All First Appeal

Order - Status 5: CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2526 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2527 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL (stamp) NO. 16905 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. Arjun H. Patil for the Applicant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 18th February, 2011. P.C. 1 Rule, returnable on 21st April, 2011. 2 There will be adinterim relief of stay of execution and operation of the impugned judgment and order subject to condition of the Applicant depositing in this Court the entire compensation amount within a period of six weeks from today. If compliance is not made by depositing the compensation amount within the stipulated time, adinterim relief of stay will stand vacated without further reference to the Court. [ A.S.OKA, J ]

Order - Status 10: ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2526 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL (stamp) NO. 16905 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. Arjun H. Patil for the Applicant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 08th July, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. None appears for the Respondent though the notice is duly served. There is no reply filed to the application. 2 Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). [ A.S.OKA, J ]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 651 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1992 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra & Anr..... Applicants. Versus Devidas Gangaram Gavhane & Ors...... Respondents. Mr. K.K.Tated, AGP for the Applicants. None for the Respondents. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 14TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C.: Issue Court notice to the respondents, returnable on 26th September, 2007. In addition to the other modes of service, liberty to serve by Registered Post A. D. as well as humdast granted. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk FIRST APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2016 Mr. Farogh Ahd. Zahor Ahd. Ansari Appellant Vs. M/s. Kataria Transport Co. Ltd. & Anr. Respondents Mr. Abhay A. Jadhavar i/b Ashok B. Tajane for the Appellant. CORAM : DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J. DATE : 26th AUGUST, 2016. P. C. : Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Admit. The appellant to furnish the private paper book within one year from the date of this order. Copy thereof be served on the respondents. After the private paper book is filed, the appeal be fixed for hearing as per CMIS date. [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]

Order - Status 7: Vidya Amin FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL No. 449 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, inces, Court's Court's or Judge's orders orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. Ashok B. Tajane, Advocate for the appellant. CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: 26th September, 2017. P.C.: The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that respondent No. 1 is served by publication. He further prays to extend the time to file paper book. Time to file private paper book is extended by one month from today. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2016 Mr. Farogh Ahd. Zahoor Ahd. Ansari V/S Appellant Adv.Y.G.Thorat i/by Ashok B. Tajane For Appellant Rupam Ghosh For Respondent No. 2 (vp Filed Before Admission) R.no.2 Is Duly Served Through Court Notice For Respondent CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J DATE : 21st March, 2018 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the Appellant, Stand 28/03/2018 and tagged with caa(st)8671/2018. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 11: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.449 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate Kavita Shinde i/by Advocate A.B. Tajane Present for Appellant. CORAM : V.R. KACHARE REGISTRAR (JUDL – II) Date : 24th September, 2018 3 weeks time is granted to supply copy of Newspaper. sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm – R(J­II) – 24.09.2018

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2016 Mr. Farogh Ahd. Zahoor Ahd. Ansari … Appellant V/s M/s Kataria Transport Co. Ltd. And Anr. … Respondents Mr. Sharad Bhosale i/b Mr. Ashok B. Tajane, for the Appellant. CORAM : V. G. BISHT, J. DATED : 13TH JANUARY, 2020. P.C. Place this matter under the caption of " For Final Hearing" on 27th February, 2020. ( V. G. BISHT, J.)

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2016 Mr. Farogh Ahd. Zahoor Ahd. Ansari ....Appellant V/S M/s. Kataria Transport Co. Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent Mr Y G Thorat h/for Mr Ashok B Tajane, Advocate For Appellant CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J DATE : 27th February, 2020 P.C. : Mentioned at 2.00 p.m. At the request of the Advocate for the Appellant, place the matter on Board for hearing on 05/03/2020. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2016 Mr. Farogh Ahd. Zahoor Ahd. Ansari ....Appellant V/S M/s. Kataria Transport Co. Ltd. And Anr. ....Respondent CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J DATE : 5th March, 2020 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 02/04/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.449 OF 2016 Farogh Ahd. Zahoor Ahd. Ansari ] Appellant Vs. M/s. Kataria Transport Co. Ltd. ] and another ] Respondents ..... Mr. Akshay Kashid i/b Mr. Ashok B. Tajane, for Appellant. None for the Respondents. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 4th FEBRUARY. 2021. P.C. This is an appeal for enhancement of the claim awarded by M.A.C.T, Mumbai. ….. It is contended that despite a claim to the tune of Rs.20,00,000/-, the learned Tribunal has granted only an amount of Rs.5,93,487/-. The appeal has already been admitted on 26th August, 2016. The appellant had also filed a paper book. In that view of the matter, list the appeal on the board of "Final Hearing" in the week commencing from 15th March, 2021. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2016 Mr. Farogh Ahd. Zahoor Ahd. ….Appellants Ansari V/s. M/s. Kataria Transport Co. Ltd. and another …..Respondents Mr. Y. G. Thorat i/b Mr. Ashok Tajane for the Appellants None for Respondents CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE: JULY 14, 2021. P.C.: 1] None for the appellants. Prayer for listing the appeal for fnal hearing will be considered once the physical hearing commences. [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]

Order - Status 23: SALGAONKAR M M Digitally signed by SALGAONKAR M Date: 2022.03.30 20:37:46 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.449 OF 2016 Farogh Ahd. Zahoor Ahd. Ansari .. Appellant Versus M/s. Kataria Transport Co. Ltd. & Anr. .. Respondents … ... Mr.Y.G.Thorat i/b Mr.Ashok B. Tajane for the Appellant. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 29th MARCH, 2022 P.C:- The appeal, being admitted on 26/08/2016, is ready for final hearing. The Registry has notified that R & P is reeeieed, but without paper-book. The learned Adeoeate for the appellant has already filed a prieate paper-book on 13/10/2017. Sinee the respondents are duly sereed and respondent No.2 is represented by Adeoeate Rupam Ghosh, list the appeal for final hearing on 04/05/2022 at 2.30 p.m. ( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

Order - Status 25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.449 of 2016 Farogh and Zahoor and Ansari .. Appellant Versus M/s.Kataria Transport Co.Ltd and Anr .. Respondents … Mr. Ashok Tajane for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 4 th MAY 2022. P.C:- 1 Appeal is slated for final hearing. However, none appear for the contesting respondents. As far as Insurance Company is concerned, vakalatnama is filed by Rupam Ghosh, but Mr.Tajane, learned counsel for the appellant state that when he had telephonic talk with her, she had specifically informed that she had returned the papers to the Insurance Company. 2 In wake of the above, issue fresh notice to respondent no.2, intimating that the Appeal shall be taken for hearing on 4/7/2022 at 2.30 p.m in wake of the urgency expressed on behalf of the appellant. 3 Mr.Tajane is also at liberty to inform about the said order to any counsel of Oriental Insurance Company who normally represent the Company. ( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.449 OF 2016 Mr. Farogh Ahmed Zahoor Ahmed Ansari … Appellant Versus M/s. Kataria Transport Co. Ltd. and Anr. … Respondents .... None for the Appellant and for the Respondents. .... CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. (HEAD OF THE PANEL) Y.A. GOSWAMI, REGISTRAR (CPC), MEMBER H.V. KULKARNI, DEPUTY REGISTRAR, MEMBER DATE : 13th AUGUST, 2022 P.C. : None appears for the parties. Transfer to the Regular Court. (H.V. KULKARNI) (Y.A.GOSWAMI) (SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J)

Order - Status 29: Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.449 OF 2016 Farogh Ahd. Zahoor Ahd. Ansari … Appellant V/s. Kataria Transport Co. Ltd and Anr … Respondents Mr. Ashok Tajane for the appellant. Ms. S.S. Dwivedi for respondent No.2. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JANUARY 25, 2023 P.C.: List the first appeal "for final hearing" on the board commencing from 6 th February, 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2016 Mr. Farogh Ahd. Zahoor Ahd. Ansari, Age, - 48 years, Resident of F/8, 666 Tenements Compound Mumbai – 400011 ) ) ) ) Appellant Versus 1. M/s. Kataria Transport Co. Ltd., ) A-28, Suvidha Estate, ) Gandhinagar, bavla Highwa, ) Surkhej, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. ) 2. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ) 7, J. T. Road, Churchgate, ) Mumbai – 400 020. )Respondents (Policy No. 141700-2007/8927) ) Valid from 31/02/2007 to 20/03/2008 ) Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for the Appellant. Ms. Sneha Dwivedi for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J. DATE : 17th FEBRUARY 2023. JUDGMENT : Heard learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. Shantanu Dhudum 228-FA449-2016.doc Both learned counsel submits that both the parties have settled the matter. The respondent no. 2-insurance company is ready to pay Rs. 34 Lakh as compensation to the appellant excluding the amount already deposited before the MACT, Mumbai in MACP No. 3476 of 2007 as per the order dated 19/07/2014. This amount of Rs.34 Lakh would be without interest, it excludes the compensation awarded by the MACT, Mumbai. Learned counsel for appellant agrees for it. The claimant who is present in the Court also agrees for the same. In view of the submission of both learned counsel and the appellant/claimant, I pass the following order: ORDER i. Appeal is allowed. ii. The respondent no. 2-insurance company shall deposit amount of Rs. 34 Lakhs before the Tribunal within two weeks from today. iii. The appellant is permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by the respondent no. 2 insurance company as award amount granted by the tribunal along with accrued interest thereon and the amount of Rs. 34 Lakhs. The Appeal stands disposed of. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. (S. G. DIGE, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 194 OF 2008 Vinay Prahaladrai Poddar ... Appellant versus Mrs. Rachana Vinay Poddar ...Respondent Mr. V.S. Kapse for the appellant. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2008 . P.C. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks some time for depositing cost imposed by this Court as per the order dated 23 rd September, 2008. The amount of cost to be deposited before the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority be deposited on or before 24 th October, 2008. Adjourned to 12 th November, 2008. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.

Order - Status 15: pmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.194 OF 2008 Mr. Vinay Prahaladrai Poddar … Appellant V/s. Mrs. Rachana Vinay Poddar … Respondent Mr. V.S. Kapse, for the Appellant. Mr. Harish R. Pawar, for Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 15th APRIL, 2014 P.C. . The Consent Terms duly signed by the Appellant and the Respondent and their respective Advocates are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Appellant and Respondent are personally present. Through their respective counsel they state that they have carefully read the terms and conditions incorporated in the Consent Terms and they accept the correctness thereof. The Appellant has handed over to the Respondent, a Banker's cheque in the sum of Rs.8 lakhs in terms of clause 3 of the Consent Terms. By accepting the undertakings in the Consent Terms, we dispose of the Appeal in terms of Consent Terms. Hence, we pass the following order : ORDER (i) The undertakings in the Consent Terms marked "X" for identification are accepted; (ii) The impugned Judgment and Decree dated 17th December, 2007 in Petition No.A811 of 2006 is hereby quashed and set aside and the said Petition No.A818 of 2007 is restored; (iii) By consent, the said Petition is converted into a Petition under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Amendment shall relate back to the date of the institution of the said Petition; (iv) The parties have agreed that reconciliation is not possible and in view of the differences between them, the dissolution for the marriage is the only solution; (v) Accordingly in Petition No.A818 of 2007, there shall be decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The marriage solemnised between the Appellant and Respondent dated 13th February, 2001 is hereby dissolved by the decree of divorce; (vi) The Appeal is disposed of on above terms and in terms of the Consent Terms. There will be no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J ) (A.S.OKA, J )

Order - Status 6: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's Memoranda of Coram, orders appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders ------------------------------------------------------ Mr. D.R. Tiwari for appellant-wife. Mr. S.C. Thatte for respondent-husband. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, & D.B. BHOSALE,JJ. 18/07/2008. P.C.: . Heard Mr. Tiwari the learned counsel for the appellant-wife. . Admit. . Mr. Thatte waives service for the respondent-husband. . Appeal to be heard with FCA No. 66 of 2008. (D.B. Bhosale,J.) (B.H.Marlapalle,J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (St) NO.13209 of 2019 Anand Baban Khedkar Appellant vs Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar Respondent Mr.Amijith Anandhan I.b.Mr,.Sachin Pawar for Appellant. CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J DATE : 22nd JULY, 2019 P.C Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. Issue notice to the Respondent returnable on 19.8.2019. In addition to Court's notice, learned counsel for the Appellant to serve the Respondent by private notice. [M.S.KARNIK,J]

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ....Appellant V/S Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ....Respondent CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 17th September, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 22/11/2019 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ....Appellant V/S Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ....Respondent Adv.Sachin R,Pawar for Appellant CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J DATE : 14th October, 2019 P.C. : At the request of learned advocate for the petitioners / respondent / applicant , Stand over to 11/11/2019 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ....Appellant V/S Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ....Respondent Mr.Apmjit M.A. a/w Mr.L.R.Kewat for Appellant. Vilas Babanrao Tapkir Vp For Sole Res. For CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J DATE : 5th February, 2020 P.C. : Stand over to 06/02/2020 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: Tandle IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 13209 OF 2019 Ananda Baban Khedkar ... Appellant Versus Yashwant Tatyaba Daundkar ... Respondent. Mr. Sachin R. Pawar for the Appellant. Mr. V. B. Tapkir for the Respondent. - - - - - - - CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 6th FEBRUARY, 2020 P. C. : After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant at length when this Court expressed its disinclination to grant any relief, the learned counsel, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Appeal unconditionally. Leave and liberty granted. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that, the Trial Court will not get influenced by the dismissal of the present Appeal and shall decide the suit filed by the appellant on its own merits. (A. S. GADKARI, J.)