Manoj Badgujar

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale ••• Petitioner Versus District Collect, Pune & Ors. ••• Respondents Mr. Manoj Badgujar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA & MADHAV J. JAMDAR,JJ. DATED : JUNE 8, 2022 P.C. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is armed with a decree of civil Court. The suit for partition and separate possession was filed and the suit is decreed. The petitioner is awarded 1/5th share. The petitioner is not concerned with the loan availed by the present respondent No.6. The property in respect of which the decree is passed in favour of the petitioner is sought to be attached under the impugned order passed under Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961. Notice to respondents returnable on 6 th July 2022. The learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Till next date, the respondent shall not take further coercive steps regarding the share of the petitioner in CTS No.672 i.e. the suit property of Special Civil Suit No. 1727 of 1997 and decree dated $2^{nd}$ May 2008. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) Gaikwad RD

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale ....PETITIONER V/S District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R.D. DHANUKA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR, JJ DATE : 6th July, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 25/08/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale ....PETITIONER V/S District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R.D. DHANUKA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR, JJ DATE : 6th July, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 25/08/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale V/s.PetitionerDistrict Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune & Ors.Respondent. .... Mr. Manoj Badgujar a/w. Sagar Kukreja for petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP a/w. A. P. Vanarse, AGP for respondent-State. .... Mr. Hemnat Ghadigaonkar for respondent nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S PATIL, JJ. DATED : 23 rd FEBRUARY 2023 P.C.: Petition be listed on $15^{th}$ March, 2023. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Order - Status 10: Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale Petitioner V/s. District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune & Ors. Respondent. Mr. Manoj Badgujar a/w. Sagar Kukreja for petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP a/w. A. P. Vanarse, AGP for respondent-State. .... Mr. Hemnat Ghadigaonkar for respondent nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S PATIL, JJ. DATED : 23 rd FEBRUARY 2023 P.C.: Petition be listed on $15^{th}$ March, 2023. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Order - Status 11: Amol 1/5 suo moto IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 144 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3053 OF 1999 Union of India & Anr Appellants V/s. Shri. L. P. Netare and 8 Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 202 OF 2010 IN LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO.144 OF 2010 Union of India & Anr Appellants V/s. Shri. L. P. Netare and 8 Ors. Respondents WITH LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3061 OF 1997 Union of India & Anr Appellants V/s. A. V. Bonde & Others Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 201 OF 2010 IN LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2010 Union of India & Anr Appellants V/s. A. V. Bonde & Others Respondents AND Amol 2/5 suo moto WRIT PETITION NO. 3146 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1301 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3146 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 4655 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3146 OF 2022 Miss Rekha Premchand Safari & Anr. Petitioners V/s. Upnibandha Sahakari Sanstha & Anr Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale Petitioner V/s. District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune & Ors. Respondent. AND LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 203 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4647 OF 2011 Mahapalika Kamgar Sabha Appellant V/s. Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation Respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1805 OF 2017 Shri Sunil Shankar More & Ors. Petitioners V/s. Amol 3/5 suo moto The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondent. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12373 OF 2019 Shri. Arvind Kashinath Kore Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondent. WITH LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 316 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4647 OF 2011 Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation Appellant V/s. Mahapalika Kamgar Sabha Respondent. AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 19542 OF 2022 In FIRST APPEAL 78 OF 2014 Thane Municipal Corporation Through Its Commissioner,Thane ....PETITIONER V/S Dr. Dilip Mansukhlal Shah And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 246 of 2014 in FIRST APPEAL NO. 78 of 2014 Shri. Dilip Mansukhlals Shah And Ors. ....APPLICANT V/S Shri. Chandrakant Kantilal Shah And Ors. ....RESPONDENT 4/5 suo moto WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1132 of 2019 in FIRST APPEAL NO. 78 of 2014 .... Shri. Sebastian J. Sequeiraand Ors. ....PETITIONER V/S Mr. Dilip Mahasukhlal Shah And Ors. ....RESPONDENT AND LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 337 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6216 OF 2011 .... Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Appellant V/s. Petroleum Employees Union & 24 Ors. Respondents. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S PATIL, JJ. (In Chamber) DATED : 2 nd March 2023 P.C.: Suo moto called for Speaking to the Minutes of orders dated 23 rd February 2023. 2 In the cause title of orders dated 23 rd February 2023 the words "ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION" be substituted with "CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION" . Amol Amol 5/5 suo moto 3 Rest of the orders remain unaltered. 4 Original orders to be corrected accordingly. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17606 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6628 OF 2022 Sudhir Sadashiv Jawale ….Petitioner V/s. District Collector, Collectorate Office, Pune and Ors. …Respondents Mr. Manoj Badgujar a/w Mr. Sagar Kursija for Petitioner. Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar for Respondent No.3. Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl. G.P. a/w Mr. A.P. Vanarse, AGP for State. CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 15 th MARCH 2023 P.C. : At the outset Mr. Ghadigaonkar appearing for Respondent No.3 submitted that Rule 107 (19) of The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 provides for an alternative remedy in the sense if any objection is to be made by any party to the attachment to any property, the party may apply to the Recovery Officer who in this case is Respondent No.4 and Recovery Officer shall investigate the claim or objection and dispose it on merits. Mr. Badgujar for petitioner states that petitioner will file objection before Respondent No.4 within one week to the order of attachment. Mr. Ghadigaonkar states that the Recovery Officer will pass appropriate order within four weeks of receiving the objections and if petitioner requests for a personal hearing, a personal hearing can also be granted. In view of the statement made by Mr. Badgujar and Mr.Ghadigaonkar as above, we dispose the petition. We clarify that we have not made any observations on the merits of the matter. Petition disposed. Mr. Ghadigaonkar states until the objections are decided, it is quite obvious Respondent No.4 will not take any further coercive steps. Consequently, all Interim Applications also stand disposed. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)