Deepak Madhvan vs. Wilson Charles Wakde

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1900 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 152 OF 2021 Deepak Madhvan ...Applicant Versus Wilson Charles Wakde and Anr. ...Respondents None for the Applicant. Mr. S.V.Gavand, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 3rd AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : None appears for the applicant. Stand over to 4th August, 2021. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 6: 27-IA-1900-2021.doc SHAGUFTA Q PATHAN Digitally signed by SHAGUFTA Q PATHAN Date: 2021.08.06 11:05:19 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1900 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.152 OF 2021 Deepak Madhvan ...Applicant Versus Wilson Charles Wakde & Anr. ...Respondents None for the Applicant None for the Respondent No. 1 Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2–State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. WEDNESDAY, 4th AUGUST 2021 P.C. : 1 None appeared for the applicant at the first as well as at the second call. Stand over to 11th August 2021. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 8: RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Digitally signed by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date: 2021.08.12 16:54:57 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1900 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 152 OF 2021 Deepak Madhvan ...Applicant Versus Wilson Charles Wakde State of Maharashtra ...Respondents Mr. P.V.Satam i/b Mr. Vikas Mishra for the Applicant. Mr. A.R.Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2021 P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant. By this applicant, the Applicant seeks suspension of his sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal of his Revision Application. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the Respondent No.2 (Original Complainant) had filed a complaint as against the Applicant for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in the year 2003. He submits that the amount involved in the dishonour of cheques was Rs.2,00,000/-. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that during the pendency of the case filed by the Respondent No.2 (Original Complainant), the Applicant handed over a piece of land by a Sale Deed to the Respondent No.2 in the year 2006. He submits that there is evidence on record to show that the said transfer was in lieu of the dishonour of cheques. He submits that even otherwise, the Applicant has without prejudice deposited Rs.1,50,000/- in the Appellate Court i.e. Sessions Court during the pendency of his appeal. The Applicant was on bail pending trial as well as in the Appellate Court. Having perused the evidence, the Applicant has made out a case for suspension of his sentence and enlargement of bail, pending the hearing and final disposal of his aforesaid Revision Application. Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the Applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal of his appeal, on the following terms and conditions :- ORDER i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount; ii) The Applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in six months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his Revision Application is finally disposed of; iii) The Applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his current address and mobile contact number and/or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time; Learned Counsel for the Applicant states that he will not file any application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by the Applicant, in the Appellate Court. Statement Accepted. The application is accordingly disposed of. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.