All Bail Application

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ..Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra . ..Respondents Ms. Sheetal Gaikar i/b. Tushar Sonawane for the Applicant. Mr. A.A.Palkar, APP for the State. CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 26th AUGUST, 2022. P.C. Issue Notice to Respondent No.2. Learned APP to make an endeavor to intimate the next date of hearing to the Respondent No.2, through the officer of the concerned police station. Stand over to 13.09.2022. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Shri. Tushar Sonawane for Applicant. Shri. A. A. Palkar, APP for the State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH D. NAIK J DATE : 11th October, 2022 P.C. : Await service. Stand over to 20/10/2022. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondents Mr. Tushar Sonawane for the Applicant. Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State. $cdots cdots cdots$ $cdots cdots cdots$ CORAM: N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 20 OCTOBER 2022 $P.C. :=$ The Investigating Officer shall intimate about the filing of the present application and the next date of hearing of the application to the respondent No. 2. $2.$ Stand over to 16 November 2022. $(N.R. BORKAR, J.)$

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for Respondent-State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 16th November, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 05/12/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra ••• Respondent Mr. Tushar Sonawane for the Applicant. Mr. V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State. Mr. Ravi Rajulwar, API, Sangola Police Station, Solapur. CORAM : R.N.LADDHA, J. DATE : 5 th December 2022 P.C. : The Investigating Officer is directed to inform the first informant about filing of the present application within a week. Stand over to 15 th December 2022. (R.N. LADDHA, J) Lata Panjwani, P.S.

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore Versus The State of Maharashtra Applicant. Respondent Mr. Tushar Sonawane, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State. Mr. Ashish Satpute, Legal Aid Counsel appointed. CORAM : R. N. Laddha, J. DATE: 15 th December 2022 Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL SUNIL PANJWANI PANJWANI Date: 2022.12.16 11:15:15 +0530 P.C.: Learned APP informs this Court that the Applicant is not in a position to engage private Advocate and requests to provide legal aid. Mr.Ashish Satpute, Counsel from the Legal Aid Panel is appointed as Advocate to espouse the cause of the Applicant. Office is directed to serve a copy of the Application to the learned counsel appointed on behalf of the Applicant. Page No. 1 of 2 15 th December 2022 36 ba 1685.22.docx Stand over to 9 th January 2023. (R. N. LADDHA, J.) L.S.Panjwani, P.S. Page No. 2 of 2 15 th December 2022

Order - Status 15: ba 1685.22 speaking.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore Versus The State of Maharashtra Applicant. Respondent CORAM : R. N. Laddha, J. (IN CHAMBER) DATE: 5 th January 2023 P.C.: The matter is taken in chamber suo moto. In Paragraphs 1 & 2 of the order dated 15 th December 2022, wherever the words 'Applicant' is there, it be replaced by words 'Respondent No.2'. The order dated 15 th December 2022 stands corrected accordingly. (R. N. LADDHA, J.) L.S.Panjwani, P.S. Page No. 1 of 1 15 th December 2022

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr. Tushar Sonawane a/w Pooja Satpute for Applicant. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for State. Mr. Amit Icham i/b Ashish Satpute for Complainant. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 8th February, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 15/02/2023 ( H. O. B.). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr. Tushar Sonawane a/w Pooja Satpute for Applicant. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for State. Mr. Ashish Satpute for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 15th February, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 17/02/2023 ( H. O. B.). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: Urmila Ingale 22.ba 1685.22.doc URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2023.02.17 14:22:07 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ...Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Tushar Sonawane a/w Ms.Pooja Satpute, for the Applicant. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 17, 2023 P.C. : The matter to come up in due course. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1685 OF 2022 Samadhan Dattu Gore ..Applicant $v/s$ . The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent Mr. Tushar Sonawane for the Applicant. Mr. Ashish Satpute for the Respondent No.2 Mrs. A.A.Takalkar, APP for the State. CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : $13 th $ APRIL, 2023. $P.C.$ $1.$ This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed by the aforesaid Applicant, who is facing trial in Special Case No.7 of 2021 pending before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Pandharpur. The said case arises from Crime No. 10 of 2022, registered with Sangola Police Station for the offences under Section 354, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4, 8, 12 and 42 of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act. $2.$ Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and learned APP for the State. I have perused PRASANNA P SALGAONKAR the records and considered the submissions advanced by the learned Digitally signed by PRASANNÄ‚ P SALGAONKAR Date: 2023.04.18 10:37:49 p +0530 Counsels for the respective parties. The aforesaid crime was registered pursuant to the FIR lodged by the mother-in-law of the victim. She has stated that on 04.01.2022 she had gone in search of the victim, who had gone to wash clothes near the rivulet (Odha). She saw the Applicant pulling the victim by her hand and heard the victim crying for help. She has stated that she had also heard the Applicant threatening her not to shout. When she intervened the Applicant left the victim and ran away from the spot. Based on the said report, initially crime was registered under Section 354, 506 of IPC and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. Statement of the victim was recorded. The victim claimed that the Applicant had touched her chest and private parts. On the basis of the allegations made by the victim, Section 4 and 8 also came to be added. It is to be noted that though the Applicant is charged for committing offences under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, the statement of the victim does not prima facie indicate that the Applicant had committed penetrative sexual assault. In such circumstances, in my considered view, prima facie, the offence under Section 4 of not made out. The maximum sentence in respect of other offences is five years. The Applicant was arrested on 04.01.2022 and is presently in Judicial Custody. Considering the large pendency, the trial is not likely to commence in the near future. The application filed by the Applicant has been rejected mainly on the ground of antecedents of the Applicant. Learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant shall not visit Sangola District, Solapur, till the evidence of the victim is recorded. Considering the above facts and circumstances, in my considered view, this would be a fit case, to exercise discretion under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in favour of the Applicant. Hence the application is allowed on the following terms and conditions:- (i) The Applicant who is facing trial in Special Case No.7 of 2021 pending before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Pandharpur arising out of Crime No. Crime No. 10 of 2022, registered with Sangola Police Station, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twentyfive Thousand Only) with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount; (ii) The Applicant shall not visit Sangola District till the evidence of the victim is recorded. (iii) The Applicant shall report to the nearest police station on the first Monday of every month till the date of framing of charge; (iv) The Applicant shall not interfere with the complainant or the other witnesses, or tamper with the evidence in any manner; (v) The Applicant shall keep the Special Court as well as the Investigating Officer informed of his permanent as well as temporary address, and his contact details, and/or change of residence or mobile details from time to time. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 26th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time ,stand over to 21/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 23rd August, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time ,stand over to 19/09/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule .Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP, for the Respondent – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 19.09.2019 P.C. . Learned counsel for the Applicant seeks time to file an Affidavit of the Applicant. Accordingly, the Superintendent, Taloja Central Jail to permit the Applicant to affirm the Affidavit before him or any other authorized officer, in accordance with the rules. Stand over to 14.10.2019 . All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 13: shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1405 OF 2019 Asif Mohd. Mamtule ] Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ] Respondent ….. ….. Mr. Aniket Vagal, for the Applicant. Mr. A.A. Patkar, A.P.P for the Respondent - State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2019. P.C. : After arguing for some time, when the Court was not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw this application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. Having regard to the age of of the victim boy i.e 8 years, trial of the Applicant is expedited, lest the victim boy forgets the incident due to passage of time. The learned trial Judge to dispose of the Applicant's case as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within six months from the date of receipt of this order. Application is disposed of. All the concerned to act upon the authenticated copy of this order. [REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : P. N. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 20nd JULY 2016. P.C. : On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on daily and supplementary board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CMIS. S.N. Case No. CMIS DATE 2 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1583/2015 07/09/2016 3 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1748/2015 07/09/2016 4 BAIL APPLICATION NO.69/2016 07/09/2016 5 BAIL APPLICATION NO.291/2016 07/09/2016 6 BAIL APPLICATION NO.331/2016 07/09/2016 8 BAIL APPLICATION NO.750/2016 07/09/2016 9 BAIL APPLICATION NO.907/2016 07/09/2016 10 BAIL APPLICATION NO.916/2016 07/09/2016 11 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1084/2016 07/09/2016 12 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1085/2016 07/09/2016 13 BAIL APPLICATION NO.41/2016 07/09/2016 14 BAIL APPLICATION NO.316/2016 07/09/2016 15 BAIL APPLICATION NO.427/2016 07/09/2016 17 BAIL APPLICATION NO.841/2016 07/09/2016 18 BAIL APPLICATION NO.952/2016 07/09/2016 19 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1027/2016 07/09/2016 20 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1029/2016 07/09/2016 21 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1037/2016 07/09/2016 22 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1090/2016 07/09/2016 24 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1158/2016 07/09/2016 25 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1394/2016 07/09/2016 26 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.687/2016 07/09/2016 In the above matters, adinterim relief or interim relief, if any, is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. (P. N. DESHMUKH, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2016 Kamlesh Parsram Balani Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. Satyavrat Joshi Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. R.M. Gadhvi, A.P.P. for the Respondent State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATED : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2016. P.C. : 1 This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for bail in C.R. No.I/222/2015 dated 02.07.2015 registered with Vitthalwadi Police Station, District Thane, under sections 363, 366, 376 (2)(j), (2)(n) of Indian Penal Code and under sections 3, 4, 5(l) and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2 The First Information Report is lodged by the mother of victim girl Smt. Ambica Mane, on 02.07.2015. On the basis of the said report, the aforesaid First Information Report is lodged by the Police. During the course of investigation, the statement of the victim girl, who was at that relevant time about 16 years of age is recorded on 08.07.2015. That the statement of the victim girl, under section 164 of Cr.P.C. is also recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 6th Court, Ulhasnagar, on 27.07.2015. The applicant was arrested on 5th July 2015. That after completion of the investigation, the police have submitted chargesheet on 14.09.2015. 3 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. also perused the entire chargesheet annexed to the present application. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that a bare perusal of the statement of the victim girl recorded under section 161 so also under section 164 of Cr.P.C. would reveal that the alleged act has contemplated under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code was a Consensual act. Prima facie I find substance in the said submission. It is to be noted here that the victim girl who was at the relevant time aged about 16 years, had stayed with the applicant at the place of the aunt of the applicant for about 18 to 20 days. It prima facie appears form the evidence available on record that the victim girl had attained the age of understanding on the date of registration of offence and at her free will had accompanied the applicant at various places. 4 In view of the above, the applicant has made out a case for his release of bail. 5 Hence the following order : (i) The applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.I/222/2015 registered with Vitthalwadi Police Station, District Thane, on his furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/ with one or more local sureties in the like amount. (ii) After his release from the jail, the applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction of Vitthalwadi Police Station except for marking his presenty as is directed herein below. (iii) After his release from the jail, the applicant shall attend the Vitthalwadi Police Station once in three months on every 1st Monday of the said month between 11.00 a.m.to 1.00 p.m. (iv) Before his release from the jail, the applicant shall provide the documents pertaining to the address where he intends to reside after his release from jail. (v) Any two consecutive defaults in complying with the aforestated conditions, shall attract the provisions of cancellation of bail. (vi) Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1257 OF 2017 Ramesh Bhimrao Dubale Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Rahul Kadam, i/b Mr.Mr.M.J.Pathan, for the Applicant. Mr.S. H. Yadav, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 20th JUNE, 2017 P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on bail in connection with C.R.No.94 of 2016 registered with the Samarth Police Station, Pune for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 3, 4 and 7 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the said case. He submitted that the applicant was about 18 years at the relevant time. 4. Learned APP opposed the application. Perused the papers. The complainant is the mother of the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix was about 5 years of age at the relevant time. She has stated that the applicant took her to his house and committed forcible intercourse with her. The incident has taken place on 25th May, 2016 at about 11.00 a.m. and the FIR was lodged on 27th May, 2016. The medical history given to the Doctor is consistent with the prosecutrix's statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The opinion of the medical doctor shows that there was evidence of torn hymen with peritymenal inflammation which is suggestive of vaginal penetration with no evidence of any injury on any part of the body. Considering the material on record, prima-facie, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, the Application for bail is rejected and disposed of as such. However, the trial of the applicant is expedited keeping in mind the age of the prosecutrix and not the age of the applicant. It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie for deciding the aforesaid application, and the learned Judge shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1104 OF 2015 Rajesh Bharatbhai Rathod ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Tejas Hilage, Advocate appointed ,for the applicant. Ms. R.M.Gadhavi, APP, for the State CORAM: SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 18th June, 2015. P.C . An application is received through jail. The applicant is praying for bail in Case No.370 of 2011. This Court had requested the learned counsel Shri Tejas Hilage to espouse the cause of the applicant. He has graciously accepted to do the same. Office to furnish copy of the application to the Advocate so appointed. The learned APP to take specific instructions in respect of the stage of trial. S.O. to 25.6.2015. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1104 OF 2015 Rajesh Bharatbhai Rathod. ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. None for Applicant. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : JULY 13, 2015 P.C.: 1 Learned APP upon instructions submits that the applicant herein was taken to J.J. Hospital, Mumbai on 26/6/2015. It is reported that the applicant has been tested positive for HIV. 2 It is further submitted that the trial has commenced. The next scheduled date for recording of evidence is 27/7/2015. In view of this, the applicant does not deserve grant of bail. In the eventuality that the applicant files an application seeking bail on medical ground, Talwalkar 1/2 the learned Judge shall consider the same on its own merits. The application is accordingly disposed of. 3 Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in jail. ( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J) Talwalkar 2/2

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sangpal Gulabrao Jamnik ] Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ] Respondent Ms. Mayuri Hatle, for the Applicant. Smt.Rutuja Abmekar, APP for the State. CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE : 12th OCTOBER, 2022. P.C. 1] Since the offences invoke against the Applicant are under the provisions of POCSO Act, let the complainant be added as party-Respondent No.2. 2] After necessary amendment is being carried out, Issue notice to Respondent No.2 returnable on 29.11.2022. 3] Let the learned APP intimate the complainant through the Investigating Officer about her impleadment in the application and also apprise her of her right of being represented through counsel of her choice or through legal aid. [BHARATI DANGRE, J]

Order - Status 6: Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2022.11.30 10:52:53 +0530 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2501 OF 2021 Mr. Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik ..Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms. Mayuri D. Hatl,e for applicant. Ms. P.N. Dabholkar, APP for respondent-State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2022 P.C. : 1. The Learned APP submits that the complainant has been served and she wants to be represented through legal aid. Mr. Akshay Pai is requested to appear on behalf of the complainant and represent her. 2. List the matter on 06/12/2022. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 6th December, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 16/12/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Ms. Mayuri D. Hatle for Applicant. Ms. G. P. Mulekar, APP for State. Mr. Akshay Pai for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 16th December, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 20/12/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 20th December, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/01/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2021 SAGAR @ SANGPAL GULABRAO JAMNIK ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS ------------ Ms. Mayuri D. Hatle for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Pai for respondent No.2. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the State. ------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 5, 2023. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application. A request is made to expedite the trial as the applicant is in custody since 22/09/2020. The FIR is lodged on 28/07/2020. Considering that the applicant is in custody for more than 2 years and 3 months, the trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of six months from today. In any case, considering that the applicant is incarcerated for this long a period, the trial Court is requested to record the evidence of the child within a period of one month from the date when this order is produced on record. 3. Liberty to apply for bail in case the trial does not substantially proceed during the period of six months from today. 4. Subject to what is observed hereinabove, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. 5. I appreciate the assistance rendered by Mr. Pai, learned advocate, who was requested to appear on behalf of the victim. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2501 OF 2021 Sagar @ Sang Pal Gulabrao Jamnik Versus...Applicant ...RespondentThe State Of Maharashtra...Respondent ____ None for the Applicant Ms. Anamika Mlahotra, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : $28^{text{th}}$ AUGUST 2023. P.C. : The letter dated 5 th July 2023 is received from District Judge-7 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for extension of one year time for disposal of Special (POCSO) Case No. 506/2020. Considering the reasons mentioned in the letter, one year time is extended to dispose of Special (POCSO) Case No. 506/2020. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1071 OF 2020 Charansingh Kanhiyalal Solanki APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 21st February, 2022 P.C. : Matter did not reach till the court time was over. Hence adjourned. Stand over to 14/03/2022. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1071 OF 2020 Charansingh Kanhiyalal Solanki ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI J DATE : 14th March, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 08/04/2022. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1071 OF 2020 Charansingh Kanhiyalal Solanki .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent … Mr.Hrishikesh Hatalkar i/b Pankaj Kavale for the applicant. Mr. A.A. Palkar, APP for the State. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 8th JUNE, 2022 P.C:- 1 Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seek leave of this Court to withdraw the Bail Application. 2 Application is permitted to be withdrawn and stands disposed off as such. ( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2164 OF 2024 The State of Maharashtra. … ------------------- Respondent V/s. Aslam @ Gondiya Hamid Mulla Applicant. Shri Farzan Shaikh i/b Kamil Sayyed, Advocate for Applicant. Shri Shreeram S. Chaudhari, APP for the State. CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATE : 13TH JUNE, 2024. PC: Heard. Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 08/07/2024. The learned A.P.P. waives notice for the Respondent-State. RAJIV BABARAOJI RAUT Digitally signed by RAJIV BABARAOJI RAUT Date: 2024.06.14 14:49:18 +0530 (ANIL S. KILOR, J)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2164 OF 2024 Aslam @ Gondiya Hamid Mulla APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 8th July, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 29/07/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2164 OF 2024 Aslam @ Gondiya Hamid Mulla, Age 34 years, Occ.Service, R/o.Hazarmachi, Tal.Karad, Dist.Satara. (Presently in Satara District Prison) Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Ganesh Bhujbal, Advocate for Applicant. Mr.Sameer M.Mangaonkar, APP, for State. Mr.Mahesh B.Shinde, P.C, Karad City Police, present. CORAM : ANIL S.KILOR, J. DATE : 21st August 2024 PC : Heard. By this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the applicant is seeking bail in Crime No.1191 of 2023 registered with Karad City Police Station, District Satara, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 364, 324, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for Applicant submits that there are discrepancies in the CCTV footage transcription and the statements of witnesses. It is submitted that the first informant did not name the Applicant. The FIR was registered against total 10 accused, out of which four were known and six unknown accused persons. It is submitted that version of the eye witness is doubtful and since charge sheet has been filed, further custody of the Applicant is not necessary. Accordingly he prays for grant of bail. MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Digitally signed by MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Date: 2024.08.22 18:12:26 +0530 Learned APP strongly opposed the application and grant of bail. I have gone through the charge sheet and relevant material collected by the Investigating Officer during investigation. It is evident that seeing the CCTV footage the Applicant was identified by the eye witness and there is sufficient evidence to show that at the time of incidence Applicant was present with other co-accused. The CCTV footage shows that the accused persons were assaulting the deceased. The allegations are of unlawful assembly with common intention. In the circumstances though there may be some discrepancies in the CCTV footage transcription and the statement of witness, however, presence of the Applicant at the spot with common intention cannot be prima facie disputed in view of sufficient incriminating material against the Applicant. In the circumstances since the offence is very serious, I do not find the present case as a fit case for grant of bail. Accordingly it is rejected. Trial is expedited. Liberty is granted to move afresh before Trial Court after one year, if there is no progress in trial. Learned counsel for Applicant undertakes to place this order on the record of Trial Court within two weeks from today. (ANIL S.KILOR, J.) MST

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @ Chand ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 5th June, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned, 27/06/2017 Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @ Chand ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 13th July, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 31/07/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @ Chand ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 14th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 29/09/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @ Chand ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 14th September, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time stand over to 29/09/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1170 OF 2017 Khalil Ahmad Salmani @Chand Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.S.R.Gaud i/b Mr.M.R.Gowd, for the Applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 26th SEPTEMBER, 2017 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on board. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions of the instructing Advocate, seeks leave to withdraw this application. The Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. It is made clear, that this application has not been heard on merits. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 4: 519.BA.2153.2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2153 OF 2022 Rajesh Dagadu Salave Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Shailesh Chavan, Advocate for applicant. Mr.A.A.Palkar, APP, for State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 11th October 2022 PC : Not on board. Taken on board. Learned APP seeks time to file affidavit-in-reply. Reply be filed before next date of hearing. Stand over to 22nd November 2022. High on board. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST Digitally signed by MANISH SURESH THATTE Date: 2022.10.13 11:49:45 +0530

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2153 OF 2022 Rajesh Dagadu Salave ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI J DATE : 22nd November, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 08/12/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2153 OF 2022 Rajesh Dagadu Salave APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr. Shailesh Chavan Adv. for Applicant Mr. A. A. Palkar, APP for Respondent - State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 19th December, 2022 P.C. : At the request of the learned APP, stand over to 13/01/2023 . Ad-interim/ Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2153 OF 2022 Rajesh Dagadu Salave ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shailesh Chavan Adv. for Applicant Mr. A. A. Palkar, APP for Respondent - State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 13th January, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 06/02/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: 41-ba-2153-22.doc DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Digitally signed by DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Date: 2023.04.22 16:58:53 +0500 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2153 OF 2022 Rajesh D. Salave …Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Mr. Shailesh Chavan a/w. Mr. Sachin Arade for the Applicant. Mr. Amit Palkar, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 06.02.2023. P.C. : This is an application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure for bail. The applicant came to be arrested in Crime No.459 of 2021 registered at Manchar Police Station, Pune (Rural) for the ofences punishable under Sections 302 and 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3 read with 25 and 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(i)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes Act, 1999 (MCOC Act). I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent – State. According to the prosecution, there was an enmity between the deceased and the co-accused Santosh Jadhav, who according to the prosecution, is a member of organized crime syndicates formed by co-accused Pawan Thorat. It is alleged that they thus hatched the conspiracy and committed the murder of the deceased on 1 August 2021. The allegations against the present applicant are that prior to the alleged incident, he gave Rs.2000/- to one of the gang member on the instructions of gang leader and even promised him to bear the expenses for their bail after the alleged incident. There appears to be no enmity between the deceased and the present applicant. Prima facie, the applicant appears to have provided or promised to provide fnancial help due to fear. The learned APP submits that in view of presumption under Section 22 of the MCOC Act, the applicant may not be released on bail. However, considering the overall facts and circumstances and as there are no other criminal antecedents, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. In the result, the following order is passed. O R D E R A] Bail Application is allowed. B] The applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.459 of 2021 registered at Manchar Police Station, Pune (Rural) for the ofences punishable under Sections 302 and 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3 read with 25 and 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(i)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes Act, 1999 (MCOC Act) on furnishing P.R Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one or two sureties in the like amount. C] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station once in a month, i.e., on frst Saturday between 11.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. till conclusion of the trial. [N.R.BORKAR, J.]