Vaibhav Ramchandra Gaikwad

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9881 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9880 OF 2016 Dipak Anandrao Jadhav & Ors. Petitioners Versus Assistant Registrar Co­operative Society Respondents Koregaon & Ors. Mr. Vaibhav R. Gaikwad for petitioners. Mr. S.B.Kolel, AGP for respondent no.1. CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 P.C. . Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the petitioners, the matter is taken on board for extension of time to remove all office objections as per earlier order dated 22nd August, 2016. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the earlier order dated 22nd August, 2016, time is extended till 30th September, 2016 to remove all office objections, failing which writ petition shall stand dismissed without referring back to the Court. Office is directed to place the matter on board on 3rd October, 2016. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9881 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9880 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders None present. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI REGISTRAR (JUDLI) Date : 05 OCTOBER 2016 Await service to Respondent No. 3 for five weeks i.e. 16.11.2016. REGISTRAR (JUDLI)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9880 OF 2016 Mahadeo Anandrao Jadhav And Ors ....Petitioner V/S Assistant Registrar, Co.operative Society And ....Respondent WITH Ors WRIT PETITION NO. 9881 OF 2016 Dipak Anandrao Jadhav And Ors ....Petitioner V/S Assistant Registrar, Co.operative Society And Ors ....Respondent Shri Vaibhav Ramchandra Gaikwad, Adv For Petitioner Shri Sachin Kankal, AGP for Respondent/ State CORAM : R.M. SAVANT., J DATE : 16th November, 2016 P.C. : Stand over to 23/11/2016. To be listed alongwith W P No.9881/2016. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9880 OF 2016 Mahadeo Anandrao Jadhav And Ors ....Petitioner V/S Assistant Registrar, Co.operative Society And ....Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9881 OF 2016 Dipak Anandrao Jadhav And Ors ....Petitioner V/S Assistant Registrar, Co.operative Society And Ors ....Respondent Vaibhav Ramchandra Gaikwad Petitioner no. 1 To 3 Mr. Bodke For Respondent S.D. Rayrikar AGP For State CORAM : SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J DATE : 5th September, 2018 P.C. : Ors Stand Over to 27/09/2018 on Supplementary Board. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2014 Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P. M. Palshikar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 07 APRIL, 2014 P.C.: The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Labour Court, Mumbai has not considered the stand of the Petitioner that 5 th Pay Commission, upon which the reliance was sought by the Respondent, was made applicable only after execution of the agreement dated 25 June 2004 and the Respondent had obtained voluntary retirement scheme on 31 May 2004 and therefore, it was not applicable to him. Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 5 May 2014. Till further orders, the Respondent will not take coercive steps based on the impugned order. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 29: Sequeira IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2509 of 2014 The Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation. .. Petitioner Vs. Shri Balkrishna Ganpati Salunkhe. .. Respondent Mr.P.M.Palshikar, for the Petitioner. Mr.Vaibhav Gaikwad, for the Respondent. CORAM: N.M.Jamdar, J. Monday 23 November, 2015 P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Petitioner Federation challenges the order dated 3 August 2013 passed by Labour Court, Mumbai allowing application filed by the Respondentmember under Section 33 (c)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court has accepted the claim of the Respondent No.1 for entitlement of difference and wages for the period from 1 June 2003 to 31 May 2004 after applicability of recommendation from 5th Pay Commission and certain other findings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that some employees of the Federation who were not in the category of workmen had filed Writ petition No.4274 of 2009 and 4267 of 2009 with the Aurangabad bench of this Court and the Division bench had granted identical relief which is granted by the Labour Court in the present case. The learned counsel submitted that the Federation has challenged the decision of the Division bench by way of Civil Appeal Nos.4521 and 4522 of 2013 and the Apex Court has admitted and granted leave and unconditionally stayed the operation of the orders. Copies of the orders are placed on record. In view of this position, Rule. Respondent waives service. The interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). Liberty to apply after the decision of the Apex Court is rendered. (N.M.Jamdar, J.)

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL No. 424 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION 3670 OF 2022 Balkirshan Parshuram Jinghare Appellant v/s. Smt. Parvati Mahadu Raikar Respondents Mr. A. M. Kulkarni I/b Vaibhav R. Gaikwad for the Appellant. CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : 15th JUNE, 2022. P.C. The Appellant has challenged the Judgment and order dated 16th October, 2019 passed by the Learned District Judge and the Judgment dated 24th November, 2016 of the Trial Court. By the Impugned Judgment dated 24th November, 2016 the Trial Court has directed the Respondent to demolish the construction within two months. Learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the decree is sought to be executed and in the event stay is not granted the residential house will be demolished even before the appeal is admitted. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable returnable on 29th June, 2022. Parties to maintain status quo in respect of the subject structure till the next date of hearing. Leave granted to file compilation of documents. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 7: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 424 OF 2022 Balkrishan Parshuram Jinghare ....APPELLANT V/S Smt. Parvati Mahadu Raikar ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3670 OF 2022 In Second Appeal 424 OF 2022 Balkrishan Parshuram Jinghare ....PETITIONER V/S Parvati Mhadu Raikar ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE J DATE : 11th November, 2024 P.C. : Listed for assigning date.Stand Over to 03/03/2025 If any ad-interim / interim relief is operating till today, the same shall continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/ interim relief is granted not for a limited period, the same shall remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 424 OF 2022 Balkrishan Parshuram Jinghare ....APPELLANT V/S Smt. Parvati Mahadu Raikar ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3670 OF 2022 In Second Appeal 424 OF 2022 Balkrishan Parshuram Jinghare ....PETITIONER V/S Parvati Mhadu Raikar ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3323 OF 2025 In Second Appeal 424 OF 2022 Balkrushna Parshuram Jinghare Since Deceased Through Lrs ....PETITIONER V/S Parvati Madhu Raikar ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE J DATE : 3rd March, 2025 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand Over to 28/07/2025. If any ad-interim / interim relief is operating till today, the same shall continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/ interim relief is granted not for a limited period, the same shall remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )