All Writ Petition (Civil)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 17121 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent MADHAV JAYAJIRAI JAMDAR GOVERNMENT PLEADER WRIT CELLR.NO. 1 CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ DATE : 8th August, 2016 P.C. : Mentioned. At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners Stand over to 16/08/2016. Ad-interim relief if any granted earlier to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION AND ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : S.S. KEMKAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 16 / 08 /2016 P.C.: The following matters on balance Board/Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. The matters will appear on the dates as may be fixed as per C.M.I.S. Civil Appellate Side C.M.I.S. Date Origi nal Side C.M.I.S Date 95, 145 14/10/16 101 06/04/17 96, 103 150, 151, 152,153,154,155,156,157,158, 159,160,161,162 27/10/16 102 07/04/17 146, 149 20/12/16 89, 90, 91, 92, 97, 98,99,100,104,105,106,107, 108, 109,110, 111, 112, 113,115,116, 117,118,119,120,121,122,123, 124,125,126,127,128,129,130, 131,132,133,134,135 02/03/17 136,137,138,139,140, 143,144,147,148 03/03/17 If in any of the above matters, ad interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If adinterim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected. (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (S.S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent Madhav Jayajirai Jamdar For Petitioner Ms. R.M. Shinde, AGP for State. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ DATE : 26th October, 2016 P.C. : No order, as per CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent Madhav Jayajirai Jamdar For Petitioner Ms. NIsha Mehra,Assst. Government Pleader Writ Cell R.no. 1 For Respondent CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ DATE : 28th November, 2016 P.C. : Stand over to 18/01/2017 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents …... Mr. Madhav J. Jamdar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms. R. M. Shinde, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State. Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 18, 2017. …... P.C. : Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on the question of admission. 2 Issue notice to the respondents. 3 Learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent no.1. 4 Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 waives service of notice on his behalf. 5 Steps for service of notice on respondent no.3 be taken within two weeks. rpa 2/2 wp-10327-16.doc 6 Reply of the petition be filed within four weeks from today. 7 List the petition as per C.M.I.S. date. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10327 OF 2016 Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe and Others Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others Respondents Mr. M.J. Jamdar, for the Petitioners Ms. Chaitali Kale i/b. Mr. N.P. Deshpande, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. V.N. Sagare, AGP for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : APRIL 03, 2017 P.C.: . The learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 undertakes to file reply during the course of the day. The rejoinder if any, may be filed by the Petitioners within four weeks. List the matter as per CMIS date. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ DATE : 7th December, 2017 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. Stand over to CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent CORAM : R.M. BORDE & RAJESH G. KETKAR, JJ DATE : 7th February, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is curtailed from daily board and adjourned as per CMIS date. In the meantime,Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe And Ors ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra Through Addl. Chief Secretary And Ors ....Respondent Mr.Madhav Jayajirai Jamdar For Petitioner Mr. C.P. Yadav, AGP for State/Respondent no. 1. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ DATE : 18th April, 2018 P.C. : None for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Stand Over to 20/06/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10327 OF 2016 Mr. Deepak Sopanrao Salunkhe & Ors. … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents Mr. Madhav J. Jamdar for Petitioners. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State. CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : JULY 13, 2018 . Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners on the question of admission. RULE. No fresh notice after admission is necessary, as Respondents are already represented. (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)

Order - Status 8: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 1243 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court's or Judge's orders appearances,Court 's : orders or directions & : Prothonotary's orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ R.Dada, senior counsel with G.Kulkarni i/b. Ms.Swati Deshpande for the petitioner. Mrs.S.V.Bharucha with Ms.Nisha Valani for the respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 13th April 2007. P.C.: . Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Rule. 3. There shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (C)(i). 4. Mrs.Bharucha waives services on behalf of respondents. 5. Hearing of the petition is expedited. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2414 OF 2024 Baban Undrya Kathara ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Aniket Vagal aw Mr. Sanket Bhavad aw Mr. Kunal Pednekar for Petitioner Mr. Pradip Rajput for Resp 2 Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 18th June, 2024 P.C. : At the request of the learned APP for the Respondent - State, S.O. to 20/06/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3387 OF 2017 Shri. Laxman Arjun Hudekar And Ors. ....Petitioner V/S Shri. Shivaji Vithoba Patil And Ors. ....Respondent G. N. Salunke For Petitioner CORAM : RAJESH G. KETKAR, J DATE : 22nd March, 2017 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on production board. Matter to be placed on 29/03/2017. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3387 OF 2017 Shri. Laxman Arjun Hudekar & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Shri. Shivaji Vithoba Patil & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. G.N. Salunkhe for petitioners. CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 28 JANUARY 2019. P.C:- . Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner/original plaintiff is challenging the order dated 27.09.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gadhinglaj below Exhibit-38 in Regular Civil Suit No.14 of 2013 recasting the issues. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the next date before the trial Court is 05.02.2019. He submits that in view of these facts, further proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No.14 of 2013 to be stayed. It is to be noted that though the petition was filed on 21.12.2016, till today the respondents are not served. Therefore, there is no question of granting any ad-interim relief at this stage without hearing the respondent. Considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the impugned order, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out case for following order : a) Registry is directed to issue notice before admission to the respondents stating that if time permits matter be decided finally at the stage of admission, returnable on 29.04.2019. b) In addition to the usual mode of service petitioner is permitted to serve the respondents by private notice along with entire proceedings either by RPAD and or by hand delivery and file Affidavit of Service to that effect on or before 18.04.2019. c) Stand over to 29.04.2019. d) At present no ad-interim relief. (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3387 OF 2017 Shri. Laxman Arjun Hudekar And Ors. ....Petitioner V/S Shri. Shivaji Vithoba Patil And Ors. ....Respondent CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J DATE : 13th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 11/11/2019 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3387 OF 2017 Laxman Arjun Hudekar & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Shivaji Vithoba Patil & Ors. .. Respondents ................... Mr. G.N. Salunke for the Petitioners Mr. Amar Bodke i/by Mr. M.V. Thorat for Respondent No. 1 ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 7, 2020. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Bodke informs the Court that Advocate Mr. M.V. Thorat representing for respondent No. 1 has taken discharge and given NOC to respondent No. 1. Hence, he seeks time for respondent No. 1 to take necessary steps. 3. Mr. Salunke, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is very old. However, he accedes to the request of Mr. Bodke and does not make any issue out of it. He submits that fair chance is required to be given to the contesting parties to appear before the Court. This stand of Mr. Salunke is appreciated by the Court. 4. Petitioners are directed to serve respondent No. 1 by private notice and to file affidavit to that effect on or before the next date. Hamdust granted. 5. Mr. Salunke submits that prima facie it appears that strategy of respondent No. 1 is to prolong and delay the proceedings of the trial Court which are at the stage of evidence. He, therefore, submits that the Court should consider grant of interim relief and stay the trial Court proceedings. 6. On perusal of order dated 28.1.2019 passed by this Court, I am not inclined to grant ad-interim relief as of today in absence of respondent No. 1 considering that the present advocate of respondent No. 1 has sought discharge. However, this Court shall consider grant of ad-interim relief on the next date subject to Mr. Salunke placing on record the affidavit of service. 2 of 3 7. S.O to 6.3.2020. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ravindra M. Amberkar Digitally signed by Ravindra M. Amberkar Date: 2020.02.10 11:14:51 +0530

Order - Status 9: ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms.Pallavi Dabholkar i/by Mr. S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr. K. Narayanan i/by M/s. Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED : 10th November, 2008. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing for Respondent in Writ Petition No.4905 of 2008 stating certain development needs to be taken on record by an affidavit and the same be filed within a period of one week. Adjourned to 17/11/2008. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4950 OF 2008 P.R.Enterprises, Mumbai .. Petitioners V/s. Kalyanji K.Gada (Since deceased through his LR's) Mrs.Maniben K.Gada & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.Y.Katkade for the Petitioners. Mr.K.Narayanan i/b.Narayanan & Narayanan for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6. CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C. . Admit. Rule, returnable on 9th February, 2008. No coercive steps pursuant to the impugned order. The learned counsel for the Respondent waives service. (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.