Ashok M Saraogi

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 164 OF 2017 Satish Kumar Manchanda And Anr ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J DATE : 4th April, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 25/04/2017.Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 164 OF 2017 Satish Kumar Manchanda And Anr ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 13th June, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 04/07/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 164 OF 2017 Satish Kumar Manchanda And Anr ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 10th July, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned 28/07/2017. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 164 OF 2017 Satish Kumar Manchanda And Anr ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Ashok M Saraogi For Applicant Mr.M.G.,Patil, APP for State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 14th July, 2017 P.C. : Stand over to 19/07/2017, on Suppl. Board. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 164 OF 2017 Satish Kumar Manchanda And Anr ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent Ashok M Saraogi For Applicant M.G.Patil, APP for State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J DATE : 19th July, 2017 P.C. : Stand Over to 28/07/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.164 OF 2017 Satish Kumar Manchanda and anr. …Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Anand Mishra i/b. Mr. A. M. Sarogi for the applicant. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the respondent State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 21 JULY, 2017 P.C. : This is an application for modification of order passed by the Sessions Court. The applicant was granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court vide ABA No. 1114 of 2016. The said application was allowed by confirming interim order dated 24th June, 2016 passed by the said Court in that application on 10th August, 2016. As per the said interim order dated 24th June 2016, the applicant was directed to be released on P.R. of Rs.20,000/ (Rupees Twenty Thousand only.) and like amount of one surety. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is not in position to make arrangement for solvent surety since the Sessions Court has directed the applicant to be released on P.R. of Rs.20,000/. The applicant prefers the present applicant for modification of order 24th June, 2016 passed by the Sessions Court. Considering the circumstances and the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the applicant, order dated 24th June, 2016 can be modified. Hence, I pass following order; :: ORDER :: (i) Order dated 24 June,2016 passed by the Sessions Court in ABA No.1114 of 2016 which is confirmed by order dated 10th August, 2016 is modified and the applicant is directed to be released on furnishing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees Twenty Thousand only.) with one or more sureties in the like amount. (ii) Application stands disposed of. [PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]

Order - Status 4: Chitra Sonawane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924 OF 2021 Vivian Felix Gonsalves …. Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …. Respondents. … Mr.A.M. Saraogi for the petitioner. Mr.Ravi Kadam, AGP for State. Miss Savita Suryavanshi for respondent no.2. CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 17th JULY, 2021. [Through Video Conferencing] P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. By this petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging order dated 24th May 2021 passed under the provisions of Section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act ('the said Act' for short). … Learned AGP Mr.Ravi Kadam appearing on behalf of the State submits that alternate efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner u/s 154 of the said Act. Considering the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the fact that in the present matter when this Court called upon the learned Advocate for the petitioner, as to how much amount he can pay, to which, he submitted that he require some time to take instructions from his client. On his request matter to appear on board on 20th July 2021. Hence, the following order is passed. a) Matter to appear on board on 20th July, 2021. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 6: 41 wp2924-21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924 OF 2021 Vivian Flexi Gonsalves ..... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….. Respondents Mr.Amit Dubey i/b Mr.Ashok Saraogi for the Petitioner Mr.Ravi Kadam, A.G.P. for the State Ms.Savita Suryavanshi for the Respondent no.2 Mr.Anil D'souza for the Respondent nos.3 to 6 CORAM: K.K.TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : JULY 20, 2021 P.C. . Heard. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that his Arguing Counsel A.M.Saraogi is not available. Hence, he requires some time. The learned counsel for the Respondent no.3 to 6 submit that they have not received copy of Petition. He submits that Petitioner may be directed to provide copy of Petition to them. Hence, the following order is passed: TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Digitally signed by TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date: 2021.07.22 12:43:52 +0530 a. Petitioner is directed to serve copy of Petitioner on all the Respondents on or before 23.07.2021 and fle Affdavit of Service to that effect, failing which they have to pay cost to each and every Respondents. b. Matter to appear on board on 27.07.2021. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2924 OF 2021 .… .… Vivian Felix Gonsalves ] Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra through Deputy Registrar ] ] Cooperative Societies,Vasai & Ors. ] ] Respondents. Mr.A.M. Saraogi for Petitioner. Mr.R.P. Kadam, AGP for State. Ms Savit Suryavanshi for respondent no.2. Mr.Anil D'souza for respondent nos.3 to 6. CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 27th JULY, 2021. [Through Video Conferencing] P.C. Heard learned Counsel for parties. At the request of learned Advocate for the petitioner, matter to appear on board on 6th August 2021. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2924 OF 2021 Vivian Felix Gonsalves ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thru Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Vasai And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE K.K. TATED & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ DATE : 6th August, 2021 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 11/08/2021 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2924 OF 2021 Vivian Felix Gonsalves ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thru Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Vasai And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE K.K. TATED & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ DATE : 11th August, 2021 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 12/08/2021 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2924 OF 2021 Vivian Felix Gonsalves ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thru Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Vasai And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE K.K. TATED & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ DATE : 12th August, 2021 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 18/08/2021 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 16: 27.2924.21-wp.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924/2021 BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL signed by BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Date: 2021.08.23 13:00:00 +0530 Digitally Vivian Flexi Gonsalves ….. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents None for the Petitioner Mr. R. P. Kadma, AGP for the State Mr. Ashish Suryavanshi I/b. Savita Suryavanshi for Respondent No.2. CORAM: K.K.TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 18, 2021 P.C. 1 None for the Petitioner. The learned counsel for Respondent No.2 seeks some time. 2 It is to be noted that, in the present proceedings, the Petitioner is challenging the order dated 24.05.2021 passed by Respondent No.1 under the provisions of section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Against the said order, revision is maintainable under section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act 1960. 3 Place the matter on board on 31.08.2021. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 18: 31 wp2924-21.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924 OF 2021 Vivian Flexi Gonsalves …. Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….. Respondents None for the petitioner Mr.R.P.Kadam, A.G.P. for the State Ms.Sarita Suryavanshi for the respondent no.2 Mr.S.S.Redekar i/b Mr.Anil D'souza for the respondent nos.3 to 6 CORAM: K.K.TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 31, 2021 P.C. . None for the Petitioner. As no one appeared on behalf of Petitioner, Registry is directed to place the matter on board on 03.09.2021 for dismissal. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.) Mohite 1/1 Digitally signed by TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date: 2021.09.02 19:08:36 +0530

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2924 OF 2021 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Digitally signed by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date: 2021.09.06 11:00:26 +0530 Vivian F. Gonsalves ] Petitioner. … … Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] Respondents. None for petitioner. Ms Savita Suryavanshi for Respdt.no.2. Mr.R. P. Kadam, AGP for State. CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2021. P.C. 1 None for the petitioner. Ms Savita Suryavanshi, learned Advocate for respondent. The office note shows that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 18.8.21 and 31.8.2021 and today also. This Court by order dated 31.8.2021 directed Registry to keep the matter on board under caption 'for dismissal'. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2015 Mr. Ismail S/o. Mehmoob Sayyed ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.A.M.Saraogi, Advocate,for the applicant. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP, for the State CORAM: SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 2nd July, 2015. P.C . Heard. This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. The applicant herein is apprehending his arrest in Crime No.249 of 2014 registered at Basant Park (Chembur) Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 420 read with Section 34 of IPC. The applicant had approached the Court of Sessions seeking pre-arrest bail in the year 2014. By an order dated 30.5.2014, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge had directed the Investigating Officer to give 48 hours' notice to the applicant prior to his arrest. The application was disposed of. Mhi 2 ABA-818-15.sxw The Senior Inspector of Police of Chembur Police Station had requested the officer in charge of Aurad Police Station, Dist. Bidar, Karnataka State that the present applicant is wanted in Crime No.249 of 2014 registered at Chembur Police Station and in the eventuality that the applicant is traced, he shall be detained and the information be relegated to Chembur Police Station. It is pertinent to note that the police personnel of Chembur Police Station had made several visits to serve a 48 hours notice upon the applicant, but to no avail as his permanent address is not known. It appears that the applicant is absconding. The learned counsel for the applicant has fairly submitted that the applicant was not even arrested in the offence registered against him at Aurad Police Station. The whereabouts of the applicant are not known. There is no impugned order which may be challenged before this Court under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. In view of this, the applicant doe not deserve the discretionary relief in the nature of pre-arrest bail. Hence, the application being sans merits, stands rejected. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 4 th April, 2025 Per Court :- At the time of rising at 5.15 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the To be listed on To be listed on To be listed in the Board category 2 28.04.2025 2.30 pm 3 28.04.2025 For Disposal 4 28.04.2025 For Compliance 5 and 6 28.04.2025 Fresh Admission 7 28.04.2025 For Admission 9 to 60 17.04.2025 Urgent Order 61 to 88 24.04.2025 Urgent Order 90 to 93 24.04.2025 Urgent Order 95 to 121 24.04.2025 Urgent Order SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE Digitally signed by SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE Date: 2025.04.08 14:32:37 +0530 Sunny Thote .. 2 .. common order 04.04.20252 123 to 137 24.04.2025 Urgent Order 139 to 156 30.04.2025 Urgent Order 158 to 162 30.04.2025 Urgent Order 163 to 173 10.06.2025 Due Admission (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10534 OF 2024 In WRIT PETITION 4270 OF 2021 Afsana D/o Shabbir Tamboli ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors ....RESPONDENT None for Petitioner Mr. P.P.Kakade, Addl.G.P a/w Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent-State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ DATE 2441 4 11 2025 DATE : 24th April, 2025 P.C. : S. O. to 13/06/2025 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date: 2025.06.18 12:34:20 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 13th JUNE, 2025. P.C. :- At the time of rising, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 2 to 4 24/06/2025 Fresh Admission 6 to 22 24/06/2025 Fresh Admission 24 and 25 24/06/2025 Fresh Admission 26 to 31 25/06/2025 Fresh Admission 33 to 58 25/06/2025 Fresh Admission 60 08/07/2025 Urgent Admission 61 to 71 16/07/2025 Urgent Orders Gauri Gaekwad 2 common order 13.06.2025 72 to 75 17/07/2025 Due Admission 79 17/07/2025 Due Admission 80 to 88 08/07/2025 Final Hearing (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

Order - Status 2: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 15157 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 15158 OF 2018 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 15157 OF 2018 Mrs. Lata W/o. Hemant Garg .. Appellant/Orig.Plaintiffs Vs. Nehru Nagar Sukhsagar CHS Ltd. & Anr ..Respondent/Orig. Def. CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J. DATE : 7th August, 2018. P.C. :- 1. The appellant did not remove the office objections. The appellant has preferred an appeal, but there were office objections notified by the Registry. The learned Counsel for the appellant undertakes to remove office objections within stipulated period of two weeks. In case, appellant failed to remove the office objections, the appeal shall stands dismissed automatically without further reference to this Court. 2. In case office objections are removed, list this appeal for further process on 31st August, 2018. ( K.K. SONAWANE, J.)

Order - Status 8: Tandle IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 583 of 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.772 OF 2018 Mrs. Lata w/o Hemant Garg ... Appellant/ Orig.Plaintiff Versus Nehru Nagar Sukhsagar CHS Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondent/ Orig. Defendant. . . . . . . Mr. Sushil Upadhye i/b A. M. Saraogi for the Appellant. Mr. S. R. Patel for the Respondent No.2. . . . . . . CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 20th NOVEMBER, 2019 P. C. : 1] After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant at length, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, the learned counsel on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present application unconditionally. Leave granted. 2] Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3] In view of the dismissal of the Appeal, Civil Application No. 772 of 2018 does not survive and is accordingly disposed off. (A. S. GADKARI, J.)