Ajay A Joshi

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.15926 OF 2023 Bhaskar Pratap Mahadik .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through Department of Education and Ors. .. Respondents Ms. Mrunmayi Khambete, i/by Mr. Ajay A. Joshi, for the Petitioner. Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ DATE : 20TH DECEMBER, 2023. P.C. : On the motion made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is permitted to be withdrawn. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. [ FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]

Order - Status 2: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA STAMP NO. 1531 OF 2017 In FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 28419 OF 2016 Smt. Meera Ganesh Khude And Anr. Applicant V/S Respondent Chief Officer Bharti Axa General Insurance Company Ltd. Through Mr. Ashwin Kumar Gawai Manager Legal Ajay A Joshi For Applicant CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J DATE : 20th September, 2017 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on production board, by way of praecipe. Registry note shows that matter is under search. No orders. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: Trupti p513-fast-2841-16.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2947 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 28419 OF 2016 Smt. Meera Ganesh Khude and Anr. …Applicants Versus Chief Officer, Bharti AXA General Insurance Company Ltd. …Respondent Mr.Vilas B. Tapkir h/f. Mr.Ajay A. Joshi for the Applicants. Mr.Rahul Mehta i/b. KMC Legal Venture for the original Appellant in FA (St.) No. 28419 of 2016. …… …... CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 P.C. : Upon urgent mentioning, taken on Production Board. This Application is moved for withdrawal of an amount deposited by the insurance company/original appellant pursuant to the judgment and award dated 16.02.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara, in M.A.C.P. No. 673 of 2010. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are the wife and minor daughter of the deceased. He submitted that till today, the applicants have not received any amount, except no fault liability. The learned counsel for the insurance company opposed this application and submitted that the insurance company has filed the appeal on the ground of quantum and the deceased was gratuitous licencee. In view of the submissions and the reasons mentioned in the application, the applicants are allowed to withdraw 50% amount of the compensation on an usual undertaking. The remaining amount is to be deposited in the fixed deposit in any nationalized bank. Civil Application is allowed and is accordingly disposed of. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 7: 914-CAS-1334-2018.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1334 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.3953 OF 2017 Shri Sahebamin Mashaksaheb Patil … Applicant Vs Smt. Khajabi Peeransaheb Patil ... Respondent … Mr. J. Yadav I/by Mr. A.A.Joshi for the Applicant. CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J. DATE : APRIL 11, 2019 P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 It is an application for condonation of delay of 4 days occurred in filing appeal against the judgment and decree dated 2nd November,2016 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.40 of 2010. That for the reasons stated in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application, delay is condoned and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Place this appeal as per the CMIS date. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)