All Cases

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 7: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 9: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 11: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 13: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 14: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2361 OF 2024 Smt. Jayashree Deepak Irale … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents Mr. Rushikesh Barge for the Petitioner. Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, APP for the Respondent No. 2 – State. CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATE : 18 th JUNE, 2024. P.C.:- Heard. Perused the Petition. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 15th July, 2024. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1- State waives the notice and seeks time to file reply. Stand over to 15th July, 2024. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)

Order - Status 5: Rane 1/1 6.6.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan …..Petitioner V/s. Pappu Babu Pinjari and Ors. ….Respondents **** Mr. Rajesh S. Datar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. Thursday, 6th June, 2019. P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 25th June, 2019. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....Petitioner V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....Respondent Adv. Rajesh Sudhakar Datar For Petitioner Adv. K. K. M. for Res No. 2 CORAM : SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE, J DATE : 10th July, 2019 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on board. Place the petition on 07/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: 2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan … Petitioner Vs Pappu Babu Pinjari and Ors. ... Respondents … Mr. Rajesh S. Datar for the Petitioner. Mr. Kishor K. Malpathak for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J. DATE : AUGUST 7, 2019 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on board. Liberty to move the Court as sought is granted. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan .. Petitioner Versus Anil @ Bala Ghag & Anr. .. Respondents ................... Mr. Akshay J. Kondorkar i/by Mr. Rajesh S. Datar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Gautam J. Jain h/f Mr. Prathmesh Gokhale, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Kishor K. Malpathak, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : MARCH 03 2021. ................... P.C.: At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, place the matter on board on 17.03.2021. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ravindra M. Amberkar Digitally signed by Ravindra M. Amberkar Date: 2021.03.03 17:25:32 +0530

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ...Petitioner vs. Pappu Babu Pinjari and Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Rajesh S. Datar for Petitioner. Ms. Rajlaxmi Punjabi i/b Mr. Prathamesh Gokhale for Respondent No.1. Mr. K. K. Malpathak for Respondent No.2. CORAM : AMIT B. BORKAR, J. DATE : 26 NOVEMBER 2021 P.C. : Arguable questions are raised. Hence Rule. Petitioner, a decree-holder, has filed an application under Execution proceedings seeking various relief against the owner. However, the said application came to be rejected by the impugned order. Petitioner has therefore filed the present petition challenging the order of rejection of reliefs by the Executing Court. Considering the facts disclosed on record and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, it appears that respondent No.2, who is a developer has no regard for the orders passed by the Court. In Regular Civil Suit No.690/2010, the trial Court had passed a decree as under: Suit is decreed with costs as follows: a] It is hereby ordered and decreed that plaintiff is entitled to get flat admeasuring 450 sq. ft. on second floor of the building to be constructed over property Tika No.13 owned by defendant No.1 and on such construction, defendant to deliver the vacant possession thereof to the plaintiff. b] Decree be drawn up accordingly. Against the said decree, respondent No.2, a developer, filed a Civil Appeal on 116/2015. While granting a stay to the decree, the learned lower Appellate Court imposed the following condition on respondent No.2. "1) The judgment and decree passed in RCS No.690/2010 as well as execution proceeding bearing Special Darkhast No.31/2019 filed for executing said decree, both are stayed subject to following condition: a] Appellant/original defendant No.2 is directed to reserve a flat admeasuring 450 sq. ft on the 2nd floor of the building being constructed over the suit property by obtaining necessary permission thereof from Planning Authority and submit the written undertaking to that effect on or before 20/6/2019." Inspite aforesaid order, during the pendency of the present petition, Respondent No.2 filed an affidavit dated 5/8/2019 stating that respondent No.2 agreed to earmark flat ad-measuring 450 sq. ft. carpet area on the 3rd floor of the property. During arguments, Mr. Malpathak appearing for respondent No.2, submitted that respondent No.2 has alienated flats on the 2nd floor of the building after filing the aforesaid affidavit. 3/4 The Supreme Court in Prestige Lights Ltd. v. State Bank of India 1 , has observed as follows: "An order passed by a competent Court - interim or final - has to be obeyed without any reservation. If such order is disobeyed or not complied with, the Court may refuse the party violating such order to hear him on merits. We are not unmindful of the situation that refusal to hear a party to the proceeding on merits is a 'drastic step' and such a serious penalty should not be imposed on him except in grave and extraordinary situations, but some time such an action is needed in the larger interest of justice when a party obtaining interim relief intentionally and deliberately flouts such order by not abiding the terms and conditions on which a relief is granted by the Court in his favour." The Supreme Court has succinctly held that a drastic measure to show the doors to the litigant can very well be resorted to in grave and extraordinary circumstances. A party who disobeys the orders of the Court cannot take advantage of its disobedience. The facts stated above prima facie show contemptuous conduct of the respondent No.2 developer of having no regard to the order of the lower appellate Court referred in para 3 of this order. In such a situation, to maintain the majesty of justice, the following interim order shall meet the ends of justice: ORDER 1(2007) 8 SCC 449 i) Respondent Nos. 2 is directed to deliver possession of flat admeasuring 450 sq. ft. on the 2nd floor of the building constructed over property Tika No.13 within one month from today. It is made clear that if respondent No.2 fails to comply with the interim order, the petitioner decree-holder will be at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings, including filing a petition under the Contempt of Court Act. At this stage, learned counsel seeks to stay to this order. However, considering the respondent's conduct having willfully breached the order of the lower Appellate Court, the request for a stay of this order is rejected. (AMIT B. BORKAR, J)

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 17th March, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 12/06/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 17: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 6457 of 2019 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Sham Singh is present for the petitioner. CORAM : H. M. BHOSALE REGISTRAR (JUDL-I) Date : 28/04/2023 Mr. Rajesh S. Datar, Advocate for the petitioner has filed a preacipe dated 03/04/2023 seeking discharge from the present petition as an advocate for the petitioner. He has further stated that he has already returned all the papers to the petitioner and acknowledgment thereof is placed on record. Today, learned advocate Mr. Sham sing is present on behalf of the petitioner. He submits that he has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner. In the circumstances, Mr. Rajesh S. Datar, advocate for the petitioner is discharged from the present petition. Office to take necessary entry regarding change of Advocate for the petitioner in CIS system. Sd/- Registrar (Judicial-I)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO. 12592 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam Singh for Petitioner Mr. Girish Godbole, Sr. Adv. a/w Mr. Sandeep Mishra i/by Mr. Ganesh Jha for R. no. 1 Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. P. S. Gautam for Intervenor CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 8th June, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 23/06/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO. 12592 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 30th August, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 13/09/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO. 12592 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 13th September, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 31/10/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: VRJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan … Petitioner V/s. Anil Alias Bala Ghag & Anr. … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST.) NO.12592 OF 2023 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari (Through Legal Heir of Deceased Papamiya Bapu Pinjari) … Intervener In the matter between Irfan Sayeed Khan ... Petitioner V/s. Anil Alias Bala Ghag … Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan … Petitioner V/s. Pappu Babu Pinjari & Anr. … Respondents Mr. Shyam K. Singh for the petitioner in WP and CP. Mr. Gautam Pyarelal for the Intervener. Mr. G. S. Godbole, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Mishra i/by Mr. Ganesh Jha for respondent No.1. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 30, 2023 P.C.: Learned advocate for the contemnor seeks time to file reply. To enable him to file reply, stand over to 6 th November 2023, under the caption "for circulation". (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 27: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner in CP/453/2022. Mr. P.S. Gautam for Intervenor in IA/17067/2013 Mr. Girish S. Godbole, Sr. Adv. i/b Mr. Gangesh Jha for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 6th November, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 28/11/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 28th November, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/12/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 31: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 5th December, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 13/12/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 13th December, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/03/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 33: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner. Mr. Gangesh Jha for Respondent No. 1 n CP/453/22. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 10th January, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Respondent , stand over to 29/01/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 35: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Shyam K Singh for petitioner CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 29th January, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 26/02/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 26th February, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 15/04/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 41: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 15th April, 2024 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 19/08/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 43: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 19th August, 2024 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 29/11/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 3: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.924 OF 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.71 OF 2009 Deepak Fertilisers And ..Applicant Pertrochemicals Corporation Ltd. Versus Vitol S.A. & anr. ..Respondents Mr.N.N.Seervai, Senior Counsel with Mr.P.A.Kabadi i/b.M/s.Doijode Associates, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Zal Andhyarujini with Ms.Duhita Lewis i/b.Chamber Javed Gaya, Advocate, for the Respondents CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 16TH JULY, 2010 P.C. . In view of dismissal of Appeal from Order, Civil Application does not survive and the same is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 3620 OF 2016 Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. J. Shekhar i/b J. Shekhar & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for the Respondent State. Mr. M. S. Topkar, for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. Mr. Rampal Kohli, for Respondent No. 5. CORAM : V. M. KANADE, M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 28, 2016 PC. Issue notice before admission returnable on 25.4.2016. Sd/- [V. M. KANADE, J.] Sd/- [M. S. KARNIK, J.] Vinayak Halemath [1VI. 3. KAKINIK, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation •••• Petitioner vs State of Maharashtra and others •••• Respondents Mr. Shekhar Jagtap a/w Akshay Kapadia i/b J. Shekhar & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. S. A. Sawant a/w Mr. Ketan Joshi for respondent no. 3 o. 3 Mr. R. S. Kohli for Respondent no. 5. Ms. Pavitra Manesh i/b Mr. M. S. Tapkar for respondent nos. 6 & 7 t nos .6&7 CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 29 MARCH , 2016 ORDER: Not on board. In view of the urgency expressed, matter is taken on board today. Pending the other writ petitions, this Court in Writ Petition No. 337 of 2016, have passed workable order wherein this Court has observed in para 5 as under: **"**5 However, considering the emergent situation in question and so also the obligations of the "Local Authority" to provide various services in the city of Nashik through or by appointing agents/contractors and to avoid further complications, as such sudden revocation of registration itself rendered the Petitioner helpless for want of power and authority to appoint the Licensed Contractor or agents for providing essential services, therefore, by way of interim arrangement, we are inclined to observe that the position as of 31 December 2015 requires to continue in all respect, qua the subject matter of impugned notice dated 1 January 2016 i.e. no revocation of registration, so that the people at large should not be made to suffer because of the stated inaction on the part of the Corporation of non compliances, so referred in impugned order dated 1 January 2016. The Petitioner to continue with their obligations to provide amenities and/or facilities and services to the citizen of Nashik City." A statement is made that this arrangement is still continuing. By impugned tender notice dated 29/02/2016, four contractors whose issue with regard to their black listing, are pending in the Court i.e. Writ Petition No. 379 of 2016, 380 of 2016, 11630 of 2015 & 11631 of 2015. The issue is also pending with the State Government in view of the appeal under section 451 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 filed by respondent no. 5. After going through the orders passed by this Court in the petition filed by those contractors, who are at present black listed and as their applications for stay and/or related issues are not yet finalized in their favour, the resolution and decision taken by respondent no. 3 i.e. Standing Committee of Municipal Corporation, permitting them to participate in the tender process, in our view, at this stage, required to be stayed. This is to avoid further complications and specifically in view of the fact of pendency of writ petitions so referred above. By keeping all points open, including maintainability of writ petitions as alternative remedy is available, and the other petitions are pending in this Court for final decision as recorded above, we are inclined to pass the order as under. O R D E R (i) Adinterim relief in terms of prayer clause (C) which reads thus: "C. Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Writ Petition, this Hon'ble High Court may kindly stay the effect, implementation, execution and operation of the impugned Resolution No. 822 dated 29/02/2016 passed by the Respondent no. 3 and thereby permitting the Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 to participate in the tender process due on 29/03/2016." Parties to act upon the authenticated copy of this order. The learned counsel for respondent no. 5, on instructions, seeks stay of this order passed in Court today. Considering the reasons so recorded above, the said request is rejected. Stand over to 12/04/2016. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation -Versus F Petitioner State of Maharashtra & Ors. R Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.882 OF 2016 D.882 OF 20 16 Sayyed Asif Ali A Applicant In the matter between: Nashik Municipal Corporation P Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. R Respondents Mr.Shekhar Jagtap with Akshay Kapadia i/b. J. Shekhar & Co. for petitioner Mr.Ketan Joshi for respondent No.3 Mr.S.R.Ranghe for respondent No.4 and for applicant in CAW 882 of 2016 Mr. Rampal S. Kohli for respondent No.5 CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A.SAYED, JJ § DATE : 13th April 2016. 2016. P.C. 1] In view of the earlier order dated 5th April 2016 after considering the civil application as well as the submissions so made, we have specifically ordered as under:- "5. On 29 March, except Respondent No. 4, all other Respondents were duly heard. Based upon the orders passed in Writ Petitions, which are mentioned in para 4 of the order dated 29 March 2016 and considering the urgency so expressed, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) of the Petition has been granted. As the matter itself is directed to be listed on 12 April, 2016, we are inclined to list this matter on 12 April 2016 so that all the Respondents will be heard on merits of the matter, including the submissions revolving around the order so passed on 29 March, 2016. In view of the above, no case is made out for interim relief and/or recalling any order at this stage in this Civil Application. The Petitioner to file Reply to the Civil Application. The submission is made that in other Writ Petitions (Writ Petition No. 379 of 2016, 380 of 2016, 11630 of 2015 & 11631 of 2015) directions are given to list the said Petitions after two weeks for final disposal and it is also observed that further process of the tender shall be subject to the final outcome of the Writ Petitions. Therefore, it is also necessary for the parties to file common precipe so that all these matters can be heard together by one Bench. Parties to take steps accordingly. Place the Petition on 12 April 2016 for hearing before the appropriate Bench." 2] We are informed that a precipe is already filed in pursuance of the above order on 11th April 2015 before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice for appropriate orders. 3] Let the matter be placed before appropriate bench in view of the above. (A.A.SAYED, J) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J)

Order - Status 12: mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Akshar Kapadia i/b. J. Shekhar & Co. Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Ketan Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Mr. Mohammed Ashraf, Advocate for Respondent No.5 Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the State Ms. Pavitra M. i/b. Mr. M.S. Topkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 CORAM : V.M.KANADE & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 20TH APRIL, 2016 P.C. : Not before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member. Matter be placed before the appropriate Bench. Application is made for speaking to the minutes of our order dated 28th March, 2016. In fact the order was passed that the matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member. However, inadvertently an order is passed " issue notice before admission returnable on 25.4.2016 ". The said order is accordingly modified and it is clarified that on 28th March, 2016 order which was passed was "The matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member". The order is accordingly modified and shall be read as follows: "The matter should not be placed before the Bench in which Mr. Justice M.S. Karnik is a member" . (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.)

Order - Status 14: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 15: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11630 OF 2015 M/s Samiksha Construction Company ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP STAMP NO. 23039 OF 2017 In Writ Petition 11630 OF 2015 M/s Samiksha Construction Company ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11631 OF 2015 M/s Vishal Services ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 380 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan Bora ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 293 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 474 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 292 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 473 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan P. Bora ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 1064 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 11631 OF 2015 M/s Vishal Services ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Industry, Energy And Labour Dept. And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 473 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor Shri. Chetan Bora ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 334 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 379 OF 2016 ....RESPONDENT M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 336 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 380 OF 2016 M/s. Watergrace Products Through Proprietor, Shri. Chetan P. Bora ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP NO. 640 OF 2016 In Writ Petition 379 OF 2016 M/s. Sayyed Asif Ali Through Proprietor Shri Sayyed Ali ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 474 OF 2010 Tain Constructions ....PETITIONER V/S Vilas Shankar Shelar And Ors. ....RESPONDENT ....APPLICANT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 19th March, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 07/08/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2016 Nashik Municipal Corporation ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....RESPONDENT Mr. Mithchelle Almeida i/b Rompal Singh Kohli for Respondent Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 & 2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 29th April, 2024 P.C. : Stand over to 08/07/2024 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.203 OF 2020 Suresh Chunilal Pariyar Applicant V/s. Ashok Kumar Chatarsen & Anr. Respondents Mr. P. K. Bohade, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Amit Palkar, APP for Respondent No.2 (State). CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 31st MARCH, 2021. P.C. : Heard. Admit. (A. S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 6: 1 902-REVN 203-20@IA 1330-21 in 203-20.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.203 OF 2020 Suresh Chunilal Pariyar … Applicant Vs. Ashok Kumar Chatarsen & Anr. … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1330 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.203 OF 2020 Mr. Y. G. Thorat i/by A. B. Tajane for Respondent No.1. CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. (HEAD OF THE PANEL) V.V. PATIL, REGISTRAR (INSPECTION-I), MEMBER R.V. WANWADI, DEPUTY REGISTRAR (INSPECTION-I), MEMBER DATE : 12TH MARCH 2022 P.C. : This matter does not pertain to Railway Claims. Registry to verify as to how this matter is placed for Lokadalat. (R.V. WANWADI) (V.V. PATIL) (ABHAY AHUJA, J.)

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3895 OF 2023 IN CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.4340 OF 2023 MRS. CHAYYA GANGADHAR BHOSALE & ORS. )...APPLICANTS V/s. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. )...RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4656 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.133 OF 2021 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. )...APPLICANT V/s. MRS. CHAYYA GANGADHAR BHOSALE & ORS. )...RESPONDENTS Mr. Yogesh Pande, Advocate for the Applicant in IA/3895/2023 and Respondents No.1 & 2 in FA/133/2021. Mr. Rajesh Kanojia with Ms. Nikita Singh i/b Res Juris, Advocate for the Applicant in IA/4656/2023/Appellant in FA/133/2021. CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 20th JUNE 2023. P.C. : INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4656 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.133 OF 2021 This is an application seeking restoration of the First Appeal that came to be dismissed for failure to file private paper book within the stipulated period. There is delay of 306 days in filing this application for restoration. Mr. Yogesh Pande, learned Counsel submits that he does not have copy of Interim Application and requests for some time. Let copy be supplied to him and reply be filed by the next date. List on 11th July, 2023. INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3895 OF 2023 IN CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO.4340 OF 2023 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 500 days in preferring the Cross Objection in the First Appeal No.133 of 2021 which has been dismissed for failure to file paper book in time. Mr. Rajesh Kanojia, learned Counsel for the applicant submits that if Mr. Yogesh Pande, learned Counsel consents to allow the condonation of delay for restoration of the First Appeal then he has instructions to consent for the condonation of delay in filing the Cross Objection so that both the First Appeal and the Cross Objection can be heard on the same date on merits. Mr. Yogesh Pande, learned Counsel states on instructions, that pursuant to the dismissal of the First Appeal the original claimant has already withdrawn the entire amount and would submit that in the Lower Court when the amount was allowed to be withdrawn, the Advocate or Representative of the Insurance Company did not object to the same. Mr. Yogesh Pande, learned Counsel seeks some time in IA No.4656/2023 to bring the above objections on record by way of affidavit. List on 11th July, 2023. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.)

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3895 OF 2023 In CROSS OBJECTION STAMP STAMP NO. 4340 OF 2023 Mrs. Chayya Gangadhar Bhosale And Ors. ....PETITIONER V/S Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Manager Mr. Amit Ashwini Sharma ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4656 OF 2023 In First Appeal 133 OF 2021 Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Manager Mr. Amit Ashwini Sharma ....PETITIONER V/S Mrs. Chayya Gangadhar Bhosale And Ors. ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA J DATE : 18th July, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 17/08/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3895 OF 2023 In CROSS OBJECTION STAMP STAMP NO. 4340 OF 2023 Mrs. Chayya Gangadhar Bhosale And Ors. ....PETITIONER V/S Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Manager Mr. Amit Ashwini Sharma ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4656 OF 2023 In First Appeal 133 OF 2021 Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Manager Mr. Amit Ashwini Sharma ....PETITIONER V/S Mrs. Chayya Gangadhar Bhosale And Ors. ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA J DATE : 17th August, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 15/09/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4656 OF 2023 In FIRST APPEAL 133 OF 2021 Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Manager Mr. Amit Ashwini Sharma ....PETITIONER V/S Mrs. Chayya Gangadhar Bhosale And Ors. ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3895 OF 2023 In Cross Objection Stamp STAMP NO. 4340 OF 2023 Mrs. Chayya Gangadhar Bhosale And Ors. ....PETITIONER V/S Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Manager Mr. Amit Ashwini Sharma ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL J DATE : 14th September, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 02/11/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4656 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.133 OF 2021 Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr. ...Applicants Versus Chayya Gangadhar Bhosale and Anr. ...Respondents …. Mr. Rajesh Kanojia i/b. M/s. Res Juris for the Applicants. Mr. Yogesh Pande for the Respondents. CORAM: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2023. P.C.:- Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel and the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 306 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The appeal be restored to file. The application is allowed and disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Megha 1/1