All First Appeal

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 998 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.16135 OF 2017 Balu Waman Alhat …Applicant Versus Union of India through the General Manager …Respondents Mr.Kuldip Singh for the applicant. CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J. DATE : 7 th MARCH 2019. P.C. : Issue notice to respondents, returnable on 22nd March 2019. In addition to the regular mode, the applicant is permitted to serve through other modes as are permissible in law and file affidavit of service accordingly. [PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.]

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.998 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16135 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None Present. CORAM : V.R. KACHARE REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 19th March, 2019 Returnable date is extended by 6 weeks. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm – R(J­II) – 19.03.19

Order - Status 9: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.998 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.16135 OF 2017 Mr. Balu Waman Alhat ...Applicant Versus Union of India Through The General Manager ...Respondent ...... None for the Applicant. ...... CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : AUGUST 29th, 2019 P.C. 1 None for the Applicant. By this Civil Application, Applicant/Claimant is seeking condonation of 647 days delay in filing First Appeal, challenging the Judgment and Award dated 16th April 2015 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal Mumbai in Original Application No. OA 1044 of 2010. When the matter is called out, no one appeared on behalf of the Applicant hence, dismissed for non prosecution. (K.K.TATED, J.) 1/1

Order - Status 2: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA STAMP NO. 1531 OF 2017 In FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 28419 OF 2016 Smt. Meera Ganesh Khude And Anr. Applicant V/S Respondent Chief Officer Bharti Axa General Insurance Company Ltd. Through Mr. Ashwin Kumar Gawai Manager Legal Ajay A Joshi For Applicant CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J DATE : 20th September, 2017 P.C. : Not on board. Taken on production board, by way of praecipe. Registry note shows that matter is under search. No orders. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: Trupti p513-fast-2841-16.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2947 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 28419 OF 2016 Smt. Meera Ganesh Khude and Anr. …Applicants Versus Chief Officer, Bharti AXA General Insurance Company Ltd. …Respondent Mr.Vilas B. Tapkir h/f. Mr.Ajay A. Joshi for the Applicants. Mr.Rahul Mehta i/b. KMC Legal Venture for the original Appellant in FA (St.) No. 28419 of 2016. …… …... CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 P.C. : Upon urgent mentioning, taken on Production Board. This Application is moved for withdrawal of an amount deposited by the insurance company/original appellant pursuant to the judgment and award dated 16.02.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara, in M.A.C.P. No. 673 of 2010. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are the wife and minor daughter of the deceased. He submitted that till today, the applicants have not received any amount, except no fault liability. The learned counsel for the insurance company opposed this application and submitted that the insurance company has filed the appeal on the ground of quantum and the deceased was gratuitous licencee. In view of the submissions and the reasons mentioned in the application, the applicants are allowed to withdraw 50% amount of the compensation on an usual undertaking. The remaining amount is to be deposited in the fixed deposit in any nationalized bank. Civil Application is allowed and is accordingly disposed of. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal From Order no.8l of 2006 with Civil Application No.88 of 2006 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge's Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court's Orders & Directors and Registrar's Order Mr P.S.Dani for appellants CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. DATED 2.2.2006 P.C. . Issue notice returnable on 2.5.2006 . In addition, the appellants shall serve the concerned respondents by advocate's notice, either personally or by courier/speed post/ e-mail/fax and file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. . Status quo with regard to the suit property to be maintained by the parties till 2.5.2006.

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.81 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.88 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memorandum Court's or Judge's of Coram appearance, court's Orders. orders or direction and Prothonotery's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------ CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : 18TH APRIL, 2006. P.C. : Matter was called out in the morning session when request for keeping back the matter is made at the instance of Mr.Dani. But due to paucity of time, it will not be possible to take up this matter today. Stand over to 8th June, 2006. Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till then.

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.81 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.88 OF 2006 Shri Katch Kadva Patidar Samaj Panvel ... Appellant Vs. Pen Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. P.S. Dani for the Appellant. Mr. G.S. Godbole for the respondent No.2. CORAM : : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : : 8TH JUNE, 2006. P.C.: - Heard counsel for the parties. After hearing counsel for the parties, I was inclined to place this matter for final disposal. However, counsel for Respondent No.2 submits that instead of keeping the matter pending before this court, Respondent No.2 is willing to abide by the arrangement that he will not create any third party interest in the suit property or for that matter in the structure to be erected on the suit plot by him till the disposal of the suit pending before the trial court. Respondent No.2, however, submits through counsel that the construction of the structure may not be interdicted on condition that the same will be done by Respondent No.2 entirely at his risk, costs and consequences and Respondent No.2 shall not claim any equity whatsoever at the later stage of the proceedings. Respondent No.2 undertakes through counsel before this Court that in the event the Appellant succeeds before the trail court and if the trial court so directs, Respondent No.2 shall forthwith remove the structure at his own costs and consequences. Respondent No.2 is present in the court and has instructed his advocate to make this statement. The arrangement suggested by Respondent No.2, in my opinion, is a fair arrangement. In the circumstances, instead of going into the contentions which have been raised in the present appeal, in my opinion, it is in the interest of justice to accept the offer given by Respondent No.2 and direct the trial court to decide the suit expeditiously in any case by end of December, 2006. Parties through their counsel assure before this court that they will extend full cooperation for early disposal of the suit and will not seek adjournment on any count whatsoever. The order passed by the trial court stands modified to the above extent. Appeal and accompanying civil application is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3261 OF 2005. IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2490 OF 2004. IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18649 OF 2004. Mr.Rajesh Vinayak Sawant : : Complainant versus Shri Ramachandra Ganesh Barve : : Respondent/. & ors. Applicants. Mr.S.B.Shetye for the Appellant/Complainant Ms.Pallavi Joshi i/by R.Bhargavan for Respondent No.2/Applicant. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 13th September 2005. ORAL ORDER This application is filed by the original respondent for setting aside the order dated 10th 1 June 2005 which came to be passed in the application for condonation of delay and by which the delay was condoned. Counsel for the responden,t now applicant in this application, contended that even though the respondents were served, there advocate was busy some-where-else and, therefore, that order was required to be set aside. This is not a ground for setting aside the order. In any case that order was passed on merits in that application. It is open to the applicant/respondent to challenge that order in the appropriate proceedings. This civil application is dismissed. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J]

Order - Status 4: ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1967 OF 2007 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.P.N.Joshi for the appellant. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 25th July, 2007 P.C. Issue notice, returnable within two weeks. The private notice is also permitted. [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE FIRST APPEAL NO.1967 OF 2007 (SERIAL NOS.45) Coram : Anoop V.Mohta,J Date : 8th August, 2007. PC After service. (Anoop V.Mohta,J)

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET FIRST APPEAL NO.1967 OF 2007 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.P.N.Joshi for the Appellant CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 30,2007. P.C.: Admit. Hearing is expedited. Printing is dispensed with. The Appellant to implead Gram Panchyat,Dahegaon as a party Respondent. Requisite number of copies of Private Paperbooks along with Decree Forms shall be filed by the Appellant within a period of one year from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to the court. JUDGE