V.s. Kapse

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 194 OF 2008 Vinay Prahaladrai Poddar ... Appellant versus Mrs. Rachana Vinay Poddar ...Respondent Mr. V.S. Kapse for the appellant. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2008 . P.C. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks some time for depositing cost imposed by this Court as per the order dated 23 rd September, 2008. The amount of cost to be deposited before the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority be deposited on or before 24 th October, 2008. Adjourned to 12 th November, 2008. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.

Order - Status 15: pmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.194 OF 2008 Mr. Vinay Prahaladrai Poddar … Appellant V/s. Mrs. Rachana Vinay Poddar … Respondent Mr. V.S. Kapse, for the Appellant. Mr. Harish R. Pawar, for Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 15th APRIL, 2014 P.C. . The Consent Terms duly signed by the Appellant and the Respondent and their respective Advocates are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Appellant and Respondent are personally present. Through their respective counsel they state that they have carefully read the terms and conditions incorporated in the Consent Terms and they accept the correctness thereof. The Appellant has handed over to the Respondent, a Banker's cheque in the sum of Rs.8 lakhs in terms of clause 3 of the Consent Terms. By accepting the undertakings in the Consent Terms, we dispose of the Appeal in terms of Consent Terms. Hence, we pass the following order : ORDER (i) The undertakings in the Consent Terms marked "X" for identification are accepted; (ii) The impugned Judgment and Decree dated 17th December, 2007 in Petition No.A811 of 2006 is hereby quashed and set aside and the said Petition No.A818 of 2007 is restored; (iii) By consent, the said Petition is converted into a Petition under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Amendment shall relate back to the date of the institution of the said Petition; (iv) The parties have agreed that reconciliation is not possible and in view of the differences between them, the dissolution for the marriage is the only solution; (v) Accordingly in Petition No.A818 of 2007, there shall be decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The marriage solemnised between the Appellant and Respondent dated 13th February, 2001 is hereby dissolved by the decree of divorce; (vi) The Appeal is disposed of on above terms and in terms of the Consent Terms. There will be no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J ) (A.S.OKA, J )

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.171 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (STAMP) NO.15932 OF 2008 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court's or Judge's orders. coram, appearances, Court's orders : or directions and Registrar's : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.V.S.Kapse for the appellant. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ DATED: 15th July, 2008. P.C.: . Heard Mr.Kapse, learned counsel for the applicant-husband. Issue notice to the respondent-wife, returnable after ten weeks. In addition, to normal mode of service, Mr.Kapse is at liberty to issue advocate's notice to the respondent but under Registered Post A.D and shall also file affidavit of service on the next date. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.171 of 2008 In Family Court Appeal Stamp No.15932 of 2008 Mr.Vinay Applicant Prahaladrai Poddar Vs. Mrs.Rachana Respondent Vinay Poddar Mr.Abhijit V. Rane i/b. Mr.V.S. Kapse for applicant. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. September 23, 2008. P.C. .Heard Mr.Rane holding for Mr.Kapse, the learned counsel for the applicant - husband. The notice issued to the respondent - wife has been returned by the postal authorities with the remark "Refused" and the postal envelope is placed on record. .This is an application praying for condonation of delay caused in filing Family Court Appeal under Stamp No.15932 of 2008. .As per the office note the appeal is beyond time by 64 days and we are satisfied that the delay caused deserves to be condoned subject to payment of costs. .Hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of costs quantified at Rs.500/- and to be remitted to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority within two weeks from today. .List the appeal for admission on 13th October (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)