Anoma Law Group Llp

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A.Wahab Isane & Ors. ] Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] through Principal Secretary, ] Department of Revenue & Forest ] & Ors. ] Respondents. … Gayatri Singh, Senior Counsel a/w Sangram Chinnappa i/b Kartikeya Bahadur for petitioner. Mr.S.S. Panchpor, AGP for State. Ms Sharmila Deshmukh, for respondent no.5 Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority. … CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 3rd AUGUST, 2021. P.C. Heard learned Counsel for parties. Learned Senior Counsel Ms Gayatri Singh appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in the present proceeding, as per letter dated 24th December 2004 (Exhibit 'O' page 65) the Revenue and Forest Department directed the Collector, Raigad that excavation of sand in the 11 kilometers area from Vicharewadi to Dasgaon in Savitri river bed, Raigad should be by manual i.e. 'Hathpati'. She submits that inspite of that, the respondent issued E-tender dated 30th September 2021 for mechanized drilling of sand. In support of her contention, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner relies on Annexure to E-tender on page no.227 particularly, Gat No.53 to 57. Whether Gat no.53 to 57 comes within the area of 11 kilometer as per letter dated 24th December 2004 from Revenue and Forest department to Collector Raigad or not, for that purpose the petitioner is granted liberty to file affidavit in support of petition. Learned AGP Mr.Panchpor for respondent also seeks some time to file their affidavit in reply. In view of this, following order is passed. a) Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file additional affidavit in support of petition on or before 7th August 2021 with copy to other side. b) Respondent/State to file their affidavit in reply on or before 9/8/2021. c) Matter to appear on board on 11th August 2021. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 7: 10.3608.21-wp+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3608/2021 Shoukat A. Wahab Isane & Ors. ….. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents WRIT PETITION NO.2946/2021 Abdul Samad Almiya Mandlekar ….. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents Mr. Kartikeya Bahadur for the Petitioner in 3608/2021 Mr. Sangam Chinappa for the Petitioner in 2946/2021 Mr. S. S. Panchpor, AGP for the State Mr. Kaushal Parsekar a/w. Saloni Vyas I/b. Legasis Partners for Respondent No.4 Ms. Jaya Bagwe I/b. Sharmila Deshmukh for Respondent No.5 MCZMA – in both matters Mr. Kumar Abhishek Singh a/w. Nishant Bhatia I/b. Anomal Law Group LLP for Respondent No.6 – in both matters CORAM: K.K.TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 31, 2021 P.C. 1 Heard. The learned AGP for the State seeks permission to file an additional compilation of documents in the Registry, with copy to other side. 2 Hence, the following order is passed: a. The learned AGP to file an additional compilation of documents in the Registry, on or before 07.09.2021, with copy to other side. b. The matter to appear on board on 20.09.2021. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A. Wahab Isane And Ors ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary Dept. Of Revenue And Forest And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ DATE : 27th September, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 11/10/2021. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: Priya Soparkar 1 12 wp 3608-21 with wp 2946-21-c PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date: 2021.10.12 11:05:37 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A. Wahab Isane and ors. … Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents Mr.Kartikeya Bahadur, Advocate for the Petitioners in WP No.3608 of 2021. Ms.Gayatri Singh i/by Mr.Sangram Chinnappa, Advocates for the Petitioner in WP No.2946 of 2021. Ms.Neha Bhide, "B" Panel counsel for the Sate. Mr.Kaushal Parsekar i/by M/s Legasis Partners, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Ms.Sharmila Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.5-MCZMA in both matters. Mr.Kumar Abhishek Singh alongwith Mr.Shubham Agrahari and Mr. Nishant Bhatia i/by M/s Anoma Law Group LLP, Advocates for Respondent No.6. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 11, 2021. P.C.:- It appears that the contract period of the petitioner has expired on 30th September, 2021. Ms.Bhide, learned AGP to inform us on the next date as to whether there is any proposal for extension of the contract period. All the affidavits be filed in the registry before the next date. Stand over to 21st October, 2021. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.) ….

Order - Status 15: Digitally signed HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV SHIV by HEMANT CHANDERSEN Date: 2022.03.17 17:22:16 $+0530$ Shiv IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2022 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Petitioner $...$ Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO.6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2022 Shaurya Enterprises Versus Dilip Babaji Ulkirde & Ors ...Petitioner ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2946 OF 2021 ... Petitioner Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors $...$ Respondents Page 1 of 5 17th March 2022 Mrs Gayatrisingh *, Senior Advocate with Mr Sangram Chinnappa for the Petitioner in WP 2564/2022 & WP 3608/2021.* Mr Mihir Desai *, Senior Advocate i/b Kartieya Bahadur for the Petitioner in WP 2946/2021.* Mr K S Thorat *, AGP for the State/Respondent.* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh for the MCGM/Respondent No 5 in WP 3608/2021 and WP 2946/2021, WP 2564/2022, IAL 6528/2022.* Mr Prashant Pratap *, Senior Advocate with Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham A and Nishant Bhatia i/b Anoma Law Group LLP for Respondent No 6.* Mr Mayur Khandeparkar *, i/b Vaibhav Jagtap, for the Applicant in IAST 6528/2022.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 17th March 2022 PC:- 1. We will require from the State of Maharashtra the entire original file by 12.30 pm today relating to all sand mining and sand dredging activities permitted or proposed on the 11 km stretch that is subject matter of Appellate Side Writ Petition No 2564 of 2022, Writ Petition No 3608 of 2021 and Writ Petition No 2946 of 2021. 2. We require this because in Writ Petition No 3608 of 2021 and Writ Petition No 2946 of 2021, both of which are pending, on 11th October 2021 this Court was informed that the contract period regarding the sand mining or dredging had ended on 30th September 2021. The Government was to inform the Court whether there was any proposal for extending the contract period. 3. There was no such communication from the Government at any time. In other words, the Court was never informed of any extension. Instead, it seems that for one contractor represented by Mr Pratap today, an extension of a 2021 contract was granted on 16th February 2022 and sent through the various channels until it finally reached that contractor, who is engaged in mechanised sand dredging at a site on this very stretch along the Savitri river, on 8th March 2022. 4. 8th March 2022 is also the date on which, after hearing Ms Singh and Mr Thorat, we made an ad-interim order in Civil Writ Petition No 2564 of 2022 staying an auction notice for award of mechanised dredging contracts in various gats notified for this very 11 km stretch of the Savitri river. Mr Pratap submits that his clients' contract, though within this 11 km stretch, is not covered by the auction notice that is the subject matter of Writ Petition No 2564 of 2022. 5. Even if that be so, we do not see how the Government could have communicated and put into operation any extension or proposal for extension of Mr Pratap's client's contract since that information had not been communicated to the High Court in the two active Writ Petition Nos 3608 of 2021 and 2946 of 2021. 6. Mr Desai appears for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No 2946 of 2021. Ms Gayatri Singh appears for the Petitioner Writ Petition No 3608 of 2021. (There was an error in noting the appearances on that date). 7. Respondent No 6 before the Division Bench on 11th October 2021 was precisely Mr Pratap's client today. There is no possibility at all of either Mr Pratap's client or of the Government being unaware of the order that was passed on 11th October 2021, or that the Court desired to be informed not only about an extension of the contract but even about any proposal for an extension of the contract period. What the order records (there appears to be another typographical error) is that it was the contract period of Respondent No 6, Mr Pratap's client today, which had expired on 30th September 2021. It is that expired contract that is now sought to be extended. In our view, this is impermissible and could not have been done without informing this Court having regard to these circumstances. 8. For today we will require the original file from the Government relating to the award of all contracts around this stretch of the Savitri river. 9. The previous interim order passed in Writ Petition 2564 of 2022 are extended until next date. We make it clear that for this 11 km stretch of Savitri river no award in any form of sand mining or dredging whether mechanised or by hard is to be awarded until the next date. 10. All Affidavits to be filed by Tuesday 22nd March 2022. 11. Mr Pratap will be entitled to file an Affidavit in Reply to the 2022 Petition. In Writ Petition 2946 of 2021, leave to amend to bring subsequent events on record without need of re-verification. Amendment to be carried out by Tuesday 22nd March 2022. 12. List the Petitions on supplementary board on 25th March 2022, high on board. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 17: Arun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue And Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue And Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal …Respondents Secretary & Ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shquakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue & Forest & Ors …Respondents Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate *, i/b Kartikeya Bahadur, for the Petitioner in WP/2946/2021.* Mr AM Kulkarni *, 'A' Panel Counsel with Mr KS Thorat, AGP, for the State* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, with Anchita Nair and Gayatri Deshmukh, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No5 (MCZMA).* Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate *, Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham A & Nishant Bhatia, i/b Anoma Law Group LLP, for Respondent No. 6 in WP/2564/2022, WP/2946/2021 and WP/3608/2021.* Mr Mayur Khandeparkar *, with Vaibhav Jagtap, for the Applicant in IAST/6528/2022.* Mr Amol Yadav *, Addl Collector, Raigad, present.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 25th March 2022 PC:- 1. Mr Kulkarni tenders an additional file. Ms Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate *, with Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioner in WP/2564/2022 & WP/3608/2021.* 2. Mr Kulkarni requests time till 1st April 2022. He states on oral instructions received in Court that the extension order in favour of the 6th Respondent to Writ Petition No. 3608 of 2021 and also in Writ Petition No. 2946 of 2021 will be recalled by an administrative order taken at the level of the ministry. We have today in open Court outlined the reasons why we believe this is necessary and have made specific reference to an earlier order of 11th October 2021. We are clear that the order needs to be recalled. It is for this reason that we grant Mr Kulkarni time until 1st April 2022. 3. We return the entire file to Mr Kulkarni including the volume that was tendered across the bar today. 4. We also allow the 6th Respondent, Aditya Enterprises and the State Government to file a formal application for extension of the 6th Respondent's license for our consideration. 5. Copies will be served on the Advocates for the Petitioners in all matters. 6. List all the matters for orders on the supplementary board of 1st April 2022. 7. The previous order will continue until Friday, 1st April 2022. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J) Page 3 of 3 25th March 2022

Order - Status 20: Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2022.04.07 09:52:11 +0530 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8142 OF 2022 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents Page 1 of 3 6th April 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8144 OF 2022 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents Ms Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate *, with Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioner in WP/2564/2022 & WP/3608/2021.* Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate *, i/b Kartikeya Bahadur, for the Petitioner in WP/2946/2021.* Mr AM Kulkarni, 'A' Panel Counsel *, with KS Thorat, AGP, for the State in WP/2564/2022 & WP/2946/2021.* Mr RP Kadam, AGP *, for Respondent-State, in WP/3608/2021.* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No.5 (MCZMA) in WP/3608/2021 and WP/2946/2021.* Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate *, with Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham Agrahi, Nishaan Shetty & Rohan Mathur, i/b Anoma Law Group LLP, for Respondent No. 6, in WP/2564/2022, WP/2946/2021 & WP/3608/2021 .* Mr Mayur Khandeparkar *, with Vaibhav Jagtap, for the Applicant in IAST/6528/2022.* Mr Chirag Dave *, i/b Legasis Partners, for Respondent No. 4, in WP/2946/2021.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 6th April 2022 PC:- Page 2 of 3 6th April 2022 1. We expect an Affidavit explaining (there is no other word for it) from the Maharashtra Maritime Board as to how and for what reason it has recommended mechanised dredging and sand mining on the eleven kilometres stretch of Savitri river that is the subject matter of these Petitions. 2. We are also told that the Collector Raigad said that the policy needed to change and it would be advisable to permit mechanised operations here. We do not pretend to understand what this is supposed to mean. Mr Kulkarni for the State Government will need to file a further Affidavit explaining why these changes in the policy were effected and for what public purpose. We want these Affidavits to be filed in the present two Interim Applications. State Government's Affidavits are to be filed by Monday, 11th April 2022. 3. List all three Petitions and two Interim Applications on Tuesday, 12th April 2022, high on board for orders. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 23: Ashwini IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents WITH ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH Digitally signed by ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH Date: 2022.04.13 15:20:27 +0530 INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8142 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary, Dept of Revenue & Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8144 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary, Dept of Revenue & Forest & Ors …Respondents Ms Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate *, i/b Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioners in WP/3608/2021 & WP/2564/2021.* Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate *, i/b Kartikeya Bahadur, for the* Petitioner in WP/2946/2021. Page 2 of 5 12th April 2022 Mr AM Kulkarni, 'A' Panel *, with KS Thorat, AGP, for Respondent-State.* Mr Chirag S Dave *, i/b Legasis Partners, for Respondent No. 4, in WP/ 2564/2022.* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No. 5- MCZMA.* Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate *, with Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham Agrahari, Nishaan Shetty & Nishant Bhatia, i/ b Anoma Law Group LLP, for Respondent No. 6.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 12th April 2022 PC:- 1. The Writ Petitioners, whom we shall now refere to as the Hatpatti Petitioners, have filed at least three Petitions, two in 2021 and one in 2022 all dealing with the same 11 km stretch of the Savitri river. There are different auctions for sand mining challenged in each. The principle is one: whether there should be an auction for mechanised dredging and sand mining along this or any other stretch of the Savitri river. We refuse to look at this mess of thoroughly disorganised filing. We decline to be asked to look at four-digit page numbers in one matter and then switch to three-digit page numbers in another. The Petitioners must prepare a common consolidated compilation of documents and pleadings (we will not fall into the trap of calling it a 'convenience' compilation, an expression that only does violence to the language) by the next date. A minimal courtesy is to keep papers organized. Page 3 of 5 12th April 2022 2. Interim Application No. 8144 of 2022 is by Aditya Enterprises. It seeks an extension of its license period for permission to continue work at Gat No. 54, Sub-Gat No. HH-2 for another period of 71 days from being given possession. There is an alternative prayer that Aditya Enterprises application or representation be considered by the State Government. 3. Aditya Enterprises' work order of 28th/21st August 2021 has in Clause 52 a condition that dredging will not be done below a depth of 3 mtrs. This has been reiterated in the so-called extension that was granted to Aditya Enterprises from 8th March 2022. 4. Mr Pratap would have it this restriction of 3 mtrs is "a typographical error" because the auction notice/tender mentioned a depth of 5 mtrs. That was the basis on which Aditya Enterprises put it its bid on 21st June 2021. In fact, he says the existing depth is 4.31 mtrs and therefore giving a license to excavate to 3 mtrs is utterly meaningless and even nonsensical. He says, therefore, that the 3 mtrs restrictions in the work order of 20th August 2021 and the extension of 8th March 2022 are clearly mistakes. 5. Mr Kulkarni for the State Government on instructions says that there is no mistake. The 3 mtr depth restriction is one that is mandated by the relevant guidelines and by orders of the Supreme Court. 6. At best, therefore, on Aditya Enterprises ' application we can permit Aditya Enterprises to make a representation to the Page 4 of 5 12th April 2022 Department of Revenue for an appropriate extension and clarification. Mr Kulkarni states that a hearing will be afforded to Aditya Enterprises as also to the legal representatives of the Petitioner before a final order is passed. Mr Pratap says that a representation will be made within one week from today. The officer delegated to decide this representation to do so within two weeks thereafter after giving notice to the Advocates for the Petitioner and affording them a hearing. We grant liberty to the parties to apply. 7. We make it clear that if Aditya Enterprises files any proceeding on an order made by the Revenue Department on Aditya Enterprises' representation, then Aditya Enterprises will join these Petitioners or their Association to that proceeding. 8. So far as the 2022 auction is concerned the stay previously granted will continue. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 25: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 27: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 29: jvs SALUNKE J V Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.01.12 11:15:15 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17629 OF 2022 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde } Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents With WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 of 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17631 OF 2022 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar } Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17630 OF 2022 Shouakat A. Wahab Isane } and Ors. } Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents Mr. Prathamesh D. Bhanushali for the petitioners. Mr. K. S. Thorat, AGP for State. Ms. Rahat Kalpatri i/b. Legasis Partners for respondent no. 4. Ms. Jaya Bagwe for respondent no. 5. Mr. Shubham Agrahari and Mr. Siddhant Marathe i/b. Andha Law Groups (LLP) for respondent no. 6. CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE: JANUARY 11, 2023 1 P.C.: Writ Petition No. 2564 of 2022: 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner, on written instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. Writ Petition Nos. 2946 of 2021 and 3608 of 2021: 1. These writ petitions are scheduled on 6th February 2023. The same be listed on the scheduled date. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)