08/15 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 04/08/15 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35. 05/08/15 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46. 06/08/15 If in any of the above matters, adinterim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If adinterim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M. S. SONAK, J.)

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.744 OF 2014 Himmatlal Chhogalal and Anr. ] … Applicants Versus Vijaysingh Gordhandas and Ors. ] … Respondents Mr. Suresh M. Jain for Applicants. Ms. Asha Bhambwani for Respondents. Mr. Himmatlal Chhogalal, Applicant No.1, present in person. CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 P. C. : The learned Counsel for Applicants, on the basis of instructions from the Applicants, states that they desire to withdraw this Civil Revision Application. Accordingly, leave is granted to withdraw the Civil Revision Application and the same is disposed of as withdrawn. Mr. Himmatlal Chhogalal, Applicant No.1, present in person. Mr. Suresh M. Jain states that he will file Vakalatnama within a period of one week from today. The statement is accepted. (M. S. SONAK, J.) CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Order.

#VALUE!

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2008 Smt.Sakhubai Dnyanu Pukale ...Appellant vs. Shri Dnyanu Dadu Pukale ...Respondent None for the Appellant. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. AUGUST 25, 2011 P.C :- None for the appellant. Issue notice to respondent, returnable in six weeks. In addition to court notice, the appellant is directed to give advocate's notice to the respondent either personally or through RPAD/Speed Post and file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. The appellant is also directed to file appeal memo in substance forms along with decree forms within a period of six weeks failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the court. (M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.) (D.B. BHOSALE, J.)