All Contempt Petition

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.83 OF 2003 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.725 OF 1991 Shree.. Rajasthan Jain Sangh Petitioner v/s. Mataprasad Singh Bholanath Singh since deceased by his heirs: 1A.Smt.Ram Dulari wd/o.Mataprasad Singh.. & ors. Respondents Ms.Monica D'Souza for Mr.A.K.Abhyankar for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Dixit i/by M/s.V.R.Tripathi & Associates for the respondent. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. DATED : 10th October, 2005 P.C. 1991 OF No.725 Application Revision Civil it when and 17.9.91 on court this by admitted was was it 21.4.1994 on hearing final for up came has application civil This default. in dismissed respondent the record on bringing for filed been of representatives legal the as 1H to Nos.1A the note, office the per As No.1. respondent days. 102 and years 8 by time beyond is application for filed 2002 of No.430 application Civil been has application revision the of restoration rejected today and therefore, this application does not survive. (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)

Order - Status 8: C.A. NO.197 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15548 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.198 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15552 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.199 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15556 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.200 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15559 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.201 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15565 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.202 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15569 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.203 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15574 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.204 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15577 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.205 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15582 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.206 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15584 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.207 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15588 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.208 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15592 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.209 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15699 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.210 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15707 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.211 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15713 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.212 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.15717 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.215 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.19542 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.216 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.19545 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.217 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.19549 OF 2008 WITH C.A. NO.218 OF 2008 IN C.R.A.(ST.) NO.19557 OF 2008 WITH -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, appearances, Court's . orders or directions and . Registrar's orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.T.D. Deshmukh for the Applicants. Mrs.S.V. Gajare, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J . DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : 1.In each of the above Civil Applications the reasons for delay of over two years is that the Petitioners were prosecuting a review application before the Collector. Whether that review application is maintainable or not is another matter. The review application has not been decided as yet. However, by way of abundant caution, the Petitioners have also filed these Civil Revision Applications. 2.In these circumstances, the delay ought to be condoned. 3.The delay in filing the Civil Revision Applications is condoned. Office to place the matters for admission.

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 401 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO. 17334 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's orders : Court's or Judge's Orders _______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Mr. Parekh i/b. M/s. K.R. Parekh & Co., Advocate for the Applicant. CORAM : G.S.GODBOLE, J DATED : 12TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. PC : Heard. Rule returnable after 6 weeks. In addition to service through Court, Advocate of the Applicant/s is also permitted to send private notice by RPAD or Speed Post AD and file Affidavit of Service only if acknowledgment is received or postal envelope is returned with remark "refused". The Civil Application will however be heard either after Court service notices are served or Respondent/s appear through Advocate by filing Vakalatnama on service of private notice. (G.S.GODBOLE, J)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.401 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.17334 OF 2011 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.K.R.Parekh i/b K.R.Parekh & Co. for the Applicant Ms Savina S. Baygera for the resp. nos.1,2,4 to 8 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 18,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1,2 and 4 to 8. The application is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. 2 In view of the averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.72 OF 2005 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO.16223 OF 2005 Shri Madhukar Narayan Karandikar (expired as on 13.4.2004 L/R on record) Smt.Lilabai Madhukar Karandikar &.. ors. Applicants v/s. Maharashtra Chittapavan Sandh, Pune.. & ors. Respondents Mr.A.P.Vanarase for the applicants. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. DATED : 10th October, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr.Vanarase, the learned counsel for the applicants. No.16223 stamp under Application Appli Revision R Civil 2. hence, and dly belatedly t 1 but filed been has 2005 of per As delay. of 0 ion condonation for ation application this The days. 32 of 5 ( is caused delay note, office the and age old be to stated stat been has delay for reason awarding ä by condoned hereby he is delay The illness. the to remitted re and 8 Rs.500/- at ed quantified cost two within ty Authority A Services Ser Legal Court High weeks. Place this Civil Revision Application for admission after vacation. (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)