Tag: Criminal Against Order Of Conviction
Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 736 OF 2016 (For fixing date of final hearing) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472 OF 2007 Arjun Baban Jagdhane Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. Onkar Nagvekar i/b Mr. P. R. Arjunwadkar for the Applicant Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. WEDNESDAY, 20th JULY, 2016 P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. By this application, the applicant prays that the Criminal Appeal No. 472 of 2007 be restored to the final hearing board and date may be fixed for final hearing. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the Appeal was earlier added to the final hearing board, however, is not on board now. Perused the application. For the reasons set out in the application, the application is allowed. Criminal Appeal No. 472 of 2007 be added to the final hearing board in the category of appeals where the accused are on bail, in the week commencing from 25th July, 2016 at its appropriate place. Application is disposed of. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Petitioner-1: Arjun Baban Jagdhane
#VALUE!
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Petitioner-1: Dattu Rama Theurkar
Petitioner-2: Others
Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 465 OF 2017 Somnath Haridas Kamble .. Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Appearances Mr. Sagar Tambe i/by Mr. Jaydeep D. Mane Advocate for the Appellant Mr. H.J. Dedhia APP for the State ................... ................... CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 13, 2017. P.C.: Admit. The appellant to prefer separate application for bail. [ SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
Order - Status 7: Osk 222-Apeal-465-2017.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 465 OF 2017 Somnath Haridas Kamble … Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Ms.Vilasini B. i/b. Mr.Jaydeep Mane for Appellant. Mr.S.S. Hulke, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI AND MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 17th August 2022. P.C. : . At the request of learned Advocate for Appellant, list the Appeal on Final Hearing Board from the week commencing from 12th September 2022. [MILIND N. JADHAV, J.] [A.S. GADKARI, J.]
1) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Filed By : Somnath Haridas Kamble
Advocate: Rajesh Bindra
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 12/03/2025
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Petitioner-1: Somnath Haridas Kamble
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Petitioner-1: Shri. Anil Ukhaji Ippar
Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 326 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2016 Subhash Waman Awate ...Applicant Versus Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Siddharth Mehta for the Applicant Mr. A. L. Bhise I/b Mr. H. S. Venegavkar for the Respondent No. 1 Ms. R. V. Newton, A.P.P for the Respondent No. 2-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. WEDNESDAY, 20th JULY, 2016 P.C. : Stand over to 27th July, 2016. Parties are ready to settle the matter amicably. To be placed on 27th July, 2016 under caption `settlement/filing Consent Terms'. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 333 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 326 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPICATION No. 333 OF 2016 Subhash Waman Awate ...Applicant Vs. Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane and Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Vivek Arote i/b. Harshad Bhadbhade for Applicant Mr. Sachin Rahate I /b. Amit P. Ghag for Respondent No.1 Mr. M.G. Patil APP for the State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 16 JANUARY, 2018. P.C. : The learned advocate for the Applicant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties. Hence, at the request made by the learned Advocate for the Applicant, stand over to 30th January, 2018 for taking appropriate steps on account of settlement time which is sought by him. [PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.] Tikam
Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 333 OF 2016 Subhash Waman Awate ....Applicant V/S Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J DATE : 4th May, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 333 OF 2016 Subhash Waman Awate ....Applicant V/S Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J DATE : 4th May, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2016 Subhash Waman Awate ….Applicant Vs. Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane & Anr. ….Respondents. Mr. Harshad Bhadbhade for the Applicant. Mr. Amit Ghag for the Respondent No.1. Smt. Veera Shinde APP, for the RespondentState. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 29th AUGUST, 2018. P.C.: Heard. Admit. (A.S. GADKARI, J.) S S Mashalkar Digitally signed by S S Mashalkar Date: 2018.08.31 17:50:35 +0530
Order - Status 17: Aarti Digitally signed by Aarti G. Palkar G. Date: 2021.03.03 Palkar 140: 2022.03 Palkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION APPLICATION NO.333 OF 2016 Subhash Waman Awate ..... Applicant VS. Shri. Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane & Anr. .....Respondents ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2019 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO.333 OF 2016 ....... Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane ..... Applicant vs. Subhash Waman Awate & Anr. .....Respondents None for the Applicant. Mr. Amit P. Ghag for Respondent No.1. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J. DATE : 2 MARCH 2021. P. C. : . Learned counsel for Respondent No.1 submits that the Applicant has already deposited the entire amount of compensation in this Court as well as in the Sessions Court. Stand over to 12.03.2021. [SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.] 9.REVN.333.2016.doc
Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 333 OF 2016 Subhash Waman Awate ....APPLICANT V/S Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. APPLICATION IN REVISION NO. 22 OF 2019 In Cr. Revision Appln. 333 OF 2016 Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane ....APPLICANT V/S Subhash Waman Awate And Anr. ....RESPONDENT SHRI ARYA SAPRE I/B SHRI HARSHAD BHADBHADE, ADV FOR APPLICANT SHRI VIRAL BABAR I/B SHRI AMIT P. GHAG , ADV FROR RESP. NO.1 IN REVN APPLICATION SHRI A R PATIL, APP FOR STATE CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH D. NAIK J DATE : 28th July, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 04/08/2022 ( H. O. B.). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 22: 82-revn-333-2016.doc Shivgan IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BEFORE SPECIAL LOK ADALAT CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2016 Subhash Waman Awate...ApplicantVersusBhalchandra Sopan Gawane & Anr....Respondents Adv. Swati Panjwani, i/b Adv. Harshad Bhadbhade , for the Applicant. Ms. S.S.Kaushik, APP for the Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. V. V. Kathare, (Registrar Vigilance-II), Member : DATED: S. N. Phad, (Deputy Registrar/Member Secretary SCMS Committee), Member 1 st December 2024 PC:- At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant, list the matter before the next Lok Adalat, i.e., on 14 th December 2024. (S. N. Phad) (Deputy Registrar/Member Secretary SCMS Committee), Member (V. V. Kathare) (Registrar (Dr. Neela Gokhale, J) Vigilance-II), Member 82-revn-333-2016.doc
Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.333 OF 2016 Subhash Waman Awate ….Applicant Versus Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane and anr. ….Respondents ********* Ms. S. Patel i/by Mr. Harshad Bhadbhade, Advocates for the Applicant. Ms. R.S. Tendulkar, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. ********* CORAM : SADHANA S. JADHAV, J., HEAD OF THE PANEL S.R. AGRAWAL, REGISTRAR, (JUDICIAL-II), MEMBER P.R. NAVALE, OSD AT (JUDICIAL-I), MEMBER DATE : th 14 DECEMBER, 2024. P.C. : The learned counsel for the Revision Applicant requests to place the matter before the regular Court. As per her request, place the matter before the regular Court. (P.R. NAVALE) (S.R. AGRAWAL) (SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) OSD at (Judicial-I) Member Registrar (Judicial-II) Member Head of the Panel
1) Document Filed: Vakalatnama
Advocate: Amit P. Ghag
Filed Document - Date of Receiving - 1: 18/07/2016
Respondent-1: Bhalchandra Sopan Gawane
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Subhash Waman Awate
Order - Status 6: Dusane 1/3 904 apeal 693, appa 738.2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.693 OF 2019 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.738 OF 2019 Vipul Ravindra Yadav Vs. Appellant/Applicant (Ori. Accused no.1) The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. Shekhar Arvind Ingawale for the appellant/applicant. Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for State. Coram : Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J. Date : 2 nd May 2019 P.C.: 1 Heard the respective counsel. 2 Appeal admit. 3 The above application is filed under Section 389 Code of Criminal Procedure seeking suspension of substantive sentence imposed upon the appellant/applicant. The applicant herein is convicted by the District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli vide judgment and order dated 22nd March 2019 in Sessions Case No. 142 of 2014, for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 of Dusane 2/3 904 apeal 693, appa 738.2019.doc Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year, three years, fine of Rs.2,000/-, Rs.5,000/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months, three months respectively. 4 The appellant was married for hardly six months. He had sent his wife (deceased) to her maternal house for appearing in the examination. While returning, there was a trifling dispute. She simply entered into the house, poured kerosene on her person and got immolated. 5 The sentence imposed upon the applicant is a short term sentence. This Court is hearing the jail appeals of the year 2013 and that there is no possibility of the appeal being finally heard expeditiously. Hence, the applicant deserves extension of the same relief during pendency of the appeal. Hence, the following order. O R D E R i ) The application is allowed. ii ) The substantive sentence imposed upon the applicant vide judgment and order dated 22nd March 2019 is hereby suspended. iii ) The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount. iv ) The applicant shall mark his presence before the District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli once in six months on the date assigned by the Sessions Judge. v ) Upon failure to attend any two consecutive dates, the Sessions Court shall make a report to the High Court and the prosecution would be at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation of bail. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. ( Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J)
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Petitioner-1: Vipul Ravindra Yadav
Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION IN APPLICATION NO. 719 OF 2019 In APPLN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) STAMP NO. 214 OF 2019 The Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd. Now Known As Godavari Bio-refineries Ltd. Thr Pandurang Dalvi ....Applicant V/S Ramesh Anandrao Sawant And Anr. ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 7th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 05/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Respondent-1: Ramesh Anandrao Sawant
Respondent-2: Anr.
Petitioner-1: The Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd.
Order - Status 3: sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre & Anr. … Applicants vs.State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. A. R. Shaikh i/b. H.E. Palwe for the Applicants. Mr. V. B. Khamkhedkar, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATE : 20th JUNE, 2017 P.C. On the application of the learned counsel for the applicant who states that Mr. Palwe is unable to attend and seeks sometime. Hence, to come up as per scheduled date. Remove from the board. (A. K. MENON, J.)
Order - Status 6: sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre & Anr. … Applicants vs.The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. H. E. Palwe for the Applicants. Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2017 P.C. Liberty to apply after the applicant surrenders. (A. K. MENON, J.)
Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre And Anr ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J DATE : 20th December, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 03/02/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre and Anr. ...Applicants vs. State of Maharashtra …Respondent ***** Mr.Sudip Mallick i/b. Mr.Harshad E. Palwe – Advocate for Applicants. Mr.A.D.Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent – State. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 11th JANUARY 2024 P. C. :- This is a Revision against the concurrent finding of conviction. On 2nd August, 2017, liberty was granted to apply after surrender. Learned Advocate is short of instructions. Let him to take instructions. Stand over to 9 th February, 2024 . [S. M. MODAK, J.]
Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ***** Mr. Sudip Mallick i/by Harsahd E. Palwe - Advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar - APP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 09th FEBRUARY, 2024 P. C. :- The Court of the JMFC has convicted the accused personsaccused Nos. 1 and 3 for the offence punishable under Sections 326, 324 and 323 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code as per judgment dated 07/10/2014, at page no. 53. Their appeal was partly allowed by learned Sessions Judge, Nashik on 03/05/2017. The conviction of the accused nos. 1 and 3 for the offence punishable under Section 326 read with 34 was set aside. Whereas it is maintained for the offence Section 324 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused No. 3 was not directed to undergo sentence immediately but he was asked to execute the bond of good behaviour for the period of two years. That period has already expired. The following issue arisen in the revision:- (i) The legality of the sentence under Section 326 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code against accused no. 1. (ii) The legality of the sentence against accused no. 3 for the same offence. Yet revision is not admitted. Matter be kept on 08th March, 2024, after admission. [S. M. MODAK, J.]
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Petitioner-1: Nathu Bhila Devre
Petitioner-2: Anr
Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.
Order - Status 5: BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Digitally signed by PRITHIANI Date: 2023.03.02 16:56:20 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1263 OF 2022 Bapu Dharma Javale … Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents 42-apeal-1263.22.doc ****** Mr. Mohansinh U. Rajput, appointed advocate a/w Amey S. Ajgaonkar for the Appellant. Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, APP for the Respondent-State. ****** CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 1st MARCH, 2023 P.C. :- . Issue fresh notice to respondent no.2 to be served through respondent no.1, returnable on 24th April, 2023. Call Records and Proceedings. [R. N. LADDHA, J.] [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent-2: Anr.
Petitioner-1: Bapu Dharma Javale
Respondent-1: The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent-2: Anr
Petitioner-1: Mayekar Chandrakant Shankar