Tag: Criminal Quashing Of Fir C.R.

Order - Status 5: Digitally signed by Mandira Salgaonkar Date: 2021.03.02 17:16:24 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1001 OF 2021 Srinivasan Ravindran Sarma ] Residing at A/105, Supernal Gardens, ] Dhokali Naka, Kolshet Road, ] Thane (West) – 400 607 ] Petitioner VERSUS 1. State of Maharashtra ] ] 2. Mrs.Neeta Srinivasan Sarma ] Residing at 1st Floor, 'B' Wing, ] 101, Violet Apartment, Near Janta ] Sahakari Bank, Murbad Road ] Syndicate, Kalyan (West)-421301 ] Respondents Ms.Priyanka S. Sangare for the Petitioner. Ms.Sana Hakim for Respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 present in Court. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1/State. PSI Manjusha V. Shelar, MFC Police Station present. CORAM : S.S.SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 01st MARCH, 2021 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER S.S.SHINDE, J.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, heard finally. It is common contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondent No.2 that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and to that effect, consent terms are placed on record before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 had tendered across the bar, affidavit of respondent No.2. Same is taken on record. In the said affidavit, details of the settlement are averred. Respondent No.2 is present before the Court. She has been identified by her counsel. She has stated that it is her voluntary act to enter into such settlement and pray for quashing of the impugned FIR and proceedings arising out of the said FIR, in view of the consent terms filed before the court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another 1 has held that, the criminal cases having overwhelmingly and predominatingly civil flavour stand on a different footing for the purposes of quashing, particularly the offences arising from commercial, financial, mercantile, civil, partnership or such like transactions or the offences arising out of matrimony relating to dowry, etc. or the family disputes where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute. In this category of cases, the High Court may quash the criminal proceedings if in its view, because of the compromise between the offender and the victim, the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak and continuation of the criminal case would put the accused to great oppression and prejudice and 1 2012 (10) SCC 303 extreme injustice would be caused to him by not quashing the criminal case despite full and complete settlement and compromise with the victim. It has also held that inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz.: (i) to secure the ends of justice, or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Since the parties have amicably settled the dispute, respondent No.2 is not going to participate in the said proceedings and chances of the conviction of the petitioner would be bleak and remote and, therefore, further continuation of the proceedings in RCC No.730 of 2017 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kalyan for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 495, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, would be an exercise in futility and would tantamount to abuse of process of the Court. In that view of the matter, to secure the ends of justice and to prevent the abuse of the process of the court, the petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, the proceedings bearing RCC No.730 of 2017 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kalyan for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 495, 504 of the Indian Penal Code are quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute in above terms. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.) M.M.Salgaonkar

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.268 OF 2019 (Malhari Tulshiram Sadafule Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another) Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances,Court's orders, or directions, and Registrar's Orders Ms Manisha Devkar for Petitioner. CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2019 P.C.: Not on Board. At the request of Ms Devkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, taken up in the production Board. Respondent No.2 had filed proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') before the trial Court. By order dated 12.04.2010, maintenance @ Rs.1,300/- per month with effect from 10.06.2008 was awarded to the respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 thereafter filed proceedings under Section 127 of Cr.P.C. for enhancing the maintenance amount. By order dated 30.05.2016, the learned Judge, Family Court No.3, Mumbai allowed the Petition and directed the petitioner herein to pay enhanced maintenance @ Rs.12,000/- per month to the respondent No.2 from the date of the Petition i.e. 17.04.2014. Ms Devkar, on instructions, states that petitioner has paid the maintenance from 17.04.2014 till June, 2018 @ Rs.12,000/- per month as per the order dated 30.05.2016. From July, 2018 onwards, he has not paid the maintenance as he has filed proceedings for cancelling the maintenance amount from 30.04.2018 on the ground that petitioner has attained superannuation. On instructions, she further states that before the next date of hearing, petitioner will deposit the arrears of maintenance of Rs.84,000/- (from July 2018 to 28.02.2019 @ Rs.12,000/- per month) in this Court. In view thereof, list the Petition for 'admission' on 14.03.2019 in the Supplementary Board. Till next date, subject to the petitioner depositing Rs.84,000/- in this Court before the next date of hearing, order dated 04.12.2018 issuing distress warrant against the petitioner herein is stayed. No coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner till next date. It is further made clear that in case the petitioner does not deposit arrears within the stipulated time, this protection shall stand vacated without further reference to the Court. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) Minal Parab

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 268 OF 2019 Malhari Tulshiram Sadafule ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent Manisha Arjun Devkar For Petitioner CORAM : RAJESH G. KETKAR, J DATE : 14th March, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for 28/03/2019 on supplementary board. In the meantime, Ad-interim relief if any, granted earlier to continue. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 268 OF 2019 Malhari Tulshiram Sadafule ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : RAJESH G. KETKAR, J DATE : 28th March, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for 18/04/2019 on supplementary board. In the meantime, Ad-interim relief if any, granted earlier to continue. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents ..... Rishi Bhuta a/w. Monish Bohra i/b. A.S.Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State. .... CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI J. DATED : 20TH AUGUST, 2014 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. S.O. to 03/09/2014. In the meantime, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) JUDGE

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.538 of 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents Mr.Rishi Bhuta and Mr.Manish Bohra i/b M/s.A.S.Khan & Associates for the applicant. Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. ­­­ CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 14th NOVEMBER 2014. ­­­ P.C. : 1 Heard. 2 Rule. 3 Rule made returnable on 1st December 2014. 4 To be listed for final hearing at the end of the admission board along with other connected Writ Petitions which have, by an order dated 6th August 2014 already been directed to be listed for final hearing in the first week of December 2014. 5 In the mean time, the learned Magistrate shall not proceed further with the case. (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Mr.Sunny Singh i/b A.S.Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.M.G.Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent No.1 State. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 01st December, 2014. P.C. : 1 Mr.M.G.Shukla, the learned Counsel for respondent No.2 states that he has already received copy of the application. Mr.Sunny Singh, the learned Counsel for the applicant prays for time. 2 Granted finally. Stand over to 12/12/2014. 3 To be placed along with Writ Petition No. 834 of 2014 to Writ Petition No. 847 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 1494 of 2014 & Writ Petition No. 1495 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 1474 of 2014 to Writ Petition No. 1487 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 2562 of 2014 to Writ Petition No. 2568 of 2014 (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2201 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.378 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.379 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.380 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.381 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.382 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.383 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.384 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.385 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1739 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2202 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2203 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2204 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2205 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.373 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.376 OF 2014 Girishchandra Ugresan Sahoo Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.387 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.389 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.390 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.391 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.392 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.393 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.394 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.395 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.396 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.397 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1665 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1666 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1667 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1668 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1669 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1670 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2206 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2207 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2208 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2209 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2210 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2211 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2212 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2213 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2214 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2215 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1380 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.374 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.375 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.377 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1381 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1382 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1383 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1384 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1514 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1515 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1516 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1517 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1518 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1519 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1520 OF 2014 Shantanu Narayan Rooj & Anr. .. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 834 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 836 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 837 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 838 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 839 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 840 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 841 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 842 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 843 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 844 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 845 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 846 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 847 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1474 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1475 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1476 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1477 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1478 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1479 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1480 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1481 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1482 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1483 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1484 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1485 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1487 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1494 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1495 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2562 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2563 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2564 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2565 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2566 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2567 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2568 OF 2014 Alok Sharma & Ors. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents Mr.Prasad Kumar Das, Advocate for the Petitioners in W.P.No.2201 of 2014 & Group. …. Mrs. S.V. Gajare, A.P.P. for Respondent – State in W.P.No.2201 of 2014 & Group. Ms.Mrunmal Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.M.G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.A.P. Mundargi, Senior Advocate for the Petitioners in W.P.No.1380 of 2014 & Group. Mr.Y.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent – State in W.P.No.1380 of 2014 & Group. Ms.Mrunmal Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.M.G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.Rishi Bhuta i/b. A.S. Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Petitioners in APL No.538 of 2014 & Group. Mrs.M.R. Tidke, A.P.P. for Respondent – State in APL No.538 of 2014 & Group. Ms.Mrunmal Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.M.G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. …. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : DECEMBER 12, 2014. P.C. : The learned counsel for the respondent no.2 states that the respondent no.2 shall not proceed further in any of these matters in the Court of the Magistrate. 2 Stand over to 20th December, 2014. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.538 of 2014 rpa Amit Prakash Jaste Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.834 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.835 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.836 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.837 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.838 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.839 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.840 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.841 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.842 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.843 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.844 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.845 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.846 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.847 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1475 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1476 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1477 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1478 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1479 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1480 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1481 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1482 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1483 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1484 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1485 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1486 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1487 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1494 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1495 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2562 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2563 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2564 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2565 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2566 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2567 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2568 of 2014 Alok Sharma and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents Mr.Rishi Bhuta i/b. M/s. A.S. Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Aplicant. Mr.M.D. Pareek i/b. Mr.M. G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mrs.M.R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. --- CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 20th DECEMBER, 2014. --- P.C. : On the prayer of learned counsel for the respondent no.2, stand over to 13th January, 2015, for final hearing. (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2414 OF 2024 Baban Undrya Kathara ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Aniket Vagal aw Mr. Sanket Bhavad aw Mr. Kunal Pednekar for Petitioner Mr. Pradip Rajput for Resp 2 Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 18th June, 2024 P.C. : At the request of the learned APP for the Respondent - State, S.O. to 20/06/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.539 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.540 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.541 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.542 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.548 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.551 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & anr. .Respondents Mr.Rishi Bhuta & Mr.Manish Bohra i/b. M/s.A.S.Khan & Associates, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.M.G.Shukla, Advocate, for the Respondent No.2 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 11TH JULY, 2014 P.C. . Not on board. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. The proceedings are stayed until further orders qua the petitioner. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 9: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.556 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mı Mr. Vyas i/b Vyas And Bhalwal for Applicant. Mr. Rejas M. Bhatt for respondent no.2. Mr. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. : 17th July 2015. DATE P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. Admit. Interim relief in terms of prayer clause (ii). (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 5: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Applicant present in Court None for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- JANUARY 31, 2014 ...... P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant. By this Application, the Applicant is challenging the order dated 5th December, 2013 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 52nd Court, Kurla, Mumbai, below Exhibit 4 in C. C. No. 189/Misc/2013, by which, her application came to be rejected, wherein she had challenged the locus standi of the Respondent No.1 to file an application under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The present Applicant is the daughter-in-law of the Respondent No.1. The Respondent No. 1 has filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking reliefs under Sections 18, 21 and 22 of the said Act, and has also sought protection order apart from other reliefs. The learned Counsel for the Applicant has relied on a Judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Varsha Kapoor vs. Union of India & Ors. in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 638 of 2010, in support of his contention that the term `respondent' as defined in Section 2(q), is restricted only to adult male persons while construing the expression, "a relative of the husband or the male partner." Issue notice to the respondent No.1, returnable on 11th February, 2014. Hamdust permitted. In addition to Court notice, Applicant to serve the respondent No.1 by Advocate's notice and file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. The learned Counsel for the Applicant, on the instructions of the Applicant, who is present in Court, states that she will not visit the house of respondent No.1 or create any nuisance or threaten the respondent No.1. Ad-interim stay in terms of prayer clause (c) till 12th February, 2014. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 7: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Maya Upadeshe h/f Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant None for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2014 P.C. On 31st January, 2014, notice was issued, which was made returnable on 11th February, 2014 and hamdust was permitted. However, despite the said order, the Advocate for the applicant has not supplied spare copy and hence, notice could not be issued. It is made clear that if the spare copy is not supplied within two days from today, the stay granted vide order dated 31st January, 2014 shall stand vacated. Stand over to 14th February, 2014. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 9: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani .Applicant V/s. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & anr. .Respondents None for the Applicant Mr.Tariq Khan, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal, APP, for Respondent No.2 – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2014 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for respondent No.1. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 states that he will file his Vakalatnama within one week from today. Stand over to 28-02-2014. Till then, interim relief granted vide order dated 31-01-2014 to continue. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 11: nsc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Memorandam of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Office Court's or Judge's orders ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr.Laxman P. Kanal, for the applicant. Mr.Tariq Khan, for respondent no.1. Ms.U.V.Kejariwal, APP for the State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED : 28th February, 2014. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1, states that he will file his reply in the Registry during the course of the day. He states that a copy of the reply has been served on the Counsel for the Applicant. On the next date, an endeavour shall be made to decide the matter finally at the stage of 2/2 18-apl.66.2014.doc admission. Stand over to 7th March, 2014. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 13: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Mr. Tariq Khan for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- MARCH 7, 2014 P.C. Heard Counsel for the parties. Arguable questions are raised. Admit. Mr. Khan waives service for respondent No.1. Ms. Kejariwal, A.P.P waives service for respondent No.2-State. To be listed in the 2nd week of April, 2014 at the end of the admision Board under caption `for final hearing and disposal'. There shall be an interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani .Applicant V/s. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & anr. .Respondents Mr.Laxman P. Kanal, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Tariq Khan, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP, for Respondent No.2 – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2014 P.C. . By consent, stand over after vacation. Till then, interim relief granted earlier to continue. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 20: Osk 935-Apl-66-2014.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani … Applicant V/s. Laat Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. … Respondents Mr.Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant. Mr.S.S. Hulke, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 17th June 2022. P.C. : . At the request of learned Advocate for Applicant, stand over to 28th June 2022. [A.S. GADKARI, J.] OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2022.06.20 13:04:16 +0530

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APL NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani …..Applicant Vs. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. …..Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for the Applicant. Mr. R.M. Pethe APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 1st JULY, 2022. P.C.:- None for the Respondent No.1. In order to grant an opportunity to the Respondent No.1, stand over to 15th July, 2022. To be listed on supplementary board. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr.Laxman Kalel for the Applicant. Mr. Tariq Khan for the Respondent No.-1. Mr. R.M.Pethe, APP for the Respondent - State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI J DATE : 15th July, 2022 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Respondent , stand over to 22/07/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Mrs. J. S. Lohokare APP-for State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR J DATE : 22nd July, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 29/07/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT LAXMAN PRATABRAI KANAL A/W. DIVYA KANAL FOR APPLICANT YOGESH Y DABKE APP FOR STATE/RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 29th July, 2022 P.C. : The Registry to verify and place the matter before the appropriate Court. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )