All Cases

Order - Status 5: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr. A. H. H. Ponda a/w Swapnil Ambure i/b Dinesh Tiwari for Petitioner Mrs. A. A. Mane AGP for the State. CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE AND V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. (VACATION COURT) DATED : st JUNE, 2015. 1 P.C. : Issue notice to respondent no. 1 for final disposal of disposal of the matter. Notice returnable on 16/06/2015 16/06/2015. Learned APP waives service of notice for respondent no. 2. 2) There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause 'b' till then. (V.L. ACHLIYA, J.) (R. K. DESHPANDE, J.)

Order - Status 3: sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre & Anr. … Applicants vs.State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. A. R. Shaikh i/b. H.E. Palwe for the Applicants. Mr. V. B. Khamkhedkar, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATE : 20th JUNE, 2017 P.C. On the application of the learned counsel for the applicant who states that Mr. Palwe is unable to attend and seeks sometime. Hence, to come up as per scheduled date. Remove from the board. (A. K. MENON, J.)

Order - Status 6: sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre & Anr. … Applicants vs.The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. H. E. Palwe for the Applicants. Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2017 P.C. Liberty to apply after the applicant surrenders. (A. K. MENON, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre And Anr ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J DATE : 20th December, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to 03/02/2020 . In case any ad-interim/interim relief is operating till today, the said order will continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said order will remain unaffected. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre and Anr. ...Applicants vs. State of Maharashtra …Respondent ***** Mr.Sudip Mallick i/b. Mr.Harshad E. Palwe – Advocate for Applicants. Mr.A.D.Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent – State. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 11th JANUARY 2024 P. C. :- This is a Revision against the concurrent finding of conviction. On 2nd August, 2017, liberty was granted to apply after surrender. Learned Advocate is short of instructions. Let him to take instructions. Stand over to 9 th February, 2024 . [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 12: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 344 OF 2017 Nathu Bhila Devre and Anr. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ***** Mr. Sudip Mallick i/by Harsahd E. Palwe - Advocate for the Applicants Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar - APP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 09th FEBRUARY, 2024 P. C. :- The Court of the JMFC has convicted the accused personsaccused Nos. 1 and 3 for the offence punishable under Sections 326, 324 and 323 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code as per judgment dated 07/10/2014, at page no. 53. Their appeal was partly allowed by learned Sessions Judge, Nashik on 03/05/2017. The conviction of the accused nos. 1 and 3 for the offence punishable under Section 326 read with 34 was set aside. Whereas it is maintained for the offence Section 324 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused No. 3 was not directed to undergo sentence immediately but he was asked to execute the bond of good behaviour for the period of two years. That period has already expired. The following issue arisen in the revision:- (i) The legality of the sentence under Section 326 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code against accused no. 1. (ii) The legality of the sentence against accused no. 3 for the same offence. Yet revision is not admitted. Matter be kept on 08th March, 2024, after admission. [S. M. MODAK, J.]

Order - Status 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, JJ DATE : 30th July, 2019 P.C. : Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned to as per CMIS date. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. U/S 482 NO. 545 OF 2019 Nenshi Ladhabhai Shah And Ors ....Applicant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent Karan L Jain For Applicant Ms.S.D.Shinde- APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE. & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 27th August, 2019 P.C. : Stand over to as per CMIS date. ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )

Order - Status 3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1773 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1774 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 251 OF 2022 Padmanabhan Thandu Iyer...ApplicantVersusState Of Maharashtra And Anr....Respondents Ms. Saiyukta S. Kamat, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 17 th JUNE, 2022. PER COURT: 1. These interim applications are preferred by the applicant for suspension of sentence and grant of bail during the pendency of Criminal Revision Application No.251 of 2022. 2. The applicant has been convicted for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act vide judgment and order dated 14 th February, 2017 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30 th Court, Kurla, Mumbai and sentenced to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- in default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment of one year. He is also sentenced to pay compensation of Rs.4,45,000/- within one month from the date of order. The judgment of the trial Court has been confirmed by the Sessions Court by judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2022. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is ailing. There are discrepancies in the evidence adduced before the trial Court. The applicant has deposited Rs.1,00,000/- before the Appellate Court towards the compensation during the pendency of appeal. The applicant would deposit further amount of Rs.1,00,000/- within a period of four weeks from today. Considering the submissions, presently interim relief can be granted to the applicant till the next date of hearing. Hence, I pass the following order: ORDER i. The sentence of imprisonment imposed vide Judgment and order dated 14th February, 2017 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai in C.C. No.3001612/SS/2015 and confirmed by Judgment and order dated 2nd May, 2022 passed by the Sessions Court, Greater Bombay in Criminal Appeal No.187 of 2017 is suspended and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount; ii. The applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- till the next date of hearing. iii. The applicant shall deposit the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- before the trial Court within a period of four weeks from today. iv. Stand over to 18th July, 2022. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

Order - Status 8: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 552 OF 2003 Anjana (nee) Anjira Ashok Jadhav ...Appellant vs. Nana...Respondents Vithoba Nalawade & Ors. Mr.Bhushan Walimbe for the Appellant Mr.P.J.Thorat h/f Shri R.A.Thorat for Respondent Nos.1 to 5. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 16, 2007. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Second Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law : i) Whether the certified copy of the statement at Exh-46 of the first Respondent in a proceeding under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code,1966 was admissible in evidence to prove the admission contained therein of the ii) Whether it can be said that the admission of the first Respondent in the statement at Exh.46 is not admissible in evidence as the first Respondent was not confronted with the alleged admission during his cross examination? The learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 waives service. Printing is dispensed with. The Appellant is directed to file private paper book within a period of one year from today failing which Appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the court. relationship between the Appellant and Rajaram ? JUDGE