R. B. Bohora Educational vs. Vijay V. Mundaware

Order - Status 5: R. B. Bohora Educational & Welfare Trust .. Petitioner -versus Vijay. V Mundaware .. Respondent. Mr. C.G. Gavnekar, for the Petitioner. S. N. Bhosle, AGP for respondent No.9. CORAM: R.V. MORE, J. DATED: 22nd July, 2010 P.C. vks Issue Notice before admission, returnable on 23.8.2010. In the meanwhile there shall be interim reliefs in terms of prayer clause (c). (R. V. MORE, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET WRIT PETITION NO.5595 OF 2010 1 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Suhas Deokar i/b Mr.C.G.Gavnekar for the petitioner Mr.R.M.Patne ,A.G.P for the respondent No.9 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : AUGUST 23,2010 P.C.: 1 Await service till 17th September 2010. In the meanwhile, Advocate for the petitioner will serve private notice to the respondent Nos.1 to 8. If Affidavit of service is not filed on or before 15th September 2010, Petition will stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the Court. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till further orders. JUDGE

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5595 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders. Registrar's orders. Shri C.G. Gavnekar for the Petitioner. Shri J. Shekhar i/;by M/s. J. Shekhar & Co. for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. Shri Suhas S. Deokar for Respondent Nos. 5 to 8. Shri Suresh Bhosale, AGP for the Respondent No.9. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C.: . Heard Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 1st , 3 rd and 4th Respondents. Heard learned AGP for Respondent No.9. The impugned order has been passed in purported exercise of powers under Section 41A of the Bombay Public Trusts act, 1950. Considering the scope of Section 41A of the said Act, prima facie, it appears that the impugned order could not have been passed in exercise of the said power. Rule. There will be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (d). Ash Notwithstanding pendency of this petition and grant of interim relief, it will be open for the parties to take action in accordance with law. (A.S.OKA, J)