All Bail Application

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1003 OF 2015 Harish Kondu Kokare ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.for the Applicant APP, for Respondent – State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: JUNE 16, 2015 P.C.: The applicant/accused is facing charges u/s 307, 341,34...... in C.R. No.65 of 2015 registered at Lonavla police station (Rural). A complaint was given by one A.S. Ghole on 21.4.2015. The incident of assault has taken place on 21.4.2015 at around 8.15 pm, when the complainant and one Bhau Gaikwad, who was the Sarpanch of the Panchayat Samiti, were going in a car and at that time, the applicant/accused and the co-accused came in a Zen car and the car of the complainant was stopped. They attacked the Sarpanch Bhau Gaikwad and also the complainant Ananta Gule. Bhau Gaikwad was injured as he was stabbed 5 to 6 times on chest and throat by the assailants. He was sent to hospital and the applicant/accused was arrested and taken into custody on the same day i.e., 21.4.2015 and since then, he is in prison. Hence, this bail application. The learned Counsel for the applicant/accused relied on the contents in the FIR, wherein it is stated that the applicant/accused assaulted the complainant with fist blows and there is no act of assaulting Bhau Gaikwad is mentioned. He submitted that he was not holding any weapon. It is further submitted that the applicant/accused is one of the members of the Panchayat Samiti and he did not attend two meetings of the Panchayat Samiti. Now the third meeting is scheduled on 18th June, 2015 and, therefore, if he fails to attend the said meeting, as per law, he will be debarred and his appointment will be canceled. The learned Prosecutor has opposed the application. The Investigating Officer is not present. She relied on the description of the injuries on Bhau Gaikwad. Perused the FIR. The act attributed to the applicant/accused is of giving a fist blow to the complainant. No specific act is attributed to him of assaulting Bhau Gaikwad. In view of the submission that the applicant/accused will be out of Panchayat Samiti if he does not attend the third meeting, I am inclined to grant bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed on the following terms and conditions: i) The applicant/accused shall be released on bail upon furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-, with one or two sureties in the like amount; 2 / 3 ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence; iii) The applicant shall not indulge into any kind of offence including offence on human body and especially on the Panchayat Samiti members, while on bail; iv) The applicant shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer and attend the concerned police station on every Friday, between 6pm to 7pm, for a period of one month. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1483 OF 2019 Ajinkya @ Avinash Anant Shinde ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 7th June, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 04/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1483 OF 2019 Ajinkya @ Avinash Anant Shinde ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 4th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to 29/07/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1483 OF 2019 Ajinkya @ Avinash Anant Shinde ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 22nd August, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned.Stand over to 16/09/2019. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1483 OF 2019 Ajinkya @ Avinash Anant Shinde ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 16th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 09/10/2019 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1483 OF 2019 Ajinkya @ Avinash Anant Shinde ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, J DATE : 9th October, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 15/11/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1483 OF 2019 Ajinkya @ Avinash Anant Shinde ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 15th November, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 06/12/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1482 OF 2019 Roshan Sunil Pawar .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO.1483 OF 2019 Ajinkya @ Avinash Anant Shinde .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent …... …... Mr.Silvin Y. Kale, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.A.A. Takalkar, APP APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATED : DECEMBER 20, 2019. P.C. : The applicants in both the applications were arrested in connection with C.R.No.I–291 of 2018, registered with Panvel City Police Station, Navi Mumbai, for the ofence punishable under Section 302j read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. 2 The case of the prosecution is that on 30th June, 2018, the victim/complainant was waiting at rickshaw stand. Accused Avi alias Ajinkya Shinde spoke to the victim and told him that he want to travel at Karanjade and the fare was fied at Rs.60/-. He boarded rickshaw. The victim dropped him at Karanjade. He paid Rs.50/- towards the fare although it was fied to be Rs.60/-. The victim demanded the balance amount. Accused Avi alias Ajinkya told him that he is associate of Rajesh Kaikadia and slapped him. The victim also slapped him. Thereafter, the victim went towards Panvel railway station and was waiting at rickshaw stand. At about 22:30 hrs., he went for smoking cigarette. Avi alias Ajinkya Shinde came and questioned him as to why he charges heavy fare and left the place. After some time, Ajinkya Shinde, Babu Kaikadia and two other persons approached the victim. Ajinkya Shinde assaulted him with iron rod in his head. As a result the victim fell down. Babu Kaikadia assaulted by knife and two other persons assaulted the victim by fst blows. Babu Kaikadia then assaulted him on head. The mother and wife of the victim reached the spot. Babu Kaikadia also assaulted his mother and all of them fled away from the place of incident. The victim was taken to the hospital. His statement was recorded, which was treated as First Information Report. Subsequently, victim succumbed to the injuries and charge under Section 302 of IPC was invoked. 3 Learned counsel for the applicant appearing for both the applicants submitted that there are major discrepancies in the evidence of witnesses. There are contradictions in the statements of eye witnesses. Applicants are falsely implicated,. There is no evidence against the applicant Roshan Pawar, the eye witnesses have given contradictory versions about the role played by him. Although, the applicant was identifed, subsequent to identifcation, diferent role is attributed to the said applicant. The version of both the eye witnesses were contradictory to each other. The applicants are in custody from the date of arrest and further detention is not necessary. Co-accused Iqbal Abdul Kadir Shaha has been granted bail by this Court. 4 Learned APP submitted that the role has been assigned to both the applicants. Applicant Avinash had picked up quarrel with the deceased. Thereafter, he came along with other accused and the victim was assaulted by weapons. The applicants are identifed by the eye witnesses. Thus, there is suficient evidence against the applicant and bail may not be granted. 5 Having heard both the sides. I have perused the charge–sheet. The frst informant is the victim of the crime. He has stated that accused Avi alias Ajinkya had quarreled with him. Subsequently, he came along with the other accused. In the frst information report, it is stated that Avi alias Ajinkya Shinde had assaulted the victim on his head by iron rod and Babu Kaikadia had assaulted by knife. Two unknown persons had allegedly caught hold of the victim. Thus, the role of assault is attributed to Avi alias Ajinkya Shinde and Babu Kaikadia. During the course of investigation, statement of Naziya and Sherbano were recorded. Naziya had stated in a statement under Section 164 that the victim was assaulted by Avi alias Ajinkya and others. Avi alias Ajinkya was holding iron rod and the other short person was holding knife. The victim was assaulted by iron rod on his head and the other person had assaulted by knife. Her statement was also recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., which is in consonance with her earlier statement. Thus, the said witness categorically stated that Avi alias Ajinkya Shinde had assaulted the victim by iron rod on his head and other persons assaulted by knife. Statement of Sherbano was recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. She has stated that accused Avi alias Ajinkya and others had assaulted the victim. The identifcation parade was conducted. In the parade Naziya has identifed accused Roshan Pawar and stated that Roshan Pawar had assaulted victim by knife. The other witness Ayesha has also identifed Roshan Pawar and during the identifcation stated that he had assaulted the victim by fst blows. Thus, apparently, there are discrepancies in the evidence with regards to the role played by Roshan Pawar in the FIR, statement of eye witnesses and the identifcation parade. However, as far as Ajinkya @ Avinash Anant Shinde, is concerned, specifc overtact has been attributed to him. There is consistency in the evidence of witnesses. He was the cause of quarrel and incident of murder. The victim as well as other witnesses have attributed him role of assault. In this circumstances, applicant Roshan Pawar can be granted bail, however, applicant Ajinkya @ Avinash Shinde is not entitled for bail. 7 Hence, I pass the following order: :: O R D E R :: (i) Bail Application No.1482 of 2019, is allowed and disposed of; (ii) Applicant Roshan Sunil Pawar, is directed to be released on bail in connection with C.R.No.I– 291 of 2018, registered with Panvel City Police Station, Navi Mumbai, on his eiecuting P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-, with one or more sureties in the like amount; (iii) Applicant Roshan Sunil Pawar, shall attend the concerned police station once in a month on frst Saturday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon, till the conclusion of the trial; (iv) Bail Application No.1483 of 2019, is rejected. ( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2386 OF 2021 Vishal Mangesh Yadav .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent … … Mr. N.M. Nadar h/f. Mr. S.V. Marwadi for the Applicant. Ms. A.A. Takalkar, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2021. P.C:- At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant, list the matter on 06/10/2021. [SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2386 OF 2021 Vishal Mangesh Yadav APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 23rd November, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 13/12/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2386 OF 2021 Vishal Mangesh Yadav APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 13th December, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/01/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: PMB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2386 OF 2021 PRADNYA MAKARAND BHOGALE signed by PRADNYA MAKARAND BHOGALE Date: 2023.01.05 17:10:30 +0530 Digitally VISHAL MANGESH YADAV ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ None for the applicant. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State. Mr. Vaibhav Pawar, PSI, Nalasopara Police Station is present. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 5, 2023. P.C. : 1. None appears for the applicant. 2. Only by way of an indulgence, list the matter on 06/01/2023. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2386 OF 2021 VISHAL MANGESH YADAV ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Adv. Veerdhaval Kakade i/b Adv. Mrunal Jadhav for the applicant. Ms. A.A. Takalkar, APP for the State. ------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 6, 2023. P.C. : 1. Considering the applicant is in custody for more than 4 years and 6 months, the Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial. I am informed that the charge has now been framed. 2. In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application. The application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. 3. In case the trial does not substantially proceed, liberty to file a fresh application after 6 months. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent .................... Ms. Sakshi Mane, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent – the State of Maharashtra. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 15, 2025 P.C . : 1. Mentioned out of turn. 2. Heard Ms. Mane, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Bajoria, learned APP for Respondent – the State of Maharashtra. 3. This is an Application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') seeking Bail in connection with C.R. No.408 of 2023 registered with Shil Diaghar Police Station, Thane for offence under Sections 376(2)(n), 328 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. 4. Issue notice to private Respondent No.2. Ms. Bajoria, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – the State of Maharashtra waives service on behalf of State of Maharashtra. 5. Humdast permitted. In addition to Court's notice, Applicant is directed to serve and inform Respondent No.2 about the next date of hearing by any permissible mode of service and file appropriate affidavit of service with tangible proof thereof. 6. Private Respondent can through the Investigating Officer of the case inform whether she requires legal representation. Concerned Investigating Officer shall also convey this order to the Private Respondent who is now major through a lady Police Officer and file appropriate report to that effect on information received from Private Respondent No.2. Copy of Application shall be served on Complainant through Investigating Officer within a period of two weeks from today. 7. Stand over to 22 nd January, 2025. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.01.15 18:15:45 +0530

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 22, 2025. P.C.: 1. Due to paucity of time, the following matters are adjourned to future dates as follows:- Serial No. Adjourned date 2, 6, 7, 41, 43, 44, 46, 48 to 51, 53 to 63, 65, 67 to 75 and 77 to 90 24th February 2025 91 to 98 25th February 2025 2. In the meanwhile, ad-interim / interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Digitally signed by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.01.23 10:49:41 +0530

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent .................... Ms. Sakshi Mane, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganpathy, APP for Respondent State of Maharashtra. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 28, 2025 P.C . : 1. Heard Ms. Mane, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Ganpathy, learned APP for Respondent – State of Maharashtra. 2. This is an Application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') seeking Bail in connection with C.R. No.408 of 2023 registered with Shil Daighar Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 328 and 506 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 67 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. 3. Applicant is directed to serve Respondent No.2 as remark shows that 'spare copies has not been supplied'. Let spare copies be supplied to Department and service be effected within a period of one week from today. 4. Stand over to 04 th February, 2025. To be placed under the caption 'Medical Urgency'. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.01.28 14:29:37 +0530

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents .................... Ms. Sakshi S. Mane for Applicant Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for State Mr. Santosh V. Chavan, API, Shil Daighar Police Station, Thane is present ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 04, 2025 P. C . : 1. Heard. 2. In view of the directions contained in paragraph No. 6 of the order dated 15.01.2025, Respondent No. 2 has consented for appointment of Advocate through legal aid to espouse and represent her case. In that view of the matter, I direct High Court Legal Services Committee to appoint Ms. Kavisha Khanna, learned Advocate practicing as Advocate in this Court (Contact No. 9619197448) to represent and espouse the cause of Respondent No. 2 through the Legal Aid. High Court Legal Services Committee shall give appointment letter to her to that effect. 3. Copy of the Bail Application shall be handed over to the Appointed Advocate by learned Advocate for Applicant immediately. 4. Stand over to 18th February, 2025 Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date: 2025.02.04 14:34:06 +0530 2 of 2

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 18, 2025 P.C . : 1. Due to paucity of time, the following matters are adjourned to future dates as follows:- Serial Nos. Adjourned date 37 to 50, 52, 53 and 55 to 60 25th February, 2025 61 to 80 26th February, 2025 81 to 100 27th February, 2025 101 to 117 28th February 2025 2. In the meanwhile, ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue. Ajay [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Digitally signed by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.02.18 15:01:05 +0530 Ajay

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2025 P.C . : 1. Due to paucity of time, the following matters are adjourned to future dates as follows:- Serial Nos. Adjourned date 36 to 50 04th April 2025 51 to 70 07th April 2025 71 to 90 08th April 2025 91 to 99, 101 to 108, 110 to 112 and 114 09th April 2025 2. In the meanwhile, ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue. Ajay [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Digitally signed by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.03.01 13:09:10 +0530

Order - Status 15: HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents .................... Ms. Sakshi Mane, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent No.1. CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : MARCH 05, 2025 P.C . : 1. Heard Ms. Mane, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Bajoria, learned APP for Respondent No.1. ................... 2. Prima facie, it is seen that Application has been ingeniously moved on medical grounds so that it can be listed and get priority hearing and it is sought to be argued on merits. 3. Be that as it may, I would like to ascertain the medical status of Applicant from Chief Medical Officer of Prison Hospital where the Applicant is lodged whether Applicant is indeed suffering from Tuberculosis. I am informed by Ms. Mane that Applicant is lodged in Thane Central Prison. 4. Chief Medical Officer of Thane Central Prison shall make appropriate report about the medical status of Applicant to inform the Court within a period of one week after which further directions will be passed. 5. Stand over to 12 th March, 2025. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

Order - Status 17: HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : MARCH 12, 2025 P.C . : 1. Due to paucity of time, the following matters are adjourned to a future dates as follows:- Serial Nos. Adjourned date 32, 38, 41, 44, 46, 48, 49, 53, 55, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70 and 72. 05th May, 2025 73, 81, 82, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 92, 95, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103 06th May, 2025 2. In the meanwhile, ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.03.13 12:17:45 +0530

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Ms. Sakshi Mane for Applicant Ms. Kavisha Khanna for Respondent No.2 Ms. Megha Bajoria, APP for State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 8th April, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 13/06/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 13th June, 2025 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 08/07/2025 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Ms. Sakshi S. Mane for the Applicant. Ms. Kavisha Khanna (Appointed as legal aid counsel) for Respondent No. 2. Mrs. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent / State. Mr. Niteen Belge, Shil Daighar Police Station, Thane City is present. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 27th June, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 08/07/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 125 OF 2025 Danish Hanif Shaikh APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 8th July, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 18/08/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )