Tag: Mercantile Laws Commercial Transactions

Order - Status 4: Digitally signed by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date: 2024.06.25 13:49:54 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7844 OF 2024 IIFL Home Finance Ltd., Thane .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents Ms. Priyanka Fadia, i/by Mr. Shashank Fadia, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. M.S. Srivastava, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 24 TH JUNE, 2024. P.C. : It is informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the next date of the proceedings before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate is 8th July 2024. To consider whether the said proceedings are taken up on the adjourned date, put up for further consideration on 16th July 2024. [ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7844 OF 2024 Iifl Home Finance Ltd PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr Assistant RESPONDENT Government And Anr CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. CHANDURKAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 16th July, 2024 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 30/07/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7844 OF 2024 IIFL Home Finance Ltd., Thane .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents Ms. Priyanka Fadia, i/by Mr. Shashank Fadia, Advocates for the Petitioner. Ms. M.S. Srivastava, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 21 ST OCTOBER 2024. P.C. : The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition since the purpose of filing the same has been served. The writ petition is disposed of. [ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] 6-WP-7844-2024.doc Dixit

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (ST.)NO.15103 OF 2018 Shyamlal Sampatraj Soni & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd. .. Respondent …... Mr.Vijay V. Sonawane, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.Shashank N. Fadia, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. (VACATION COURT) DATED : MAY 30, 2018. …... P.C. : After having heard Mr.Sonawane, learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court was inclined to show indulgence subject to condition that applicant depositing an amount of Rs.50,00,000/- through a Demand Draft in this Court by 1st June, 2018. The petitioner is not agreeable to the said condition. Mr.Fadia, learned counsel for the respondent has informed that the outstanding against the petitioners are to the tune of Rs.57,00,000/-. According to him, the petitioners have already approached DRT Mumbai vide Securitisation Application No.85 of 2018, wherein similar prayer was already rejected on 7th March, 2018. He has tendered copy of the order passed by the DRT Mumbai to that effect. 2 When confronted, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has no instructions on the said issue as to whether the petitioners have approached DRT Mumbai in the matter or not. Be that as it may, having regard to the fact that the petitioners have already approached the DRT Mumbai and appropriate remedy is available to the petitioners against the order of DRT Mumbai passed on 7th May, 2018, we are not inclined to cause any interference. Writ Petition is dismissed. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) ( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 1/1 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2273 OF 2021 … Mr.Ashok Rajaram Yadav ...Petitioner v/s. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Siddharth Samantaray i/b Dimple Tejani for the Petitioner. Mr.Ashutosh Mishra for Respondent No.1. Mr.Zariv Bharucha a/w Rishi Thakur and Mr.Umang Thakur for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. … CORAM : A.A. SAYED & MADHAV JAMDAR, JJ. DATED : 29 JUNE 2021 (THROUGH V.C.) P.C.: Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 states that secured asset which is the subject matter of the present Writ Petition has been sold in a subsequent auction sale, which was conducted on 28-06- 2021. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain the Petition, which is filed by the highest bidder in an earlier auction sale and seeking time to deposit the balance amount of consideration in respect of the earlier auction sale. The Petition is dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. All contentions are kept open. (MADHAV JAMDAR,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.)