All Cases

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2099 OF 2022 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 738 OF 2021 Bhushan Suresh Lad .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent … Mr.Francis A. Caszo for the applicant in IA No.2099/22. Mrs. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 6th JULY, 2022 P.C:- 1 Application came to be dismissed in default on 29/4/2022 by marking absence of the applicant and his counsel. 2 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the application. The learned counsel state that he did not attend the matter since he was suffering from High Blood Pressure and viral fever. No certificate to that effect has been placed on record nor is the statement on affidavit. However, since the reasons stated is coming from an Advocate, the same is believed. 3 Resultantly, the impugned order is set aside. The Application is restored to file. ( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1318 OF 2018 Sudarshan Rajkumar Badguzar Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Anand Jondhale i/b Jondhale and Co. for Applicant Ms.Veera Shinde - APP for State CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 7th June, 2018 P.C. : Learned APP waives service and seeks time to take instructions. Time as prayed for is granted. Stand over to 14/06/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1318 OF 2018 Sudarshan Rajkumar Badguzar ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 14th June, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Stand over to 19/06/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1318 OF 2018 Sudarshan Rajkumar Badguzar ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 19th June, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Stand over to 11/07/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1317 OF 2018 Ashok Devram Patil ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1318 OF 2018 Sudarshan Rajkumar Badguzar ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1319 OF 2018 Kundan Mukund Khanvilkar Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1320 OF 2018 Pavan Ramchandra Kachre ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1321 OF 2018 Rohit Sunil Borse ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr.Anand Jondhle a/w Ms.Yashoda Jondhale a/w Mr.Babu Singh i/b Jondhale And Co For Applicant Ms.Veera Shinde - APP for State CORAM : SMT. S.S. JADHAV, J DATE : 25th June, 2018 P.C. : At the request of learned APP for State, Stand over to 12/07/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 931 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ù¡, Court's or Judge's orders Ms Ka Fozda Ms Mr Assoc Ms Karishma Shirke i/by M/s Gordhandas & Fozdar for the Appellant. Ms Mrunalini V. Panchal i/by M/s Navdeep Vora & Associates for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J. DATE : JANUARY 6, 2014. P.C.: On the request of learned Counsel for the Appel Appellant, stand over 13 January 2014. 2. To be listed along with Appeal No. 930 of 2013. (A.A. SAYED, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 820 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 233 OF 2007 Shivaji Shankar Ghadge ... Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. M.V. Thorat i/by Ms. Pooja V. Thorat for the applicant. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED : JULY 18, 2011 P.C. In the light of the order passed in Criminal Application No. 376 of 2010, Criminal application No. 820 of 2011 is rejected. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.) hvn

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 4331 OF 2018 In FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 15757 OF 2018 United India Insurance Company Ltd.through Its Nashik Divisional Office ....Applicant V/S Smt. Usha Vijay Ramteke And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 4332 OF 2018 In FIRST APPEAL LODGING NO . 15757 OF 2018 United India Insurance Company Ltd.through Its Nashik Divisional Office ....Applicant V/S Smt. Usha Vijay Ramteke And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 4450 OF 2018 In FIRST APPEAL LODGING NO . 15757 OF 2018 Smt. Usha Vijay Ramteke And Anr. ....Applicant V/S United India Insu. Co. Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent Amol Gatne For Applicant Pritesh Kantikumar Bohade for Applicant in CAF 4450/2018. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J DATE : 20th December, 2018 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on Board. At the request of learned advocate for the applicant, Stand over to as per CMIS. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4332 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 15757 OF 2018 United India Insurance Company Ltd. .....Applicant V/s. Smt. Usha Vijay Ramteke and others .....Respondents Mr. Shubham M. i/b Amol Gatne for the applicant. Mr. Pritesh Bohade for respondent nos. 1 & 2 CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : MARCH 15, 2019. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2. 2 By this Civil Application, applicant is seeking stay of the operation of the Judgment and Award dated 07/12/2017 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Nashik in MACP No. 990 of 2010 by which Tribunal held that respondents are entitled to the sum of Rs. 3,40,000/ with 8% interest by way of compensation. 3 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that he received instructions from the Insurance Company that they are ready and willing to deposit entire awarded amount alongwith interest in Tribunal within 4 weeks from today. Statement is accepted. 4 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and as the applicant is ready and willing to deposit entire awarded amount within 4 weeks, I am satisfied that applicant has made out case for following order: (I) Operation and implementation of impugned Judgment and Award dated 07/12/2017 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Nashik in MACP No. 990 of 2010 is stayed till hearing and final disposal of First Appeal. (II) Applicant to deposit entire awarded amount in Tribunal on or before 30/04/2019 failing which Civil Application stands dismissed without referring back to the Court. (III) If amount is deposited within stipulated period as stated herein above, Tribunal is directed to invest the said amount in fixed deposit in any nationalized bank, initially for a period of one year and thereafter, till further orders. (IV) Liberty granted to respondent nos. 1 & 2 to take out appropriate proceedings, if so advised, for withdrawal and that application be decided on its own merits. (V) Application stands disposed of accordingly. (VI) No order as to costs. [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 4331 OF 2018 In FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 15757 OF 2018 United India Insurance Company Ltd.through Its Nashik Divisional Office ....Applicant V/S Smt. Usha Vijay Ramteke And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 4332 OF 2018 In FIRST APPEAL LODGING NO . 15757 OF 2018 United India Insurance Company Ltd.through Its Nashik Divisional Office ....Applicant V/S Smt. Usha Vijay Ramteke And Ors. ....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 4450 OF 2018 In FIRST APPEAL LODGING NO . 15757 OF 2018 Smt. Usha Vijay Ramteke And Anr. ....Applicant V/S United India Insu. Co. Ltd. And Ors. ....Respondent Amol Gatne For Applicant CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 4th October, 2019 P.C. : Mentioned out of turn. At the request of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner/Respondent, stand over to 11/11/2019 . Ad-interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

#VALUE!

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 209 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7591 OF 2010 Harsha Rohan Shirdhankar .. Applicant Vs. Rohan Kesarinath Shirdhankar .. Respondent Mr. Anand S. Kulkarni for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date : 8th February, 2011. P.C. The Petition of the husband has been dismissed. The amount of maintenance deposited by the husband in this Court shall be allowed to be withdrawn by the wife. The cheque to be drawn by the Registrar of this Court shall be in the name of Ms. Harsha Ganesh Koparde. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. ( ROSHAN DALVI, J.) Amk

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.673 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders. Ms Neeta Karnik for the Petitioner. Shri T.D. Deshmukh for Respondent No.1. Smt. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATE : 22ND JANUARY 2013 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the first Respondent. Heard the learned AGP for the State. Leave to amend for adding a party respondent and for incorporating additional averments in the Petition. In view of the communication dated 9th January 2013, the Petitioner can continue to act as a Principal at least till 31st January 2013. Therefore, we direct that this Petition shall be fixed for admission on 30th January 2013. ( A.P. BHANGALE, J) (A.S.OKA, J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.673 of 2013 Neeta Sane … Petitioner V/s. Dnyanasadhana College, Through Chairman and Ors. … Respondents Ms. Neeta Karnik , Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. T.D. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.3. Ms. Chandrakanta Gongane i/b. R.A. Rodrigues for Respondent No.2. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 30TH JANUARY, 2013 P.C. When the papers of this petition were produced before this Court on 22nd January, 2013 for seeking urgent relief, the papers were not circulated in advance. Therefore, it was not noticed that one of us (A.S. OKA, J.) will not be in a position to take up this petition. Hence, place it before a bench to which one of us (A.S. OKA, J.) is not a party. ( A.P. BHANGALE, J ) ( A.S. OKA, J )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 673 OF 2013 Neeta Sane .. Petitioner Vs. Dnyanasadhana College & Ors. .. Respondents Ms Neeta Karnik for Petitioner. Mr. T. D. Deshmukh for Respondent No. 1. Ms. Chandrakanta Gongane i/b. Mr. R. A. Rodriques for Respondent No. 2. Mr. P. P. Kakade – AGP for Respondent No. 3 . CORAM : NARESH. H. PATIL & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2013 P.C. 1] Heard. 2] The petitioner has questioned the communication made by the respondent College Dnyanasadhana, Thane dated 9.1.2013. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in view of the University Regulations after putting in one year service in absence of any adverse communication the petitioner shall be deemed to have been confirmed as Principal. 3] This fact is disputed by the counsel appearing for the respondent college. The learned counsel for the respondent college submits that the petitioner has a statutory remedy under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. 4] In the facts of the case the petitioner has statutory remedy of approaching the College Tribunal under the provisions of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. 5] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the communication dated 9.1.2013 the petitioner continued to act as a Principal till 31.1.2013 and prayed that the petitioner be allowed to continue to act as a Principal for a period of two weeks from today. 6] The petitioner be allowed to continue as a Principal till 14.2.2013. This court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter. 7] Writ Petition is disposed of. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) Chandka 2/2

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.109 OF 2022 Jaya Talakshi Chheda Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. Respondents Mr. Taraq Sayed i/b Mr. Ajay Dubey, for the F Petitioner. Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, A.P.P for the Respondents. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 24 th AUGUST 2022 P.C. : The aforesaid petition has been circulated for withdrawal. Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. It is made clear that we have not heard the petition on merits. SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.