J Shekhar

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3620 OF 2016 Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. J. Shekhar i/b J. Shekhar & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for the Respondent State. Mr. M. S. Topkar, for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. Mr. Rampal Kohli, for Respondent No. 5. CORAM : V. M. KANADE, M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 28, 2016 PC. Issue notice before admission returnable on 25.4.2016. Sd/- [V. M. KANADE, J.] Sd/- [M. S. KARNIK, J.] Vinayak Halemath [1VI. 3. KAKINIK, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation •••• Petitioner vs State of Maharashtra and others •••• Respondents Mr. Shekhar Jagtap a/w Akshay Kapadia i/b J. Shekhar & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. S. A. Sawant a/w Mr. Ketan Joshi for respondent no. 3 o. 3 Mr. R. S. Kohli for Respondent no. 5. Ms. Pavitra Manesh i/b Mr. M. S. Tapkar for respondent nos. 6 & 7 t nos .6&7 CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 29 MARCH , 2016 ORDER: Not on board. In view of the urgency expressed, matter is taken on board today. Pending the other writ petitions, this Court in Writ Petition No. 337 of 2016, have passed workable order wherein this Court has observed in para 5 as under: **"**5 However, considering the emergent situation in question and so also the obligations of the "Local Authority" to provide various services in the city of Nashik through or by appointing agents/contractors and to avoid further complications, as such sudden revocation of registration itself rendered the Petitioner helpless for want of power and authority to appoint the Licensed Contractor or agents for providing essential services, therefore, by way of interim arrangement, we are inclined to observe that the position as of 31 December 2015 requires to continue in all respect, qua the subject matter of impugned notice dated 1 January 2016 i.e. no revocation of registration, so that the people at large should not be made to suffer because of the stated inaction on the part of the Corporation of non compliances, so referred in impugned order dated 1 January 2016. The Petitioner to continue with their obligations to provide amenities and/or facilities and services to the citizen of Nashik City." A statement is made that this arrangement is still continuing. By impugned tender notice dated 29/02/2016, four contractors whose issue with regard to their black listing, are pending in the Court i.e. Writ Petition No. 379 of 2016, 380 of 2016, 11630 of 2015 & 11631 of 2015. The issue is also pending with the State Government in view of the appeal under section 451 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 filed by respondent no. 5. After going through the orders passed by this Court in the petition filed by those contractors, who are at present black listed and as their applications for stay and/or related issues are not yet finalized in their favour, the resolution and decision taken by respondent no. 3 i.e. Standing Committee of Municipal Corporation, permitting them to participate in the tender process, in our view, at this stage, required to be stayed. This is to avoid further complications and specifically in view of the fact of pendency of writ petitions so referred above. By keeping all points open, including maintainability of writ petitions as alternative remedy is available, and the other petitions are pending in this Court for final decision as recorded above, we are inclined to pass the order as under. O R D E R (i) Adinterim relief in terms of prayer clause (C) which reads thus: "C. Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Writ Petition, this Hon'ble High Court may kindly stay the effect, implementation, execution and operation of the impugned Resolution No. 822 dated 29/02/2016 passed by the Respondent no. 3 and thereby permitting the Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 to participate in the tender process due on 29/03/2016." Parties to act upon the authenticated copy of this order. The learned counsel for respondent no. 5, on instructions, seeks stay of this order passed in Court today. Considering the reasons so recorded above, the said request is rejected. Stand over to 12/04/2016. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation -Versus F Petitioner State of Maharashtra & Ors. R Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.882 OF 2016 D.882 OF 20 16 Sayyed Asif Ali A Applicant In the matter between: Nashik Municipal Corporation P Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. R Respondents Mr.Shekhar Jagtap with Akshay Kapadia i/b. J. Shekhar & Co. for petitioner Mr.Ketan Joshi for respondent No.3 Mr.S.R.Ranghe for respondent No.4 and for applicant in CAW 882 of 2016 Mr. Rampal S. Kohli for respondent No.5 CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A.SAYED, JJ § DATE : 13th April 2016. 2016. P.C. 1] In view of the earlier order dated 5th April 2016 after considering the civil application as well as the submissions so made, we have specifically ordered as under:- "5. On 29 March, except Respondent No. 4, all other Respondents were duly heard. Based upon the orders passed in Writ Petitions, which are mentioned in para 4 of the order dated 29 March 2016 and considering the urgency so expressed, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) of the Petition has been granted. As the matter itself is directed to be listed on 12 April, 2016, we are inclined to list this matter on 12 April 2016 so that all the Respondents will be heard on merits of the matter, including the submissions revolving around the order so passed on 29 March, 2016. In view of the above, no case is made out for interim relief and/or recalling any order at this stage in this Civil Application. The Petitioner to file Reply to the Civil Application. The submission is made that in other Writ Petitions (Writ Petition No. 379 of 2016, 380 of 2016, 11630 of 2015 & 11631 of 2015) directions are given to list the said Petitions after two weeks for final disposal and it is also observed that further process of the tender shall be subject to the final outcome of the Writ Petitions. Therefore, it is also necessary for the parties to file common precipe so that all these matters can be heard together by one Bench. Parties to take steps accordingly. Place the Petition on 12 April 2016 for hearing before the appropriate Bench." 2] We are informed that a precipe is already filed in pursuance of the above order on 11th April 2015 before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice for appropriate orders. 3] Let the matter be placed before appropriate bench in view of the above. (A.A.SAYED, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J)

Order - Status 12: mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Akshar Kapadia i/b. J. Shekhar & Co. Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Ketan Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Mr. Mohammed Ashraf, Advocate for Respondent No.5 Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the State Ms. Pavitra M. i/b. Mr. M.S. Topkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 CORAM : V.M.KANADE & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 20TH APRIL, 2016 P.C. : Not before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member. Matter be placed before the appropriate Bench. Application is made for speaking to the minutes of our order dated 28th March, 2016. In fact the order was passed that the matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member. However, inadvertently an order is passed " issue notice before admission returnable on 25.4.2016 ". The said order is accordingly modified and it is clarified that on 28th March, 2016 order which was passed was "The matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member". The order is accordingly modified and shall be read as follows: "The matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member" . (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 14: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 15: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11630 OF 2015 M/s Samiksha Construction Company ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP STAMP NO. 23039 OF 2017 In Writ Petition 11630 OF 2015 M/s Samiksha Construction Company ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11631 OF 2015 M/s Vishal Services ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 380 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan Bora ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 293 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 474 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 292 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 473 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan P. Bora ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 1064 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 11631 OF 2015 M/s Vishal Services ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 473 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor Shri. Chetan Bora ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 334 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 379 OF 2016 ....RESPONDENT M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 336 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 380 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan P. Bora ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 640 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 379 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 474 OF 2010 Tain Constructions ....PETITIONER V/S Vilas Shankar Shelar And Ors. ....RESPONDENT ....APPLICANT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 19th March, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 07/08/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....RESPONDENT Mr. Mithchelle Almeida i/b Rompal Singh Kohli for Respondent Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 & 2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 29th April, 2024 P.C. : Stand over to 08/07/2024 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: spb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4379 OF 2011 Zilla Parishad Pune ... Petitioner. V/s. Shir Ganesh Kisan Adsare & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. Shekhar i/by J. Shekhar & Co. for the Petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 11th July 2011 P.C. 1 Issue notice to the respondents returnable at the end of eight weeks. Notice to indicate that the petition may be heard finally at the stage of admission itself. 2 In addition to the court service, the petitioner is directed to serve the respondents by a private notice by hand delivery or by speed post registered AD and file affidavit of service on or before the next date. 3 In the meanwhile, it is clarified and ordered that the order of injunction granted by the trial court and confirmed by the appellate court shall not in any prevent the petitioner from initiating any proceedings in accordance with the law. The petitioner, however, shall not disturb the possession of the respondents nor evict them except by due process of law. (D.G.KARNIK, J) .....

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4379 OF 2011 Zilla Parishad Pune .. Petitioners v/s. Ganesh Kisan Adsare & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. J. Shekhar for the petitioners Mr. Abhijit B. Kadam for respondent no.3 Mr. S.R. Agarkar for respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 26th MARCH, 2012. P.C. : Respondent nos. 1 and 2 filed R.C. Suit No.99 of 2010. In the said suit, learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Junnar passed order on 30th November, 2010 thereby restraining present petitioners from demolishing the suit property and from constructing the compound wall till the final disposal of the suit. The said Judge also issued an order of injunction restraining the petitioner nos.1 and 2 from disturbing peaceful possession and enjoyment of respondent nos. 1 and 2 from the suit property till the disposal of the suit. This order was challenged by the petitioners in Misc. Civil Appeal No.369 of 2010. The said appeal has been dismissed by learned District Judge14, Pune by order dated 19th April,l 2011. Hence, this writ petition is filed. After having perused the impugned order, it is clear that the learned trial Judge accepted the case of the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and issued an order of injunction. The order passed by the learned trial Judge was confirmed by the appellate Court i.e. District Court. In such a situation, it would not be proper for this Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts below. The learned advocate for the petitioners states that the petitioners shall adopt appropriate proceedings to redress their grievances so far as respondent nos. 1 and 2 in a competent Court. Statement made by learned advocate for the petitioners is recorded. As and when such proceedings are filed, the petitioners are free to apply to the Court of learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Junnar, Dist. Pune for vacation the order passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Junnar on 30th November, 2010 on the ground that no purpose will be served by continuing the order of injunction on account of the proceedings, which would be filed by the petitioners. With the aforesaid observation, petition stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]