A. L. Patki

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3482 OF 2010 1 Tulsibai Shankar Vaijal & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors....Respondents Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni i/b Mr.A.L.Patki for the petitioners Mr.Hemang S. Rathattha for the respondent no.2 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MAY 3, 2010 P.C.: 1 This petition challenges the order passed on application for review of the order passed in Notice of Motion no.1373 of 2003. The petitioner has preferred an Appeal from Order stamp no.10602 of 2010 for challenging the order passed on the Notice of Motion. These two matters will have to be heard by the same Court. 2 The Registrar (Judicial-I) will take appropriate administrative order in this behalf from the Hon ble the Chief Justice. JUDGE ssp

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3482 OF 2010 WITH C.A.NO.3286 OF 2015 IN W.P.NO.3482 OF 2010 WITH C.A.NO.3287 OF 2015 IN W.P.NO.3482 OF 2010 ALONG WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 WITH C.A.(ST.) NO.17024 OF 2010 IN A.O.(ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 WITH C.A.NO.828 OF 2010 IN A.O.(ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 WITH C.A.(ST.) NO.10606 OF 2010 IN A.O.(ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 WITH C.A.(ST.) NO.30556 OF 2010 IN A.O.(ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 Tulsibai Shankar Vaijal and others … Petitioners Vs. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority and another … Respondents Mr. Abhay L. Patki for Petitioners and Appellants in WP and AO respectively. Mr. Jayesh Mestry i/b. Mr. Hemang R. for Respondent-MHADA. Mr. Drupad Patil for Interveners in C.A.No.3287/15 in WP 3482 of 2010 and C.A.(St.) No.30556 of 2010 in A.O.(St.) No.10602 of 2010. CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2015 P.C. : Not on Board. At the request of Mr. Patki, taken up in the production board. WRIT PETITION NO.3482 OF 2010 Heard Mr. Patki, learned Counsel for petitioners, Mr. Mestry, learned Counsel for respondent-MHADA. Mr. Patki seeks leave to withdraw this Petition unconditionally as the parties have filed consent terms in Writ Petition (L) No.14050 of 2015. He also seeks leave to delete respondent No.1. Leave is granted. Amendment shall be carried out forthwith On the motion made by Mr. Patki, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the disposal of the Petition, Civil Application No.3286 of 2015 for impleadment of applicants as respondents No.3 to 7 as also Civil Application No.3287 of 2015 for impleadment of applicants as respondents No.3 and 4 do not survive and the same are disposed of as such. APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.10602 OF 2010 Heard Mr. Patki, learned Counsel for appellants, Mr. Mestry, learned Counsel for respondent-MHADA. Mr. Patki seeks leave to delete respondent No.1. Leave is granted. Amendment shall be carried out forthwith. Mr. Patki submitted that by the administrative order dated 03.02.2010, the Hon'ble Chief Justice has tagged this Appeal from Order along with Writ Petition No.3482 of 2010. He seeks permission to withdraw this Appeal from Order unconditionally in view of the parties filing consent terms in Writ Petition (L) No.14050 of 2015. On the motion made by Mr. Patki, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the disposal of the Appeal from Order, C.A.(St.) No.17024 of 2010 for impleadment of applicants as respondents No.3 to 7 as also C.A.No.828 oF 2010 for condonation of delay, C.A.(St.) No.10606 OF 2010 for injunction and C.A.(St.) No.30556 of 2010 do not survive and the same are disposed of as such. Order accordingly. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) Minal Parab