Tag: Charge Sheet Or Prosecution

Order - Status 5: pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2129 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2146 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar Registrar's orders. Mr. G. K. Anand i/by Mohd. Shine with S. S. Bijlani for petitioners in WP No. 2129 of 2016. Mr. G. K. Anand i/by Manish Rai for petitioners in WP No. 2146 of 2016. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for State. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ **.** July 05, 2016. P.C. : Issue notice to respondents, returnable after four weeks i.e. 2/8/2016. Learned APP waives notice on behalf of respondent no.1 – State. Till the next date i.e. 2/8/2016, we direct that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in respect of the subject crime. However, it is clarified that there is no stay to the investigation. (PRAKASH D. NAIK *,* J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

Order - Status 7: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2129 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2146 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Mohd.Shine with S.S.Bijlani for Petitioner in WP No.2146 of 2016. Mr.G.K.Masand i/by Manish Rai for Petitioner in WP No.2129 of 2016. Mr.Kanishk Jayant with Mr.Harvinder Singh for Respondent no.2. Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for State. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : 2nd August 2016 PC :­ 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2. Heard. Learned counsel for Respondent no.2 appears. Stand over to 10 August 2016. Ad­interim relief granted earlier to continue till 10 August 2016. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J)

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PEITION NO.2129 OF 2016 Commander Kamaljeet Singh Bhatti (Retired) & Ors. Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PEITION NO.2146 OF 2016 Ghara Singh (Retired) & Anr. .. Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents …... Mr. Mohd. Shine a/w. S.S. Bijlani, Advocate for the Petitioners in W.P. No.2129 of 2016. Mr.G.K. Masand i/b. Mr.Manish Rai, Advocate for the Petitioners in W.P.No.2146 of 2016. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for Respondent - State in both the petitions. Mr. Kanishk K. Jayant, Advocate for Respondent Respondent no.2 in both the petitions. …... CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 11, 2016. P.C. : Heard learned counsel appearing for petitioners. Following issues arise for consideration: (a) Whether petitioners belong to Scheduled Caste in relation to the State of Maharashtra; (b) Whether petitioners belong to Scheduled Caste in the State of Punjab; (c) Whether FIR/complaint registered against accused persons attracts penal provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short "the SC & ST Act") 2 In the facts and reading compliant whether penal offence is attracted, learned counsel appearing for petitioners places reliance on following judgments: (a) Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao Vs. Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College & Ors. 1 (b) State of Mahrashtra Vs. Milind & Ors. 2 (c) Gorige Pentaiah Vs. State of A.P. & Ors. 3 (d) Ghanshyam Kala s/o. Jagat Ram Kala Vs. The State 4 (e) Udaysingh Ramsingh Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra 5 (e) Dhiren Prafulbhai Shah Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. 6 1 (1990) 3 SCC 130 2 (2001) 1 SCC 4 3 (2008) 12 SCC 531 4 2009(1) Uttaranchal Decision 639 5 2003(3) Mh.L.J 225 6 (2010) 8 SCC 775 3 Learned counsel appearing for complainant prays for dismissal of these petitions. It was submitted that complainant belongs to Scheduled Caste in the State of Punjab and in relation to the State of Maharashtra, the issue is required to be considered on a broader prospective. Learned counsel referred to Article 17 of the Constitution of India. 4 Learned APP submits that investigation is likely to be completed within three to four weeks. 5 We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. We find that the issues raised by petitioners for consideration. 6 Rule. Rule returnable early. 7 In the meantime, further proceedings consequent to registration of FIR stands stayed. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

Order - Status 13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2129 OF 2016 Commander Kamaljeet Singh Bhatti (Retired) & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2146 OF 2016 Mr. Ghara Singh (Retired) & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Mohd. Shine i/b S.S. Bijlani for petitioners in WP/2129/2016. Mr.Manish Rai for petitioner in WP/2146/2016. Mr.F.R. Shaikh, APP for respondent No.1-State. Mr.Kaushik Jayant a/w. Ms. Antra Jayant, Mr. Nilesh Mandavkar, Mr. Rajye Jain i/b Kanishk Jayant for respondent No.2 in WP/2129/2016 and WP/2146/2016. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATE : 9TH OCTOBER 2019 P.C. 1. Not on board. Mentioned, in view of urgency. Taken on production board. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties in both petitions. 3. The subject first information report bearing C.R. No. II-15/2016, dated 18-05-2016 on the complaint of the respondent No.2 (in both petitions) for the offences punishable under section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 read with section 7 of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955. The petitioners in Writ Petition No.2146 of 2016, are the original accused Nos.1 and 2 in the subject crime and the petitioners in Writ Petition No.2129 of 2016 are the original accused Nos.3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 in the subject crime. 4. Pending investigation of the subject crime, the parties have settled their dispute amicably and accordingly the complainantrespondent No.2 has submitted consent terms before the Civil Judge, Senior Division-Panvel in Hindu Marriage Petition No.297 of 2015. The copy of the consent terms presented before the Court. Clause (4) of the consent terms reads as under :- 4 The petitioner Husband has agreed to give his consent for quashing of FIR filed by him bearing No. II-15/2016 dated 18 th May 2016 u/s 3(1)(10) of Atrocities Act, 1989 and section 7(1)(5) of Protection of Civil Rights Act. 1955 with CBD Police Station, Navi Mumbai against father of the Respondent i.e., the Gharasingh Chahal, Gurmit Kaur, Gurbax Singh, Hardeep Singh Anjan, Mehersingh Randhava, K.J.S. Bhatti, Gurinderjit Saini. The Petitioner-husband is agreed to give his consent and/or file an affidavit to that effect in Writ Petition bearing No. 2146 of 2016 and Writ Petition bearing No. 2129 of 2016 filed in respect of said FIR bearing No.II-15/2016." 5. In view of the above understanding, the parties have approached this Court for quashing the subject crime. The respondent No.2 has filed a common affidavit dated 9 th October 2019 in both Writ Petitions, i.e., Writ Petition No.2146 of 2016 and Writ Petition No. 2129 of 2016 and in paragraph 6 thereof, has given consent to the withdrawal of all the charges levelled in the subject crime. The respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and on specific query by this Court, confirmed that he has no objection to quash the subject FIR. 6. It can, thus, be seen that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. From the perusal of complaints, it transpires that the allegations are totally personal in nature. In these circumstances, and especially, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Narinder Singh vs. State of Punjab 1 , we find that no purpose would be served by keeping the criminal proceedings pending except burdening the Criminal Courts which are already overburdened. Accordingly, both petitions are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), respectively. However, at the same time, costs need to be saddled on the petitioners for using the police and judicial machinery for settling their personal disputes. In view of this, the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 2146 of 2016 and Writ Petition No. 2129 of 2016 to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as costs in each petition. The total amount of Rs.20,000/- to be paid to "Tata Memorial Hospital", an institution that takes care of the patients suffering from cancer at advanced stage and/or terminally ill due to cancer. For the quashment to take effect, the petitioners shall pay the said costs and produce the receipt thereof on the file of this Court within the period of four weeks from today. Failing to pay cost and produce receipt within stipulated time, petitions shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference 1 2014 AIR SCW 2065 to the Court and order quashing the proceedings/FIR shall be treated as non-est. 8. Subject to above, the writ petitions stand disposed of. [ N.J. JAMADAR, J. ] [ RANJIT MORE, J.]

Order - Status 5: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Applicant present in Court None for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- JANUARY 31, 2014 ...... P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant. By this Application, the Applicant is challenging the order dated 5th December, 2013 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 52nd Court, Kurla, Mumbai, below Exhibit 4 in C. C. No. 189/Misc/2013, by which, her application came to be rejected, wherein she had challenged the locus standi of the Respondent No.1 to file an application under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The present Applicant is the daughter-in-law of the Respondent No.1. The Respondent No. 1 has filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking reliefs under Sections 18, 21 and 22 of the said Act, and has also sought protection order apart from other reliefs. The learned Counsel for the Applicant has relied on a Judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Varsha Kapoor vs. Union of India & Ors. in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 638 of 2010, in support of his contention that the term `respondent' as defined in Section 2(q), is restricted only to adult male persons while construing the expression, "a relative of the husband or the male partner." Issue notice to the respondent No.1, returnable on 11th February, 2014. Hamdust permitted. In addition to Court notice, Applicant to serve the respondent No.1 by Advocate's notice and file an affidavit of service before the returnable date. The learned Counsel for the Applicant, on the instructions of the Applicant, who is present in Court, states that she will not visit the house of respondent No.1 or create any nuisance or threaten the respondent No.1. Ad-interim stay in terms of prayer clause (c) till 12th February, 2014. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 7: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Ms. Maya Upadeshe h/f Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant None for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2014 P.C. On 31st January, 2014, notice was issued, which was made returnable on 11th February, 2014 and hamdust was permitted. However, despite the said order, the Advocate for the applicant has not supplied spare copy and hence, notice could not be issued. It is made clear that if the spare copy is not supplied within two days from today, the stay granted vide order dated 31st January, 2014 shall stand vacated. Stand over to 14th February, 2014. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 9: Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani .Applicant V/s. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & anr. .Respondents None for the Applicant Mr.Tariq Khan, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal, APP, for Respondent No.2 – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2014 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for respondent No.1. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 states that he will file his Vakalatnama within one week from today. Stand over to 28-02-2014. Till then, interim relief granted vide order dated 31-01-2014 to continue. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 11: nsc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Memorandam of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Office Court's or Judge's orders ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr.Laxman P. Kanal, for the applicant. Mr.Tariq Khan, for respondent no.1. Ms.U.V.Kejariwal, APP for the State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED : 28th February, 2014. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1, states that he will file his reply in the Registry during the course of the day. He states that a copy of the reply has been served on the Counsel for the Applicant. On the next date, an endeavour shall be made to decide the matter finally at the stage of 2/2 18-apl.66.2014.doc admission. Stand over to 7th March, 2014. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 13: SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 ...... ...... Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ...Applicant Versus Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Mr. Tariq Khan for Respondent No.1 Ms. Usha Kejariwal, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State CORAM:- REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED :- MARCH 7, 2014 P.C. Heard Counsel for the parties. Arguable questions are raised. Admit. Mr. Khan waives service for respondent No.1. Ms. Kejariwal, A.P.P waives service for respondent No.2-State. To be listed in the 2nd week of April, 2014 at the end of the admision Board under caption `for final hearing and disposal'. There shall be an interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani .Applicant V/s. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & anr. .Respondents Mr.Laxman P. Kanal, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Tariq Khan, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP, for Respondent No.2 – State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2014 P.C. . By consent, stand over after vacation. Till then, interim relief granted earlier to continue. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Order - Status 20: Osk 935-Apl-66-2014.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani … Applicant V/s. Laat Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. … Respondents Mr.Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant. Mr.S.S. Hulke, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 17th June 2022. P.C. : . At the request of learned Advocate for Applicant, stand over to 28th June 2022. [A.S. GADKARI, J.] OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2022.06.20 13:04:16 +0530

Order - Status 22: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APL NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani …..Applicant Vs. Lata Srichand Sakhrani & Anr. …..Respondents Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for the Applicant. Mr. R.M. Pethe APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 1st JULY, 2022. P.C.:- None for the Respondent No.1. In order to grant an opportunity to the Respondent No.1, stand over to 15th July, 2022. To be listed on supplementary board. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Order - Status 24: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr.Laxman Kalel for the Applicant. Mr. Tariq Khan for the Respondent No.-1. Mr. R.M.Pethe, APP for the Respondent - State. CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI J DATE : 15th July, 2022 P.C. : At the request of learned counsel for the Respondent , stand over to 22/07/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 26: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Laxman P. Kanal for Applicant Mrs. J. S. Lohokare APP-for State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR J DATE : 22nd July, 2022 P.C. : S. O. to 29/07/2022 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 66 OF 2014 Niharika Manoj Sakhrani ....APPLICANT V/S Laat Srichand Sakhrani And Anr ....RESPONDENT LAXMAN PRATABRAI KANAL A/W. DIVYA KANAL FOR APPLICANT YOGESH Y DABKE APP FOR STATE/RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL J DATE : 29th July, 2022 P.C. : The Registry to verify and place the matter before the appropriate Court. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble and others … Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Akhilesh Jaiswal alongwith Mr. Asit Chaware for the Petitioners. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. …...... …...... CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 1 AUGUST 2022 P.C. :- The learned Counsel for the Petitioners seeks to amend that is to place the typed/legible copy of the FIR on record and also to join the Complainant as party Respondent. Amendment to be carried out within period of one week from today. A copy of the amended Petition shall be served on the newly added Respondent. Stand over to 29 August 2022. ( N.R. BORKAR, J. ) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J. ) Date: 2022.08.02 18:10:23 +0530 Digitally signed by KANCHAN PRASHANT DHURI

Order - Status 6: 52.WP2577.2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble & ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents. Mr. Akhilesh Jaiswal a/w. Mr. Asit Chaware and Mr. Udaysinh Deshmukh & Mr. Aniket Ahire & Mr. Tanveer Patel, advocate for Petitioners. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & R.N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 15th NOVEMBER, 2022 P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned APP waives notice on behalf of the respondent No.1–State and seeks time to take instructions. In addition to Court notice, petitioners to serve the respondent No.2, by private notice and file affidavit of service before the next date. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners to supply spare copies in the Registry within two week from today, so as to enable the registry to issue notice to the respondent No.2, failing which, the aforesaid Petition shall stand dismissed, for want of prosecution. If the spare copy is supplied within the stipulated time, notice be made returnable on 19th December, 2022. Hamdast permitted. Having heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, in the meantime, till the next date, investigation to continue, however, charge-sheet not to be filed against the petitioners. R.N. LADDHA, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble And Anr PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ DATE : 19th December, 2022 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 15/02/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble And Anr PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. G. DIGE, JJ DATE : 15th February, 2023 P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 26/04/2023. Interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2577 OF 2022 Geeta Dattatray Kamble And Anr PETITIONER V/S State Of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Ms.Siddhi Sawant i/b. Gaurav Parkar for Petitioner Smt.M.H.Mhatre APP for Respondent/State Mr.Amit Icham i/b. Asif Chaware for R.No.2 CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK, JJ DATE : 18th February, 2025 P.C. : At the request of the learned Counsel for the Appellant(s)/ Applicant(s) / Petitioner(s) / Respondent No. stand over to 11/03/2025. Ad-interim order, if any, to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM:- SARANG V. KOTWAL & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE:- 11th March,2025 P.C. :- As the Court time is over, the balance board could not be taken up. Matter stand over to the dates mentioned in the chart below. Serial number of matter on board To be listed on Sr. No. 27, 30 to 36, 38 to 44 11/06/2025 Sr. No. 47 to 60 13/06/2025 Sr. No. 61 to 75 16/06/2025 Sr. No. 76 to 78, 80 to 90 17/06/2025 Sr. No. 91 to 103, 105 to 115 18/06/2025 Sr.No. 116,117,120, 123 to 125 19/06/2025 Sr. No. 126 to 140 20/06/2025 Sr. No. 141 to 150, 152, 153 23/06/2025 Ad-interim order,if any, to continue till the next date. (S.M. MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL,J.) Deshmane

Order - Status 16: GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date: 2025.06.18 12:34:20 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 13th JUNE, 2025. P.C. :- At the time of rising, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 2 to 4 24/06/2025 Fresh Admission 6 to 22 24/06/2025 Fresh Admission 24 and 25 24/06/2025 Fresh Admission 26 to 31 25/06/2025 Fresh Admission 33 to 58 25/06/2025 Fresh Admission 60 08/07/2025 Urgent Admission 61 to 71 16/07/2025 Urgent Orders Gauri Gaekwad 2 common order 13.06.2025 72 to 75 17/07/2025 Due Admission 79 17/07/2025 Due Admission 80 to 88 08/07/2025 Final Hearing (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, JJ DATE : 30th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent Karan L Jain For Applicant Ms.S.D.Shinde- APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 27th August, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to as per CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.268 OF 2019 (Malhari Tulshiram Sadafule Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another) Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances,Court's orders, or directions, and Registrar's Orders Ms Manisha Devkar for Petitioner. CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2019 P.C.: Not on Board. At the request of Ms Devkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, taken up in the production Board. Respondent No.2 had filed proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') before the trial Court. By order dated 12.04.2010, maintenance @ Rs.1,300/- per month with effect from 10.06.2008 was awarded to the respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 thereafter filed proceedings under Section 127 of Cr.P.C. for enhancing the maintenance amount. By order dated 30.05.2016, the learned Judge, Family Court No.3, Mumbai allowed the Petition and directed the petitioner herein to pay enhanced maintenance @ Rs.12,000/- per month to the respondent No.2 from the date of the Petition i.e. 17.04.2014. Ms Devkar, on instructions, states that petitioner has paid the maintenance from 17.04.2014 till June, 2018 @ Rs.12,000/- per month as per the order dated 30.05.2016. From July, 2018 onwards, he has not paid the maintenance as he has filed proceedings for cancelling the maintenance amount from 30.04.2018 on the ground that petitioner has attained superannuation. On instructions, she further states that before the next date of hearing, petitioner will deposit the arrears of maintenance of Rs.84,000/- (from July 2018 to 28.02.2019 @ Rs.12,000/- per month) in this Court. In view thereof, list the Petition for 'admission' on 14.03.2019 in the Supplementary Board. Till next date, subject to the petitioner depositing Rs.84,000/- in this Court before the next date of hearing, order dated 04.12.2018 issuing distress warrant against the petitioner herein is stayed. No coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner till next date. It is further made clear that in case the petitioner does not deposit arrears within the stipulated time, this protection shall stand vacated without further reference to the Court. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) Minal Parab

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 268 OF 2019 Malhari Tulshiram Sadafule ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent Manisha Arjun Devkar For Petitioner CORAM : RAJESH G. KETKAR, J DATE : 14th March, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for 28/03/2019 on supplementary board. In the meantime, Ad-interim relief if any, granted earlier to continue. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 268 OF 2019 Malhari Tulshiram Sadafule ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : RAJESH G. KETKAR, J DATE : 28th March, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned for 18/04/2019 on supplementary board. In the meantime, Ad-interim relief if any, granted earlier to continue. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents ..... Rishi Bhuta a/w. Monish Bohra i/b. A.S.Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State. .... CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI J. DATED : 20TH AUGUST, 2014 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. S.O. to 03/09/2014. In the meantime, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) JUDGE

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.538 of 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents Mr.Rishi Bhuta and Mr.Manish Bohra i/b M/s.A.S.Khan & Associates for the applicant. Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. ­­­ CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 14th NOVEMBER 2014. ­­­ P.C. : 1 Heard. 2 Rule. 3 Rule made returnable on 1st December 2014. 4 To be listed for final hearing at the end of the admission board along with other connected Writ Petitions which have, by an order dated 6th August 2014 already been directed to be listed for final hearing in the first week of December 2014. 5 In the mean time, the learned Magistrate shall not proceed further with the case. (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Mr.Sunny Singh i/b A.S.Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.M.G.Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent No.1 State. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 01st December, 2014. P.C. : 1 Mr.M.G.Shukla, the learned Counsel for respondent No.2 states that he has already received copy of the application. Mr.Sunny Singh, the learned Counsel for the applicant prays for time. 2 Granted finally. Stand over to 12/12/2014. 3 To be placed along with Writ Petition No. 834 of 2014 to Writ Petition No. 847 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 1494 of 2014 & Writ Petition No. 1495 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 1474 of 2014 to Writ Petition No. 1487 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 2562 of 2014 to Writ Petition No. 2568 of 2014 (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)

Order - Status 14: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2201 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.378 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.379 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.380 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.381 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.382 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.383 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.384 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.385 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1739 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2202 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2203 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2204 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2205 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.373 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.376 OF 2014 Girishchandra Ugresan Sahoo Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.387 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.389 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.390 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.391 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.392 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.393 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.394 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.395 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.396 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.397 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1665 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1666 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1667 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1668 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1669 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1670 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2206 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2207 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2208 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2209 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2210 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2211 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2212 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2213 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2214 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2215 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1380 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.374 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.375 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.377 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1381 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1382 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1383 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1384 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1514 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1515 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1516 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1517 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1518 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1519 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1520 OF 2014 Shantanu Narayan Rooj & Anr. .. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 538 OF 2014 Amit Prakash Jaste .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 834 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 836 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 837 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 838 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 839 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 840 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 841 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 842 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 843 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 844 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 845 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 846 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 847 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1474 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1475 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1476 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1477 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1478 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1479 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1480 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1481 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1482 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1483 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1484 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1485 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1486 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1487 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1494 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1495 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2562 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2563 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2564 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2565 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2566 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2567 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2568 OF 2014 Alok Sharma & Ors. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents Mr.Prasad Kumar Das, Advocate for the Petitioners in W.P.No.2201 of 2014 & Group. …. Mrs. S.V. Gajare, A.P.P. for Respondent – State in W.P.No.2201 of 2014 & Group. Ms.Mrunmal Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.M.G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.A.P. Mundargi, Senior Advocate for the Petitioners in W.P.No.1380 of 2014 & Group. Mr.Y.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent – State in W.P.No.1380 of 2014 & Group. Ms.Mrunmal Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.M.G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.Rishi Bhuta i/b. A.S. Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Petitioners in APL No.538 of 2014 & Group. Mrs.M.R. Tidke, A.P.P. for Respondent – State in APL No.538 of 2014 & Group. Ms.Mrunmal Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.M.G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. …. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : DECEMBER 12, 2014. P.C. : The learned counsel for the respondent no.2 states that the respondent no.2 shall not proceed further in any of these matters in the Court of the Magistrate. 2 Stand over to 20th December, 2014. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)

Order - Status 16: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.538 of 2014 rpa Amit Prakash Jaste Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.834 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.835 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.836 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.837 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.838 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.839 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.840 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.841 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.842 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.843 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.844 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.845 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.846 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.847 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1475 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1476 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1477 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1478 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1479 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1480 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1481 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1482 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1483 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1484 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1485 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1486 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1487 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1494 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.1495 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2562 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2563 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2564 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2565 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2566 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2567 of 2014 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2568 of 2014 Alok Sharma and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents Mr.Rishi Bhuta i/b. M/s. A.S. Khan & Associates, Advocate for the Aplicant. Mr.M.D. Pareek i/b. Mr.M. G. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mrs.M.R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. --- CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 20th DECEMBER, 2014. --- P.C. : On the prayer of learned counsel for the respondent no.2, stand over to 13th January, 2015, for final hearing. (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)

Order - Status 4: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2414 OF 2024 Baban Undrya Kathara ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT Mr. Aniket Vagal aw Mr. Sanket Bhavad aw Mr. Kunal Pednekar for Petitioner Mr. Pradip Rajput for Resp 2 Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the State CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI & HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE, JJ DATE : 18th June, 2024 P.C. : At the request of the learned APP for the Respondent - State, S.O. to 20/06/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )