All Writ Petition (Civil)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1834 OF 2009 Shri Aiyaz Mamoodmiya Rais : Petitioner (Orig.Accused) V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents ... Mr.S.D. Patil with Mr.Shivraj R. Patil for the petitioner. Mr.D.P.Adsule, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : JULY 20, 2009. P.C.: Mentioned. Not on board. Issue notice before admission, returnable in two weeks. By way of ad-interim relief, the interim bail granted by the trial Court on 15.6.2009 shall be extended till then. S.A. BOBDE, J.

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.673 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders. Ms Neeta Karnik for the Petitioner. Shri T.D. Deshmukh for Respondent No.1. Smt. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATE : 22ND JANUARY 2013 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the first Respondent. Heard the learned AGP for the State. Leave to amend for adding a party respondent and for incorporating additional averments in the Petition. In view of the communication dated 9th January 2013, the Petitioner can continue to act as a Principal at least till 31st January 2013. Therefore, we direct that this Petition shall be fixed for admission on 30th January 2013. ( A.P. BHANGALE, J) (A.S.OKA, J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.673 of 2013 Neeta Sane … Petitioner V/s. Dnyanasadhana College, Through Chairman and Ors. … Respondents Ms. Neeta Karnik , Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. T.D. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.3. Ms. Chandrakanta Gongane i/b. R.A. Rodrigues for Respondent No.2. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 30TH JANUARY, 2013 P.C. When the papers of this petition were produced before this Court on 22nd January, 2013 for seeking urgent relief, the papers were not circulated in advance. Therefore, it was not noticed that one of us (A.S. OKA, J.) will not be in a position to take up this petition. Hence, place it before a bench to which one of us (A.S. OKA, J.) is not a party. ( A.P. BHANGALE, J ) ( A.S. OKA, J )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 673 OF 2013 Neeta Sane .. Petitioner Vs. Dnyanasadhana College & Ors. .. Respondents Ms Neeta Karnik for Petitioner. Mr. T. D. Deshmukh for Respondent No. 1. Ms. Chandrakanta Gongane i/b. Mr. R. A. Rodriques for Respondent No. 2. Mr. P. P. Kakade – AGP for Respondent No. 3 . CORAM : NARESH. H. PATIL & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2013 P.C. 1] Heard. 2] The petitioner has questioned the communication made by the respondent College Dnyanasadhana, Thane dated 9.1.2013. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in view of the University Regulations after putting in one year service in absence of any adverse communication the petitioner shall be deemed to have been confirmed as Principal. 3] This fact is disputed by the counsel appearing for the respondent college. The learned counsel for the respondent college submits that the petitioner has a statutory remedy under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. 4] In the facts of the case the petitioner has statutory remedy of approaching the College Tribunal under the provisions of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. 5] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the communication dated 9.1.2013 the petitioner continued to act as a Principal till 31.1.2013 and prayed that the petitioner be allowed to continue to act as a Principal for a period of two weeks from today. 6] The petitioner be allowed to continue as a Principal till 14.2.2013. This court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter. 7] Writ Petition is disposed of. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) Chandka 2/2

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7120 OF 2018 Mrs. Usha Shantaram Wadkar ....Petitioner V/S Saraswati Ganpatrao Yadav (decd) Thro. Lr. Raghunath Yadav (decd) Through Lrs. And Ors ....Respondent Indrajeet Anandrao Bhosale For Petitioner V.S.Talkute i/b. Jayprakash Shridhar Kapre Resp No. 2a To 2e, 3a To 3e, 4a To 4c, 6 To 8 For Respondent CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J DATE : 5th July, 2018 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on production board, by way of praecipe. No orders. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: VRJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7120 OF 2018 VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2024.12.04 16:54:31 +0530 Usha Shantaram Wadkar … Petitioner V/s. Saraswati Ganpatrao Yadav (Since Deceased) & Ors. … Respondents None for the petitioner. Ms. Rupika Narkar i/by Mr. Vishwanth Talkute for respondent No.7. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : DECEMBER 4, 2024 P.C.: None for the petitioner. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT WRIT PETITION NO. 8623 OF 2021 Ankush Bapurao Thakur $V/s.$ The Deputy Collector & Ors. ...Petitioner ....Respondent Mr. Nitin Padmakar Deshpande – Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for State. Uttam R. Patil – DRO Pune. CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. D. S. DESHMUKH, REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL-II) V. A. SATHE, DY. REGISTRAR, OSD AT CPC DATE : $11^{text{th}}$ DECEMBER, 2021 $overline{P}C$ .: Remove from board. $1.$ Place the matter before Regular Court. $2.$ (V. A. SATHE) (D. S. DESHMUKH) (S. M. MODAK, J.) O.S.D. at CPC Registrar (Judl.-II) (Judge)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8623 OF 2021 Ankush Bapurao Thakur ...Petitioner V/s. The Deputy Collector Resettlement Pune District Pune and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande, for the Petitioner. Mr. R. S. Pawar, A.G.P. for the Respondent / State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 09 JUNE 2022 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Issue notice to the Respondents returnable on 30 June 2022. Learned A.G.P. waives notice for all the Respondents. (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8623 OF 2021 Ankush Bapurao Thakur PETITIONER V/S The Deputy Collector And Ors RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R.D. DHANUKA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR, JJ DATE : 30th June, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 12/08/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: UMESH SHRINIWAS MALANI Digitally signed by UMESH SHRINIWAS MALANI Date: 2022.08.20 13:31:24 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8623 OF 2021 *** *** Ankush Bapurao Thakur ...Petitioner Versus The Deputy Collector (Rehabilitation) Pune & Ors. ...Respondents None for the petitioner. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & KISHORE C. SANT, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 12, 2022. P. C. : Matter is moved before this Court by way of a praceipe. In view of urgency, order is passed on praceipe itself. None for the petitioner. List the petition as per its own turn. (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Order - Status 12: SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI Digitally signed by SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI Date: 2022.08.26 16:53:33 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8623 OF 2021 Ankush Bapurao Thakur ...Petitioner Versus The Deputy Collector (Resettlement) Pune, & Ors. ...Respondents *** Ms. Rachana Harpale i/by Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V. S. Gokhale, B Panel Counsel (AGP), for the Respondent State. *** CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & KISHORE C. SANT, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 25, 2022. P. C. : Matter is moved before this Court by way of a praceipe. In view of urgency, order is passed on praceipe itself. Heard learned Counsel for Petitioner. Issue notice to the Respondents, making the same returnable on 06th October, 2022. Learned AGP waives notice for Respondent – State. Learned Counsel for Petitioner is permitted to serve the private Respondents, by way of any legally permissible mode of service, apart from Court service and to place on record service affidavit before next date. (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8623 OF 2021 Ankush Bapurao Thakur ...Petitioner Versus The Deputy Collector Resettlement Pune District Pune And Ors. ...Respondents Ms. Kanchan Phatak i/b Mr. Nitin Deshpande, for Petitioner. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, 'B' Panel Counsel for the Respondents-State. ---- CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA, AND M.M.SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 18th JANUARY 2023 P.C. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Learned AGP waives service for the Respondent/State. Taken up for final disposal by consent. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the Respondents-State to delete the entries of 'reservation for project affected persons' from the other rights column of 7/12 extracts of the Petitioner's land admeasuring 2 Hectares and 72 Ares from Gat No. 112, situated at Village Takali Bhima, Taluka Daund, District – Pune. It is the case of the Petitioner that the subject matter land is falling in the benefited zone and as such it is kept under reservation SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Digitally signed by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Date: 2023.01.19 12:19:47 +0530 vide M. E. No. 505, for the allotment of project affected persons of Bhama-Askhed Irrigation project. It is further case of the Petitioner that because of such endorsement, he cannot deal with his land and Government has also not taken steps in last 24 years for acquisition and allotment of this land to the project affected persons. As a result, there is indefinite fetter/restriction on the Petitioner's right to enjoy subject matter land. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has invited our attention to various earlier orders passed by this Court viz. Order dated 17.09.2013 passed in Writ Petition No. 5207 of 2013, Order dt. 17.10.2018 passed in Writ Petition No. 2821 of 2018, Order dt. 14.08.2019 passed in batch of Writ Petitions with leading Writ Petition No. 5763 of 2017, Order dt. 17.02.2020 passed in Writ Petition No. 1578/2020 1567, 1474, 1475 and 1476 all of 2020, Order dt.27.10.2020 passed in group of Writ Petitions with leading Writ Petition No. 5077 of 2020, Order dt. 05.08.2021 passed in Writ Petition No.2508 of 2021, Order dt. 11.08.2021 passed in Writ Petition No. 8629 of 2018, Order dt. 07.10.2021 passed in Writ Petition No. 1601 of 2021 and Writ Petition No. 716 of 2021, Order dt. 15.11.2021 passed in group of Writ Petitions with leading Writ Petition No. 1332 of 2021 and latest Order dt. 02.03.2022 passed in group of Writ Petitions with leading Writ Petition No. 5507 of 2021. Perusal of all these orders show that this Court has taken consistent view that private lands of the citizens like Petitioner cannot be kept under continuous and indefinite fetter, without initiating any action for allotment to project affected persons. If the Respondent-State wants to allot any of these lands to project affected persons, necessary steps must be taken and completed in time bound manner, otherwise the subject matter land must be released from such endorsements on 7/12 extract. Learned AGP for the Respondent-State could not distinguish facts of the present matter from the facts of the above said cases. We are therefore, of the view that this matter is covered by aforesaid Judgments and Orders taking consistent view. In that view of the matter, we pass the following order : (i) The State Government is directed to complete the process of allotting the Petitioner's land which is declared as part of the benefited zone, for allotment to the project affected persons, if required, and the said process shall be completed within six months from today, without fail. (ii) It is further directed that if the Petitioner's land is not allotted as stated above, the mutation entries effected in its 7/12 extracts about reservation for project affected persons, be deleted without further reference to the Court within two weeks from the date of expiry of six months. It is directed that no further extension of time would be granted for the same. (iii) It is further directed that if the entire process of allotment of Petitioner's land is not over within a period of six months from today as stated above, the Petitioner whose land has been placed under the benefited zone, would be at liberty to deal with his said land in the manner he desires and the State Government shall not initiate any acquisition proceedings in respect of the Petitioner's land which is subject matter of this petition, after expiry of six months. (iv) It is further made clear that the Government Resolution dated 18th January, 2022 and 11th February, 2022 shall be read with this order, so far as its application to the Petitioner's land is concerned. (v) The Writ Petition is disposed of. Rule is made absolute in above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. (vi) All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. [M.M.SATHAYE, J.] [R.D.DHANUKA, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6517 OF 2017 Bholanath R. Shukla ...Petitioner vs. The Transport Engineer (Projects) ...Respondent Mr. Ajinkya Patil a/w. Mr. Dharmapal Dave i/b. Naik Patil Salvi & Associates, for the Petitioner. Mr. B.B. Sharma, for RespondentCIDCO. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 19, 2017 P.C.: . The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition if occasion so arises. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (M. S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7887 OF 2024 Vishwas S/o Babasaheb Deshmukh And Ors ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary Social Justice And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ DATE : 4th March, 2025 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 05/03/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7887 OF 2024 Vishwas S/o Babasaheb Deshmukh And Ors ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary Social Justice And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. S. R. Barlinge (appeared through VC) a/w Mr. Deepak Pote for Petitioner Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl.G.P. a/w Mr. A.C. Bhadang, AGP for Respondents-State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ DATE : 5th March, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 06/03/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: TRUPTI SADANAND signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2025.03.13 17:38:25 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7887 OF 2024 Vishwas s/o. Babasaheb Deshmukh & Ors. … Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents Mr.Ketan Pote (through VC) h/f. Mr.Deepak Pote for the Petitioners. Mr.P.P.Kakde, Addl.GP with Mr.A.C.Bhadang, AGP for the Respondent -State. Mr.Rajiv More, Law Officer is present. Mr.Prashant Gaikwad, Medical Social Worker is present. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 6TH MARCH, 2025 P.C. :- The Petitioners have put forth prayer clauses (A), (B) and (C), as under : "A] By a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, or order or directions in the like nature, respondent No. 2 be directed to consider the petitioners for absorption in any other aided School meant for physically challenged students. B] By a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, or order or directions in the like nature, Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 may kindly be directed to pay salary of the petitioners for a period from 2017 till the date of their absorption. C] Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition, respondent No. 2 be directed to consider the petitioners absorption as per their seniority in the waiting list maintained by respondent No. 2 without waiting for the list to be submitted by respondent No. 4 Management". The learned Addl.GP submits, on instructions, that an Appeal was filed by Respondent No.4 Management, challenging the decision of the Government to close down the said Institution. The said Appeal was allowed on 25th January, 2018. However, thereafter, the Management has not started the said Institution. Therefore, these Petitioners are still in the lurch. We are informed that the proposals of these Petitioners, for absorption, have been forwarded by Respondent No.3 to Respondent No.2. The learned Addl.GP submits that the said proposals could not be acted upon since the department requires the service books along with the appointment orders of these Petitioners and the Institution is closed. If the Petitioners tender self attested copies of the service books along with their appointment orders, Respondent No.2 would consider the same and take a decision as regards the absorption of these Petitioners. He, therefore, prays that the Petitioners should cooperate. The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits, on instructions, that the Petitioners are willing to cooperate. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off with the following directions : (a) The Petitioners shall prepare additional copies of their service books along with their appointment orders and tender them to Respondent no. 2; (b) Depending upon the availability of posts on which these Petitioners would be eligible, the appropriate Authority would start issuing orders of absorption of these Petitioners and similarly situated employees who have not approached the Court, strictly as per their seniority list; 3 of 4 (c) Insofar as the payment of salary to a surplus teacher is concerned, in the light of the Government Resolution dated 15th March, 2024, we direct the concerned Authorities to ensure that the said Government Resolution is scrupulously followed and the surplus teachers be paid their due amounts, within a period of 60 days, and to be paid until they are absorbed. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)