Tag: Criminal Others

Order - Status 4: Uday S. Jagtap IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2022 Nana Bhondiba Desai & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents ..... ….. None for the petitioners Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for the respondent - State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2022. P.C. The aforesaid petition has been circulated by the petitioner no.1, who appears in person. However, the petitioner is absent. Stand over to 16th November, 2022. PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 5: 902-WP-2150-2022.doc SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2022.09.30 14:39:38 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2022 Nana Dhondiba Desai and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Nana Dhondiba Desai – Petitioner in person. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER 2022 P.C. : Heard. Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 17th November, 2022 . Learned APP waives notice on behalf of the respondent no.1. In addition to Court notice, the petitioner who appears in person to serve the respondent no.2, by private notice and file affidavit of service before the next date. S. M. MODAK, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 8: 117-wp.2150.2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2150 OF 2022 Nana Dhondiba Desai and Ors. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents Mr. Nana Dhondiba Desai, Petitioner No.1 in-person. Mr. K. V. Saste, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1–State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & $R. N. LADDHA, JJ.$ : 17 th NOVEMBER 2022 $DATE$ $P.C.:$ Mentioned out of turn at 10:30 a.m. The petitioner No.1, who appears in person requests for taking up the matter today itself. Considering, there are 176 matters on board as well as $2.$ fixed and part-heard matters at 2:30 p.m., it is not possible to take up the aforesaid matter today. $overline{3}$ . Hence, list the matter under the caption 'For Direction' on 3 rd January 2023 at 2:30 p.m., for fixing date of hearing. $R. N. LADDHA, J.$ REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2022 Nana Dhondiba Desai & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents ..... Mr. Nana D. Desai, petitioner no.1 in person present in Court Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the respondent - State ….. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : 3rd JANUARY, 2023. P.C. Vide order dated 29th September 2022, notice was issued to the respondents returnable on 17th November 2022. In addition to the Court Notice, the petitioner who appears in person, was directed to serve the respondent no.2 by private notice and file affidavit of service before the next date. We are informed by the petitioner no.1, who appears in person, that he has filed an affidavit of service in the Registry. So far as the office noting is concerned, perusal of the same shows that notice issued to the respondent no.2 is received back unserved with the remark "respondent is admitted in hospital for treatment of brain stroke". Hence, considering the office noting, we deem it appropriate to issue fresh notice to the respondent no.2, returnable on 23rd February, 2023. Notice to indicate that an endeavor shall be made to dispose of the petition finally at the stage of admission, time permitting. Learned APP to also ensure that the concerned officer of the concerned police station informs the respondent no.2 of the next date. In the meantime, till the next date, the trial Court shall defer the proceeding pending against the petitioners. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.]

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2022 Nana Dhondiba Desai & Ors. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra $&$ Anr. Respondents Nana Dhondiba Desai – Petitioner No.1 in person. Mr. Y.M.Nakhwa, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : $23^{rd}$ FEBRUARY, 2023 $P.C.$ : Mentioned out of turn at 10.30 a.m. The petitioner No.1, who appears in person, requests for a fixed date. Stand over to 20 th March, 2023 at 4.00 p.m. $2.$ PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 15: nob-wp-2150.22.doc BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2023.03.21 13:59:09 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2022 Nana Dhondiba Desai & Ors. … Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents ****** Mr. N. D. Desai - Petitioner No.1, present in-person. Mrs. Sharmila Kaushik, APP for the Respondent-State. ****** CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 20 th MARCH, 2023 P.C. :- . Not on board. Taken on board, as the regular bench is not available. Petitioner no.1, appearing in-person, states that he has come from Balgaum (Karnataka). He states that this matter was to be taken up today. He intends that the matter be listed on 23 March 2023, and be placed on the Supplementary Board, as previously ordered by the regular bench. Stand over to 23 March 2023, to be placed on Supplementary Board. [R. N. LADDHA, J.] [G. S. KULKARNI, J.]

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2150 OF 2022 Mr. Nana Dhondiba Desai & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Nana D. Desai, Petitioner No.1 in person. Mr. Swarup D. Patil for Respondent No.2. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 27th MARCH, 2023. P.C. : Mr. Swarup Patil, learned counsel appears for Respondent No.2 seeks time to file his Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No.2 and also to file reply. Time is granted. Stand over to 10th April, 2023 High on Board. The interim order passed on 03.01.2023 is extended till the next date. [ M.M. SATHAYE, J ] [ SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J. ]

Order - Status 18: GAIKWAD Date: 2023.04.11 10:24:08 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2022 Nana Bhondiba Desai and Ors. … Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents ------------------- Mr. Nana D. Desai-petitioner in person . Mr. J.P. Yagnik-APP for the State. CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & M.M. SATHAYE, J.J. DATED : APRIL 10, 2023. P.C. : . Petitioner is present in person. Nobody is present for respondent no.2. On 27th March 2023, Mr. Swarup Patil, learned Advocate had appeared for respondent no.2, he had sought time to file Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2 and also to file reply. So far Vakaltnama has not been filed, reply also has not been filed on behalf of respondent no.2, as stated earlier respondent no.2 is absent and nobody is present on behalf of respondent no.2. In order to grant further opportunity to respondent no.2, put up on 25th April 2023 'High on Board'. Meanwhile, Investigating Officer to personally remain present before this Court on the next date together with copy of the charge-sheet. Interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date. (M.M. SATHAYE, J) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J)

Order - Status 21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2150 OF 2022 Mr. Nana Dhondiba Desai & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Nana D. Desai, Petitioner in person. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Shantanu Raktate a/w. Mr. Amar Parsekar, Mr. Saurav Katkar i/b. Mr. Swarup Patil, for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 25th APRIL, 2023. P.C. : For the reasons separately recorded, the petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (1), which reads as under:- "Wherefore the petitioners most humbly pray that F.I.R.No.49 of 2015 & charge-sheet / complaint lodged by Respondent No.2 / original complainant within the Chandgad Police Station vide F.I.R.No.49 of 2015 and Charge Sheet U/S 379, 411 R/w 34 of I.P.C., please be quashed and set aside, on such terms & conditions, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit & proper." Rule is made absolute in the above terms. [ M.M. SATHAYE, J ] [ SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J. ]

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2150 OF 2022 Mr. Nana Dhondiba Desai and Ors. ..Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Nana Desai Petitioner-in-person. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. Shantanu Raktate a/w Mr. Amar Parsekar, Mr. Saurav Katkar i/b Swarup Patil for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND M.M.SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 25th APRIL 2023 : JUDGMENT (PER: M.M.SATHAYE,J.): Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service for Respondent No.1/State. Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 waives service. Heard finally by consent of parties. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrP.C.), the Petitioners are praying for quashing of FIR No. 49 of 2015 registered with Chandgad Police Station, District Kolhapur for offences punishable SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Digitally signed by SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Date: 2023.05.30 17:38:28 +0530 under Sections 379, 411 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and also for quashing of the consequent Criminal Case bearing RCC No. 65 of 2015 pending in the Court of J.M.F.C., Chandgad, District Kolhapur. Office report shows that pursuant to interaction dated 02.06.2022, the Petitioner No.1 Mr. Nana D. Desai was found to be able to put forth his case appropriately before the Court and as such requirement of scrutiny by the Registrar under the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, is duly passed by the Petitioner No.1. Accordingly, heard Petitioner No.1 Mr. Nana D. Desai, who appeared in person for and on behalf of all the Petitioners as their power of attorney holder. Heard Mr. Yagnik, learned APP for Respondent No.1- State and Mr. Raktate for Respondent No.2 original complainant/informant. Perused the record. Petitioner No.1 has taken us through the averments in the FIR filed by the Respondent No.2 as well as other documents produced by him on record. It is the case of the Petitioners that Respondent No.2 along with other persons who are members of Chamber of Commerce, were demanding illegal amount of Rs.25,000/- from Petitioner No.2, who refused to pay and therefore, Respondent No.2 has falsely implicated the Petitioners in this case. Be that as it may. Since this is a petition for quashing, we have to go by the averments in the FIR, considering them at face value. Perusal of FIR dated 10.04.2015 shows that it is the case of Respondent No.2 that he has a karkhana by named Bell-steel Industries in the Industrial Estate at Shinoli. It is alleged that on 09.04.2015, at evening time when Respondent No.2 was strolling around the premises of his karkhana, he found that two couplings from his karkhana (worth Rs.5,000/- according to FIR) were missing. Therefore, it is alleged that he went to the Chamber of Commerce office and informed the committee members and they went to the The Petitioner No. 1's shop, who is a scrap dealer and inquired about it. It is alleged by Respondent No.2 that he found the two couplings in Petitioners' shop, which were stolen from his karkhana. So also it is alleged that some more stolen goods from one 'Dipanjali Metals' were also found in the shop of the Petitioners. It is alleged that when he inquired with Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 about the presence of the alleged stolen goods in their shop, no satisfactory answers were received and therefore, the FIR was lodged against the Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 and unknown people. It is argued on behalf of the Petitioners that this FIR is based on assumption that the Petitioners have purchased goods stolen from Respondent No.2's karkhana and one Dipanjali Metals. It is argued that Respondent No.2 himself has acted as if he is an Investigating Officer and has already concluded the issue about alleged theft and on this conclusion of theft, the FIR is filed. It is further argued that the police or the investigating agency is supposed to look into the veracity of the claim before registering the FIR and without that being done, the impugned FIR is registered under Section 379 (theft) and 411 (receiving stolen property dishonesty) of IPC. Per contra, learned counsel for Respondent No.2/informant opposed this petition contending inter alia that the averments in the FIR are sufficient to attribute specific role to the Petitioners and that coupled with material collected during investigation, is sufficient to show that the Petitioners must face trial. Learned APP has taken us through the material collected during investigation. Careful reading of Section 378 of IPC (defining theft), shows that whoever intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person's consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft. Taking these allegation in the FIR at its face value, it is not disclosed therefrom, how the Petitioners have taken dishonestly the alleged two couplings from karkhana of Respondent No.2. The FIR is filed after Respondent No.2 has himself taken up a role of investigating agency by gathering people from Chamber of Commerce, directly going to the shop of the Petitioners who are scrap dealers, finding out the alleged stolen couplings and identifying them, asking questions to Petitioners and then not being satisfied with their answers. This all is done without involvement of actual investigating agency i.e. police. We fail to understand how the police have accepted this usurpation of role by a private citizen such as Respondent No.2. It is not the case that Respondent No.2 has lodged complaint against unknown persons after finding that certain goods were missing from his karkhana and then during investigation, the Petitioners are found to be in possession thereof with stolen goods identified and therefore, they are accused. Also perusal of Section 410 of IPC (defining stolen property) shows that property, the possession whereof has been transferred by theft is stolen property, but if such property subsequently comes into the possession of a person legally entitled to it, then it ceases to be stolen property. In the matter at hand, the averments in FIR do not disclose clearly, how the so-called lack of satisfaction of Respondent No.2 about possession of the goods in the shop of Petitioners, can have any bearing on the issue of Petitioners being legally entitled to possess those goods or otherwise. In other words, the necessary ingredients of 'stolen property' and its alleged receipt by the Petitioners dishonestly (Section 411 of IPC), are not at all fulfilled. Another aspect worth noting is that the impugned FIR makes a reference to finding out certain goods allegedly stolen from Dipanjali Metals for which the Petitioners are accused. It is not case that this Dipanjali Metals have also filed any such complaint of theft. Overall, the manner in which Respondent No.2 has filed the impugned FIR and the manner in which its cognizance is taken, can not be sustained. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we are of the considered view that this is a fit case to quash the impugned FIR and the consequent criminal case. The facts of this case, clearly cull-out a situation that falls in one of the exceptions carved out in the case of State of Haryana v/s. C. Bhajan Lal reported in AIR 1992 SC 604. Therefore, the Petition deserves to be allowed. Hence, we pass following order: ORDER The petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (1), which reads as under:- "Wherefore the petitioners most humbly pray that F.I.R.No.49 of 2015 & charge-sheet / complaint lodged by Respondent No.2 / original complainant within the Chandgad Police Station vide F.I.R.No.49 of 2015 and Charge Sheet U/S 379, 411 R/w 34 of I.P.C., please be quashed and set aside, on such terms & conditions, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit & proper." Rule is made absolute in the above terms. (M. M. SATHAYE, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE,J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2018 ..... .... The State of Maharashtra ... Applicant V/s. Shri.Mithun Balaso Sawant & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Applicant/State. CORAM : A.M.BADAR J. DATED : 20th JULY 2018. P.C. : 1 Issue notice to respondents returnable on 14th September 2018. (A.M.BADAR J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.190 OF 2018 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...APPLICANT V/s. MITHUN BALASO SAWANT AND ANR. )...RESPONDENTS Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Applicant – State. Mr.Sharad Mulik, Advocate for the Respondent State. CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 15th OCTOBER 2018 P.C. : 1 This is an application for condonation of delay in preferring an application for leave to appeal. What is sought to be challenged is acquittal of the respondents in Special Case registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. 2 Heard the learned APP appearing for the State as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. He argued that carelessness of the State is reflected from the fact that neither the name of the court nor the other particulars are properly mentioned in the instant application. The same is therefore liable to be rejected. 3 I have considered the submissions so advanced. The delay occurred is that of 21 days. Leaving apart the misdescription of the court and other particulars in the application, sufficient cause is shown for the short delay of 21 days in filing the application for leave to appeal. Hence, the order : ORDER i) The application is allowed. ii) The delay in filing the application for leave to appeal is condoned. iii) The application is accordingly disposed off. (A. M. BADAR, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 243 OF 2015 Samayadurai K. Agamudian. ..Petitioner. Versus The Hon'ble Chief Minister, Government of Maharashtra and Others. ..Respondents. Mr. S. G. Kudale for the Petitioner. Mr. F. R. Shaikh, learned APP for the State. Mr. S. G. Surana for Respondent No. 5. Mr. Mahesh Vaswani, Mr. Javed Gheewala, Dharini Nagda, Anushree Kulkarni for Respondent No. 6 and 7. Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : February 2, 2015 . P. C. : Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks leave to amend the prayer clause. Leave granted. Necessary amendment be carried out within a week. Place the writ petition for admission on 16th February 2015. [SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 243 OF 2015 Samayadurai K. Agamudian. ..Petitioner. Versus The Hon'ble Chief Minister, Government of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents. Mr. S. G. Kudale for the Petitioner. Mr. S. G. Suvarna for Respondent No. 5. Mr. U. V. Kejriwal, learned APP for the State. Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : March 17, 2015 . P. C. : By the order dated 2nd February 2015, we granted leave to the Petitioner to amend the prayer clause. The Petitioner, however, not only amended the prayer clause but has also inserted paragraph No.11a to 11j in the main petition without seeking leave of the Court. Besides, the Petitioner without leave of the Court, has annexed Exhibit-F to N. Registry is directed to submit explanation in what circumstances, the Petitioner was allowed to carry out amendment by introducing paragraph 11a to 11j and annexe Exhibit-F to N, without leave of the Court to that effect. [SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 243 OF 2015 Samayadurai K. Agamudian .. Petitioner v/s. The Hon'ble Chief Minister, Government of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. S.G. Kudle for the petitioner Mr. S.G. Suvarna for respondent no.5 Ms. Dharini Nagda i/b Javeed Mohd. Gaus Gheewala for respondent nos. 6 and 7 CORAM: RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED: 31st MARCH, 2015. P.C. We have gone through the explanation offered by Mrs. Mali, Section Officer. We accept the explanation, however, Section Officer is directed to be more cautious in future. Mr. Kudale, learned Counsel for the petitioner has carried out amendment contrary to the order dated 02.02.2015 hence, the paragraphs, which are inserted contrary to the order of amendment, shall be removed. Stand over to 6th April, 2015. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) ( RANJIT MORE, J.)

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.243 OF 2015 Samayadurai K. Agamudian ..Petitioner. V/s. The Hon'ble Chief Minister, Government of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.S.G.Kudle for the petitioner. Mrs.U.V.kejriwal, APP for respondent-State. Mr.M.S.Surana for respondent No.5. Mr.Mahesh Vaswani i/b. Mr.Javeed Mohd. Gaus Gheewala for respondent Nos.6 and 7. CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ. DATED : 17TH DECEMBER, 2015 P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the parties. At the outset, Mr.Kudle, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his petition to the relief claimed in prayer (c). Statement is accepted. Mr.Kudale in this regard relies upon his application dated 29th November, 2013 (annexed at Exhibit-L, page 80 of the petition) seeking police protection, which is pending since last two years. Learned APP having taken instructions states that said application will be decided by the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Protection Branch), Mumbai as expeditiously as possible. In the above circumstances, we direct the Deputy Commissioner (Protection Branch), Mumbai to dispose of the petitioner's application within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Order accordingly. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (V.L.ACHLIYA, J.) ( RANJIT MORE, J.)

Order - Status 5: 924 wp 1885.16.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1885 OF 2016 M/s. N. F. Construction … Petitioner Vs State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent Mr. Subhas Jha a/w Mr. S. A. Vaidya i/b. M/s. Law Global Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for State. … CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKARJOSHI, JJ. DATE : 25 MAY, 2016 VACATION COURT P.C. : Issue notice returnable on 8th June 2016. (DR. SHALINI PHANSALKARJOSHI, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1885 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1886 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1887 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1888 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memorandam of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders …... Mr. Subhash Jha i/b. M/s. Law Global, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the Respondent – State in W.P.1885 and 1888 of 2016. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP in W.P. No.1886 of 2016. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP in W.P. No.1887 of 2016. …... CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND P.D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JUNE 8, 2016. P.C. : The learned counsel Mr.Jha appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw these petitions with liberty. Leave is granted. Petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (P.D. NAIK, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

Order - Status 8: Order Text Request Text Click the button above to request the full text of this order.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT None for Applicant Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP/Strate CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH D. NAIK J DATE : 14th June, 2021 P.C. : None appears for (Applicant / Respondent No. / APP). Stand over to 28/06/2021. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2021 Mrs. Tabassum Begum .. Applicant Vs. The State Of Maharashtra .. Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Hamminder Anand i/b H. S. Anand, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, A.P.P. for the State-Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 28th JUNE, 2021 PC. Issue notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks. In addition to Court notice, the applicant is permitted to serve the respondent by way of private notice. Stand over to 26.07.2021. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 26th July, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned. Stand over to 26/08/2021 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP KASHINATH SHINDE J DATE : 26th August, 2021 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 29/09/2021. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application No. 110 / 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (Zaidi) .. Applicant Versus. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent **** Mr. H.S. Anand, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhawa, APP for State. **** CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J. DATE : 11th OCTOBER,2021. P.C. : - Issue notice to the Respondent No.2 returnable on 7th December, 2021. Hamdast is permitted. In addition to the Court service, Applicant is permitted to serve the Respondent No.2 by private service and file affidavit of service. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) **Najeeb..**1/1 MOHAMMAD NAJEEB MOHAMMAD QAYYUM Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD NAJEEB MOHAMMAD QAYYUM Date: 2021.10.12 16:44:05 +0530

Order - Status 15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 TABASSUM BEGUM WIFE OF MOHAMMED WAS SAYED (ZAIDI) ) APPLICANT V/S. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ) RESPONDENTS * * * * Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay i/by. Mr. Harminder Aanand, Advocate for the applicant. Smt. S.V. Sonawane, APP for State-respondent no.1. Ms. Jameela Damani, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. Tuesday, 7th December, 2021. P.C. : Applicant is seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent no.2. Offce to verify the prayers and place it before the appropriate Court as per the Roaster. NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2021.12.07 16:33:00 +0530 (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 14th February, 2022 P.C. : Matter did not reach till the court time was over. Hence adjourned. Stand over to 10/03/2022. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT Mr.H S ANAND for Applicant Adv.Jameela Damani for Respondent No.1 Mohd Wasi Sayzed. Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP for State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR J DATE : 22nd April, 2022 P.C. : The Registry to verify and place the matter before the appropriate Court. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 20: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE J DATE : 14th July, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 28/07/2022. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE J DATE : 28th July, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/09/2022. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 30th November, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 22/12/2022 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 22nd December, 2022 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 30/01/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 28: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 30th January, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 24/02/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 30: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 24th February, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 03/03/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 32: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK J DATE : 3rd March, 2023 P.C. : Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 10/03/2023 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 34: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2021 Tabassum Begum Wife Of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (zaidi) ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI J DATE : 10th March, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 27/03/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 37: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application No. 110 of 2021 Tabassum Begum W/o. Mohammed Wasi Sayed (Zaidi) ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. H. S. Anand, for the Applicant. None for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent – State. Coram : R. N. Laddha, J. Date : 15 July 2024 P.C. . The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant and his wife have resolved their disputes and they are staying together. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. Leave granted as prayed for. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn. R. N. Laddha, J.

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam And Anr PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT Mr. Bharat Gadhavi i/b Tejas Dande for Petitioner Mr. Vishal Navale for Respondent No. 2 Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for State/Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. R. BORKAR, JJ DATE : 13th July, 2022 P.C. : By consent S. O. to 17/08/2022 ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam and another … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents …...... Mr. Bharat Gadhavi instructed by Mr. Tejesh Dande for the Petitioners. …...... Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State. Mr. Vishal Navale for Respondent No.2. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 17 AUGUST 2022 P.C. :- At the request of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, stand over to 26 September 2022. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. ) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J. )

Order - Status 8: common order-paucity-26.9.2022.doc NISHA Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP HITTNIS CHITNIS 13:59:48 + 0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 71 to 78, 79 to 84, 86 to 89, 90, 92, 93, 95 to 108, 109, 110 & 112 to 115, 117 to 128, 130 to 136 and 138 to 141 ON THE BOARD DATED 26 th SEPTEMBER 2022 CAUSE TITLES AND APPEARANCES AS NOTIFIED ON THE BOARD DATED 26 th SEPTEMBER 2022 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 26 th SEPTEMBER 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, it is not possible to proceed with the hearing of these matters today. All these matters are adjourned and will be listed on the Board on the respective assigned dates as mentioned below:- Serial Nos. Assigned Date 71 to 78 10/11/2022 79 to 84 11/11/2022 86 to 89 11/11/2022 90, 92, 93 14/11/2022 95 to 108 17/11/2022 common order-paucity-26.9.2022.doc 109, 110 & 112 to 115 23/11/2022 117 to 128 23/11/2022 130 to 136 24/11/2022 138 to 141 24/11/2022 Ad-interim order granted in any of the above said matters, if any, to continue till the respective assigned date. Order accordingly. S. M. MODAK, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam And Anr PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. N. LADDHA, JJ DATE : 11th November, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/12/2022. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 13: 79-WP-5760-2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5760 OF 2021 Amrut Abhiman Nikam and Ors. … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents Mr. Pratik Sabrad i/b Tejesh Dande and Assoc., for the Petitioners. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent No.1 – State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 13th DECEMBER, 2022. P. C. : On today's board at Sr. No. 79. Mentioned out of turn. 2 Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that during the pendency of the aforesaid petition, the matter was compounded before the learned Additional C.J. M., Malegaon (Nashik). Learned Counsel has tendered a photo copy of the said order dated 12.11.2022. The same is taken on record. The said order shows that in view of the compounding, the petitioners have been acquitted of the offence under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 16:24:20 +0530 Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2022.12.14 Rekha Patil 1/2 3 In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives in the aforesaid Petition. 4 Petition stands disposed of accordingly. PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.490 OF 2015 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.773 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. Shyamkumar Marwadi for applicant. Ms. Mallika Ingale for respondent no.2. Mr. Tapan Thatte for Intervener in APPP-490/2015. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 17th November 2015 P.C.: This application has been taken out by the original complainant for intervention in Anticipatory Bail Application no.773 of 2015. For the reasons stated in the said application and in the interest of justice, I am inclined to allow the said application. The applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No.773 of 2015 is hereby directed to implead the original complainant as respondent no.3. The amendment to be carried out within one week from today. The application is allowed in the above terms. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 23th APRIL 2015 P.C. : On account of paucity of time rest of the matters on Daily Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under: SR.NO NUMBER ADJOURNED DATE 2 ALP/46/2013 28/04/2015 4 APPA/838/2014 28/04/2015 5 APPA/131/2015 28/04/2015 6 APPA/483/2015 28/04/2015 8 APPLN/688/2014 28/04/2015 10 APEAL/408/2015 09/06/2015 11 APPLN/451/2013 05/05/2015 12 APPLN/529/2013 05/05/2015 13 APPLN/532/2013 05/05/2015 14 APEAL/794/1997 15/06/2015 15 APEAL/913/2004 15/06/2015 2 Interim orders, if any in force in any of the petitions/applications, till today, shall continue to remain in force till the next date fixed for such matter/matters. 3 In case of extreme urgency either of the parties may move the Court for production of papers before it. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 28th APRIL 2015 P.C. : On account of paucity of time rest of the matters on Daily Board are adjourned to dates fixed as per the CMIS (Court Management Information System) which read as under: SR.NO NUMBER ADJOURNED DATE 29 ALP/124/2015 09/06/2015 30 ALP/156/2015 09/06/2015 31 APEAL/311/2015 09/06/2015 33 APEAL/498/2015 16/06/2015 34 ALP/322/2013 16/06/2015 35 ALP/471/2013 16/06/2015 36 ALP/46/2013 16/06/2015 37 ALP/584/2013 16/06/2015 38 ALP/119/2014 16/06/2015 39 APPLN/695/2014 16/06/2015 40 APPLN/58/2015 16/06/2015 41 APPP/338/2015 08/05/2015 42 APPA/485/2015 08/05/2015 43 APEAL/612/2013 07/05/2015 44 APPA/838/2014 07/05/2015 45 APPA/1131/2014 12/06/2015 46 APPA/319/2015 12/06/2015 47 APEAL/330/2015 12/06/2015 48 APEAL/395/1995 16/06/2015 49 APEAL/1302/2004 16/06/2015 50 APEAL/19/2005 16/06/2015 2 Interim orders, if any in force in any of the petitions/applications, till today, shall continue to remain in force till the next date fixed for such matter/matters. 3 In case of extreme urgency either of the parties may move the Court for production of papers before it. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.84 OF 2013 Gulab Rambhai Rohit ... Applicant V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. ... Respondents ..... Mrs.Mallika Ingale, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Krinjal Ahuja i/b. Mr.Rajesh Desia, Advocate for the Respondent/CBI. Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent/State. .... CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY J. DATED : 7TH MAY 2015 P.C. The learned counsel for the respondent/CBI prays for time to file a counter affidavit. Stand over to 19th June 2015 . To be listed along with appeal. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.84 OF 2013 Gulab Ramubhai Rohit ... Applicant V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.V.Marwadi i/b. Ms.Malika A. Ingale, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Rebecca Gonsalvez, Advocate for the Respondent No.1/CBI. Mrs.S.GajareDhumal, APP for the Respondent/State. .... ..... CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY J. DATED : 8TH OCTOBER 2015 P.C. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1/CBI prays for time. Granted finally. Stand over to 28th October 2015 . (ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.) CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.

Order - Status 16: 4-APPA-838-2014-APPEAL-84-2013.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.838 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.84 OF 2013 GULAB RAMBHAI ROHIT )...APPLICANT V/s. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.)...RESPONDENTS Shri S.V.Marwadi i/b. Smt.Mallika Ingale, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt.Rebecca Gonsalvez, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Smt.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 28th OCTOBER 2015. P.C. : 1 Shri S.V.Marwadi, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that he would urge that the appeal itself be listed for final hearing at an early date, and that, he would not press the present application. 2 After hearing Shri Marwadi and Smt.Rebecca Gonsalvez, the learned counsel for respondent no.1, it is directed that the appeal be listed for 'Final Hearing' on 8th December 2015. 3 In view of this, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.) CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment / Order.