All Writ Petition (Civil)

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 7: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents … … Ms. Priyanka Chavan for the petitioners. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P. for respondent-State. CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 08TH FEBRUARY, 2021. P.C:- Stand over to 09/02/2021. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appearances of the Advocates as per Board dated 09/02/2021. … CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 09TH FEBRUARY, 2021. P.C:- Matters at serial numbers mentioned below of the Board stands discharged and will be taken first on 10th February, 2021, followed by the matters from the Causelist dated 10th February, 2021. Sr. Nos. Due Date 32, 35 to 41, 43 to 46, 48 to 51, 54 to 60, 62 to 74, 76, 77, 78, 80, 81 10-02-2021 Ad-interim /interim reliefs, if any, to continue till then. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 14: 31_wp.486.2021.doc Vishwanath S. Sherla Digitally signed by Vishwanath S. Sherla Date: 2021.02.10 17:14:35 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde & another … Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & others … Respondents Ms.Priyanka Chavan for the Petitioners Mr.K.V. Saste, APP, for Respondent – State CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2021 P.C.: At the request of the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, stand over to Monday, the 15th February, 2021 . (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL / CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.291 OF 2021 (Sr.No.66) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.385 OF 2021 (Sr.No.67) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.402 OF 2021 (Sr.No.68) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.457 OF 2021 (Sr.No.69) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 (Sr.No.70) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO.519 OF 2021 (Sr.No.71) IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO 333/2021 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.540 OF 2021 (Sr.No.73) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.554 OF 2021 (Sr.No.74) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.575 OF 2021 (Sr.No.75) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 581 OF 2021 (Sr.No.76) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.617 OF 2021 (Sr.No.77) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.618 OF 2021 (Sr.No.78) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.639 OF 2021(Sr.No.83) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.643 OF 2021 (Sr.No.85) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.644 OF 2021 (Sr.No.86) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.645 OF 2021 (Sr.No.87) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.646 OF 2021 (Sr.No.88) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.648 OF 2021 (Sr.No.90) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.652 OF 2021(Sr.No.92) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.653 OF 2021 (Sr.No.93) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.660 OF 2021 (Sr.No.94) Appearances of the Advocates as per Board dated 15/02/2021. CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2021. P.C:- Due to paucity of time, the board is discharged for the day and the above matters are adjourned to 16/02/2021. Interim relief or ad-interim relief, if any in the above matters to continue till then. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde & Anr. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents … Mr.Robin Fernandes i/b Ms.Priyanka Chavan for the Petitioners. Dr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S.S.SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 16th FEBRUARY, 2021 P.C:- Learned APP submits that the concerned police officer had made sincere efforts to trace out the missing person, namely, Atul Ankush Shinde. However, the concerned police officer could not trace him out. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Investigating Agency, CID, Pune is having specialised police personnel to conduct the investigation. We are satisfied with the inquiry/investigation conducted by the concerned police officer. However, since the Investigating Agency, CID, Pune is a specialised agency, we deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to entrust further inquiry/investigation with the Investigating Agency, CID, Pune forthwith. List this petition on 8th March, 2021. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.) M.M.Salgaonkar Digitally signed by Mandira Salgaonkar Date: 2021.02.17 20:52:26 +0530

Order - Status 20: (35) cri.wp-486.21.odt Laxmikant G. Chandan Digitally signed by Laxmikant G. Chandan Date: 2021.03.10 10:39:54 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde and anr. : Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. : Respondents. Ms. Priyanka Chavan for the Petitioner. Dr. F R Shaikh, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, MANISH PITALE, JJ DATE : 09th MARCH 2021 P.C. 1 Dr. F R Shaikh, the learned APP appearing for the Respondent/State, on instructions, submits that inquiry/investigation is transferred to CID Branch, State of Maharashtra. He, therefore, prays two weeks time so as to enable him to take instructions. At his request, stand over to 05/04/2021. [MANISH PITALE, J] [S. S. SHINDE , J]

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde And Ors. PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. RESPONDENT Smt. Priyanka Chavan for Petitioner Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for Respondent - State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.S. SHINDE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE, JJ DATE : 5th April, 2021 P.C. : At the request of the learned APP for the Respondent - State, S.O. to 21/04/2021 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde And Ors. PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.S. SHINDE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 27th July, 2021 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 03/08/2021 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde And Ors. PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. RESPONDENT PRIYANKA CHAVAN for Petitioner. Mrs. M. H. Mahatare, APP for Respondent/State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.S. SHINDE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 3rd August, 2021 P.C. : S. O. to 04/08/2021 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde and Anr. ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents SUBHASH PAREKAR Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2021.08.05 10:31:28 +0530 VISHAL Ms. Priyanka Chavan, for the Petitioner Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 04, 2021 P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Mrs. Mhatre, learned APP, on instruction, seeks time to carry out further investigation so as to trace out the missing person. Ms. Chavan, learned counsel for the petitioner states that she is not averse to granting time to the investigating agency. At the request of learned APP list on 21st September, 2021. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 30: WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Ms.Priyanka Chavan for Petitioners. Ms.A.S. Pai, PP for State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATED : 2 FEBRUARY 2022 P.C. : . At the request of learned PP, three weeks time is granted to submit report to this court. S.O. to 23 February 2022. (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A.Wahab Isane & Ors. ] Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] through Principal Secretary, ] Department of Revenue & Forest ] & Ors. ] Respondents. … Gayatri Singh, Senior Counsel a/w Sangram Chinnappa i/b Kartikeya Bahadur for petitioner. Mr.S.S. Panchpor, AGP for State. Ms Sharmila Deshmukh, for respondent no.5 Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority. … CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 3rd AUGUST, 2021. P.C. Heard learned Counsel for parties. Learned Senior Counsel Ms Gayatri Singh appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in the present proceeding, as per letter dated 24th December 2004 (Exhibit 'O' page 65) the Revenue and Forest Department directed the Collector, Raigad that excavation of sand in the 11 kilometers area from Vicharewadi to Dasgaon in Savitri river bed, Raigad should be by manual i.e. 'Hathpati'. She submits that inspite of that, the respondent issued E-tender dated 30th September 2021 for mechanized drilling of sand. In support of her contention, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner relies on Annexure to E-tender on page no.227 particularly, Gat No.53 to 57. Whether Gat no.53 to 57 comes within the area of 11 kilometer as per letter dated 24th December 2004 from Revenue and Forest department to Collector Raigad or not, for that purpose the petitioner is granted liberty to file affidavit in support of petition. Learned AGP Mr.Panchpor for respondent also seeks some time to file their affidavit in reply. In view of this, following order is passed. a) Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file additional affidavit in support of petition on or before 7th August 2021 with copy to other side. b) Respondent/State to file their affidavit in reply on or before 9/8/2021. c) Matter to appear on board on 11th August 2021. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [K. K. TATED, J.]

Order - Status 7: 10.3608.21-wp+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3608/2021 Shoukat A. Wahab Isane & Ors. ….. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents WRIT PETITION NO.2946/2021 Abdul Samad Almiya Mandlekar ….. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents Mr. Kartikeya Bahadur for the Petitioner in 3608/2021 Mr. Sangam Chinappa for the Petitioner in 2946/2021 Mr. S. S. Panchpor, AGP for the State Mr. Kaushal Parsekar a/w. Saloni Vyas I/b. Legasis Partners for Respondent No.4 Ms. Jaya Bagwe I/b. Sharmila Deshmukh for Respondent No.5 MCZMA – in both matters Mr. Kumar Abhishek Singh a/w. Nishant Bhatia I/b. Anomal Law Group LLP for Respondent No.6 – in both matters CORAM: K.K.TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 31, 2021 P.C. 1 Heard. The learned AGP for the State seeks permission to file an additional compilation of documents in the Registry, with copy to other side. 2 Hence, the following order is passed: a. The learned AGP to file an additional compilation of documents in the Registry, on or before 07.09.2021, with copy to other side. b. The matter to appear on board on 20.09.2021. (PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A. Wahab Isane And Ors ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary Dept. Of Revenue And Forest And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ DATE : 27th September, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 11/10/2021. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: Priya Soparkar 1 12 wp 3608-21 with wp 2946-21-c PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date: 2021.10.12 11:05:37 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A. Wahab Isane and ors. … Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents Mr.Kartikeya Bahadur, Advocate for the Petitioners in WP No.3608 of 2021. Ms.Gayatri Singh i/by Mr.Sangram Chinnappa, Advocates for the Petitioner in WP No.2946 of 2021. Ms.Neha Bhide, "B" Panel counsel for the Sate. Mr.Kaushal Parsekar i/by M/s Legasis Partners, Advocate for Respondent No.4. Ms.Sharmila Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.5-MCZMA in both matters. Mr.Kumar Abhishek Singh alongwith Mr.Shubham Agrahari and Mr. Nishant Bhatia i/by M/s Anoma Law Group LLP, Advocates for Respondent No.6. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 11, 2021. P.C.:- It appears that the contract period of the petitioner has expired on 30th September, 2021. Ms.Bhide, learned AGP to inform us on the next date as to whether there is any proposal for extension of the contract period. All the affidavits be filed in the registry before the next date. Stand over to 21st October, 2021. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.) ….

Order - Status 15: Digitally signed HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV SHIV by HEMANT CHANDERSEN Date: 2022.03.17 17:22:16 $+0530$ Shiv IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2022 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Petitioner $...$ Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO.6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2022 Shaurya Enterprises Versus Dilip Babaji Ulkirde & Ors ...Petitioner ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2946 OF 2021 ... Petitioner Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors $...$ Respondents Page 1 of 5 17th March 2022 Mrs Gayatrisingh *, Senior Advocate with Mr Sangram Chinnappa for the Petitioner in WP 2564/2022 & WP 3608/2021.* Mr Mihir Desai *, Senior Advocate i/b Kartieya Bahadur for the Petitioner in WP 2946/2021.* Mr K S Thorat *, AGP for the State/Respondent.* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh for the MCGM/Respondent No 5 in WP 3608/2021 and WP 2946/2021, WP 2564/2022, IAL 6528/2022.* Mr Prashant Pratap *, Senior Advocate with Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham A and Nishant Bhatia i/b Anoma Law Group LLP for Respondent No 6.* Mr Mayur Khandeparkar *, i/b Vaibhav Jagtap, for the Applicant in IAST 6528/2022.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 17th March 2022 PC:- 1. We will require from the State of Maharashtra the entire original file by 12.30 pm today relating to all sand mining and sand dredging activities permitted or proposed on the 11 km stretch that is subject matter of Appellate Side Writ Petition No 2564 of 2022, Writ Petition No 3608 of 2021 and Writ Petition No 2946 of 2021. 2. We require this because in Writ Petition No 3608 of 2021 and Writ Petition No 2946 of 2021, both of which are pending, on 11th October 2021 this Court was informed that the contract period regarding the sand mining or dredging had ended on 30th September 2021. The Government was to inform the Court whether there was any proposal for extending the contract period. 3. There was no such communication from the Government at any time. In other words, the Court was never informed of any extension. Instead, it seems that for one contractor represented by Mr Pratap today, an extension of a 2021 contract was granted on 16th February 2022 and sent through the various channels until it finally reached that contractor, who is engaged in mechanised sand dredging at a site on this very stretch along the Savitri river, on 8th March 2022. 4. 8th March 2022 is also the date on which, after hearing Ms Singh and Mr Thorat, we made an ad-interim order in Civil Writ Petition No 2564 of 2022 staying an auction notice for award of mechanised dredging contracts in various gats notified for this very 11 km stretch of the Savitri river. Mr Pratap submits that his clients' contract, though within this 11 km stretch, is not covered by the auction notice that is the subject matter of Writ Petition No 2564 of 2022. 5. Even if that be so, we do not see how the Government could have communicated and put into operation any extension or proposal for extension of Mr Pratap's client's contract since that information had not been communicated to the High Court in the two active Writ Petition Nos 3608 of 2021 and 2946 of 2021. 6. Mr Desai appears for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No 2946 of 2021. Ms Gayatri Singh appears for the Petitioner Writ Petition No 3608 of 2021. (There was an error in noting the appearances on that date). 7. Respondent No 6 before the Division Bench on 11th October 2021 was precisely Mr Pratap's client today. There is no possibility at all of either Mr Pratap's client or of the Government being unaware of the order that was passed on 11th October 2021, or that the Court desired to be informed not only about an extension of the contract but even about any proposal for an extension of the contract period. What the order records (there appears to be another typographical error) is that it was the contract period of Respondent No 6, Mr Pratap's client today, which had expired on 30th September 2021. It is that expired contract that is now sought to be extended. In our view, this is impermissible and could not have been done without informing this Court having regard to these circumstances. 8. For today we will require the original file from the Government relating to the award of all contracts around this stretch of the Savitri river. 9. The previous interim order passed in Writ Petition 2564 of 2022 are extended until next date. We make it clear that for this 11 km stretch of Savitri river no award in any form of sand mining or dredging whether mechanised or by hard is to be awarded until the next date. 10. All Affidavits to be filed by Tuesday 22nd March 2022. 11. Mr Pratap will be entitled to file an Affidavit in Reply to the 2022 Petition. In Writ Petition 2946 of 2021, leave to amend to bring subsequent events on record without need of re-verification. Amendment to be carried out by Tuesday 22nd March 2022. 12. List the Petitions on supplementary board on 25th March 2022, high on board. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 17: Arun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue And Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue And Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal …Respondents Secretary & Ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shquakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue & Forest & Ors …Respondents Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate *, i/b Kartikeya Bahadur, for the Petitioner in WP/2946/2021.* Mr AM Kulkarni *, 'A' Panel Counsel with Mr KS Thorat, AGP, for the State* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, with Anchita Nair and Gayatri Deshmukh, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No5 (MCZMA).* Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate *, Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham A & Nishant Bhatia, i/b Anoma Law Group LLP, for Respondent No. 6 in WP/2564/2022, WP/2946/2021 and WP/3608/2021.* Mr Mayur Khandeparkar *, with Vaibhav Jagtap, for the Applicant in IAST/6528/2022.* Mr Amol Yadav *, Addl Collector, Raigad, present.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 25th March 2022 PC:- 1. Mr Kulkarni tenders an additional file. Ms Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate *, with Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioner in WP/2564/2022 & WP/3608/2021.* 2. Mr Kulkarni requests time till 1st April 2022. He states on oral instructions received in Court that the extension order in favour of the 6th Respondent to Writ Petition No. 3608 of 2021 and also in Writ Petition No. 2946 of 2021 will be recalled by an administrative order taken at the level of the ministry. We have today in open Court outlined the reasons why we believe this is necessary and have made specific reference to an earlier order of 11th October 2021. We are clear that the order needs to be recalled. It is for this reason that we grant Mr Kulkarni time until 1st April 2022. 3. We return the entire file to Mr Kulkarni including the volume that was tendered across the bar today. 4. We also allow the 6th Respondent, Aditya Enterprises and the State Government to file a formal application for extension of the 6th Respondent's license for our consideration. 5. Copies will be served on the Advocates for the Petitioners in all matters. 6. List all the matters for orders on the supplementary board of 1st April 2022. 7. The previous order will continue until Friday, 1st April 2022. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J) Page 3 of 3 25th March 2022

Order - Status 20: Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2022.04.07 09:52:11 +0530 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8142 OF 2022 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents Page 1 of 3 6th April 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8144 OF 2022 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents Ms Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate *, with Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioner in WP/2564/2022 & WP/3608/2021.* Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate *, i/b Kartikeya Bahadur, for the Petitioner in WP/2946/2021.* Mr AM Kulkarni, 'A' Panel Counsel *, with KS Thorat, AGP, for the State in WP/2564/2022 & WP/2946/2021.* Mr RP Kadam, AGP *, for Respondent-State, in WP/3608/2021.* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No.5 (MCZMA) in WP/3608/2021 and WP/2946/2021.* Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate *, with Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham Agrahi, Nishaan Shetty & Rohan Mathur, i/b Anoma Law Group LLP, for Respondent No. 6, in WP/2564/2022, WP/2946/2021 & WP/3608/2021 .* Mr Mayur Khandeparkar *, with Vaibhav Jagtap, for the Applicant in IAST/6528/2022.* Mr Chirag Dave *, i/b Legasis Partners, for Respondent No. 4, in WP/2946/2021.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 6th April 2022 PC:- Page 2 of 3 6th April 2022 1. We expect an Affidavit explaining (there is no other word for it) from the Maharashtra Maritime Board as to how and for what reason it has recommended mechanised dredging and sand mining on the eleven kilometres stretch of Savitri river that is the subject matter of these Petitions. 2. We are also told that the Collector Raigad said that the policy needed to change and it would be advisable to permit mechanised operations here. We do not pretend to understand what this is supposed to mean. Mr Kulkarni for the State Government will need to file a further Affidavit explaining why these changes in the policy were effected and for what public purpose. We want these Affidavits to be filed in the present two Interim Applications. State Government's Affidavits are to be filed by Monday, 11th April 2022. 3. List all three Petitions and two Interim Applications on Tuesday, 12th April 2022, high on board for orders. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 23: Ashwini IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 6528 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 Dilip B Ulkirde …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents WITH ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH Digitally signed by ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH Date: 2022.04.13 15:20:27 +0530 INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8142 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2021 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary, Dept of Revenue & Forest & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 8144 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 Shouakat A Wahab Isane & Ors …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary, Dept of Revenue & Forest & Ors …Respondents Ms Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate *, i/b Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioners in WP/3608/2021 & WP/2564/2021.* Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate *, i/b Kartikeya Bahadur, for the* Petitioner in WP/2946/2021. Page 2 of 5 12th April 2022 Mr AM Kulkarni, 'A' Panel *, with KS Thorat, AGP, for Respondent-State.* Mr Chirag S Dave *, i/b Legasis Partners, for Respondent No. 4, in WP/ 2564/2022.* Ms Jaya Bagwe *, i/b Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent No. 5- MCZMA.* Mr Prashant Pratap, Senior Advocate *, with Kumar Abhishek Singh, Shubham Agrahari, Nishaan Shetty & Nishant Bhatia, i/ b Anoma Law Group LLP, for Respondent No. 6.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ. DATED: 12th April 2022 PC:- 1. The Writ Petitioners, whom we shall now refere to as the Hatpatti Petitioners, have filed at least three Petitions, two in 2021 and one in 2022 all dealing with the same 11 km stretch of the Savitri river. There are different auctions for sand mining challenged in each. The principle is one: whether there should be an auction for mechanised dredging and sand mining along this or any other stretch of the Savitri river. We refuse to look at this mess of thoroughly disorganised filing. We decline to be asked to look at four-digit page numbers in one matter and then switch to three-digit page numbers in another. The Petitioners must prepare a common consolidated compilation of documents and pleadings (we will not fall into the trap of calling it a 'convenience' compilation, an expression that only does violence to the language) by the next date. A minimal courtesy is to keep papers organized. Page 3 of 5 12th April 2022 2. Interim Application No. 8144 of 2022 is by Aditya Enterprises. It seeks an extension of its license period for permission to continue work at Gat No. 54, Sub-Gat No. HH-2 for another period of 71 days from being given possession. There is an alternative prayer that Aditya Enterprises application or representation be considered by the State Government. 3. Aditya Enterprises' work order of 28th/21st August 2021 has in Clause 52 a condition that dredging will not be done below a depth of 3 mtrs. This has been reiterated in the so-called extension that was granted to Aditya Enterprises from 8th March 2022. 4. Mr Pratap would have it this restriction of 3 mtrs is "a typographical error" because the auction notice/tender mentioned a depth of 5 mtrs. That was the basis on which Aditya Enterprises put it its bid on 21st June 2021. In fact, he says the existing depth is 4.31 mtrs and therefore giving a license to excavate to 3 mtrs is utterly meaningless and even nonsensical. He says, therefore, that the 3 mtrs restrictions in the work order of 20th August 2021 and the extension of 8th March 2022 are clearly mistakes. 5. Mr Kulkarni for the State Government on instructions says that there is no mistake. The 3 mtr depth restriction is one that is mandated by the relevant guidelines and by orders of the Supreme Court. 6. At best, therefore, on Aditya Enterprises ' application we can permit Aditya Enterprises to make a representation to the Page 4 of 5 12th April 2022 Department of Revenue for an appropriate extension and clarification. Mr Kulkarni states that a hearing will be afforded to Aditya Enterprises as also to the legal representatives of the Petitioner before a final order is passed. Mr Pratap says that a representation will be made within one week from today. The officer delegated to decide this representation to do so within two weeks thereafter after giving notice to the Advocates for the Petitioner and affording them a hearing. We grant liberty to the parties to apply. 7. We make it clear that if Aditya Enterprises files any proceeding on an order made by the Revenue Department on Aditya Enterprises' representation, then Aditya Enterprises will join these Petitioners or their Association to that proceeding. 8. So far as the 2022 auction is concerned the stay previously granted will continue. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 25: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 27: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 29: jvs SALUNKE J V Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.01.12 11:15:15 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2564 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17629 OF 2022 Dilip Babaji Ulkirde } Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents With WRIT PETITION NO. 2946 of 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17631 OF 2022 Abdul Samad Alimiya Mandlekar } Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17630 OF 2022 Shouakat A. Wahab Isane } and Ors. } Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents Mr. Prathamesh D. Bhanushali for the petitioners. Mr. K. S. Thorat, AGP for State. Ms. Rahat Kalpatri i/b. Legasis Partners for respondent no. 4. Ms. Jaya Bagwe for respondent no. 5. Mr. Shubham Agrahari and Mr. Siddhant Marathe i/b. Andha Law Groups (LLP) for respondent no. 6. CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE: JANUARY 11, 2023 1 P.C.: Writ Petition No. 2564 of 2022: 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner, on written instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. Writ Petition Nos. 2946 of 2021 and 3608 of 2021: 1. These writ petitions are scheduled on 6th February 2023. The same be listed on the scheduled date. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1702 OF 2009 Nutan] Balasaheb Thakare .. Petitioner Versus 1.] State of Maharashtra & 3 ors. .. Respondents Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the petitioner. Mr. Abhay Patki, Special counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. : 1.We direct the Scrutiny Committee to produce the original files in respect of the petitioner as also in respect of the petitioner's brother whose claim has been validated by the Scrutiny Committee. 2.The petitioner is also directed to produce copy of the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee in the matter of the petitioner's brother. The petitioner is further directed to produce the original copies of the documents, xerox copies of which were produced before the Scrutiny Committee. : 2 : 3.Stand over to 16th February, 2009. Sd/- [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1702 OF 2009 Nutan Balasaheb Thakare. Verss Petitioner. State of Maharashtra and 3 others. Respondents. Mr.A.I. Patel, AGP for the State. State. CORAM : 1 : BILAL NAZKI AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- 1. Heard. 2. Admit. [BILAL NAZKI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1702 OF 2009 Nutan Balasaheb Thakare ....Petitioner V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....Respondent Shri.R. K. Mendadkar For Petitioner Jyoti Jadhav, AGP for state. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & MANISH PITALE, JJ DATE : 21st November, 2017 P.C. : Mentioned at 5:00 PM. By consent Stand Over to 27/11/2017 at the end of admission board. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1702 OF 2009 Nutan Balasaheb Thakare ....Petitioner V/S State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ....Respondent Shri.R K. Mendadkar with Ms Priyanka Shaw, Advocate For Petitioner Ms Nisha Mehra, AGP for R nos. 1 To 3 CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ DATE : 16th January, 2018 P.C. : Civil Application No. 1313/2016 will be heard in the month of April 2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1702 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1313 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1608 OF 2014 Nutan Balasaheb Thakare ... Petitioner/Applicant versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents ….. Mr.R.K.Mendadkar a/w. Mr.C.K.Bhangoji, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt.A.A.Purav, AGP for the Respondent/State. ….. CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- APRIL 1, 2021 PC : 1 This Petition has been notified as per the list of matters as received from the office of the learned Government Pleader to have become infructuous. As per the office notice dated 16th March 2021, the Advocate for the petitioner/petitioner was called upon to give a praecipe in advance in case the petition has not become infructuous. 2 It is informed on behalf of the petitioner that the petition has not become infructuous. 3 List the petition for hearing before the regular Court. (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) Gaikwad RD 1/1

Order - Status 4: Amol IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors …Respondents Mr Saurabh Pakale *, i/b PU Malgaonkar, for the Petitioner.* Ms SS Bhende, AGP *, for the Respondent-State.* CORAM G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ. DATED: 17th February 2023 PC:- 1. Issue notice to Respondents Nos. 5 and 6. Respondents Nos. 1 to 5 waive service. In addition to service through Court, private service, including by courier and email is permitted.. 2. Affidavit in Reply is to be filed by 10th March 2023. 3. List the matter on 14th March 2023. (Neela Gokhale, J) (G. S. Patel, J) AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH Date: 2023.02.20 17:51:48 +0530

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 14th March, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/04/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 13th April, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 23/06/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: Arun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through School Education & Sports Dept & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through School Education & Sports Dept & Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through School Education & Sports Dept & Ors …Respondents ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2023.08.05 15:12:20 +0530 Mr Saurabh Pakale *, i/b Padmaja U Malgaonkar, for the Petitioner.* Mrs AA Purav, AGP *, for State.* Mr Onkar Wable *, i/b Milind Deshmukh, for Respondents Nos. 5 & 6.* Digitally signed by CORAM G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ. DATED: 4th August 2023 PC:- 1. We will require an answer as to the refusal on page 27. Prima facie we are not satisfied that either of these grounds for refusal of the appointment can be sustained. Undoubtedly, every school needs a sport teacher. Whether that sport teacher is described as such or as a trained teacher makes to us no difference at all. We are also unable to see what procedure can be said not to have been followed in the appointment of the trained teacher. 2. The learned AGP will take instructions. 3. List the matter on 9th August 2023. (Neela Gokhale, J) (G. S. Patel, J)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 9th August, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 17/10/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1690 OF 2023 Mr. Ashok B. Kolte •• Petitioner. WRIT PETITION NO.1690 OF 2023 Mr. Ashok B. Kolte Petitioner. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Others Respondents. WKII PEIIIION NO.1091 OF 2023 WITH •• Petitioner. WRIT PETITION NO.1691 OF 2023 Mr. Ajit B.Barve Petitioner. v/s. - The State of Maharashtra & Others Respondents. WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2023 WITH Detitioner •• WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2023 Mr. Santosh Pakale with Mr. Abhishek Karnik and Mr.Nilesh Desai, for the Petitioner in all the Petitions. The State of Maharashtra & Others .. Respondents. Ms. A.A. Purav, AGP for Respondent-State in all the Petitions. CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2023. P.C:- The learned AGP seeks further time in the matter to file Affidavit-in-Reply. 2 Stand over to 3rd October, 2023. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA ,J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE,J.) 904-wp-1690-2023.doc S.R.JOSHI 1 of 1 Signed by: Smita R. Joshi Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 04/09/2023 19:02:19

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents SHARAD PATIL Digitally signed by SHARAD PATIL Date: 2024.02.14 11:01:07 +0530 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Amol Janrao and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Ajit Barve and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioner in all Petitions. Ms. A.A. Purav AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Respondent No. 5. .…... ……. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M.SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 8 FEBRUARY 2024 P.C.: . All these Writ Petitions are circulated with the preacipe that they are connected with Writ Petition No. 8926 of 2023. Learned counsel for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No. 8926 of 2023 is not informed and he is also not aware whether these Petitions are identical or not. Remove from Board. Liberty to file fresh preacipe. (M.M.SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 21st February, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 15/04/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res Nos. 5 & 6 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 26th March, 2024 P.C. : Stand over to 02/04/2024 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 2nd April, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 28/06/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 2nd April, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 04/04/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 27: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res Nos. 5 & 6 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 4th April, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 06/05/2024 ( for directions). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res Nos. 5 & 6 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 4th April, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 06/05/2024 ( for passing orders). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Saurabh Pakale, Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b Ms. Padmaja Umesh Malgaonkar for Petitioner Ms. Pooja Joshi-Deshpande, AGP for State-Res Nos. 1 to 4 Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Res No. 5 in all WPS CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 4th April, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 06/05/2024 ( for passing orders). ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 31: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Deptt. & Ors. ... Respondents with WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Deptt. & Ors. ... Respondents with WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Deptt. & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioners in both Petitions Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the Respondent No.5 Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent – State in WP 1690/23 Ms. Pooja Joshi Deshpande, AGP for the Respondent – State in WP 1691/23 and 1692/23 CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 29 APRIL 2024 P.C. :- It is the contention of the Petitioner that the Deputy Director of Education could not have taken review of the earlier approvals granted and such review is only on exceptional grounds such as fraud, misrepresentation and collusion. After the matter was closed for orders, it is noticed that certain factual clarification is required from the State. A show cause notice in all these Petitions is also issued to the erstwhile Education Officer who is named in the show cause notice and subject of the show cause notice is regarding the orders passed by this Education Officer. Therefore, though the reply affidavit has been filed, it does not explain as to why a show cause notice is issued to the Education Officer and whether the orders passed by this Education Officer have been taken in review because of collusion. The State will have to file reply as to whether there was any allegation of collusion between the Respondent – Management and the Education Officer. Stand over to 8 May 2024. M.M. SATHAYE, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 8th May, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 14/06/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 36: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 14th June, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 05/09/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 37: 52 WP-1690-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents HUSENBASHA Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date: 2024.07.04 14:23:21 +0530 RAHAMAN NADAF WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents *** Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Ms. Padmaja Malgaonkar, for Petitioner . Mr. S.B. Kalel AGP for Respondent/State in WP/1690/2023 and WP/1691/2023. *** Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for Respondent/State in WP/1692/2023. CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 3 JULY 2024 P.C.: . Papers of the Petitions are not placed before the Court. The learned AGP seeks further time. The Registry will ensure that papers are placed before the Court on the next date, failing which to take necessary steps for reconstruction. Stand over to 24 July 2024. Reply to be filed by 18 July 2024. ( M.M. SATHAYE, J.) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 41: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 5th August, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 19/09/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 42: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE, JJ DATE : 19th August, 2024 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 22/11/2024 In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 43: 35.WP.1690.2023 - B.doc ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Digitally signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2024.09.04 17:46:01 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao … Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents. Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai i/b. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioners in all Petitions. Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the Respondent No. 5 in all Writ Petitions. Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for Respondents – State in all Writ Petitions. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATED : 4 SEPTEMBER 2024 P.C.: We had called upon the State to file additional affidavit to point out whether there was any case of fraud, collusion or misrepresentation which had led to passing of the impugned order by the Deputy Director of Education The collusion if at all, would be between the Respondent-Management and the Education Officer. Therefore, it was expected that the reply was to be filed by the Deputy Director of Education. Instead, it is the Deputy Education Inspector has filed the reply and has avoided to mention anything about collusion between the Respondent – Management and the concerned Education Officer. The affidavit should be by the Deputy Director of Education, who is further directed to explain whether any departmental action is initiated or pending against the concerned Education Officer, if it is the case of collusion. Let the affidavit be filed by the Deputy Director of Education by 18 September 2024. Stand over to 20 September 2024. (M. M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)

Order - Status 47: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE :- 16th OCTOBER, 2024 P.C :- At the time of rising at 6.30 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be To be listed in the listed on category 20 – 31 14.11.2024 Interim Applications 9 to 17 19.11.2024 Fresh Admissions 8, 32 to 50 2.12.2024 Due Category 51 to 70 3.12.2024 71 to 95 4.12.2024 96 to 118 5.12.2024 119 to 143 6.12.2024 (except Sr. Nos.45, 56, 76, 141 & 142) (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Husen

Order - Status 48: .. 1 .. common order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. Date :- 19th NOVEMBER, 2024 Per Court :- At the time of rising at 5.45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 51 to 63 27/11/2024 Fresh Admission 66 to 69, 71 27/11/2024 Fresh Admission 72 & 73 14/12/2024 For Admission 76 to 79, 81, 83 to 92 28/11/2024 Urgent Admission 93 to 95 29/11/2024 Interim Application Order 96 to 102 24/02/2025 Due Admission 104 to 135 2 Due Admission 136 to 146 25/02/2025 common order 104 to 135 24/02/2025 Due Admission 136 to 146 25/02/2025 Due Admission 148 to 160 25/02/2025 Due Admission 161 to 189 26/02/2025 Due Admission 191 to 204 27/02/2025 Due Admission 206 to 221 27/02/2025 Due Admission 224 to 254 256 to 275 28/02/2025 28/02/2025 Due Admission Due Admission 276 to 277 16/12/2024 Final hearing (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Harish Signed by: Harish V. Chaudhari Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 22/11/2024 18:05:15

Order - Status 51: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maha. Thr. School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors ....RESPONDENT Mr. Suresh Pakale, Sr. Adv. a/w Mr. Nilesh Desai & Ms. Netra Tembe for the Petitioner Adv. K. S. Thorat, B. Pnl & Adv. N. M. Mehra, AGP for the State - Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ DATE : 4th December, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 10/12/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 53: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1690 OF 2023 Ashok Baban Kolte. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1691 OF 2023 Ajit Bansilal Barve. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1692 OF 2023 Amol Bhimrao Janrao. … Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. **** Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Nilesh Desai, Ms. Netra Tembe, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.S. Thorat, 'B' Panel Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4./State. Mr. Milind Deshmukh, for Respondent No. 5. **** CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 10th DECEMBER, 2024 P.C. : We have considered the submissions of the learned Advocates for the respective sides. Save and except, a bald statement that there are irregularities and illegalities committed in the appointment of these Petitioners, we hardly find any material before us, which could substantiate the stand taken by the Deputy Director Education. Moreover, a report has been submitted by Shri Rajesh Kshirsagar, Deputy Director Education-cum-Authorised Officer Education, office of the Divisional Education, Pune that there are no irregularities and the appointments of these Petitioners appear to be in order. However, he further concludes that the provisions of the MEPS Act, 1977 and MEPS Rules, 1981 have not been strictly followed. The issue before us is as to whether these Petitioners who have been working for more than 12 years, can be disturbed or dislodged on account of some irregularities that might have been committed by the Management. If that be so, since the Management is whole and sole incharge of carrying out recruitment process, the issue would turn upon the Management. However, no affidavit in reply has yet been filed by the Management i.e. Rayat Shikshan Sanstha. In view of the above, we grant time to the Management to file a common affidavit in reply in the first Petition and explain as to whether there were any irregularities and if at all some irregularities are noticed, whether we should attribute the same to the conduct of the Management. Let the reply be filed on or before 10th January, 2025. List this Petition on 22nd January, 2025, to be called out after the fresh admissions board is over. Interim protection granted to these Petitioners would continue until disposal of these Petitions, which we intend to do on the next date. Unpaid salaries of these Petitioners from the dates of the impugned orders, shall be paid to the Petitioners prior to the next date in the matter and the regular salary would also be paid. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Digitally signed by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date: 2024.12.13 19:29:44 +0530

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2361 OF 2024 Smt. Jayashree Deepak Irale … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents Mr. Rushikesh Barge for the Petitioner. Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, APP for the Respondent No. 2 – State. CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATE : 18 th JUNE, 2024. P.C.:- Heard. Perused the Petition. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 15th July, 2024. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1- State waives the notice and seeks time to file reply. Stand over to 15th July, 2024. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)

Order - Status 5: Rane 1/1 6.6.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan …..Petitioner V/s. Pappu Babu Pinjari and Ors. ….Respondents **** Mr. Rajesh S. Datar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. Thursday, 6th June, 2019. P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 25th June, 2019. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....Petitioner V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....Respondent Adv. Rajesh Sudhakar Datar For Petitioner Adv. K. K. M. for Res No. 2 CORAM : SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE, J DATE : 10th July, 2019 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on board. Place the petition on 07/08/2019. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: 2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan … Petitioner Vs Pappu Babu Pinjari and Ors. ... Respondents … Mr. Rajesh S. Datar for the Petitioner. Mr. Kishor K. Malpathak for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J. DATE : AUGUST 7, 2019 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on board. Liberty to move the Court as sought is granted. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan .. Petitioner Versus Anil @ Bala Ghag & Anr. .. Respondents ................... Mr. Akshay J. Kondorkar i/by Mr. Rajesh S. Datar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Gautam J. Jain h/f Mr. Prathmesh Gokhale, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Kishor K. Malpathak, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : MARCH 03 2021. ................... P.C.: At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, place the matter on board on 17.03.2021. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ravindra M. Amberkar Digitally signed by Ravindra M. Amberkar Date: 2021.03.03 17:25:32 +0530

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ...Petitioner vs. Pappu Babu Pinjari and Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Rajesh S. Datar for Petitioner. Ms. Rajlaxmi Punjabi i/b Mr. Prathamesh Gokhale for Respondent No.1. Mr. K. K. Malpathak for Respondent No.2. CORAM : AMIT B. BORKAR, J. DATE : 26 NOVEMBER 2021 P.C. : Arguable questions are raised. Hence Rule. Petitioner, a decree-holder, has filed an application under Execution proceedings seeking various relief against the owner. However, the said application came to be rejected by the impugned order. Petitioner has therefore filed the present petition challenging the order of rejection of reliefs by the Executing Court. Considering the facts disclosed on record and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, it appears that respondent No.2, who is a developer has no regard for the orders passed by the Court. In Regular Civil Suit No.690/2010, the trial Court had passed a decree as under: Suit is decreed with costs as follows: a] It is hereby ordered and decreed that plaintiff is entitled to get flat admeasuring 450 sq. ft. on second floor of the building to be constructed over property Tika No.13 owned by defendant No.1 and on such construction, defendant to deliver the vacant possession thereof to the plaintiff. b] Decree be drawn up accordingly. Against the said decree, respondent No.2, a developer, filed a Civil Appeal on 116/2015. While granting a stay to the decree, the learned lower Appellate Court imposed the following condition on respondent No.2. "1) The judgment and decree passed in RCS No.690/2010 as well as execution proceeding bearing Special Darkhast No.31/2019 filed for executing said decree, both are stayed subject to following condition: a] Appellant/original defendant No.2 is directed to reserve a flat admeasuring 450 sq. ft on the 2nd floor of the building being constructed over the suit property by obtaining necessary permission thereof from Planning Authority and submit the written undertaking to that effect on or before 20/6/2019." Inspite aforesaid order, during the pendency of the present petition, Respondent No.2 filed an affidavit dated 5/8/2019 stating that respondent No.2 agreed to earmark flat ad-measuring 450 sq. ft. carpet area on the 3rd floor of the property. During arguments, Mr. Malpathak appearing for respondent No.2, submitted that respondent No.2 has alienated flats on the 2nd floor of the building after filing the aforesaid affidavit. 3/4 The Supreme Court in Prestige Lights Ltd. v. State Bank of India 1 , has observed as follows: "An order passed by a competent Court - interim or final - has to be obeyed without any reservation. If such order is disobeyed or not complied with, the Court may refuse the party violating such order to hear him on merits. We are not unmindful of the situation that refusal to hear a party to the proceeding on merits is a 'drastic step' and such a serious penalty should not be imposed on him except in grave and extraordinary situations, but some time such an action is needed in the larger interest of justice when a party obtaining interim relief intentionally and deliberately flouts such order by not abiding the terms and conditions on which a relief is granted by the Court in his favour." The Supreme Court has succinctly held that a drastic measure to show the doors to the litigant can very well be resorted to in grave and extraordinary circumstances. A party who disobeys the orders of the Court cannot take advantage of its disobedience. The facts stated above prima facie show contemptuous conduct of the respondent No.2 developer of having no regard to the order of the lower appellate Court referred in para 3 of this order. In such a situation, to maintain the majesty of justice, the following interim order shall meet the ends of justice: ORDER 1(2007) 8 SCC 449 i) Respondent Nos. 2 is directed to deliver possession of flat admeasuring 450 sq. ft. on the 2nd floor of the building constructed over property Tika No.13 within one month from today. It is made clear that if respondent No.2 fails to comply with the interim order, the petitioner decree-holder will be at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings, including filing a petition under the Contempt of Court Act. At this stage, learned counsel seeks to stay to this order. However, considering the respondent's conduct having willfully breached the order of the lower Appellate Court, the request for a stay of this order is rejected. (AMIT B. BORKAR, J)

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 17th March, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 12/06/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 17: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 6457 of 2019 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Sham Singh is present for the petitioner. CORAM : H. M. BHOSALE REGISTRAR (JUDL-I) Date : 28/04/2023 Mr. Rajesh S. Datar, Advocate for the petitioner has filed a preacipe dated 03/04/2023 seeking discharge from the present petition as an advocate for the petitioner. He has further stated that he has already returned all the papers to the petitioner and acknowledgment thereof is placed on record. Today, learned advocate Mr. Sham sing is present on behalf of the petitioner. He submits that he has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner. In the circumstances, Mr. Rajesh S. Datar, advocate for the petitioner is discharged from the present petition. Office to take necessary entry regarding change of Advocate for the petitioner in CIS system. Sd/- Registrar (Judicial-I)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO. 12592 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam Singh for Petitioner Mr. Girish Godbole, Sr. Adv. a/w Mr. Sandeep Mishra i/by Mr. Ganesh Jha for R. no. 1 Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. P. S. Gautam for Intervenor CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR J DATE : 8th June, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 23/06/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO. 12592 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 30th August, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 13/09/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO. 12592 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 13th September, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 31/10/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: VRJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan … Petitioner V/s. Anil Alias Bala Ghag & Anr. … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST.) NO.12592 OF 2023 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari (Through Legal Heir of Deceased Papamiya Bapu Pinjari) … Intervener In the matter between Irfan Sayeed Khan ... Petitioner V/s. Anil Alias Bala Ghag … Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan … Petitioner V/s. Pappu Babu Pinjari & Anr. … Respondents Mr. Shyam K. Singh for the petitioner in WP and CP. Mr. Gautam Pyarelal for the Intervener. Mr. G. S. Godbole, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Mishra i/by Mr. Ganesh Jha for respondent No.1. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 30, 2023 P.C.: Learned advocate for the contemnor seeks time to file reply. To enable him to file reply, stand over to 6 th November 2023, under the caption "for circulation". (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 27: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner in CP/453/2022. Mr. P.S. Gautam for Intervenor in IA/17067/2013 Mr. Girish S. Godbole, Sr. Adv. i/b Mr. Gangesh Jha for Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 6th November, 2023 P.C. : S. O. to 28/11/2023 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 28th November, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/12/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 31: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 5th December, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 13/12/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 13th December, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/03/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 33: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner. Mr. Gangesh Jha for Respondent No. 1 n CP/453/22. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 10th January, 2024 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Respondent , stand over to 29/01/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 35: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Shyam K Singh for petitioner CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 29th January, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 26/02/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 38: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT Mr. Shyam K. Singh for Petitioner CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 26th February, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 15/04/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 41: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 15th April, 2024 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 19/08/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 43: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 453 OF 2022 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Anil @ Bala Ghag ....RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6457 OF 2019 Irfan Sayeed Khan ....PETITIONER V/S Pappu Babu Pinjari And Anr ....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17067 OF 2023 In Cont. Petition 453 OF 2022 Mansoor Papamiya Pinjari ....PETITIONER V/S Airfan Sayeed Khan ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV J DATE : 19th August, 2024 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 29/11/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )