All Civil Revision

Order - Status 3: sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre & Anr. … Applicants vs.State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. A. R. Shaikh i/b. H.E. Palwe for the Applicants. Mr. V. B. Khamkhedkar, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATE : 20th JUNE, 2017 P.C. On the application of the learned counsel for the applicant who states that Mr. Palwe is unable to attend and seeks sometime. Hence, to come up as per scheduled date. Remove from the board. (A. K. MENON, J.)

Order - Status 6: sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre & Anr. … Applicants vs.The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. H. E. Palwe for the Applicants. Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2017 P.C. Liberty to apply after the applicant surrenders. (A. K. MENON, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre And Anr ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J DATE : 20th December, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 03/02/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre and Anr. ...Applicants vs. State of Maharashtra …Respondent ***** Mr.Sudip Mallick i/b. Mr.Harshad E. Palwe – Advocate for Applicants. Mr.A.D.Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent – State. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 11th JANUARY 2024 P. C. :- This is a Revision against the concurrent finding of conviction. On 2nd August, 2017, liberty was granted to apply after surrender. Learned Advocate is short of instructions. Let him to take instructions. Stand over to 9 th February, 2024 . [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ***** Mr. Sudip Mallick i/by Harsahd E. Palwe - Advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar - APP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 09th FEBRUARY, 2024 P. C. :- The Court of the JMFC has convicted the accused personsaccused Nos. 1 and 3 for the offence punishable under Sections 326, 324 and 323 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code as per judgment dated 07/10/2014, at page no. 53. Their appeal was partly allowed by learned Sessions Judge, Nashik on 03/05/2017. The conviction of the accused nos. 1 and 3 for the offence punishable under Section 326 read with 34 was set aside. Whereas it is maintained for the offence Section 324 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused No. 3 was not directed to undergo sentence immediately but he was asked to execute the bond of good behaviour for the period of two years. That period has already expired. The following issue arisen in the revision:- (i) The legality of the sentence under Section 326 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code against accused no. 1. (ii) The legality of the sentence against accused no. 3 for the same offence. Yet revision is not admitted. Matter be kept on 08th March, 2024, after admission. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....Applicant V/S State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents … WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....Applicant V/S State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents Mr. Manish Bohra a/w Mr. Lalit Pal, Mr. Aditya Dwevedi i/b M/s. A.S. Khan & Associates for the Applicant. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent No.1-State. … … CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 24TH MAY 2023. (VACATION COURT) P.C.: 1 Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 21 June 2023. 2 The learned APP waives notice on behalf of Respondents/State. SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2023.05.24 16:37:11 +0530 (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1908 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1907 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT Mr.Manish M. Bohra i/b. M/s. A.S.Khan and Associates for Applicant Ms.M.R.Tidke APP for Respondent/State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 23rd August, 2023 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Appellant(s)/ Applicant(s) / Petitioner(s) / Respondent No. stand over to 13/09/2023. Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1908 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1907 OF 2023 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2023 ALONGWITH REVISION APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1910 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1909 OF 2023 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Manish M. Bohra - Advocate for the Applicant Mr. Santosh S. Avhad i/by Jayakar Partners - Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar – APP for the Respondent - State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 12th JANUARY 2024 P. C. :- 1. It is true that on 13/12/2023, submission by learned Advocate for the Applicant was recorded that Rs. 1 Lakh is to be paid till 12/01/2024. Only Rs. 50,000/- is paid. Whereas SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2024.01.17 11:38:32 +0530 balance amount of Rs. 1,00,000 was agreed to be paid on or before 12/02/2024. The Applicant is bedridden due to fall. He has got difficulty to pay remaining amount. 2. There is a prayer to keep this matter in second week of February so that the Applicant will clear entire arrears. 3. It is opposed on behalf of the Respondent No. 2- Complainant. 4. Now there is choice to the parties at what amount they should settle and what should be the installments. 5. Better to keep these applications for hearing on admission on 06th February, 2024 . 6. Interim relief granted earlier to continue till next date. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1908 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1907 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK J DATE : 5th March, 2024 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 08/04/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1910 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1909 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1908 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1907 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents .................... Mr. Manish Bohra, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Santosh Avhad, Advocate i/by Jayakar & Partners for Respondent No.2. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2024 P.C . : 1. Mentioned. Not on Board. Taken on Board. 2. Heard Mr. Bohra, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr. Avhad, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. 3. Perused the praecipe dated 11.12.2024. 4. Praecipe dated 11.12.2024 is filed by private Respondent who is original Complainant. This is a group of two Criminal Revision Applications namely Criminal Revision Application No.133 of 2023 and Criminal Revision Application No.134 of 2023. 5. Mr. Avhad, learned Advocate appearing for private Respondent No.2 draws my attention to order dated 13.12.2023 followed by order dated 06.02.2024. I have perused both the orders. In compliance of aforesaid twin orders, private Respondent has received a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- uptil now. He would submit that an amount of Rs.1,10,000/- has been deposited by Applicant in Trial Court pursuant to the order dated 06.02.2024. That apart, he would submit that Applicant has also deposited an amount of Rs.30,000/- i.e. Rs.15,000/- each in both the cases towards cash bail in the Trial Court. He would submit that if private Respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.1,10,000/- and Rs.30,000/- which stands deposited by Revision Applicant in the Trial Court it would meet the ends of justice. 6. Mr. Bohra, learned Advocate appears for Revision Applicant. He would submit that he has instructions to submit to the orders of the Court and would not object any Application seeking withdrawal. 7. Mr. Avhad, learned Advocate appearing for private Respondent persuaded the Court to pass an order allowing private Respondent to withdraw the aforestated amount from the Trial Court. 8. In view of the above and more specifically no objection given by Mr. Bohra on behalf of Revision Applicant, the learned Trial Court is directed to permit the withdrawal of amount of Rs.60,000/- and Rs.50,000/- deposited in the twin cases before Trial Court and amount of Rs.15,000/- each deposited towards cash bail by Applicant on the presentation of server copy of this order. 9. Trial Court shall act and ensure that private Respondent is returned the deposited money as directed above alongwith all accrued interest thereon within a period of one week from the date of server copy of this order being presented before Trial Court. Trial Court shall not insist on certified copy of this order. Once amounts are received by private Respondent, liberty to Revision Applicant to move Revision Application for further appropriate orders. 10. Stand over to 13 th January, 2025. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2024.12.11 14:43:23 +0530