Jayesh Bhagwandas Thakkar vs. Rajkumar Arjundas Garwada

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 370 OF 2007 Jayesh Bhagwandas Thakkar. ... Applicant. V/s. Mr.Rajkumar Arjundas Garwada and another. ... Respondents. S.R.Chitnis, senior counsel with H.S.Venegavkar for the applicant. S.D.Mogre for respondent No.1. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 29th September 2007. P.C.: ---- . Heard. Both parties submit that the possibility of settlement can be explored. However, since the present applicant is in custody, talks for settlement cannot take place. In this view of the matter, in order to offer an opportunity to the parties to settle their dispute out of Court, the present applicant, viz., Jayesh Bhagwandas Thakkar is released on temporary bail for a period of 15 days from his actual release on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of his real brother, viz., Jitendrakumar Bhagwandas Thakkar. . Stand over to 8th October, 2007. JUDGE

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.370 OF 2007 Jayeshkumar Bhagwandas Thakkar ..Applicant V/s. Rajkumar Arjundas Garwada & Anr. ..Respondents ---- Mr.H.S.Venegavkar for the applicant. Mr.S.D.Mogre for respondent no.1. Ms.S.D.Shinde APP for the State. CORAM : V.C.DAGA,J Date : 22.10.2007. PC Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and learned Counsel for respondent no.1 as well as learned APP for the State. The parties have tendered the consent terms duly signed by the applicant and the respondent no.2. The applicant and respondent no.2 both are present in persons. The consent terms are also counter-signed by the respective Advocates appearing for the respective parties. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertaking given in respect of consent terms and statements made therein are accepted. On the joint motion made by the learned Advocates for the parties, Criminal Revision Application stands disposed off in terms of consent terms subject to compliance thereof. In the result, offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is compounded subject to compliance of terms and conditions in the undertaking. Bail bond of the applicant is cancelled. Parties to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Private Secretary of this Court as a true copy. (V.C.DAGA,J)