Judges: Hon’ble Shivkumar Dige
Reg no: 8636/2024
Filing no: 13860/2024
CNR: HCBM010241632024
Judicial Section: Civ
Bench Type: Single
Sorry, no records were found. Please adjust your search criteria and try again.
Sorry, unable to load the Maps API.
Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8636 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1229 OF 2022 Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. … Applicant In the matter between : Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. … Appellant Versus Vaishali Vijay Shinde and Ors. Respondents Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/b. KMC Legal Venture, Advocate for the Applicant. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 6th MAY, 2024. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that appeal be restored as applicant do not want to withdraw the appeal. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant and reasons mentioned in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) and disposed of. Applicant to take necessary steps within four weeks. The Appeal is restored to file. SONALI SATISH KILAJE Digitally signed by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date: 2024.05.09 12:11:58 +0530 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 1/1
Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8634 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 13605 OF 2024 Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation … Applicant In the matter between :- Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation … Appellant vs. Janhavi Jeevankumar @ Jeevan Gurao and Ors. … Respondents ***** Mr. Rananaware Dananjayrao :- Advocate for Applicant. Adv. U. B. Nighot :- Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Adv. Amol Gatane i/b. Adv. Swati U. Mehta :- Advocate for Respondent No. 4. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2024 P. C. :- Heard learned Advocate for Appellant and learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and learned Advocate for Respondent No. 4. There is delay while preferring Appeal. Delay is opposed. 2. For the reasons stated in the Application, it is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of. [S. M. MODAK, J.]
Respondent-1: Vaishali Vijay Shinde
Respondent-2: Ors.
Petitioner-1: Shriram General Insurance Company Limited Through Legal Manager
Petitioner-2: Satpalsingh Rajput
Date - 1: 06/05/2024
Status: Case Filed
Details: 6 May 2024
Filing No: 13860/2024
Purpose: AT 2.30 P.M.
Date - 2: 06/05/2024
Status: Disposed
Details: Before: Hon'Ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Date - 3: 06/05/2024
Status: At 2.30 P.M.
Details: Before: Hon'Ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Date - 4: 06/05/2024
Status: Case Registered
Details: Registration No: 8636/2024
Date - 5: 06/05/2024
Status: Order(1)
Date - 6: 23/09/2024
Status: Order(2)
Date - 7: 06/05/2024
Status: Disposed
Details: Final Status