All Writ Petition (Civil)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 ... ordersOrders. or directions and Registrar's orders. OfficeCourt's Notes, Office Memorada or Judge's Mr. A.K.Abhyankar , P.S.Dani with H.N.Vakil i/b. M/s. Mulla & Mulla for the petitioners. Shri R.D.Rane GP for Respdt.5. CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.M.KANADE, J. DTAED: 11TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C. To Rule. 1. be heard with W.P. of 2003. No.2697 . Status Status-quo wi continued be with liberty to get ers in interim or appropriate interim orders in in this case.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4503 OF 2006 TATA MOTORS LIMITED )...PETITIONER V/s. PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORP. ) AND ORS. )...RESPONDENTS Mr.H.N.Vakil i/b. M/s.Mulla & Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.B.Kalel, AGP for the Respondent State. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & A. M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 14th JULY 2017 P.C. : 1 Issue fresh notice to respondent nos.1 to 4, returnable on 11th August 2017. The learned AGP appears for respondent no.5. (A. M. BADAR, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA), J.)

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Rushi Mathur instructed by M/s Mulla and Mulla Co. and Craige Blunt and Caroe is present. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) Date : 13 SEPTEMBER 2017 Await service to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 for four weeks i.e. 11.10.2017. S.O. to 12.10.2017. REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) RJ I gpj / 13.09.2017

Order - Status 13: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. H.W. Vakil a/w Ms. S.M. Vakil and Mr. Andre Shah instructed by Mulla and Mulla CBC, Advocate for Petitioner is present. CORAM :A.N. MARE REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) Date : 12 OCTOBER 2017 Await service to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 for four weeks (excluding diwali vacation) i.e. 23.11.2017. S.O. to 24.11.2017. REGISTRAR (JUDL­I) RJ I gpj / 12.10.2017

Order - Status 31: VAI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 Tata Motors Limited …Petitioner Versus Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation And Ors. ..Respondents Mr P. S. Dani, Senior Advocate , a/w Mr. H. N. Vakil a/w Mr. Samkit Shah i/by Mulla and Mulla and Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Petitioner. Ms S. S. Bhende , A.G.P. for the Respondent – State. CORAM: M.S. Sonak & Kamal Khata, JJ DATED: 27th August 2024 PC:- 1. Place this matter along with Writ Petition No.2697 of 2003 on 19th November 2024. If full Bench has decided earlier, liberty to apply. (Kamal Khata, J) (M.S. Sonak, J) VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.08.30 12:04:10 +0530

Order - Status 33: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 _______ _______ Tata Motors Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents None for Petitioner. Ms. M. P. Thakur, AGP for State. CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATE: 27 JUNE 2025 P.C. None for the petitioner. As a matter of last chance, stand over to 04 July 2025. In the event, the petitioner is not represented on the adjourned date of hearing, there shall be no alternative but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2006 _________ __________ Tata Motors Limited ...Petitioner Vs. Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents None for the Petitioner. Ms. S. A. Prabhune, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATE: 04 JULY 2025. MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Digitally signed by MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Date: 2025.07.07 12:09:33 +0530 P.C. On 27th June 2025 we had passed the following order :- "1. None for the petitioner. As a matter of last chance, stand over to 04 July 2025. In the event, the petitioner is not represented on the adjourned date of hearing, there shall be no alternative but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution." Today again the Petitioner is not represented. Considering our aforesaid order, it clearly appears that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this Petition. It is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6492 OF 2016 Mr. Sameer Sikander Nadaf …...Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6493 OF 2016 Mr. Jayhind Yadavrao Phadtare …...Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6494 OF 2016 Mr. Kailash Ashok Bhore …...Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6495 OF 2016 Mr. Shrikant Vithal Mhamane …...Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6497 OF 2016 Mrs. Jayshree Mohanrao Gudge …...Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6498 OF 2016 Mr. Shivaji Tukaram Ghadge …...Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6499 OF 2016 Mr. Subhash Ramchandra Gonjari …...Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6500 OF 2016 Mr. Nitin Mahadev Veer …...Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6501 OF 2016 Mr. Bhimrao Baburao Ghodke …...Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …...Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6502 OF 2016 Mr. Bhimrao Maruti Dham V/s. …Petitioner Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6503 OF 2016 Mr. Abhiraj Dilip Nagmal V/s. …Petitioner Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6504 OF 2016 Mr. Ashok Dattaraya Bhore V/s. …Petitioner Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6505 OF 2016 Mr. Sachin Mohanrao Gudge V/s. …Petitioner Additional Commissioner & Special Registrar C.S., Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. …Respondents * * * * * Mr. P.N. Joshi i/by. Mr. S.M. Sabrad, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for respondent no.1. Mr. Dilip Bodake, Advocate for respondent no.3. Mr. Y.S. Jahgirdar, Senior Advocate i/by. Mr. Sarang S. Aradhye and Mr. Milind Prabhune, Advocate for respondents no.4, 8, 9, 10 and 14 to 27. CORAM :- SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED :- 15TH JUNE, 2016. P.C. :- 1). Admit. The petitions are being admitted only for the academic purposes of deciding the scope of By-Law 40 of respondent no.3, Bank. It is made clear that, there are no interim reliefs granted in the petitions and the petitions are admitted only for consideration of scope of By Law No.40 of the by-laws of respondent no.3, bank. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6492 OF 2016 Mr.Sameer Sikander Nadaf ..Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6493 OF 2016 Mr.Jayhind Yadavrao Phadtare Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6494 OF 2016 Mr.Kailash Ashok Bhore Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6495 OF 2016 Mr.Shrikaant Vithal Mhamane Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6497 OF 2016 Smt.Jayshree Mohanrao Gudge Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6498 OF 2016 Petitioner Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6499 OF 2016 Mr.Subhash Ramchandra Gonjari Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6500 OF 2016 Mr.Nitin Mahadev Veer Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6501 OF 2016 Mr.Bhimrao Baburao Ghodke Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6502 OF 2016 Mr.Bhimrao Maruti Dham Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6503 OF 2016 Mr.Abhiraj Dilip Nagmal Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6504 OF 2016 Mr.Ashok Dattatraya Bhore Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6505 OF 2016 Mr.Sachin Mohanrao Gudge Petitioner V/s. Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co. Op. Soc. & Ors. Respondents Mr.Amey Sawant i/b Mr.S.M. Sabrad for the Petitioners. Ms.Shraddha Pawar i/b Mr.Dilip Bodke for Respondent No.3. Mr.S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.6492 of 2016. Mr.A.P. Vanarse for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.6493 of 2016. Mr.M.C. Walimbe for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.6495 of 2016. Mr.P.P. Pujari for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.6497 of 2016. CORAM : C.V. BHADANG, J. DATE : 06th FEBRUARY 2020 P.C. The challenge of these petitions is to the rejection of the nomination papers of the petitioners by an order passed way back on 31st May 2016, which order has been confirmed by the Appellate Authority on 10th June 2016. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that this Court in a batch of connected petitions being Writ Petition No.6494 of 2016 and others had granted Rule on 15th June 2016. However perusal of the said order shows that the said petitions were admitted, only for the academic purpose of deciding scope of byelaw No.40 of respondent No.3-Bank. The learned counsel for respondent No.3 on the contrary points out that one of the connected petitions being Writ Petition No.8060 of 2010 has been dismissed by this Court on 18th January 2017, in view of the fact that the election had already taken place. He further points out that based on the said order this Court has dismissed two other petitions being Writ Petition Nos.4511 of 2017 and 4513 of 2017 on 30th January 2020. Considering the circumstances and particularly having regard to the fact that the challenge is to the rejection of the nomination in May 2016 and the elections are long over and further having regard to the fact that the three connected petitions involving a similar issue have already been dismissed, I decline to entertain the petitions. The petitions are accordingly dismissed, with no order as to costs. Nilam Kamble Digitally signed by Nilam Kamble Date: 2020.02.07 15:49:05 +0530 The issue of the scope of the bye-law No.40 of the Bank, is left open. C.V. BHADANG, J.

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 509 OF 2005 Rajaram Shankar More Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents. Dr. V. K. Chaudhary for the Petitioner. Mrs. J. S. Pawar, Addl.G.P. for the State. CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C. J. & S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 17, 2005. P.C. : Learned Counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Sd/ CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/ S. A. BOBDE, J.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam And Anr PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT Mr. Bharat Gadhavi i/b Tejas Dande for Petitioner Mr. Vishal Navale for Respondent No. 2 Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for State/Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR, JJ DATE : 13th July, 2022 P.C. : By consent S. O. to 17/08/2022 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam and another … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents …...... Mr. Bharat Gadhavi instructed by Mr. Tejesh Dande for the Petitioners. …...... Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State. Mr. Vishal Navale for Respondent No.2. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 17 AUGUST 2022 P.C. :- At the request of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, stand over to 26 September 2022. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. ) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J. )

Order - Status 8: common order-paucity-26.9.2022.doc NISHA Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP HITTNIS CHITNIS 13:59:48 + 0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 71 to 78, 79 to 84, 86 to 89, 90, 92, 93, 95 to 108, 109, 110 & 112 to 115, 117 to 128, 130 to 136 and 138 to 141 ON THE BOARD DATED 26 th SEPTEMBER 2022 CAUSE TITLES AND APPEARANCES AS NOTIFIED ON THE BOARD DATED 26 th SEPTEMBER 2022 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 26 th SEPTEMBER 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, it is not possible to proceed with the hearing of these matters today. All these matters are adjourned and will be listed on the Board on the respective assigned dates as mentioned below:- Serial Nos. Assigned Date 71 to 78 10/11/2022 79 to 84 11/11/2022 86 to 89 11/11/2022 90, 92, 93 14/11/2022 95 to 108 17/11/2022 common order-paucity-26.9.2022.doc 109, 110 & 112 to 115 23/11/2022 117 to 128 23/11/2022 130 to 136 24/11/2022 138 to 141 24/11/2022 Ad-interim order granted in any of the above said matters, if any, to continue till the respective assigned date. Order accordingly. S. M. MODAK, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam And Anr PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. N. LADDHA, JJ DATE : 11th November, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/12/2022. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: 79-WP-5760-2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam and Ors. … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents Mr. Pratik Sabrad i/b Tejesh Dande and Assoc., for the Petitioners. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent No.1 – State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 13th DECEMBER, 2022. P. C. : On today's board at Sr. No. 79. Mentioned out of turn. 2 Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that during the pendency of the aforesaid petition, the matter was compounded before the learned Additional C.J. M., Malegaon (Nashik). Learned Counsel has tendered a photo copy of the said order dated 12.11.2022. The same is taken on record. The said order shows that in view of the compounding, the petitioners have been acquitted of the offence under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 16:24:20 +0530 Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2022.12.14 Rekha Patil 1/2 3 In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives in the aforesaid Petition. 4 Petition stands disposed of accordingly. PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1356 OF 2021 Shri. Ramchandra Shankar Sutar … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1354 OF 2021 Shri. Uttam Tukaram Sutar … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1343 OF 2021 Shri. Bhagwan Babaji Dhawale … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1352 OF 2021 Sou. Anusaya Dhondiba Maragage … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1362 OF 2021 Shri. Dilip Gaurihar Dhawale (Dhangar) … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1359 OF 2021 Munni Adesh Deshmukh … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1361 OF 2021 Sou. Anusaya Dhondiba Maragage … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1344 OF 2021 2021 L Shri. Govind Krishna Jadhav … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1357 OF 2021 2021 L Sou. Anusaya Dhondiba Maragage … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1588 OF 2021 2021 L Shri. Maruti Ramaji Rodat (Jadhav) … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents Mr. Dhananjay Chavan a/w Mr. Vijay Garad i/b. Mr. Rajendra A. Choudhary, Advocate for the Petitioners. i∕b. Mr. Rajendra A. Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent - State. CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. A S. TWA JADHAV & L, JJ. 25th AUGUST 2021. DATED : P.C. : In all these petitions, a common order is passed today because it involves the same question; only the factual aspect differs for each petitioner. The petitioners are Project Affected Persons whose lands were acquired for Koyna Dam Project way back in the year 1961. All these petitioners are still waiting for allotment of lands in lieu of the lands which were acquired. The petitioners have made applications before the authorities as follows :- Sr. No. Name Date of application 1. Shri. Ramchandra Shankar Sutar (WP/1356/2021) 24.07.2020 2. Shri. Uttam Tukaram Sutar (WP/1354/2021) 29.07.2020 3. Shri. Bhagwan Babaji Dhawale (WP/1343/2021) 20.05.2020 4. Shri. Dilip Gaurihar Dhawale (Dhangar) (WP/1362/2021) 29.05.2020 5. Sou. Munni Adesh Deshmukh (WP/1359/2021) 29.06.2020 6. Sou. Anusaya Dhondiba Maragage (WP/1357/2021) 29.05.2020 7. Shri. Govind Krishna Jadhav (WP/1344/2021) 24.07.2020 8. Sou. Anusaya Dhondiba Maragage (WP/1361/2021) 29.05.2020 9. Shri. Maruti Ramaji Rodat (Jadhav) (WP/1588/2021) 24.06.2020 10. Sou. Anusaya Dhondiba Maragage (WP/1352/2021) 29.05.2020 The Petitioners have mentioned in their applications that lands in different survey numbers situated in village Kundevahal, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad be allotted to them. The said applications are still not decided. The petitioners have prayed for allotment of lands. Applications are pending for quite sometime. The petitioners have not been given alternate lands for many years. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we are directing the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to decide the applications of the petitioners for allotment of alternate lands of their choice within 8 weeks from today. With these directions, the petitions are disposed of. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J) (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J)

Order - Status 4: Vishwanath S. Sherla Digitally signed by Vishwanath S. Sherla Date: 2021.01.25 17:06:01 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.194 OF 2021 Raju Paulas Pakhare … Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra & another … Respondents Mr.Aniket Vagal for the Petitioner Ms.A.S. Pai, Mr.J.P. Yagnik, Ms.S.D. Shinde, Mr.K.V. Saste, Additional Public Prosecutors for Respondent – State CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 25, 2021 P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 2. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 4 th February, 2021. 3. In addition to service of notice through Court, the Petitioner shall serve a private notice by Registered Post A.D. and/or by Courier service and/or by hand delivery or by e-mail/fax on the Respondents and shall file affidavit of service with tangible proof before the returnable date**.** 4. The learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent – State. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appearances of the Advocates as per Board dated 04/02/2021. … CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 04TH FEBRUARY, 2021. P.C:- Matters from Sr. Nos.68 to 135 of the Board stands discharged. Following dates are assigned to the said matters: Sr. Nos. Due Date 68 to 75 09-02-2021 76 to 78, 81 and 83 to 84 10-02-2021 85 to 99 and 115 11-02-2021 100 to 105 15-02-2021 107 to 114 16-02-2021 117 to 130 17-02-2021 131 to 133 and 135 18-02-2021 79 08/02/2021 Ad-interim interim reliefs, if any, to continue till then. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 9: Vishwanath S. Sherla Digitally signed by Vishwanath S. Sherla Date: 2021.02.16 19:51:33 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.194 OF 2021 Raju Paulas Pakhare … Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & another … Respondents Mr.Aniket Vagal for the Petitioner Mr.Deepak Thakare, Public Prosecutor, for Respondent – State CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. JUDGMENT RESERVED ON: FEBRUARY 11, 2021 JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON: FEBRUARY 16, 2021 JUDGMENT (PER S.S. SHINDE, J.): 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties and heard finally. 2. The Petitioner had applied for grant of emergency Covid-19 parole for 45 days in view of the Covid-19 pandemic and the amendment in the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. However, his application was rejected vide order dated 19th May, 2020 passed by Respondent No.2 – Superintendent of Jail, Yerwada Open District Prison, on the ground that the petitioner, in the past, during his stay in the jail, had availed of parole / fulough leave twice, however, reported to the prison late. The petitioner is a convict undergoing sentence of life imprisonment. The petitioner has been in jail since last 10 years. 3. Mr.Vagal, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, relied upon the judgments of this Court in Kalyan s/o. Bansidharrao Renge vs. The State of Maharashtra & another (Criminal Writ Petition No.ASDB-LDVC-265 of 2020) and Uzair @ Hujer s/o. Rafiq Shaikh vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others (Criminal Writ Petition No.2989 of 2020) to contend that the ground stated in the impugned order was wholly unsustainable. It was, therefore, submitted that the Writ Petition deserves to be allowed. 4. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, opposed the petition for grant of emergency Covid-19 parole. It was submitted that the petitioner had reported late on both the occasions when he was released on parole/furlough. Now the situation in the Yerwada Open District Prison, Pune, has changed substantially. It was submitted that the number of inmates in the said prison are less than the capacity. It was submitted that there is no crowd in the jail and that the authorities have sufficient infrastructure now to immediately take care of any inmate or staff, who may suffer from Covid-19 virus. 5. We have perused the record forwarded by the respondents to the office of the Public Prosecutor of this Court. The petitioner was released twice in the past on parole/furlough, however, he had reported to the prison late. The facts and figures stated therein indicate that in pursuance of release of number of inmates due to Covid-19 pandemic, now the situation in the Yerwada Open District Prison, Pune, has changed substantially. There can be no doubt about the fact that the petitioner is justified in relying upon the aforesaid judgments of this Court to claim that the reason assigned in the impugned order is unsustainable. 6. At the same time, the fact situation on ground as on today, cannot be ignored and, therefore, there is substance in the contention raised on behalf of the learned APP that the request of the petitioner for grant of emergency Covid-19 parole needs to be considered afresh. 7. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is partly allowed. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. The petitioner is granted liberty to apply afresh for grant of emergency Covid-19 parole within one week from today. Upon filing such an application, the respondent No.2 shall decide the same on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, however, within two weeks from the date of such filing of the application in accordance with the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 and keeping in view the factors like the extent of spread of Covid-19 virus and conditions in jail. 8. Rule is partly made absolute to the above extent. The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (ST.)NO.15103 OF 2018 Shyamlal Sampatraj Soni & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd. .. Respondent …... Mr.Vijay V. Sonawane, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.Shashank N. Fadia, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. (VACATION COURT) DATED : MAY 30, 2018. …... P.C. : After having heard Mr.Sonawane, learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court was inclined to show indulgence subject to condition that applicant depositing an amount of Rs.50,00,000/- through a Demand Draft in this Court by 1st June, 2018. The petitioner is not agreeable to the said condition. Mr.Fadia, learned counsel for the respondent has informed that the outstanding against the petitioners are to the tune of Rs.57,00,000/-. According to him, the petitioners have already approached DRT Mumbai vide Securitisation Application No.85 of 2018, wherein similar prayer was already rejected on 7th March, 2018. He has tendered copy of the order passed by the DRT Mumbai to that effect. 2 When confronted, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has no instructions on the said issue as to whether the petitioners have approached DRT Mumbai in the matter or not. Be that as it may, having regard to the fact that the petitioners have already approached the DRT Mumbai and appropriate remedy is available to the petitioners against the order of DRT Mumbai passed on 7th May, 2018, we are not inclined to cause any interference. Writ Petition is dismissed. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) ( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)