Tag: Criminal Others

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 PRANAY SAKHARAM JARANDE ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2024 AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 PRATIMA PRAMOD AGHAM ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS Adv. Vinayak Pandit i/b Adv. Ajinkya Udane for the Appellant. Adv. Sankalan Das i/b Adv. Pranali Kakade for the Respondent. Ms. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : APRIL 4, 2024 P.C. : By consent, stand over to 30/04/2024. Interim order already in operation to continue till then. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 10: Diksha Rane 913. APEAL 244-24.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244/2024 PRANAY SAKHARAM JARANDE ..APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994/2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996/2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244/2024 PRATIMA PRAMOD AGHAM ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS ------------ Adv. Ajinkya M. Udane for the applicant. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for the State. Adv. Pranali Kakade a/w. Adv. Sankalan Das for the respondent no.2. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : APRIL 24, 2024. P.C. : 1. List this appeal on 30/4/2024 along with Criminal Appeal No.632/2021. 2. Advocate Pranali Kakade is requested to appear on behalf of the appellant/victim in Criminal Appeal No.632/2021. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Order - Status 13: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents Ms. Pranali Kakade appointed Advocate for the Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and for Respondent No.2 in Appeal no.244 of 2024. ________ Mr. Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for Respondent in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Appellant in Appeal No.244 of 2024. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent/State in both Appeals. Ms. Pratima P. Agham – through Video Conferencing - Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.244 of 2024 __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024. P.C.: 1 Ms. Pratima Pramod Agham has appeared through video conferencing. Her identity is confirmed by Ms. Kakade who has placed on record copy of the Adhar card. Ms. Agham confirms the position that she does not wish to press accusation against the accused. She would pray for withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 So far as Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is concerned, the same seeks pre-arrest bail in respect of Pranay Sakharam Jarande by challenging the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. The Appellant is already under interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 10 December 2020. In view of the willingness expressed by the first informant not to press the accusation against the accused, in my view interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant deserves to be made absolute. Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is accordingly allowed by setting aside the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. Interim protection granted by this Court on 10 December 2020 is made absolute. 3 In view of the disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024, the Interim Application Nos.996 of 2024 and 994 of 2024 do not survive and the same are also accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 ________ Ms. Pranali Kakade appointed Advocate for the Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and for Respondent No.2 in Appeal no.244 of 2024. Mr. Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for Respondent in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Appellant in Appeal No.244 of 2024. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent/State in both Appeals. Ms. Pratima P. Agham – through Video Conferencing - Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.244 of 2024 __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024. P.C.: 1 Ms. Pratima Pramod Agham has appeared through video conferencing. Her identity is confirmed by Ms. Kakade who has placed on record copy of the Adhar card. Ms. Agham confirms the position that she does not wish to press accusation against the accused. She would pray for withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 So far as Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is concerned, the same seeks pre-arrest bail in respect of Pranay Sakharam Jarande by challenging the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. The Appellant is already under interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 10 December 2020. In view of the willingness expressed by the first informant not to press the accusation against the accused, in my view interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant deserves to be made absolute. Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is accordingly allowed by setting aside the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. Interim protection granted by this Court on 10 December 2020 is made absolute. 3 In view of the disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024, the Interim Application Nos.996 of 2024 and 994 of 2024 do not survive and the same are also accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) katkam Page No. 2 of 2 SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2024.07.23 18:15:30 +0530

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ....Appellant V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Ms. Pranali Kakade appointed Advocate for the Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and for Respondent No.2 in Appeal no.244 of 2024. Mr. Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr. Ranjit D. Shinde, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for Respondent in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Appellant in Appeal No.244 of 2024. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent/State in both Appeals. Ms. Pratima P. Agham – through Video Conferencing - Appellant in Appeal No.632 of 2021 and Respondent No.2 in Appeal No.244 of 2024 __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024. P.C.: 1 Ms. Pratima Pramod Agham has appeared through video conferencing. Her identity is confirmed by Ms. Kakade who has placed on record copy of the Adhar card. Ms. Agham confirms the position that she does not wish to press accusation against the accused. She would pray for withdrawal of Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.632 of 2021 is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 So far as Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is concerned, the same seeks pre-arrest bail in respect of Pranay Sakharam Jarande by challenging the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. The Appellant is already under interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 10 December 2020. In view of the willingness expressed by the first informant not to press the accusation against the accused, in my view interim protection granted in favour of the Appellant deserves to be made absolute. Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024 is accordingly allowed by setting aside the order dated 8 October 2020 passed by Special Judge in Criminal Bail Application No.2702 of 2020. Interim protection granted by this Court on 10 December 2020 is made absolute. 3 In view of the disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024, the Interim Application Nos.996 of 2024 and 994 of 2024 do not survive and the same are also accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2024.11.14 20:10:12 +0530 katkam Page No. 2 of 2

Order - Status 17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Appellant V/s. Lata Sakharam Jarande and Ors. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. Lata Sakharam Jarande and Ors. ….Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2024 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Applicant/ Intervenor IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. State of Maharashtra ….Respondents ___Page No. 1 of 2 ___ 23 July 2024 Ms. Maitreyee Garade a/w. Mr. Vinayak Pandit i/by. Mr. Ajinkya Udane, for the Appellant. __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ Mr. Ashok R. Metkari, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated : 23 July 2024. P.C. : Office has suo-moto placed the above appeals on board seeking speaking to the minutes of the order dated 19 June 2024. It appears that name of the Appellant ' Pranay Sakharam Jarande' is not reflected in Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 2024. The corrections be carried out in the order and the order be read accordingly. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2024.07.23 18:02:20 +0530

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Appellant V/s. Lata Sakharam Jarande and Ors. ….Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ….Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 994 OF 2024 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 Pratima Pramod Agham ….Applicant/ Intervenor IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Pranay Sakharam Jarande ….Appellant V/s. State of Maharashtra ….Respondents ___Page No. 1 of 2 ___ 23 July 2024 Ms. Maitreyee Garade a/w. Mr. Vinayak Pandit i/by. Mr. Ajinkya Udane, for the Appellant. __________________________________________________ Mr. Ashok R. Metkari, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated : 23 July 2024. P.C. : Office has suo-moto placed the above appeals on board seeking speaking to the minutes of the order dated 19 June 2024. It appears that name of the Appellant ' Pranay Sakharam Jarande' is not reflected in Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 2024. The corrections be carried out in the order and the order be read accordingly. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Note : Corrections are carried out in cause-title only pursuant to speaking to minutes order dated 14 November 2024. NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2024.11.14 18:15:25 +0530 Digitally ___Page No. 2 of 2 ___ 23 July 2024

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.632 OF 2021 Pratima Pramod Agham ....Appellant V/S Lata Sakharam Jarande & Ors. ....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 Pranay Sakharam Jarande ....Appellant V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.996 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.994 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.244 OF 2024 ________ Ms. Maitreyee Garad i/b Mr. Ajinkya Udane for the Appellant. Ms. Shilpa K. Gajare-Dhumal, APP for Respondent/State. __________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 14 NOVEMBER 2024. P.C.: 1 Office has suo-moto placed the above Appeals on board seeking speaking to the minutes of the orders dated 19 June 2024 and 23 July 2024. katkam Page No. 1 of 2 2 It appears that name of the Respondents 'The State of Maharashtra & Anr.' in the cause title is not reflected in Criminal Appeal No.244 of 2024. The corrections be carried out in the orders and the orders be read accordingly. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....Applicant V/S State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents … WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....Applicant V/S State of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents Mr. Manish Bohra a/w Mr. Lalit Pal, Mr. Aditya Dwevedi i/b M/s. A.S. Khan & Associates for the Applicant. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent No.1-State. … … CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 24TH MAY 2023. (VACATION COURT) P.C.: 1 Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 21 June 2023. 2 The learned APP waives notice on behalf of Respondents/State. SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2023.05.24 16:37:11 +0530 (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1908 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1907 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT Mr.Manish M. Bohra i/b. M/s. A.S.Khan and Associates for Applicant Ms.M.R.Tidke APP for Respondent/State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 23rd August, 2023 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Appellant(s)/ Applicant(s) / Petitioner(s) / Respondent No. stand over to 13/09/2023. Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1908 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1907 OF 2023 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2023 ALONGWITH REVISION APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1910 OF 2023 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1909 OF 2023 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ***** Mr. Manish M. Bohra - Advocate for the Applicant Mr. Santosh S. Avhad i/by Jayakar Partners - Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar – APP for the Respondent - State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 12th JANUARY 2024 P. C. :- 1. It is true that on 13/12/2023, submission by learned Advocate for the Applicant was recorded that Rs. 1 Lakh is to be paid till 12/01/2024. Only Rs. 50,000/- is paid. Whereas SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2024.01.17 11:38:32 +0530 balance amount of Rs. 1,00,000 was agreed to be paid on or before 12/02/2024. The Applicant is bedridden due to fall. He has got difficulty to pay remaining amount. 2. There is a prayer to keep this matter in second week of February so that the Applicant will clear entire arrears. 3. It is opposed on behalf of the Respondent No. 2- Complainant. 4. Now there is choice to the parties at what amount they should settle and what should be the installments. 5. Better to keep these applications for hearing on admission on 06th February, 2024 . 6. Interim relief granted earlier to continue till next date. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1908 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1907 OF 2023 In Cr. Revision Appln. 134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar ....PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK J DATE : 5th March, 2024 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 08/04/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1910 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1909 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1908 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1907 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2023 Rajendra Vittal Gunduwar .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents .................... Mr. Manish Bohra, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Santosh Avhad, Advocate i/by Jayakar & Partners for Respondent No.2. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2024 P.C . : 1. Mentioned. Not on Board. Taken on Board. 2. Heard Mr. Bohra, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr. Avhad, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. 3. Perused the praecipe dated 11.12.2024. 4. Praecipe dated 11.12.2024 is filed by private Respondent who is original Complainant. This is a group of two Criminal Revision Applications namely Criminal Revision Application No.133 of 2023 and Criminal Revision Application No.134 of 2023. 5. Mr. Avhad, learned Advocate appearing for private Respondent No.2 draws my attention to order dated 13.12.2023 followed by order dated 06.02.2024. I have perused both the orders. In compliance of aforesaid twin orders, private Respondent has received a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- uptil now. He would submit that an amount of Rs.1,10,000/- has been deposited by Applicant in Trial Court pursuant to the order dated 06.02.2024. That apart, he would submit that Applicant has also deposited an amount of Rs.30,000/- i.e. Rs.15,000/- each in both the cases towards cash bail in the Trial Court. He would submit that if private Respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.1,10,000/- and Rs.30,000/- which stands deposited by Revision Applicant in the Trial Court it would meet the ends of justice. 6. Mr. Bohra, learned Advocate appears for Revision Applicant. He would submit that he has instructions to submit to the orders of the Court and would not object any Application seeking withdrawal. 7. Mr. Avhad, learned Advocate appearing for private Respondent persuaded the Court to pass an order allowing private Respondent to withdraw the aforestated amount from the Trial Court. 8. In view of the above and more specifically no objection given by Mr. Bohra on behalf of Revision Applicant, the learned Trial Court is directed to permit the withdrawal of amount of Rs.60,000/- and Rs.50,000/- deposited in the twin cases before Trial Court and amount of Rs.15,000/- each deposited towards cash bail by Applicant on the presentation of server copy of this order. 9. Trial Court shall act and ensure that private Respondent is returned the deposited money as directed above alongwith all accrued interest thereon within a period of one week from the date of server copy of this order being presented before Trial Court. Trial Court shall not insist on certified copy of this order. Once amounts are received by private Respondent, liberty to Revision Applicant to move Revision Application for further appropriate orders. 10. Stand over to 13 th January, 2025. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2024.12.11 14:43:23 +0530

Order - Status 5: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.323 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.179 OF 2016 Sunil Yashwant Mhatre Applicant versus Satyawan Rama Gawandi and another Respondents Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Ms.Ameeta Kuttikrishnan for applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 12th January 2018 PC :­ Issue notice to respondent no.1 returnable on 2th February 2018. Private notice is permitted. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 2: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 3: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 5: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 6: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 7: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents … … Ms. Priyanka Chavan for the petitioners. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P. for respondent-State. CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 08TH FEBRUARY, 2021. P.C:- Stand over to 09/02/2021. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appearances of the Advocates as per Board dated 09/02/2021. … CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 09TH FEBRUARY, 2021. P.C:- Matters at serial numbers mentioned below of the Board stands discharged and will be taken first on 10th February, 2021, followed by the matters from the Causelist dated 10th February, 2021. Sr. Nos. Due Date 32, 35 to 41, 43 to 46, 48 to 51, 54 to 60, 62 to 74, 76, 77, 78, 80, 81 10-02-2021 Ad-interim /interim reliefs, if any, to continue till then. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 14: 31_wp.486.2021.doc Vishwanath S. Sherla Digitally signed by Vishwanath S. Sherla Date: 2021.02.10 17:14:35 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde & another … Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & others … Respondents Ms.Priyanka Chavan for the Petitioners Mr.K.V. Saste, APP, for Respondent – State CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 10, 2021 P.C.: At the request of the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, stand over to Monday, the 15th February, 2021 . (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL / CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.291 OF 2021 (Sr.No.66) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.385 OF 2021 (Sr.No.67) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.402 OF 2021 (Sr.No.68) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.457 OF 2021 (Sr.No.69) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 (Sr.No.70) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO.519 OF 2021 (Sr.No.71) IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO 333/2021 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.540 OF 2021 (Sr.No.73) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.554 OF 2021 (Sr.No.74) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.575 OF 2021 (Sr.No.75) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 581 OF 2021 (Sr.No.76) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.617 OF 2021 (Sr.No.77) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.618 OF 2021 (Sr.No.78) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.639 OF 2021(Sr.No.83) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.643 OF 2021 (Sr.No.85) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.644 OF 2021 (Sr.No.86) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.645 OF 2021 (Sr.No.87) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.646 OF 2021 (Sr.No.88) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.648 OF 2021 (Sr.No.90) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.652 OF 2021(Sr.No.92) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.653 OF 2021 (Sr.No.93) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.660 OF 2021 (Sr.No.94) Appearances of the Advocates as per Board dated 15/02/2021. CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2021. P.C:- Due to paucity of time, the board is discharged for the day and the above matters are adjourned to 16/02/2021. Interim relief or ad-interim relief, if any in the above matters to continue till then. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 18: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde & Anr. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents … Mr.Robin Fernandes i/b Ms.Priyanka Chavan for the Petitioners. Dr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S.S.SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATED : 16th FEBRUARY, 2021 P.C:- Learned APP submits that the concerned police officer had made sincere efforts to trace out the missing person, namely, Atul Ankush Shinde. However, the concerned police officer could not trace him out. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Investigating Agency, CID, Pune is having specialised police personnel to conduct the investigation. We are satisfied with the inquiry/investigation conducted by the concerned police officer. However, since the Investigating Agency, CID, Pune is a specialised agency, we deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to entrust further inquiry/investigation with the Investigating Agency, CID, Pune forthwith. List this petition on 8th March, 2021. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.) M.M.Salgaonkar Digitally signed by Mandira Salgaonkar Date: 2021.02.17 20:52:26 +0530

Order - Status 20: (35) cri.wp-486.21.odt Laxmikant G. Chandan Digitally signed by Laxmikant G. Chandan Date: 2021.03.10 10:39:54 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde and anr. : Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. : Respondents. Ms. Priyanka Chavan for the Petitioner. Dr. F R Shaikh, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, MANISH PITALE, JJ DATE : 09th MARCH 2021 P.C. 1 Dr. F R Shaikh, the learned APP appearing for the Respondent/State, on instructions, submits that inquiry/investigation is transferred to CID Branch, State of Maharashtra. He, therefore, prays two weeks time so as to enable him to take instructions. At his request, stand over to 05/04/2021. [MANISH PITALE, J] [S. S. SHINDE , J]

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde And Ors. PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. RESPONDENT Smt. Priyanka Chavan for Petitioner Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for Respondent - State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.S. SHINDE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE, JJ DATE : 5th April, 2021 P.C. : At the request of the learned APP for the Respondent - State, S.O. to 21/04/2021 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde And Ors. PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.S. SHINDE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 27th July, 2021 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 03/08/2021 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde And Ors. PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. RESPONDENT PRIYANKA CHAVAN for Petitioner. Mrs. M. H. Mahatare, APP for Respondent/State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.S. SHINDE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 3rd August, 2021 P.C. : S. O. to 04/08/2021 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde and Anr. ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents SUBHASH PAREKAR Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2021.08.05 10:31:28 +0530 VISHAL Ms. Priyanka Chavan, for the Petitioner Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 04, 2021 P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Mrs. Mhatre, learned APP, on instruction, seeks time to carry out further investigation so as to trace out the missing person. Ms. Chavan, learned counsel for the petitioner states that she is not averse to granting time to the investigating agency. At the request of learned APP list on 21st September, 2021. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 30: WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2021 Amol Ankush Shinde & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Ms.Priyanka Chavan for Petitioners. Ms.A.S. Pai, PP for State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATED : 2 FEBRUARY 2022 P.C. : . At the request of learned PP, three weeks time is granted to submit report to this court. S.O. to 23 February 2022. (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 268 OF 2018 Dinkar Shankar Borhade ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Ors ....Respondent CORAM : R.M. SAVANT. & SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL, JJ DATE : 14th March, 2018 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 11/04/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1773 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1774 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2022 Padmanabhan Thandu Iyer...ApplicantVersusState Of Maharashtra And Anr....Respondents Ms. Saiyukta S. Kamat, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 17 th JUNE, 2022. PER COURT: 1. These interim applications are preferred by the applicant for suspension of sentence and grant of bail during the pendency of Criminal Revision Application No.251 of 2022. 2. The applicant has been convicted for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act vide judgment and order dated 14 th February, 2017 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30 th Court, Kurla, Mumbai and sentenced to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- in default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment of one year. He is also sentenced to pay compensation of Rs.4,45,000/- within one month from the date of order. The judgment of the trial Court has been confirmed by the Sessions Court by judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2022. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is ailing. There are discrepancies in the evidence adduced before the trial Court. The applicant has deposited Rs.1,00,000/- before the Appellate Court towards the compensation during the pendency of appeal. The applicant would deposit further amount of Rs.1,00,000/- within a period of four weeks from today. Considering the submissions, presently interim relief can be granted to the applicant till the next date of hearing. Hence, I pass the following order: ORDER i. The sentence of imprisonment imposed vide Judgment and order dated 14th February, 2017 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai in C.C. No.3001612/SS/2015 and confirmed by Judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2022 passed by the Sessions Court, Greater Bombay in Criminal Appeal No.187 of 2017 is suspended and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount; ii. The applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- till the next date of hearing. iii. The applicant shall deposit the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- before the trial Court within a period of four weeks from today. iv. Stand over to 18th July, 2022. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 4: TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Digitally signed by TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2023.02.06 17:26:15 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni …Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors …Respondents Mr. Siddharth R. Karpe a/w Mr. Dipak Y. Jadhav for Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent No.3 (State). CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 03, 2023 P.C.: The petitioner challenges order of grant of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. According to the petitioner as of today, arrears of Rs.10,00,000/- are due. He states that the petitioner is ready to deposit amount of Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Magistrate within one (1) week from today and remaining amount of Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter. The statement on behalf of the petitioner is accepted as undertaking. In view of the said statement, the arrest warrant issued against the petitioner shall not be executed. It is made clear that in case of failure of petitioner to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Magistrate within one (1) week from today or remaining Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter, ad-interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated without further reference to the court. Stand over to 24th February 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni …Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni And Ors …Respondents Mr. Siddharth R. Karpe a/w Mr. Dipak Y. Jadhav for Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent No.3 (State). CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 03, 2023 P.C.: The petitioner challenges order of grant of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. According to the petitioner as of today, arrears of Rs.10,00,000/- are due. He states that the petitioner is ready to deposit amount of Rs.5,00,000/- before learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai within one (1) week from today and remaining amount of Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter. The statement on behalf of the petitioner is accepted as undertaking. In view of the said statement, the arrest warrant issued against the petitioner shall not be executed. It is made clear that in case of failure of petitioner to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai within one (1) week from today or remaining Rs.5,00,000/- within two (2) weeks thereafter, ad-interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated without further reference to the court. Stand over to 24 th February 2023. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) (The order is modified as per order dated 7th January, 2023. The corrections in the paragraph 1 and 3 are inserted and corrected which shows in italicize)

Order - Status 6: Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni … Petitioner V/s. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni And Ors … Respondents Mr. Siddharth Karpe for the petitioner. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 7, 2023 P.C.: Not on board. Taken on board for speaking to the minutes. In the cause title the instead of word "Kukarni" be substituted by "Kulkarni". In paragraph 1 instead of words "Section 125 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908" be substituted by "Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973". In paragraph 1 and 3 instead of words "before the learned Magistrate" be substituted by "learned Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai". Order be corrected and uploaded as order no.2 in this matter. (AMIT BORKAR, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ....PETITIONER V/S Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR J DATE : 24th February, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 31/03/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4959 OF 2022 Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ....PETITIONER V/S Gauri Sagar Kukarni And Ors ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN J DATE : 31st March, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 06/06/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4959 OF 2022 ….. …. Sagar Suhar Kulkarni ] Petitioner Vs. Gauri Sagar Kulkarni and others ] Respondents. Mr. Siddharth Karpe, for Petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, A.P.P, for Respondent No.3-State. CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 6th JUNE, 2023. P.C. The petitioner has complied with the directions issued by this Court vide an order dated 3rd February, 2023 by depositing an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- in two installments i.e first installment on 10th February, 2023 and second installment on 23rd February, 2023 in the Family Court at Bandra. Since there is due compliance of the directions issued by this Court, there shall be no coercive action against the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondent returnable on 4th July, 2023. In addition to the Court's notice, the petitioner shall serve the respondents with private notice and file an affidavit of service. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]